Search results for 'Nature of Mind' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Human Nature (2005). Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Aleksander, Igor, The World in My Mind, My Mind in the World: Key Mechanisms of Consciousness in People, Animals and Machines, Charlottesville, VA and Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, 2005, Pp. 196,£ 17.95, $34.90. Aparece, Pederito A., Teaching, Learning and Community: An Examination of Wittgen. [REVIEW] Mind 114:455.score: 1980.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Carruthers (2004). The Nature of the Mind: An Introduction. Routledge.score: 606.0
    Many people throughout the course of human history, across all human cultures, have believed themselves to be distinct from their physical bodies, and have used this belief to ground a hope for some form of life after death. The nature of the mind examines whether, and if so how, such beliefs can be rationally grounded. Clearly written and rigorously presented, this book is intended for use in undergraduate courses in philosophy of mind. Main topics covered include: · (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Derek Bolton (1996). Mind, Meaning, and Mental Disorder: The Nature of Causal Explanation in Psychology and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.score: 606.0
    Philosophical ideas about the mind, brain, and behavior can seem theoretical and unimportant when placed alongside the urgent questions of mental distress and disorder. However, there is a need to give direction to attempts to answer these questions. On the one hand, a substantial research effort is going into the investigation of brain processes and the development of drug treatments for psychiatric disorders, and on the other, a wide range of psychotherapies is becoming available to adults and children with (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Godfrey-Smith (1996). Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge University Press.score: 594.0
    This book explains the relationship between intelligence and environmental complexity, and in so doing links philosophy of mind to more general issues about the relations between organisms and environments, and to the general pattern of 'externalist' explanations. The author provides a biological approach to the investigation of mind and cognition in nature. In particular he explores the idea that the function of cognition is to enable agents to deal with environmental complexity. The history of the idea in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Józef Bremer (2012). Book Review: Thomas Nagel. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Con-Ception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [REVIEW] Forum Philosophicum 17 (2):269-273.score: 567.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kathleen Wider (2013). Sartre and Spinoza on the Nature of Mind. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):555-575.score: 558.0
    What surfaces first when one examines the philosophy of mind of Sartre and Spinoza are the differences between them. For Spinoza a human mind is a mode of the divine mind. That view is a far cry from Sartre’s view of human consciousness as a desire never achieved: the desire to be god, to be the foundation of one’s own existence. How could two philosophers, one a determinist and the other who grounds human freedom in the (...) of consciousness itself, be seen as having any commonalities worth exploring? How could the noted user of the deductive method and one of the most important phenomenologists of the twentieth century share any philosophical ground at all? I will argue in this paper that despite the very real differences between their two philosophies, there are striking similarities between Sartre’s view of consciousness and Spinoza’s view of the mind. They become apparent when one examines each one’s analysis of the nature of mind and its relationship to itself, the body, and the world. Both are heir to a kind of Aristotelian naturalism. This commonality between them derives from their mutual rejection of Descartes’ substance dualism. I first explore the consequences of that rejection on how each one conceives of the relationship between the mind and its objects. Next I examine their view of the mind’s relation to itself and finally I look at how each one understood the mind’s relationship to the body and the world. The examination of their two views reveals how much they anticipate and support theories of mind defended by contemporary analytic philosophers of mind. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Scott Sturgeon (2000). Matters of Mind: Consciousness, Reason and Nature. Routledge.score: 549.0
    The mind-body problem continues to be the focus of many of our philosophical concerns. Matters of Mind tackles how the problem has spanned and how it has changed from the earlier theories of reducing aboutness to empirical cases for physicalism. The theories of perception, property explanation, content and knowledge, reliabilism and the problem of zombies and ghosts are all carefully assessed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephen I. Wagner (1995). Descartes' Wax: Discovering the Nature of Mind. History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (2):165 - 183.score: 549.0
    Descartes' procedure in "Meditation II" must be brought into line with his claim that "we must never ask about the existence of anything until we first understand its essence." And Descartes' "Meditation III" claim that he is aware of his mind's power to cause ideas must be grounded in a prior discovery of this power. Both demands are met by reading "Meditation II" as a progressive clarification of the nature of mind, with the investigation of the wax (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Timothy J. Gallagher (2014). A Mead‐Chomsky Comparison Reveals a Set of Key Questions on the Nature of Language and Mind. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (2):148-167.score: 549.0
