Search results for 'Neil Remington Abramson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Neil Remington Abramson (2007). The Leadership Archetype: A Jungian Analysis of Similarities Between Modern Leadership Theory and the Abraham Myth in the Judaic–Christian Tradition. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (2):115 - 129.score: 870.0
    Archetypal psychology suggests the possibility of a leadership archetype representing the unconscious preferences of human beings as a species about the appropriate relationships between leaders and followers. Mythological analysis compared God’s leadership in the Abraham myth with modern visionary, ethical and situational leadership to find similarities reflecting continuities in human thinking about leadership over as long as 3600 years. God’s leadership behavior is very modern except that God is generally more relationship oriented. The leadership archetype that emerges is of a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Neil Remington Abramson (2011). Kierkegaardian Confessions: The Relationship Between Moral Reasoning and Failure to Be Promoted. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2):199 - 216.score: 870.0
    Kierkegaard's theory of pre-ethical, aesthetic, ethical, and religious spheres of moral reasoning was applied to the case of an individual rejected for promotion to full professor. The evaluators seemed to represent the public morality of the profession, assumed that they represented the highest level of moral reasoning, and judged that the candidate represented a private morality based on a lower level of moral reasoning. The article questioned the view that moral reasoning could be discerned from one's actions. It was paradoxical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Darren Abramson (2007). Chapter Twelve Growing Minds, Computability, and the Potentially Infinite Darren Abramson. In Soraj Hongladarom (ed.), Computing and Philosophy in Asia. Cambridge Scholars Pub.. 179.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Brandon Gibb, Lauren Alloy, Lyn Abramson & Brian Marx (2003). Childhood Maltreatment and Maltreatment-Specific Inferences: A Test of Rose and Abramson's (1992) Extension of the Hopelessness Theory. [REVIEW] Cognition and Emotion 17 (6):917-931.score: 120.0
  5. Sally Borrell (2013). Answering Animals: Neil Abramson's Unsaid. Society and Animals 21 (6):594-595.score: 72.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kate Abramson (2001). Sympathy and the Project of Hume's Second Enquiry. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (1):45-80.score: 30.0
    More than two hundred years after its publication, David Hume's Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals is still widely regarded as either a footnote to the more philosophically interesting third book of the Treatise, or an abbreviated, more stylish, version of that earlier work. These standard interpretations are rather difficult to square with Hume's own assessment of the second Enquiry. Are we to think that Hume called the EPM “incomparably the best” of all his writings only because he preferred that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Darren Abramson (2011). Philosophy of Mind Is (in Part) Philosophy of Computer Science. Minds and Machines 21 (2):203-219.score: 30.0
    In this paper I argue that whether or not a computer can be built that passes the Turing test is a central question in the philosophy of mind. Then I show that the possibility of building such a computer depends on open questions in the philosophy of computer science: the physical Church-Turing thesis and the extended Church-Turing thesis. I use the link between the issues identified in philosophy of mind and philosophy of computer science to respond to a prominent argument (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kate Abramson (1999). Hume on Cultural Conflicts of Values. Philosophical Studies 94 (1-2):173-187.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kate Abramson & Adam Leite (2011). Love as a Reactive Emotion. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):673-699.score: 30.0
    One variety of love is familiar in everyday life and qualifies in every reasonable sense as a reactive attitude. ‘Reactive love’ is paradigmatically (a) an affectionate attachment to another person, (b) appropriately felt as a non-self-interested response to particular kinds of morally laudable features of character expressed by the loved one in interaction with the lover, and (c) paradigmatically manifested in certain kinds of acts of goodwill and characteristic affective, desiderative and other motivational responses (including other-regarding concern and a desire (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Kate Abramson (2007). Hume's Distinction Between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting. Philosophy Compass 2 (5):680–698.score: 30.0
