Search results for 'New Natural Law' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. N. MacCormick & Natural Law (1992). Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. In Robert P. George (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2.  40
    Joshua D. Goldstein (2011). New Natural Law Theory and the Grounds of Marriage. Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):461-482.
    New natural lawyers--notably Grisez, Finnis, and George--have written much on civil marriage's moral boundaries and grounds, but with slight influence. The peripheral place of the new natural law theory (NNLT) results from the marital grounds they suggest and the exclusionary moral conclusions they draw from them. However, I argue a more authentic and attractive NNLT account of marriage is recoverable through overlooked resources within the theory itself: friendship and moral self-constitution. This reconstructed account allows us to identify the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  76
    Nicholas Bamforth (2008). Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender: A Critique of New Natural Law. Cambridge University Press.
    Fundamentalist forms of religion today claim authority everywhere, including the debates over the politics and constitutional law of liberal democracies. This book examines this general question through its critical evaluation of a recent school of thought: that of the new natural lawyers. The new natural lawyers are the lawyers of the current Vatical hierarchy, polemically concerned to defend its retrograde views on matters of sexuality and gender in terms of arguments that, in fact, notably lack the philosophical rigor (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4.  31
    Matthew B. O'Brien & Robert C. Koons (2012). Objects of Intention: A Hylomorphic Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):655-703.
    The “New Natural Law” Theory (NNL) of Germain Grisez, John Finnis, Joseph Boyle, and their collaborators offers a distinctive account of intentional action, which underlies a moral theory that aims to justify many aspects of traditional morality and Catholic doctrine. -/- In fact, we show that the NNL is committed to premises that entail the permissibility of many actions that are irreconcilable with traditional morality and Catholic doctrine, such as elective abortions. These consequences follow principally from two aspects of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. David S. Oderberg & T. D. J. Chappell (eds.) (2004). Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law. Palgrave Macmillan.
    In recent decades, the revival of natural law theory in modern moral philosophy has been an exciting and important development. Human Values brings together an international group of moral philosophers who in various respects share the aims and ideals of natural law ethics. In their diverse ways, these authors make distinctive and original contributions to the continuing project of developing natural law ethics as a comprehensive treatment of modern ethical theory and practice.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  6
    Santiago Legarre (forthcoming). HLA Hart and the Making of the New Natural Law Theory. Jurisprudence:1-17.
    This article considers HLA Hart's influence in the making of John Finnis's book Natural Law and Natural Rights. In the style of an intellectual biography it traces the history of the interaction between the two Oxford legal philosophers using their correspondence as a starting point. It also delves into Finnis's years in Africa—a period of his life both crucial for the writing of the book and utterly unknown. It argues that Hart's role was significant not only insofar as (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Bernard G. Prusak (2008). What Kant Reconstructed Brings to Aquinas Reconstructed; Or, Why and How the New Natural Law Needs to Be Extended. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:99-113.
    The thesis of this paper is that the new natural law has reason to try to integrate Kant’s ethics, not reject it. My argument breaks into two parts. First I provide a critical account of the new natural law, taking as my exemplar of this theory Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle, and John Finnis’s 1987 article “Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends.” My criticism in the end is that the new natural law is vulnerable to much the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  11
    James Farr (2008). Locke, Natural Law, and New World Slavery. Political Theory 36 (4):495 - 522.
    This essay systematically reformulates an earlier argument about Locke and new world slavery, adding attention to Indians, natural law, and Locke's reception. Locke followed Grotian natural law in constructing a just-war theory of slavery. Unlike Grotius, though, he severely restricted the theory, making it inapplicable to America. It only fit resistance to "absolute power" in Stuart England. Locke was nonetheless an agent of British colonialism who issued instructions governing slavery. Yet they do not inform his theory--or vice versa. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Edward B. McLean (ed.) (2000). Common Truths: New Perspectives on Natural Law. Isi Books.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Stephen Macedo (2001). Against the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law. In Robert George (ed.), Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays. OUP Oxford
  11.  30
    Bebhinn Donnelly (2006). The Epistemic Connection Between Nature and Value in New and Traditional Natural Law Theory. Law and Philosophy 25 (1):1-29.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  16
    Henry B. Veatch (1988). A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. New Scholasticism 62 (3):353-365.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  13
    Germain Grisez (1988). A Critique of Russell Hittinger's Book, A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. New Scholasticism 62 (4):438-465.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Steven A. Long (2013). Fundamental Errors of the New Natural Law Theory. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):105-132.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  14
    Todd A. Salzman & Michael G. Lawler (2006). New Natural Law Theory and Foundational Sexual Ethical Principles: A Critique and a Proposal. Heythrop Journal 47 (2):182–205.
  16.  27
    Jeremy R. Garrett (2008). Why the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law Undermines Traditional Marriage. Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):591-622.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  18
    K. J. Pavlischek (1999). Questioning the New Natural Law Theory: The Case of Religious Liberty as Defended By Robert P. George in Making Men Moral. Studies in Christian Ethics 12 (2):17-30.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Christopher Tollefsen (2008). The New Natural Law Theory. Lyceum 10.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Michael Pakaluk (2013). Is the New Natural Law Thomistic? The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):57-68.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Kevin L. Flannery (2013). Thomas Aquinas and the New Natural Law Theory on the Object of the Human Act. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):79-104.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  12
    Jennifer A. Herdt (1998). Free Choice, Self-Referential Arguments, and the New Natural Law. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (4):581-600.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  13
    Ernest L. Fortin (1989). A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. Review of Metaphysics 42 (4):838-841.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  3
    J. Goldsworthy (1996). Fact and Value in the New Natural Law Theory. American Journal of Jurisprudence 41 (1):21-46.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Fulvio De Blasi (2013). The Role of God in the New Natural Law Theory. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (1):35-46.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. J. L. A. Garcia (2001). Topics in the New Natural Law Theory. American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (1):51-73.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. F. Russell Hittinger (1989). A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  3
    Joshua D. Goldstein & Robin Blake (2015). A New Natural Law Account of Sexuate Selfhood and Rape's Harm. Heythrop Journal 56 (5):734-750.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  11
    David Gordon (1989). A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (1):103-106.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  2
    G. V. Bradley (1994). The New Natural Law Theory: A Reply to Jean Porter. American Journal of Jurisprudence 39 (1):303-315.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  2
    R. P. George (1996). A Defense of the New Natural Law Theory. American Journal of Jurisprudence 41 (1):47-61.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    R. A. Connor (1988). A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. By Russell Hittinger. University of Notre Dame Press, 1987. 232 Pp. [REVIEW] American Journal of Jurisprudence 33 (1):250-256.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Jude Chua (2007). Employing Zen Methods to Teach New Natural Law Theory. Philosophical Practice 3.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Maria Maddalena Giungi (2011). Robet P. George and New Natural Law Theory: A New Rota for the Idea of Natural Law. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 103 (2):273-297.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. L. Huppes (2007). Toward a Theory of New Natural Law as a Basis for Future Legal Postivism. In Josep J. Moreso (ed.), Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. Franz Steiner Verlag
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. K. M. Staley (1993). New Natural Law, Old Natural Law, or the Same Natural Law? American Journal of Jurisprudence 38 (1):109-133.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  6
    Daniel Attas & Fragmenting Property (2006). Bebhinn Donnelly/the Epistemic Connection Between Nature and Value in New and Traditional Natural Law Theory 1–29 Re'em Segev/Justification, Rationality and Mistake: Mistake of Law is No Excuse? It Might Be a Justification! 31–79. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 25:673-674.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  38
    Erik A. Anderson (2013). A Defense of the 'Sterility Objection' to the New Natural Lawyers' Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):759-775.