    The social psychologist George Herbert Mead and the cognitive linguist Noam Chomsky both investigated the nature of language and mind during the 20th century. They approached the issues broadly, pursuing both philosophical and scientific lines of reasoning and evidence. This comparative analysis of Mead and Chomsky identifies fourteen questions that summarize their collective effort, and which animated much of the debate concerning language and mind in the 20th century. These questions continue to be relevant to 21st century (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Marleen Rozemond (2006). The Nature of the Mind. In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Wiley-Blackwell. 48--66.score: 543.0
    IN this paper I explain how Descartes's conception of the mind was novel in relation to Aristotelian scholasticism. I also argue against the standard view that Descartes believed in transparency of the mental, the view that one cannot make mistakes about one's own mental states.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. A. G. Cairns-Smith (1996). Evolving the Mind: On the Nature of Matter and the Origin of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.score: 540.0
    Evolving the Mind has two main themes: how ideas about the mind evolved in science; and how the mind itself evolved in nature. The mind came into physical science when it was realised, first, that it is the activity of a physical object, a brain, which makes a mind; and secondly, that our theories of nature are largely mental constructions, artificial extensions of an inner model of the world which we inherited from our (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. R. Smythies (ed.) (2014). Brain and Mind: Modern Concepts of the Nature of Mind. Routledge.score: 540.0
    Presenting some modern views on the problem of the nature of mind and its relationship to the brain, this book, published in 1965, brings together contributors from various disciplines which are affected by this issue. Coming from different philosophical outlooks as well as subjects, these contributors also comment on each other’s’ chapters with a view of developing thought on the approaches to the problem. The theory of mind-brain relationship is vital to human interest and has been in (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Uriah Kriegel (forthcoming). Brentano's Concept of Mind: Underlying Nature, Reference-Fixing, and the Mark of the Mental. In Sandra Lapointe & Christopher Pincock (eds.), Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan.score: 531.0
    Perhaps the philosophical thesis most commonly associated with Brentano is that intentionality is the mark of the mental. But in fact Brentano often and centrally uses also what he calls ‘inner perception’ to demarcate the mental. In this paper, I offer a new interpretation of Brentano’s conception of the interrelations between mentality, intentionality, and inner perception. According to this interpretation, Brentano took the concept of mind to be a natural-kind concept, with intentionality constituting the underlying nature of the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Antonia Lolordo (2005). Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.score: 531.0
    : Malebranche famously objects to Descartes' argument that the nature of the mind is better known than the nature of body as follows: if we had an idea of the mind's nature we would know the possible range of modes of the mind, including the sensory modes, but we do not know those modes and thus can't have an idea of the mind's nature. I argue that Malebranche's objections are readily answerable from (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mark Johnston (1995). Self-Deception and the Nature of Mind. In C. Macdonald (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Cambridge: Blackwell. 63--91.score: 531.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John J. Haldane (1994). Analytical Philosophy and the Nature of Mind: Time for Another Rebirth? In Richard Warner & Tadeusz Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate. Blackwell.score: 531.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Henry P. Stapp (2001). Quantum Theory and the Role of Mind in Nature. Foundations of Physics 31 (10):1465-1499.score: 525.0
    Orthodox Copenhagen quantum theory renounces the quest to understand the reality in which we are imbedded, and settles for practical rules describing connections between our observations. Many physicist have regarded this renunciation of our effort describe nature herself as premature, and John von Neumann reformulated quantum theory as a theory of an evolving objective universe interacting with human consciousness. This interaction is associated both in Copenhagen quantum theory and in von Neumann quantum theory with a sudden change that brings (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Shu-hsien Liu & Kwong-loi Shun (1996). Some Reflections on Mencius' Views of Mind-Heart and Human Nature. Philosophy East and West 46 (2):143-164.score: 522.0
    The origin, content, argumentative basis, practical implication, and influence of Mencius' views of mind-heart and human nature are discussed. While the differences between Confucius and Mencius are acknowledged, it is argued that Mencius' view that human nature is good is consistent with and is a further development of basic ideas in Confucius' thinking. The basis of Mencius' view is not empirical generalization but inner reflection and personal experience, which reveal a shared natural endowment in human beings with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Vivian Bohl & Alan P. Fiske (2014-02). In and Out of Each Other's Bodies: Theory of Mind, Evolution, Truth, and the Nature of the Social. Maurice Bloch. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 2012. 161 Pp. [REVIEW] American Ethnologist 41 (1):214-215.score: 519.0
