Search results for 'Neurosciences*' (try it on Scholar)

628 found
Order:
  1. William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.) (2001). Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Blackwell.
    2. Daugman, J. G. Brain metaphor and brain theory 3. Mundale, J. Neuroanatomical Foundations of Cognition: Connecting the Neuronal Level with the Study of Higher Brain Areas.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  2.  21
    Fenna van Nes (2011). Mathematics Education and Neurosciences: Towards Interdisciplinary Insights Into the Development of Young Children's Mathematical Abilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):75-80.
    The Mathematics Education and Neurosciences project is an interdisciplinary research program that bridges mathematics education research with neuroscientific research. The bidirectional collaboration will provide greater insight into young children's (aged four to six years) mathematical abilities. Specifically, by combining qualitative ‘design research’ with quantitative ‘experimental research’, we aim to come to a more thorough understanding of prerequisites that are involved in the development of early spatial and number sense. The mathematics education researchers are concerned with kindergartner's spatial structuring ability, while (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  42
    Tilo Kircher & Anthony S. David (2003). Self-Consciousness: An Integrative Approach From Philosophy, Psychopathology and the Neurosciences. In Tilo Kircher & Anthony S. David (eds.), The Self in Neuroscience and Psychiatry. Cambridge University Press 445-473.
  4.  4
    Christian Poirel (2008). La Neurophilosophie Et la Question de L'Être: Les Neurosciences Et le Déclin Métaphysique de la Pensée. Harmattan.
    Situé à la croisée des sciences humaines et de la recherche neurobiologique, cet essai entend dépasser les clivages conceptuels.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  40
    Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.) (2004). The Cognitive Neurosciences III. MIT Press.
  6.  46
    Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.) (1995). The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press.
  7. E. Tulving & Dans Ms Gazzaniga (1995). The Cognitive Neurosciences. In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  8.  44
    Sabine Müller & Henrik Walter (2010). Reviewing Autonomy: Implications of the Neurosciences and the Free Will Debate for the Principle of Respect for the Patient's Autonomy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):205.
    Beauchamp and Childress have performed a great service by strengthening the principle of respect for the patient's autonomy against the paternalism that dominated medicine until at least the 1970s. Nevertheless, we think that the concept of autonomy should be elaborated further. We suggest such an elaboration built on recent developments within the neurosciences and the free will debate. The reason for this suggestion is at least twofold: First, Beauchamp and Childress neglect some important elements of autonomy. Second, neuroscience itself needs (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9.  44
    Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.) (2000). The New Cognitive Neurosciences: 2nd Edition. MIT Press.
    The majority of the chapters in this edition of The Cognitive Neurosciences are new, and those from the first edition have been completely rewritten and updated ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10.  14
    Antti Revonsuo (2001). On the Nature of Explanation in the Neurosciences. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Wpress 45--69.
  11.  11
    A. Nicolás Venturelli (2016). A Cautionary Contribution to the Philosophy of Explanation in the Cognitive Neurosciences. Minds and Machines 26 (3):259-285.
    I propose a cautionary assessment of the recent debate concerning the impact of the dynamical approach on philosophical accounts of scientific explanation in the cognitive sciences and, particularly, the cognitive neurosciences. I criticize the dominant mechanistic philosophy of explanation, pointing out a number of its negative consequences: In particular, that it doesn’t do justice to the field’s diversity and stage of development, and that it fosters misguided interpretations of dynamical models’ contribution. In order to support these arguments, I analyze a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  79
    William Bechtel, Pete Mandik & Jennifer Mundale (2001). Philosophy Meets the Neurosciences. In William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Blackwell
  13. W. Bechtel (2008). L'épistémologie des données en neurosciences cognitives. In Pierre Poirier & Luc Faucher (eds.), Des Neurones a la Philosophie: Neurophilosophie Et Philosophie des Neurosciences. Éditions Syllepse 91--118.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  53
    Arthur J. Dyck & Carlos Padilla (2009). The Empathic Emotions and Self-Love in Bishop Joseph Butler and the Neurosciences. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (4):577-612.