    The “new natural lawyers” (NNLs) are a prolific group of philosophers, theologians, and political theorists that includes John Finnis, Robert George, Patrick Lee, Gerard Bradley, and Germain Grisez, among others. These thinkers have devoted themselves to developing and defending a traditional sexual ethic according to which homosexual sexual acts are immoral per se and marriage ought to remain an exclusively heterosexual institution. The sterility objection holds that the NNLs are guilty of making an arbitrary and irrational distinction between same-sex (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  38.  46
    M. Caputi (2008). Books in Review: Psychology and the Natural Law of Reparation, by C. Fred Alford. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 171 Pp. $75.00. [REVIEW] Political Theory 37 (2):313-315.
  39.  14
    Philip L. Quinn (2002). Robert P. George, Ed., Natural Law and Moral Inquiry: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Politics in the Work of Germain Grisez and Edward B. McLean, Common Truths: New Perspectives on Natural Law:Natural Law and Moral Inquiry: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Politics in the Work of Germain Grisez;Common Truths: New Perspectives on Natural Law. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (2):381-384.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    J. D. Eusden (1960). Natural Law and Covenant Theology in New England, 1620-1670. American Journal of Jurisprudence 5 (1):1-30.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  2
    T. Broden (1961). The Natural Law Reader. Edited by Brendan F. Brown. New York City: Oceana Publishers, 1960. Pp. X, 229. $3.50. American Journal of Jurisprudence 6 (1):159-161.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    M. J. Langford (1968). New Approaches to Natural Law. Religious Studies 4 (1):153.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. J. Farr (2008). Locke, Natural Law, and New World Slavery. Political Theory 36 (4):495-522.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Maria Maddalena Giungi (2011). Robert P. George and New Natural Theory: A New Route for the Concept of Natural Law (II). Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 103 (3):497-516.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Germain Grisez (1966). A New Formulation of a Natural-Law Argument Against Contraception. The Thomist 30 (4):343.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Carlos Ignacio Massini Correas (1999). The New School of Natural Law: Some Approaches. Rechtstheorie 30 (4):461-478.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. C. Newell (2005). Book Review: Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law. [REVIEW] Nursing Ethics 12 (5):545-546.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Brian Traska (2015). The Perspective of Love: Natural Law in a New Mode. By R.J. Snell. Pp. Xii, 207, Eugene, OR, Pickwick Publications, 2014, $24.00. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 56 (3):493-494.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  19
    Peter Seipel (2015). Aquinas and the Natural Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (1):28-50.
    Recent decades have seen a shift away from the traditional view that Aquinas's theory of the natural law is meant to supply us with normative guidance grounded in a substantive theory of human nature. In the present essay, I argue that this is a mistake. Expanding on the suggestions of Jean Porter and Ralph McInerny, I defend a derivationist reading of ST I-II, Q. 94, A. 2 according to which Aquinas takes our knowledge of the genuine goods of human (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    Desmond Henry, Hilary Gatti, Laura Benítez & Richard Ashcraft (1995). Review of The Logic of Gersonides, a Translation of Sefer Ha-Heggesh Ha-Yashar of Rabbi Levi Ben Gershom with Introduction, Commentary, and Analytical Glossary by Charles H. Manekin. New Synthese Historical Library, Vol. 40 , Xii + 341 Pp. ISBN 0-7923-1513-8; Luigi Firpo: Il Processo di Giordano Bruno . Pp. Xxvii + 378. Hardback Only: 44,000 Liras. ISBN 88-8402-135-9.; Anthony Kenny: Descartes. A Study of His Philosophy 256 Pp. 9.99 ISBN 1 85506 236 4; A. John Simmons: The Lockean Theory of Rights , Pp. Ix, 387. £30.00. ISBN 0-691-08630-3; Ross Hutchison: Locke in France 1688-1734. The Voltaire Foundation Pp. 251. 46.00. ISBN 0-7294-0418-8; Thomas Reid: Practical Ethics: Being Lectures and Papers on Natural Religion, Self-Government, Natural Jurisprudence, and the Law of Nations Edited From the Manuscripts with an Introduction and a Commentary by Knud Haakonssen , Pp. Xvi + 556. £40.00. ISBN 0-691-07350-3; The Cambridge Companion to Kant Ed. Paul Guyer , Pp. Xii + 482 £40 Hardback, £12. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1):161-207.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000