  20. Kathleen Wider (1997). The Bodily Nature of Consciousness: Sartre and Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.score: 516.0
    In this work, Kathleen V. Wider discusses Jean-Paul Sartre's analysis of consciousness in Being and Nothingness in light of recent work by analytic philosophers ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Bryan Baird (2006). The Transcendental Nature of Mind and World. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):381-398.score: 513.0
    Critics of John McDowell’s Mind and World have by and large failed to take sufficient notice of the transcendental context within whichMcDowell situates his work—a failure that has adversely affected their criticisms. In this paper, I make clear this transcendental context and show how it figures in the transcendental argument I see McDowell offering in Mind and World. Interpreting McDowell’s argument in this way, I further argue, helps to answer some of the most pressing objections to what he (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Chung‐Ying Cheng (2013). A Generative Ontological Unity of Heart‐Mind and Nature in the Four Books. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (2):234-251.score: 495.0
    Traditional scholarship seems not to pay sufficient attention to the fact that Daxue 《大學》 has established a system of ethical and political philosophy on the basis of the idea of xin 心 (heart-mind) whereas the Zhongyong 《中庸》 has argued for the participation of the human person in the creativities of heaven and earth based on the onto-generative nature (xing 性) of the human person. How to explain this fact and interrelate and integrate these two systems become both a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Katherine Nelson (2011). The Human Nature of the Economic Mind. Biological Theory 6 (4):377-387.score: 495.0
    This paper provides a historical overview of cognitive psychology and computational theories in cognitive science. Critiques of the computational model are discussed. The perspective of the evolution of mind and brain provides an alternative model such as that presented by Merlin Donald in terms of the “Hybrid Mind.” This “naturalist” model is also consistent with what we know of cognitive development in childhood. It provides a better understanding of cognition in situated context than the computational alternatives and is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David M. Rosenthal (ed.) (1991). The Nature of Mind. Oxford University Press.score: 492.0
    This anthology brings together readings mainly from contemporary philosophers, but also from writers of the past two centuries, on the philosophy of mind. Some of the main questions addressed are: is a human being really a mind in relation to a body; if so, what exactly is this mind and how it is related to the body; and are there any grounds for supposing that the mind survives the disintegration of the body?
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter Dodwell (2000). Brave New Mind: A Thoughtful Inquiry Into the Nature and Meaning of Mental Life. Oxford University Press.score: 492.0
    This book looks at how scientists investigate the nature of the mind and the brain, providing answers to these important questions.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Petr Bob (forthcoming). Quantum Science and the Nature of Mind. Journal of Mind and Behavior.score: 492.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. V. Part (2013). The Nature of Mind. In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind. Routledge. 196.score: 492.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Itay Shani (2013). Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):294-298.score: 486.0
    Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. . ???aop.label???. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2013.804045.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Robert Pasnau (2011). Philosophy of Mind and Human Nature. In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford University Press.score: 480.0
    A theory of human nature must consider from the start whether it sees human beings in fundamentally biological terms, as animals like other animals, or else in fundamentally supernatural terms, as creatures of God who are like God in some special way, and so importantly unlike other animals. Many of the perennial philosophical disputes have proved so intractable in part because their adherents divide along these lines. The friends of materialism, seeing human beings as just a particularly complex example (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Desh Raj Sirswal, The Problem of Mind, Cognitive Science and Integrated Research Methodology.score: 480.0
    There are numerous aspects of the nature of man, and each aspect gives rise to many problems. Some of these problems are comparatively simple, other deep and perplexing. Throughout time, people have made distinction between the material or physical world and mental or psychical world, the former may be perceived by any observer; the later remains a private experience. Philosophy of mind, today dealing with four issues: the nature of mind and body, mental content, mental causation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Charles W. Morris (1993). Symbolism and Reality: A Study in the Nature of Mind. J. Benjamins Pub. Co..score: 477.0
