Search results for 'Neuron' (try it on Scholar)

276 found
Sort by:
  1. Rachel Wood & Susan A. J. Stuart (2009). Aplasic Phantoms and the Mirror Neuron System: An Enactive, Developmental Perspective. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4):487-504.score: 24.0
    Phantom limb experiences demonstrate an unexpected degree of fragility inherent in our self-perceptions. This is perhaps most extreme when congenitally absent limbs are experienced as phantoms. Aplasic phantoms highlight fundamental questions about the physiological bases of self-experience and the ontogeny of a physical, embodied sense of the self. Some of the most intriguing of these questions concern the role of mirror neurons in supporting the development of self–other mappings and hence the emergence of phantom experiences of congenitally absent limbs. In (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Weyers Katja U. Likowski, Andreas Mühlberger, Antje B. M. Gerdes, Matthias J. Wieser, Paul Pauli (2012). Facial Mimicry and the Mirror Neuron System: Simultaneous Acquisition of Facial Electromyography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.score: 24.0
    Numerous studies have shown that humans automatically react with congruent facial reactions, i.e. facial mimicry, when seeing a vis-á-vis’ facial expressions. The current experiment is the first investigating the neuronal structures responsible for differences in the occurrence of such facial mimicry reactions by simultaneously measuring BOLD and facial EMG in an MRI scanner. Therefore, 20 female students viewed emotional facial expressions (happy, sad, and angry) of male and female avatar characters. During Differentiation presentation, the BOLD signal as well as M. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar (1999). A Neuron Doctrine in the Philosophy of Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):809-830.score: 21.0
    It is widely held that a successful theory of the mind will be neuroscientific. In this paper we ask, first, what this claim means, and, secondly, whether it is true. In answer to the first question, we argue that the claim is ambiguous between two views–one plausible but unsubstantive, and one substantive but highly controversial. In answer to the second question, we argue that neither the evidence from neuroscience itself nor from other scientific and philosophical considerations supports the controversial view.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jeff Coulter (1995). The Informed Neuron: Issues in the Use of Information Theory in the Behavioral Sciences. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 5 (4):583-96.score: 21.0
    The concept of “information” is virtually ubiquitous in contemporary cognitive science. It is claimed to be “processed” (in cognitivist theories of perception and comprehension), “stored” (in cognitivist theories of memory and recognition), and otherwise manipulated and transformed by the human central nervous system. Fred Dretske's extensive philosophical defense of a theory of informational content (“semantic” information) based upon the Shannon-Weaver formal theory of information is subjected to critical scrutiny. A major difficulty is identified in Dretske's equivocations in the use of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Carl Gillett (2013). Constitution, and Multiple Constitution, in the Sciences: Using the Neuron to Construct a Starting Framework. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 23 (3):309-337.score: 21.0
    Inter-level mechanistic explanations in the sciences have long been a focus of philosophical interest, but attention has recently turned to the compositional character of these explanations which work by explaining higher level entities, whether processes, individuals or properties, using the lower level entities they take to compose them. However, we still have no theoretical account of the constitution or parthood relations between individuals deployed in such explanations, nor any accounts of multiple constitution. My primary focus in this paper is to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. M. Chirimuuta & I. Gold (2009). The Embedded Neuron, the Enactive Field? In John Bickle (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    The concept of the receptive field, first articulated by Hartline, is central to visual neuroscience. The receptive field of a neuron encompasses the spatial and temporal properties of stimuli that activate the neuron, and, as Hubel and Wiesel conceived of it, a neuron’s receptive field is static. This makes it possible to build models of neural circuits and to build up more complex receptive fields out of simpler ones. Recent work in visual neurophysiology is providing evidence that (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. F. Tito Arecchi (2003). Chaotic Neuron Dynamics, Synchronization, and Feature Binding: Quantum Aspects. Mind and Matter 1 (1):15-43.score: 18.0
    A central issue of cognitive neuroscience is to understand how a large collection of coupled neurons combines external signals with internal memories into new coherent patterns of meaning. An external stimulus localized at some input spreads over a large assembly of coupled neurons, building up a collective state univocally corresponding to the stimulus. Thus, the synchronization of spike trains of many individual neurons is the basis of a coherent perception. Based on recent investigations of homoclinic chaotic systems and their synchronization, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Alex Byrne (2000). Two Radical Neuron Doctrines. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):833-833.score: 18.0