    Although the implications of Humes distinction between philosophical anatomy and painting have been the subject of lively scholarly debates, it is a puzzling fact that the details of the distinction itself have largely been a matter of interpretive presumption rather than debate. This would be unproblematic if Humes views about these two species of philosophy were obvious, or if there were a rich standard interpretation of the distinction that we had little reason to doubt. But a careful review of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Kate Abramson (2002). Two Portraits of the Humean Moral Agent. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):301–334.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Kate Abramson (1999). Correcting Our Sentiments About Hume's Moral Point of View. Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):333-361.score: 30.0
  13. Kate Abramson (2006). Happy to Unite, or Not? Philosophy Compass 1 (3):290-302.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Darren Abramson (2008). Turing's Responses to Two Objections. Minds and Machines 18 (2):147-167.score: 30.0
    In this paper I argue that Turing’s responses to the mathematical objection are straightforward, despite recent claims to the contrary. I then go on to show that by understanding the importance of learning machines for Turing as related not to the mathematical objection, but to Lady Lovelace’s objection, we can better understand Turing’s response to Lady Lovelace’s objection. Finally, I argue that by understanding Turing’s responses to these objections more clearly, we discover a hitherto unrecognized, substantive thesis in his philosophical (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jeffrey Abramson (1993). The Jury and Democratic Theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (1):45-68.score: 30.0
  16. Darren Abramson (2009). Book Review: "Supersizing the Mind" by Andy Clark. [REVIEW] International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1 (02):299-304.score: 30.0
  17. Fred G. Abramson & Leo A. Harrington (1978). Models Without Indiscernibles. Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (3):572-600.score: 30.0
    For T any completion of Peano Arithmetic and for n any positive integer, there is a model of T of size $\beth_n$ with no (n + 1)-length sequence of indiscernibles. Hence the Hanf number for omitting types over T, H(T), is at least $\beth_\omega$ . (Now, using an upper bound previously obtained by Julia Knight H (true arithmetic) is exactly $\beth_\omega$ ). If T ≠ true arithmetic, then $H(T) = \beth_{\omega1}$ . If $\delta \not\rightarrow (\rho)^{ , then any completion of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Darren Abramson (2011). Descartes' Influence on Turing. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):544-551.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jeffrey Abramson (1987). Book Review:Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities. Robert E. Goodin. [REVIEW] Ethics 97 (3):659-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. D. A. Neil, C. A. J. Coady, J. Thompson & H. Kuhse (2007). End-of-Life Decisions in Medical Practice: A Survey of Doctors in Victoria (Australia). Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):721-725.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Elizabeth Neil (1997). Hume's Moral Sublime. British Journal of Aesthetics 37 (3):246-258.score: 30.0
    Through examining the respective roles of "pride" and "sympathy" in Hume's natural sublime experience and through comparing that analysis with the roles played by those concepts in his discussion of "heroic virtue," I demonstrate both that there is an element of the moral in natural sublimity and that Hume evokes a conception of sublimity as sometimes _distinctly moral. Moral sublime experience entails the _un-comfortably _un-Humean possibility of sublimity inhering in the uniquely human object which makes that experience "moral." I detail (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Bronwen Neil (2003). Rufinus' Translation of the Epistola Clementis an Iacobum. Augustinianum 43 (1):25-39.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Fred G. Abramson (1981). Locally Countable Models of Σ1-Separation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (1):96 - 100.score: 30.0
    Let α be any countable admissible ordinal greater than ω. There is a transitive set A such that A is admissible, locally countable, On A = α, and A satisfies Σ 1 -separation. In fact, if B is any nonstandard model of $KP + \forall x \subseteq \omega$ (the hyperjump of x exists), the ordinal standard part of B is greater than ω, and every standard ordinal in B is countable in B, then HC B ∩ (standard part of B) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jeremy Neil (2009). The Liberal Conscience. Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):225-228.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. C. O. X. Neil (1991). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (4).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. C. O. X. Neil (1997). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 37 (2).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Fred G. Abramson (1979). Σ1-Separation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):374 - 382.score: 30.0