    PARTI FOREWORD "Knowledge of a thing engenders love of it; the more exact the knowledge, the more fervent the love." Leonardo Da Vinci ) The stream of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. René Descartes (2002). Meditations on First Philosophy. Second Meditation: The Nature of the Human Mind, and How It is Better Known Than the Body, and Sixth Meditation: The Existence of Material Things, and the Real Distinction Between Mind and Body. Reproduced From Descartes (1985). In David J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press. 10--21.score: 477.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Charles Hartshorne (1977). Physics and Psychics: The Place of Mind in Nature. In John B. Cobb & David Ray Griffin (eds.), Mind in Nature. University Press of America. 90--122.score: 471.0
  34. Michael Anderson, Evolution, Embodiment and the Nature of the Mind.score: 471.0
    In: B. Hardy-Vallee & N. Payette, eds. Beyond the brain: embodied, situated & distributed cognition. (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar’s Press), in press. Abstract: In this article, I do three main things: 1. First, I introduce an approach to the mind motivated primarily by evolutionary considerations. I do that by laying out four principles for the study of the mind from an evolutionary perspective, and four predictions that they suggest. This evolutionary perspective is completely compatible with, although broader than, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Petter Johansson, Lars Hall & Peter Gärdenfors (2011). Choice Blindness and the Non-Unitary Nature of the Human Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):28-29.score: 471.0
    Experiments on choice blindness support von Hippel & Trivers's (VH&T's) conception of the mind as fundamentally divided, but they also highlight a problem for VH&T's idea of non-conscious self-deception: If I try to trick you into believing that I have a certain preference, and the best way is to also trick myself, I might actually end up having that preference, at all levels of processing.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. W. H. Thorpe (1977). Mind in Nature: Essays on the Interface of Science and Philosophy Part One: The Evolution of Mind. In John B. Cobb & David Ray Griffin (eds.), Mind in Nature. University Press of America. 1.score: 471.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Author unknown, Evolution, Embodiment and the Nature of the Mind.score: 471.0
    In: B. Hardy-Vallee & N. Payette, eds. Beyond the brain: embodied, situated & distributed cognition. (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar’s Press), in press. Abstract: In this article, I do three main things: 1. First, I introduce an approach to the mind motivated primarily by evolutionary considerations. I do that by laying out four principles for the study of the mind from an evolutionary perspective, and four predictions that they suggest. This evolutionary perspective is completely compatible with, although broader than, the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. J. V. Bateman (1940). Professor Alexander's Proofs of the Spatio-Temporal Nature of Mind. Philosophical Review 49 (May):309-324.score: 468.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Peiyuan Meng (2010). A Further Analysis of Zhu Xi's Theory of Mind. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):377-395.score: 468.0
    Mind was the oneness of form and function. The change from an old theory to a new one about zhong 中 (the mean) and he 和 (harmony) was a shift from the idea of the separate form of nature and function of mind to one about both form and function of mind. Form was both the form of the spirit of the mind and of the substantiality of nature (not the same as substantial realities (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David M. Armstrong & Norman Malcolm (1984). Consciousness and Causality: A Debate on the Nature of Mind. Blackwell.score: 468.0
  41. Robert Mcrae (1985). Perceptions, Objects and the Nature of Mind. Hume Studies (Suppl.) 85 (1):150-167.score: 468.0
  42. Floyd Irving Lorbeer (1953). Electric Nature of Mind. Lancaster, Calif.,Laurel Foundation.score: 468.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. J. P. Shukla (1966). The Nature of Mind. Jabalpur, Modern Book House.score: 468.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Brand Blanshard (1941). The Nature of Mind. Journal of Philosophy 38 (April):207-215.score: 465.0
  45. W. H. Sheldon (1941). On the Nature of Mind. Journal of Philosophy 38 (April):197-206.score: 465.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Victoria McGeer (2001). Psycho-Practice, Psycho-Theory and the Contrastive Case of Autism: How Practices of Mind Become Second-Nature. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5-7):109-132.score: 462.0
  47. Linda Zagzebski (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry Into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.score: 462.0
    Almost all theories of knowledge and justified belief employ moral concepts and forms of argument borrowed from moral theories, but none of them pay attention to the current renaissance in virtue ethics. This remarkable book is the first attempt to establish a theory of knowledge based on the model of virtue theory in ethics. The book develops the concept of an intellectual virtue, and then shows how the concept can be used to give an account of the major concepts in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Sutton (2007). Batting, Habit, and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill. Sport in Society 10 (5):763-786.score: 462.0
    in Jeremy McKenna (ed), At the Boundaries of Cricket, to be published in 2007 as a special issue of the journal Sport in Society and as a book in the series Sport in the Global Society (Taylor and Francis).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. David Hunter (2001). Mind-Brain Identity and the Nature of States. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):366 – 376.score: 462.0
1 — 50 / 1000