8 found
Sort by:
  1. Natalie Dandekar (forthcoming). Can Whistle-Blowing Be Fully Legitimated? Quoted in TI White (Ed.). Business Ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Natalie Dandekar (1995). Matriarchal Oppression: Take Two. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (4):509-520.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Natalie Dandekar (1994). Recognizing Rationalizations Among Responses to Hunger. Agriculture and Human Values 11 (4):28-37.
    In this article I undertake to discover the extent to which five distinct philosophical arguments for “hardhearted” responses to hunger are rationalizations. In each case, I consider the prima facie appeal and then consider the extent to which these appeals can be answered or overcome by principles promoting policies of food equity. I pay special attention to the appeal that pits political self-determination against food equity, because I believe it is especially important to determine the extent to which respect for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Natalie Dandekar (1993). Privacy+ Theoretical, Legal, and Political Aspects-an Understanding for Embodied Persons. Philosophical Forum 24 (4):331-348.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Natalie Dandekar (1992). Response to Schedler. Social Theory and Practice 18 (3):333-345.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Natalie Dandekar & Edward Zlotkowski (1992). Moral Issues Associated With Bioengineered Species: Stewardship, Abuse and Sustainability. Between the Species 8 (4):7.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Natalie Dandekar (1991). Can Whistleblowing Be FULLY Legitimated? Business and Professional Ethics Journal 10 (1):89-108.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Natalie Dandekar (1990). Contrasting Consequences: Bringing Charges of Sexual Harassment Compared with Other Cases of Whistleblowing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):151 - 158.
    The phenomenon of whistleblowing seems puzzling in that whistleblowing presumably brings a wrongful practice to the attention of those with power to correct the situation. In this respect, whistleblowers act to serve the public interest in defeating harmful, illegal and unjust practices. Yet these persons suffer vilification and worse, not only from their fellow employees, but from members of the general public as well. Cases in which members of a discriminated minority report instances of job discrimination, and especially instances of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation