108 found
Order:
  1.  45
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1996). Plato's Socrates. OUP Usa.
    This book develops novel accounts of many of the most controversial topics in the philosophy of Socrates. The authors first develop Socrates' methodological, epistemological, and psychological views before examining his ethical, political, and religious convictions. The results reveals both the richness and the remarkable coherence of the philosophy of Plato's Socrates.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  2. Nicholas D. Smith (1999). Plato's Analogy of Soul and State. Journal of Ethics 3 (1):31-49.
    In Part I of this paper, I argue that the arguments Plato offers for the tripartition of the soul are founded upon an equivocation, and that each of the valid options by which Plato might remove the equivocation will not produce a tripartite soul. In Part II, I argue that Plato is not wholly committed to an analogy of soul and state that would require either a tripartite state or a tripartite soul for the analogy to hold. It follows that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  4
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1990). Socrates on Trial. Princeton University Press.
    Thomas Brickhouse and Nicholas Smith offer a comprehensive historical and philosophical interpretation of, and commentary on, one of Plato's most widely read works, the Apology of Socrates. Virtually every modern interpretation characterizes some part of what Socrates says in the Apology as purposefully irrelevant or even antithetical to convincing the jury to acquit him at his trial. This book, by contrast, argues persuasively that Socrates offers a sincere and well-reasoned defense against the charges he faces. First, the authors establish a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  4.  25
    Nicholas D. Smith (2013). Philosophical Reflection on Petitionary Prayer. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):309-317.
    If God actually answers prayers that petition him for something, then it seems he is willing to withhold some good from the world unless and until someone prays for those goods. But how is this compatible with His benevolence? On the other hand, if God is dedicated to providing every good to us that we may need, it would seem that He would provide these to us even if we did not pray for them. But if so, it would appear (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  14
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2013). Persuade Or Obey. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 19:69-83.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Nicholas D. Smith (1983). Plato and Aristotle on the Nature of Women. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (4):467-478.
  7.  41
    Hannah Tierney & Nicholas D. Smith (2012). Keith Lehrer on the Basing Relation. Philosophical Studies 161 (1):27-36.
    In this paper, we review Keith Lehrer’s account of the basing relation, with particular attention to the two cases he offered in support of his theory, Raco (Lehrer, Theory of knowledge, 1990; Theory of knowledge, (2nd ed.), 2000) and the earlier case of the superstitious lawyer (Lehrer, The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 311–313, 1971). We show that Lehrer’s examples succeed in making his case that beliefs need not be based on the evidence, in order to be justified. These cases (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  62
    Nicholas D. Smith (1996). Plato's Divided Line. Ancient Philosophy 16 (1):25-46.
  9.  1
    Nicholas D. Smith (2010). Partnership with God: A Partial Solution to the Problem of Petitionary Prayer: NICHOLAS D. SMITH & ANDREW C. YIP. Religious Studies 46 (3):395-410.
    Why would God make us ask for some good He might supply, and why would it be right for God to withhold that good unless and until we asked for it? We explain why present defences of petitionary prayer are insufficient, but argue that a world in which God makes us ask for some goods and then supplies them in response to our petitions adds value to the world that would not be available in worlds in which God simply supplied (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  21
    Nicholas D. Smith & Andrew C. Yip (2010). Partnership with God: A Partial Solution to the Problem of Petitionary Prayer. Religious Studies 46 (3):395 - 410.
    Why would God make us ask for some good He might supply, and why would it be right for God to withhold that good unless and until we asked for it? We explain why present defences of petitionary prayer are insufficient, but argue that a world in which God makes us ask for some goods and then supplies them in response to our petitions adds value to the world that would not be available in worlds in which God simply supplied (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1984). Vlastos on the Elenchus'. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2:185-96.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  73
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1997). Socrates and the Unity of the Virtues. Journal of Ethics 1 (4):311-324.