    G&S describe the radical neuron doctrine in a number of slightly different ways, and we think this hides an important distinction. On the one hand, the radical neuron doctrine is supposed to have the consequence "that a successful theory of the mind will make no reference to anything like the concepts of linguistics or the psychological sciences as we currently understand them", and so Chomskyan linguistics "is doomed from the beginning" (sect. 2.2.2, paras. 2,3).[1] (Note that `a successful (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Vilayanur S. Ramachandran, The Simulating Social Mind: The Role of the Mirror Neuron System and Simulation in the Social and Communicative Deficits of Autism Spectrum Disorders.score: 18.0
    The mechanism by which humans perceive others differs greatly from how humans perceive inanimate objects. Unlike inanimate objects, humans have the distinct property of being “like me” in the eyes of the observer. This allows us to use the same systems that process knowledge about self-performed actions, self-conceived thoughts, and self-experienced emotions to understand actions, thoughts, and emotions in others. The authors propose that internal simulation mechanisms, such as the mirror neuron system, are necessary for normal development of recognition, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Joe Y. F. Lau (1999). A More Substantive Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):843-844.score: 18.0
    (1) It is not clear from Gold and Stoljar’s definition of biological neuroscience whether it includes computational and representational concepts. If so, then their evaluation of Kandel’s theory is problematic. If not, then a more direct refutation of the radical neuron doctrine is available. (2) Objections to the psychological sciences might derive not just from the conflation of the radical and the trivial neuron doctrine. There might also be the implicit belief that for many mental phenomena, adequate theories (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Sutton (1999). The Churchlands' Neuron Doctrine: Both Cognitive and Reductionist. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):850-851.score: 18.0
    According to Gold & Stoljar, one cannot consistently be both reductionist about psychoneural relations and invoke concepts developed in the psychological sciences. I deny the utility of their distinction between biological and cognitive neuroscience, suggesting that they construe biological neuroscience too rigidly and cognitive neuroscience too liberally. Then, I reject their characterization of reductionism. Reductions need not go down past neurobiology straight to physics, and cases of partial, local reduction are not neatly distinguishable from cases of mere implementation. Modifying the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Tony Stone & Martin Davies (2000). Autonomous Psychology and the Moderate Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.score: 18.0
    _Two notions of autonomy are distinguished. The respective_ _denials that psychology is autonomous from neurobiology are neuron_ _doctrines, moderate and radical. According to the moderate neuron_ _doctrine, inter-disciplinary interaction need not aim at reduction. It is_ _proposed that it is more plausible that there is slippage from the_ _moderate to the radical neuron doctrine than that there is confusion_ _between the radical neuron doctrine and the trivial version._.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Christopher Cherniak, Large-Scale Optimization of Neuron Arbors.score: 18.0
    At the global as well as local scales, some of the geometry of types of neuron arbors—both dendrites and axons—appears to be self-organizing: Their morphogenesis behaves like flowing water, that is, fluid dynamically; waterflow in branching networks in turn acts like a tree composed of cords under tension, that is, vector mechanically. Branch diameters and angles and junction sites conform significantly to this model. The result is that such neuron tree samples globally minimize their total volume—rather than, for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Stuart Hameroff (1999). The Neuron Doctrine is an Insult to Neurons. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):838-839.score: 18.0
    As presently implemented, the neuron doctrine (ND) portrays the brain's neurons and chemical synapses as fundamental components in a computer-like switching circuit, supporting a view of brain = mind = computer. However, close examination reveals individual neurons to be far more complex than simple switches, with enormous capacity for intracellular information processing (e.g., in the internal cytoskeleton). Other poorly appreciated factors (gap junctions, apparent randomness, dendritic-dendritic processing, possible quantum computation, the living state) also suggest that the ND grossly oversimplifies (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. James Fahey & Michael Zenzen (1999). Reductionism and the Neuron Doctrine: A Metaphysical Fix of Gold & Stoljar's Trivial–Radical Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):835-836.score: 18.0
    The trivial neuron doctrine (TND) holds that psychology merely depends on neurobiology. The radical neuron doctrine (RND) goes further and claims that psychology is superfluous in that neuroscience can “replace it.” Popular among RND notions of “replacement” is “reduction,” and in our commentary we challenge Gold & Stoljar (G&S) to make clear their distinction between merely depends on (TND) and is reducible to (RND). G&S give us a TND–RND distinction that is a distinction without a difference; a defensible (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Frank Jackson (1999). A Slightly Radical Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):840-841.score: 18.0
    The element of truth in behaviorism tells us that some versions of a radical neuron doctrine must be false. However, the representational nature of many mental states implies that neuroscience may well bear on some topics traditionally addressed by philosophers of mind. An example is the individuation of belief states.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Dale Jamieson (1999). The “Trivial Neuron Doctrine” is Not Trivial. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):841-842.score: 18.0
    I argue that the trivial neuron doctrine as characterized by Gold & Stoljar is not trivial; it appears to be inconsistent with property dualism as well as some forms of functionalism and externalism. I suggest that the problem is not so much with the particular way in which Gold & Stoljar draw the distinction as with the unruliness of the distinction itself. Their failure to see this may be why they misunderstand the views of the Churchlands.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Han Lee & Gregory V. Simpson (2005). Phase Locking of Single Neuron Activity to Theta Oscillations During Working Memory in Monkey Extrastriate Visual Cortex. Neuron 45:147-156.score: 18.0
    activity” has been considered to play a major role in the short-term maintenance of memories. Many studies since then have provided support for this view and greatly advanced our knowledge of the effects of stimulus type and modality on delay activity and its temporal dynamics (Funahashi et al., 1993; Fuster et al., 2000; Romo et al., 1999). In humans, working memory has also been a subject of intense investigation using scalp and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG, iEEG) as well as magnetoencephalography (MEG), (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Noah Zarr, Ryan Ferguson & Arthur M. Glenberg (2013). Language Comprehension Warps the Mirror Neuron System. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:870.score: 18.0
    Is the mirror neuron system (MNS) used in language understanding? According to embodied accounts of language comprehension, understanding sentences describing actions makes use of neural mechanisms of action control, including the MNS. Consequently, repeatedly comprehending sentences describing similar actions should induce adaptation of the MNS thereby warping its use in other cognitive processes such as action recognition and prediction. To test this prediction, participants read blocks of multiple sentences where each sentence in the block described transfer of objects in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Steven G. Daniel (1999). How Trivial is the “Trivial Neuron Doctrine”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.score: 18.0
    I argue that Gold & Stoljar's “trivial neuron doctrine” is not in fact trivial. Many familiar positions in the philosophy of mind run afoul of it, and it is unclear that even those whom Gold & Stoljar identify as adherents of the trivial neuron doctrine can be comfortably described as such.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Barry Horwitz (1999). Neuron Doctrine: Trivial Versus Radical Versus Do Not Dichotomize. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.score: 18.0
    Gold & Stoljar argue that there are two (often confused) neuron doctrines, one trivial and the other radical, with only the latter having the consequence that non-neuroscientific sciences of the mind will be discarded. They also attempt to show that there is no evidence supporting the radical doctrine. It is argued here that their dichotomy is artificial and misrepresents modern approaches to understanding the neuroscientific correlates of cognition and behavior.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Lucina Q. Uddin Istvan Molnar-Szakacs (2013). Self-Processing and the Default Mode Network: Interactions with the Mirror Neuron System. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 18.0
    Recent evidence for the fractionation of the default mode network (DMN) into functionally distinguishable subdivisions with unique patterns of connectivity calls for a reconceptualization of the relationship between this network and self-referential processing. Advances in resting-state functional connectivity analyses are beginning to reveal increasingly complex patterns of organization within the key nodes of the DMN - medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) – as well as between these nodes and other brain systems. Here we review recent examinations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Guillaume Dezecache, Laurence Conty & Julie Grèzes (2013). Social Affordances: Is the Mirror Neuron System Involved? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):417-418.score: 18.0
    We question the idea that the mirror neuron system is the substrate of social affordances perception, and we suggest that most of the activity seen in the parietal and premotor cortex of the human brain is independent of mirroring activity as characterized in macaques, but rather reflects a process of one's own action specification in response to social signals.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter G. Enticott Jed D. Burgess, Sara L. Arnold, Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon, Paul B. Fitzgerald (2013). A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study of the Effect of Visual Orientation on the Putative Human Mirror Neuron System. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 18.0
    Mirror neurons are a class of motor neuron that are active during both the performance and observation of behavior, and have been implicated in interpersonal understanding There is evidence to suggest that the mirror response is modulated by the perspective from which an action is presented (e.g., egocentric or allocentric). Most human research, however, has only examined this when presenting intransitive actions. Twenty-three healthy adult participants completed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiment that assessed corticospinal excitability whilst viewing transitive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. J. Tim O'Meara (1999). Begging the Question of Causation in a Critique of the Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):846-846.score: 18.0
    Gold & Stoljar's argument rejecting the “explanatory sufficiency” of the radical neuron doctrine depends on distinguishing it from the trivial neuron doctrine. This distinction depends on the thesis of “supervenience,” which depends on Hume's regularity theory of causation. In contrast, the radical neuron doctrine depends on a physical theory of causation, which denies the supervenience thesis. Insofar as the target article argues by drawing implications from the premise of Humean causation, whereas the radical doctrine depends on the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Chris J. Gibbons (2013). The Patient Experience of Fatigue in Motor Neurone Disease. Frontiers in Psychology 4:788.score: 16.0
    Aims This paper is a qualitative investigation that aims to investigate the lived experience of fatigue in patients with motor neurone disease – a progressive and fatal neurological condition. Background Fatigue is a disabling symptom in motor neurone disease (MND) that affects a large number of patients. However, the term ‘fatigue’ is in itself imprecise, as it remains a phenomenon without a widely accepted medical definition. This study sought to investigate the phenomenon of fatigue from the perspective of the MND (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Tony Stone & Martin Davies (1999). Autonomous Psychology and the Moderate Neuron Doctrine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.score: 15.0
  28. Hugo Théoret & Shirley Fecteau (2005). Making a Case for Mirror-Neuron System Involvement in Language Development: What About Autism and Blindness? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):145-146.score: 15.0
    The notion that manual gestures played an important role in the evolution of human language was strengthened by the discovery of mirror neurons in monkey area F5, the proposed homologue of human Broca's area. This idea is central to the thesis developed by Arbib, and lending further support to a link between motor resonance mechanisms and language/communication development is the case of autism and congenital blindness. We provide an account of how these conditions may relate to the aforementioned theory.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. G. Kreiman, I. Fried & Christof Koch (2002). Single-Neuron Correlates of Subjective Vision in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science Usa 99:8378-8383.score: 15.0
  30. Ken Mogi (1997). Response Selectivity, Neuron Doctrine, and Mach's Principle in Perception. Austrian Soc. For Cognitive Science Tech Report.score: 15.0
    manner. The construction of the space-time structure that describes the dynamics of the neural network in a causal manner is a non-trivial problem. I critically review the idea of response selectivity as is applied to.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mauro Maldonato (2009). From Neuron to Consciousness: For an Experience-Based Neuroscience. World Futures 65 (2):80 – 93.score: 15.0
    Up until only a few decades ago, not many scholars recognized scientific dignity in the problem of consciousness. In the last few years this scenario has changed. The rapid development of non-invasive research techniques that explore cerebral functions has not only increased our knowledge on the correlations between mental processes and cerebral structures, but it has fed our hopes for the possibility of facing the ancient and elusive question about the mind-brain relationship with a new way of thinking. The meeting (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Derek Bickerton (2005). Beyond the Mirror Neuron – the Smoke Neuron? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):126-126.score: 15.0
    Mirror neurons form a poor basis for Arbib's account of language evolution, failing to explain the creativity that must precede imitation, and requiring capacities (improbable in hominids) for categorizing situations and unambiguously miming them. They also commit Arbib to an implausible holophrastic protolanguage. His model is further vitiated by failure to address the origins of symbolization and the real nature of syntax.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz (2007). Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):27 – 40.score: 15.0
  34. Christian Perring (1999). The Neuron Doctrine in Psychiatry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):846-847.score: 15.0
    Gold & Stoljar's target article is important because it shows the limitations of neurobiological theories of the mind more powerfully than previous philosophical criticisms, especially those that focus on the subjective nature of experience and those that use considerations from philosophy of language to argue for the holism of the mental. They use less controversial assumptions and clearer arguments, the conclusions of which are applicable to the whole of neuroscience. Their conclusions can be applied to psychiatry to argue that, contrary (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz (2007). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse". American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W4 – W6.score: 15.0
  36. Keith Gunderson (1999). What Neuron Doctrines Might Never Explain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):837-838.score: 15.0
  37. Mark Sagoff (2007). Further Thoughts About the Human Neuron Mouse. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):51 – 52.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Christopher Hitchcock (2007). 4 What's Wrong with Neuron Diagrams? In J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & H. S. Silverstein (eds.), Causation and Explanation. Mit Press. 4--69.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Cynthia B. Cohen (2007). Beyond the Human Neuron Mouse to the NAS Guidelines. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):46 – 49.score: 15.0
  40. Horacio Fabrega Jr (2005). Biological Evolution of Cognition and Culture: Off Arbib's Mirror-Neuron System Stage? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):131-132.score: 15.0
    Arbib offers a comprehensive, elegant formulation of brain/language evolution; with significant implications for social as well as biological sciences. Important psychological antecedents and later correlates are presupposed; their conceptual enrichment through protosign and protospeech is abbreviated in favor of practical communication. What culture “is” and whether protosign and protospeech involve a protoculture are not considered. Arbib also avoids dealing with the question of evolution of mind, consciousness, and self.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Alina Steinhorst & Joachim Funke (2014). Mirror Neuron Activity is No Proof for Action Understanding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.score: 15.0
  42. G. A. Ojemann, J. Ojemann & N. F. Ramsey (2012). Relation Between Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Single Neuron, Local Field Potential (LFP) and Electrocorticography (ECoG) Activity in Human Cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:34-34.score: 15.0
    The relation between changes in the blood oxygen dependent metabolic changes imaged by fMRI and neural events directly recorded from human cortex from single neurons, LFPs and ECoG is critically reviewed, based on the published literature including findings from the authors’ laboratories. All these data are from special populations, usually patients with medically refractory epilepsy, as this provides the major opportunity for direct cortical neuronal recording in humans. For LFP and ECoG changes are often sought in different frequency bands, for (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Victoria Southgate (forthcoming). Does Infant Behaviour Provide Support for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding? Consciousness and Cognition.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. E. Toombs (2003). Harmony, Explanatory Coherence and the Debate Between the Reticular Theory and Neuron Theory of Nerve Cell Structure: Echo's Resolution of a Quiet Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (4):615-632.score: 15.0
    During the latter part of the nineteenth century our description of nerve cell structure underwent a relatively unrecognized, though fundamental, transformation-a quiet revolution of sorts. The central problem facing scientists in neurology (the study of the nervous system) was a related pair: are nerve cells continuous with each other or not, and how is information conducted? Microscope resolution and staining techniques were inadequate at the time to yield definitive proof either way. I contend that explanatory coherence provides a means to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. P. Balaban (1978). “General” or “General Assembly”? On Command Neuron Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1):12.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Christian Keysers, Marc Thioux & Valeria Gazzola (2013). Mirror Neuron System and Social Cognition. In Simon Baron-Cohen, Michael Lombardo & Helen Tager-Flusberg (eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives From Developmental Social Neuroscience. Oup Oxford. 233.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Nikolaas N. Oosterhof, Steven P. Tipper & Paul E. Downing (2013). Crossmodal and Action-Specific: Neuroimaging the Human Mirror Neuron System. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (7):311-318.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Enticott Peter, Fitzgibbon Bernadette & Fitzgerald Paul (2013). The Human Mirror Neuron System: Evolutionary Adaptation or Associative Learning? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 15.0
  49. Michael Briese, Behrooz Esmaeili & David B. Sattelle (2005). Is Spinal Muscular Atrophy the Result of Defects in Motor Neuron Processes? Bioessays 27 (9):946-957.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 276