    In Joseph Butler, we have an account of human beings as moral beings that is, as this essay demonstrates, being supported by the recently emerging findings of the neurosciences. This applies particularly to Butler's portrayal of our empathic emotions. Butler discovered their moral significance for motivating and guiding moral decisions and actions before the neurosciences did. Butler has, in essence, added a sixth sense to our five senses: this is the moral sense by means of which we perceive what we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  54
    Stephan Hartmann (2001). Mechanisms, Coherence, and Theory Choice in the Cognitive Neurosciences. In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press
    Let me first state that I like Antti Revonsuo’s discussion of the various methodological and interpretational problems in neuroscience. It shows how careful and methodologically reflected scientists have to proceed in this fascinating field of research. I have nothing to add here. Furthermore, I am very sympathetic towards Revonsuo’s general proposal to call for a Philosophy of Neuroscience that stresses foundational issues, but also focuses on methodological and explanatory strategies. In a footnote of his paper, Revonsuo complains – as many (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. H. Cruse (2001). The Explanatory Power and Limits of Simulation Models in the Neurosciences. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press 138--154.
  17.  18
    Stephan Hartmann (2001). Mechanisms, Coherence, and Theory Choice in the Cognitive Neurosciences. In Peter Machamer et al (ed.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences.
    Let me first state that I like Antti Revonsuo’s discussion of the various methodological and interpretational problems in neuroscience. It shows how careful and methodologically reflected scientists have to proceed in this fascinating field of research. I have nothing to add here. Furthermore, I am very sympathetic towards Revonsuo’s general proposal to call for a Philosophy of Neuroscience that stresses foundational issues, but also focuses on methodological and explanatory strategies.2 In a footnote of his paper, Revonsuo complains – as many (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Ilya B. Farber & Patricia S. Churchland (1995). Consciousness and the Neurosciences: Philosophical and Theoretical Issues. In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press
  19.  7
    Emily Bell (2015). A Room with a View of Integrity and Professionalism: Personal Reflections on Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research in the Neurosciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):461-469.
    Neuroscientists are increasingly put into situations which demand critical reflection about the ethical and appropriate use of research tools and scientific knowledge. Students or trainees also have to know how to navigate the ethical domains of this context. At a time when neuroscience is expected to advance policy and practice outcomes, in the face of academic pressures and complex environments, the importance of scientific integrity comes into focus and with it the need for training at the graduate level in the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  12
    Felix Thiele & Barbara Hawellek (2008). The Impact of Current Developments in the Neurosciences on the Concept of Psychiatric Diseases. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):1-2.
    The impact of current developments in the neurosciences on the concept of psychiatric diseases Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10202-008-0054-2 Authors Felix Thiele, Europäische Akademie zur Erforschung von Folgen wissenschaftlich-technischer Entwicklungen Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler GmbH Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler Germany Barbara Hawellek, Universität Bonn Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Bonn Germany Journal Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science Online ISSN 1615-6617 Print ISSN 1615-6609 Journal Volume Volume 6 Journal Issue Volume 6, Numbers 1-2.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Steven M. Miller & Trung T. Ngo, Studies of Caloric Vestibular Stimulation: Implications for the Cognitive Neurosciences, the Clinical Neurosciences and Neurophilosophy.
    Objective: Caloric vestibular stimulation has traditionally been used as a tool for neurological diagnosis. More recently, however, it has been applied to a range of phenomena within the cognitive neurosciences. Here, we provide an overview of such studies and review our work using CVS to investigate the neural mechanisms of a visual phenomenon - binocular rivalry. We outline the interhemispheric switch model of rivalry supported by this work and its extension to a metarivalry model of interocular-grouping phenomena. In addition, studies (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  12
    Jürgen Zielasek & Wolfgang Gaebel (2008). Modularity in Philosophy, the Neurosciences, and Psychiatry. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):93-108.
    The neurosciences are generating new findings regarding genetic and neurobiological aspects of the pathophysiology of mental disorders. Especially, certain genetic risk factors like neuregulin-1 seem to predispose individuals to a psychotic phenotype beyond the limits of traditional classificatory boundaries between organic psychoses in Alzheimer’s disease, bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia. Little, however, is known about how such genetic risk factors actually confer an increased risk for psychosis in an individual patient. A gap between neuroscientific findings and psychopathological phenomena exists. The (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  4
    Grigoris Vaslamatzis (2007). Framework for a New Dialogue Between Psychoanalysis and Neurosciences: Is the Combined Neuro-Psychoanalytic Approach the Missing Link? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):25-.
    Freud's legacy deriving from his work The project for a scientific psychology (1895) could give a new impetus to the dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences. A rapproachment phase is warrented. Based on the work of psychoanalysts who are themselves neuroscientists (such as Mauro Mancia, Martha Koukkou and Harold Shevrin) or have a long term dialogue with neuroscientists (Arnold Modell), three points of epistemological congruence are described: dualism is no longer a satisfactory solutioncautions for the centrality of interpretation (hermeneutics)the self-criticism of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  2
    Alfredo Pereira Jr (2007). What The Cognitive Neurosciences Mean To Me. Mens Sana Monographs 5 (1):158.
    _Cognitive Neuroscience is an interdisciplinary area of research that combines measurement of brain activity (mostly by means of neuroimaging) with a simultaneous performance of cognitive tasks by human subjects. These investigations have been successful in the task of connecting the sciences of the brain (Neurosciences) and the sciences of the mind (Cognitive Sciences). Advances on this kind of research provide a map of localization of cognitive functions in the human brain. Do these results help us to understand how mind relates (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. G. M. Shepherd (1995). The Cognitive Neurosciences. In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press 105--102.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Sigrid Schmitz & Grit Hã¶Ppner (2014). Neurofeminism and Feminist Neurosciences: A Critical Review of Contemporary Brain Research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  27. Michael Gazzaniga (ed.) (2009). The Cognitive Neurosciences IV.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  83
    Lukas van Oudenhove & Stefaan E. Cuypers (2010). The Philosophical "Mind-Body Problem" and Its Relevance for the Relationship Between Psychiatry and the Neurosciences. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):545-557.
    Psychiatry is a discipline on the border between the biomedical sciences on the one hand and the humanities and social sciences (most notably psychology and anthropology) on the other. This unique position undoubtedly contributes to the attractiveness of psychiatry as a medical specialism for many young doctors, but it also causes significant problems. Unlike other medical disciplines, in which the definitions of diseases are based on objective, measurable pathophysiological underpinnings, psychiatric diagnosis and classification has been based on descriptions of inherently (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  12
    P. Janich (2003). Human Nature and Neurosciences: A Methodical Cultural Criticism of Naturalism in the Neurosciences. Poiesis and Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science 2 (1):29-40.
  30.  49
    James B. Ashbrook (1996). Interfacing Religion and the Neurosciences: A Review of Twenty-Five Years of Exploration and Reflection. [REVIEW] Zygon 31 (4):545-572.
  31.  2
    Frank W. Stahnisch (2009). Transforming the Lab: Technological and Societal Concerns in the Pursuit of De- and Regeneration in the German Morphological Neurosciences, 1910–1930. [REVIEW] Medicine Studies 1 (1):41-54.
    This paper focuses on the make-up of different cultures in experimental neurology, neuroanatomy, and clinical psychiatry. These cultures served as important research bases for early regenerative concepts and projects in the area of neurology and psychiatry at the beginning of the 20th century. Nevertheless, the developments in brain research and clinical neurology cannot be regarded to be isolated from broader societal developments, as the discourses on social de- and regeneration, neurasthenia, nerve-weakness and experiences of the brain-injured after WWI show. Societal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  4
    Michael Hagner & Cornelius Borck (2001). Mindful Practices: On the Neurosciences in the Twentieth Century. Science in Context 14 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33. Reiner Hedrich (2001). The Naturalization of Epistemology and the Neurosciences. Epistemologia 24 (2):271-300.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  8
    Laura Pignatel & Olivier Oullier (2014). Les neurosciences dans le droit. Cités 60 (4):83.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  4
    Éric Racine (2005). Pourquoi et comment doit-on tenir compte des neurosciences en éthique? Esquisse d'une approche neurophilosophique émergentiste et interdisciplinaire. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 61 (1):77-105.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  45
    Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.) (2001). Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press.
  37.  5
    Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.) (2001). Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
  38.  2
    Pascale Gillot (2016). Les neurosciences cognitives : un « matérialisme cartésien »? Cités 65 (1):157.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  2
    Thomas Rabeyron & Tianna Loose (2015). Anomalous Experiences, Trauma, and Symbolization Processes at the Frontiers Between Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Neurosciences. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  6
    G. Sommerhoff & Karl F. MacDorman (1994). An Account of Consciousness in Physical and Functional Terms: A Target for Research in the Neurosciences. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 29:151-81.
  41.  60
    Don Gustafson (2007). Neurosciences of Action and Noncausal Theories. Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):367–374.
    Recent neuroscience and psychology of behavior have suggested that conscious decisions may have no causal role in the etiology of intentional action. Such results pose a threat to traditional philosophical analyses of action. On such views beliefs, desires and conscious willing are part of the causal structure of intentional action. But if the suggestions from neuroscience/psychology are correct, analyses of this kind are wrong. Conscious antecedents of action are epiphenomenal. This essay explores this consequence. It also notes that the traditional (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Mario De Caro (2010). 10 Is Emergentism Refuted by the Neurosciences? In Antonella Corradini & Timothy O'Connor (eds.), Emergence in Science and Philosophy. Routledge 190.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Evan Thompson (2006). The Neurosciences and Religion. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  21
    Warren T. Reich (2012). From Ancient Consolation and Negative Care to Modern Empathy and the Neurosciences. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):25-32.
    A historical understanding of the virtue of consolation, as contrasted to empathy, compassion, or sympathy, is developed. Recent findings from neuroscience are presented which support and affirm this understanding. These findings are related to palliative care and its current practice in bioethics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. F. G. Worden, J. P. Swazey & G. Adelman (eds.) (1975). The Neurosciences: Paths of Discovery. MIT Press.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46.  32
    Birgitta Dresp (1999). The Cognitive Impenetrability Hypothesis: Doomsday for the Unity of the Cognitive Neurosciences? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):375-376.
    The heuristic value of Pylyshyn's cognitive impenetrability theory is questioned in this commentary, mainly because, as it stands, the key argument cannot be challenged empirically. Pylyshyn requires unambiguous evidence for an effect of cognitive states on early perceptual mechanisms, which is impossible to provide because we can only infer what might happen at these earlier levels of processing on the basis of evidence collected at the post-perceptual stage. Furthermore, the theory that early visual processes cannot be modified by cognitive states (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    Edna Andrews (2015). The Importance of Lotmanian Semiotics to Sign Theory and the Cognitive Neurosciences. Sign Systems Studies 43 (2/3):347.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    Lionel Naccache (2014). Neurosciences et sciences humaines : une relation à inventer. Cités 60 (4):17.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  4
    Franck Ramus (2014). Les Neurosciences, Un Épouvantail Bien Commode. Cités 60 (4):53.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  4
    Jérôme Sackur (2014). Les Neurosciences Cognitives, Sciences Naturelles de l'Esprit : Révolution Ou Restauration? Cités 60 (4):71.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 628