    In the Protagoras, Socrates argues that each of the virtue-terms refers to one thing (: 333b4). But in the Laches (190c8–d5, 199e6–7), Socrates claims that courage is a proper part of virtue as a whole, and at Euthyphro 11e7–12e2, Socrates says that piety is a proper part of justice. But A cannot be both identical to B and also a proper part of B – piety cannot be both identical to justice and also a proper part of justice. In this (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13. Rachana Kamtekar, Mark McPherran, P. T. Geach, S. Marc Cohen, Gregory Vlastos, E. De Strycker, S. R. Slings, Donald Morrison, Terence Irwin, M. F. Burnyeat, Thomas C. Brickhouse, Nicholas D. Smith, Richard Kraut, David Bostock & Verity Harte (2004). Plato's Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito: Critical Essays. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Plato's Euthyrphro, Apology, andCrito portray Socrates' words and deeds during his trial for disbelieving in the Gods of Athens and corrupting the Athenian youth, and constitute a defense of the man Socrates and of his way of life, the philosophic life. The twelve essays in the volume, written by leading classical philosophers, investigate various aspects of these works of Plato, including the significance of Plato's characters, Socrates's revolutionary religious ideas, and the relationship between historical events and Plato's texts.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  24
    Nicholas D. Smith (2004). Did Plato Write the "Alcibiades I?". Apeiron 37 (2):93 - 108.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  15.  73
    Nicholas D. Smith (2000). Plato on Knowledge as a Power. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):145-168.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1987). Socrates on Goods, Virtue, and Happiness'. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5:1-27.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  91
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2007). Socrates on How Wrongdoing Damages the Soul. Journal of Ethics 11 (4):337 - 356.
    There has been little scholarly attention given to explaining exactly how and why Socrates thinks that wrongdoing damages the soul. But there is more than a simple gap in the literature here, we shall argue. The most widely accepted view of Socratic moral psychology, we claim, actually leaves this well-known feature of Socrates’ philosophy absolutely inexplicable. In the first section of this paper, we rehearse this view of Socratic moral psychology, and explain its inadequacy on the issue of the damaging (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  20
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1984). Socrates and Obedience to the Law. Apeiron 18 (1):10 - 18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19. Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2009). Socratic Teaching and Socratic Method. In Harvey Siegel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2007). Socrates on Akrasia, Knowledge, and the Power of Appearance. In Christopher Bobonich & Pierre Destrée (eds.), Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus. Brill 1--18.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  6
    Nicholas D. Smith (2014). Sons and Fathers in Plato’s Euthyphro and Crito. Ancient Philosophy 34 (1):1-13.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  13
    Nicholas D. Smith (1993). Socrates. Ancient Philosophy 13 (2):169-176.
  23.  51
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1985). The Formal Charges Against Socrates. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (4):457-481.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (eds.) (2002). The Trial and Execution of Socrates: Sources and Controversies. Oxford University Press.
    Socrates is one of the most important yet enigmatic philosophers of all time; his fame has endured for centuries despite the fact that he never actually wrote anything. In 399 B.C.E., he was tried on the charge of impiety by the citizens of Athens, convicted by a jury, and sentenced to death (ordered to drink poison derived from hemlock). About these facts there is no disagreement. However, as the sources collected in this book and the scholarly essays that follow them (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  14
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1984). The Paradox of Socratic Ignorance in Plato's Apology. History of Philosophy Quarterly 1 (2):125 - 131.
  26.  4
    Nicholas D. Smith (1980). The Various Equals at Plato's Phaedo 74b-C. Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1):1-7.
  27. Richard Bett, Christopher Bobonich, David Bostock, Eric A. Brown, John M. Cooper, Dorothea Frede, David Gallop, Jonathan Lear, Nicholas D. Smith, Thomas M. Robinson, Christopher Shields, C. C. W. Taylor, Cass Weller & Bernard Williams (2001). Essays on Plato's Psychology. Lexington Books.