    Let A be a standard transitive admissible set. Σ 1 -separation is the principle that whenever X and Y are disjoint Σ A 1 subsets of A then there is a Δ A 1 subset S of A such that $X \subseteq S$ and $Y \cap S = \varnothing$ . Theorem. If A satisfies Σ 1 -separation, then (1) If $\langle T_n\mid n is a sequence of trees on ω each of which has at most finitely many infinite paths in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. C. O. X. Neil (1992). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 32 (4).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. C. O. X. Neil (1993). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (3).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. C. O. X. Neil (1995). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (3).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. H. A. Abramson (ed.) (1950). Problems of Consciousness: Transactions of the First Conference. Josiah Macy Foundation.score: 30.0
  32. H. A. Abramson (ed.) (1951). Problems of Consciousness: Transactions of the Second Conference. Josiah Macy Foundation.score: 30.0
  33. H. A. Abramson (ed.) (1952). Problems of Consciousness: Transactions of the Third Conference. Josiah Macy Foundation.score: 30.0
  34. H. A. Abramson (ed.) (1953). Problems of Consciousness: Transactions of the Fourth Conference. Josiah Macy Foundation.score: 30.0
  35. H. A. Abramson (ed.) (1954). Problems of Consciousness: Transactions of the Fifth Conference. Josiah Macy Foundation.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Thomas F. Remington (1971). The Origin of Ideology. Pittsburgh,University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. George Sher (2008). Who's in Charge Here?: Reply to Neil Levy. Philosophia 36 (2):223-226.score: 18.0
    In his response to my essay “Out of Control,” Neil Levy contests my claims that (1) we are often responsible for acts that we do not consciously choose to perform, and that (2) despite the absence of conscious choice, there remains a relevant sense in which these actions are within our control. In this reply to Levy, I concede that claim (2) is linguistically awkward but defend the thought that it expresses, and I clarify my defense of claim (1) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Neil Levy & Yasuko Kitano (2011). We're All Folk: An Interview with Neil Levy About Experimental Philosophy and Conceptual Analysis. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 19:87-98.score: 15.0
    The following is a transcript of the interview I (Yasuko Kitano) conducted with Neil Levy (The Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, CAPPE) on the 23rd in July 2009, while he was in Tokyo to give a series of lectures on neuroethics at The University of Tokyo Center for Philosophy. I edited his words for publication with his approval.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Nicholas Agar (2012). On the Irrationality of Mind-Uploading: A Rely to Neil Levy. [REVIEW] AI and Society 27 (4):431-436.score: 12.0
    In a paper in this journal, Neil Levy challenges Nicholas Agar’s argument for the irrationality of mind-uploading. Mind-uploading is a futuristic process that involves scanning brains and recording relevant information which is then transferred into a computer. Its advocates suppose that mind-uploading transfers both human minds and identities from biological brains into computers. According to Agar’s original argument, mind-uploading is prudentially irrational. Success relies on the soundness of the program of Strong AI—the view that it may someday be possible (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Rainer Kattel (forthcoming). Brian Leiter and Neil Sinhababu (Eds), Nietzsche and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.score: 12.0
    Brian Leiter and Neil Sinhababu (eds), Nietzsche and Morality Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10677-008-9134-6 Authors Rainer Kattel, Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Estonia Journal Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Online ISSN 1572-8447 Print ISSN 1386-2820.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Cristobal Orrego (2010). Autonomy Within the Limits of Sympathy: A Comment on Neil MacCormick's Practical Reason in Law and Morality. Jurisprudence 1 (1):137-146.score: 12.0
    Neil MacCormick says that his "version of institutional theory" about the law 'is "non positivist", or, if you wish, "post-positivist"'. He is aware, however, that his work could be perfectly labelled, from the point of view of the history of legal and moral thought, as a form of natural law theory, at least by those who adhere to some version of natural law. It is an important merit of MacCormick that, rising above the label walls and wars, his theory (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Joseph M. Bryant (2011). New Directions and Perennial Challenges in the Sociology of Philosophy: Theoretical and Methodological Notes on Neil Gross's Richard Rorty. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (1):3-27.score: 12.0
    Quarrels between philosophers are never entirely disconnected from larger quarrels. There was a hidden agenda behind the split between old-fashioned “humanistic” philosophy (of the Dewey-Whitehead sort) and the positivists, and a similar agenda lies behind the current split between devotees of “analytic” and “Continental” philosophy. The heavy breathing on both sides about the immorality and stupidity of the opposition signals passions which academic power struggles cannot fully explain. Neil Gross’s monograph study on the American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931–2007) is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Robyn Carston & Diane Blakemore, Introduction: Neil Smith's Linguistics.score: 12.0
    Neil Smith has worked across the full range of the discipline of linguistics and explored its interfaces with other disciplines. In all this work he has maintained a commitment to a mentalist approach to the study of language and communication. The aim of this Special Issue is to honour his work and commitment with a collection of papers which brings together work by phonologists, syntacticians, psycholinguists, and pragmatists who share this interest in language as a central component of the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. James A. Good (2011). Neil Gross's Deweyan Account of Rorty's Intellectual Development. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (1):38-45.score: 12.0
    Writing about the intellectual development of a philosopher is a delicate business. My own endeavor to reinterpret the influence of Hegel on Dewey troubles some scholars because, they believe, I make Dewey seem less original.1 But if, like Dewey, we overcome Cartesian dualism, placing the development of the self firmly within a complex matrix of social processes, we are forced to reexamine, without necessarily surrendering, the notion of individual originality, or what Neil Gross calls “discourse[s] of creative genius.”2 To (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jon Cogburn (2003). Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism. Synthese 134 (3):353 - 362.score: 12.0
    In Chapter 7 of The Taming of the True, Neil Tennant provides a new argument from Michael Dummett's ``manifestation requirement'' to the incorrectness of classical logic and the correctness of intuitionistic logic. I show that Tennant's new argument is only valid if one interprets crucial existence claims occurring in the proof in the manner of intuitionists. If one interprets the existence claims as a classical logician would, then one can accept Tennant's premises while rejecting his conclusion of logical revision. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. R. Ahlzen (2001). Poetry, Interpretation and Unpredictability: A Reply to Neil Pickering. Medical Humanities 27 (1):47-49.score: 12.0
    In his article on poetry in health care education, Neil Pickering puts forward an argument of radical unpredictability: as we can never know in advance how a poem will be interpreted, it can be of no external use.1 It is, however, exactly this potential to give rise to multiple interpretations that makes the poem valuable. We hold that the poem should be read and discussed with no other intention than to discover and reflect on its possible meanings. Exactly this (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Daniel Osherson, Note on an Observation by Neil Tennant.score: 12.0
    Neil Tennant (Tennant, 2005) has offered an important observation about the AGM theory of belief revision (G¨ardenfors, 1988). We attempt to restate and demonstrate his result in a slightly different way. Fix a formal language L that embeds sentential logic. Given K ⊆ L and ϕ ∈ L, K ⊥ ϕ denotes the class of maximally consistent subsets of K that do not imply ϕ. That is, A ∈ K ⊥ ϕ iff A ⊆ K, A |= ϕ, and (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. J. Neil C. Garcia (1999). Poems by J. Neil C. Garcia. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 3 (1):159-168.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Neil Forrester Kim Plunkett (1994). Learning the Arabic Plural: The Case for Minority Default Mappings in Connectionist Networks. Neil Forrester Kim Plunkett. In Ashwin Ram & Kurt Eiselt (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum. 319.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Edward L. Schoen (2005). Book Review: Neil A. Manson (Ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. London and New York: Routledge, 2003. XVI and 376 Pa $25.95. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2):139-142.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000