    The last several decades have witnessed an explosion of research in Platonic philosophy. A central focus of his philosophical effort, Plato's psychology is of interest both in its own right and as fundamental to his metaphysical and moral theories. This anthology offers, for the first time, a collection of the best classic and recent essays on cenral topics of Plato's psychological theory, including essays on the nature of the soul, studies of the tripartite soul for which Plato argues in the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  23
    Nicholas D. Smith & Paul Woodruff (eds.) (2000). Reason and Religion in Socratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    This volume brings together mostly previously unpublished studies by prominent historians, classicists, and philosophers on the roles and effects of religion in Socratic philosophy and on the trial of Socrates. Among the contributors are Thomas C. Brickhouse, Asli Gocer, Richard Kraut, Mark L. McPherran, Robert C. T. Parker, C. D. C. Reeve, Nicholas D. Smith, Gregory Vlastos, Stephen A. White, and Paul B. Woodruff.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  4
    Nicholas D. Smith (2009). Thomas C. Brickhouse And. In Harvey Siegel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press 177.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2005). Plato and The Trial of Socrates. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 67 (2):348-351.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  25
    Nicholas D. Smith (1981). The Objects of "Dianoia" in Plato's Divided Line. Apeiron 15 (2):129 - 137.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Nicholas D. Smith (1989). A Matter of Life and Death in Socratic Philosophy. Ancient Philosophy 9 (2):155-165.
  33.  18
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2012). Reply to Rowe. Journal of Ethics 16 (3):325-338.
    In our reply to Rowe, we explain why most of what he criticizes is actually the product of his misunderstanding our argument. We begin by showing that nearly all of his Part 1 misconceives our project by defending a position we never attacked. We then question why Rowe thinks the distinction we make between motivational and virtue intellectualism is unimportant before developing a defense of the consistency of our views about different desires. Next we turn to Rowe’s criticisms of our (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  25
    Nicholas D. Smith (1979). Knowledge by Acquaintance and 'Knowing What' in Plato's Republic. Dialogue 18 (3):281-288.
  35.  6
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2008). Is the Prudential Paradox in the Meno? Philosophical Inquiry 30 (3-4):175-184.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  7
    James Bohman, Thomas C. Brickhouse, Nicholas D. Smith, Alan Brinkley, Tex Waco, James M. Buchanan, Richard A. Musgrave, John D. Caputo, Michael J. Scanlon & Christopher Cox (2001). G. John M. Abbarno, The Ethics of Homelessness. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999, 258 Pp.(Indexed). ISBN 90-420-0777-X, $22.00 (Pb). Robert B. Baker, Arthur L. Caplan, Linda L. Emanuel and Stephen R. Latham, Eds., The American Medical Ethics Revolution. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999, 396 Pp.(Indexed). ISBN 0-8018-6170. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 35:285-289.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    Nicholas D. Smith (1983). The Origin of Socrates' Mission. Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (4):657.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  28
    Nicholas D. Smith (1979). An Argument for the Definition of Justice in Plato's Republic (433e6–434a1). Philosophical Studies 35 (4):373 - 383.
    My interpretation of the argument, then, fully generalized, is this:To do one's own is to act in such a way as to aim for each having his own.For each to have his own is justice(h) and to act in such a way as to aim for justice(h) is justice(d).Therefore, the having of one's own is justice(h) and the doing of one's own is justice(d).The advantage of this view is that it, unlike that of Vlastos, does not need to supply problematic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  17
    Nicholas D. Smith (1999). Images, Education, and Paradox in Plato's "Republic". Apeiron 32 (4):125 - 141.
    In this paper, I consider Plato's persistent and ubiquitous uses of imagery in the Republic, and compare his uses of images with what he says about the uses (and abuses) of imagery in the curricula he proposes for the kallipolis. I show how the dialogue itself might be suited to different levels of the proposed curricula--especially for those at the level of thought (dianoia)--but conclude that the dialogue was not intended to fit into the educational schemes of the 'kallipolis', but (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  7
    Nicholas D. Smith (2008). Socrates in the Apology. Ancient Philosophy 11 (2):399 - 407.
  41.  15
    Nicholas D. Smith (2002). Incurable Souls in Socratic Psychology. Ancient Philosophy 22 (1):21-36.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  25
    Nicholas D. Smith (2001). Some Thoughts About the Origins of ``Greek Ethics''. Journal of Ethics 5 (1):3-20.
    In this paper, I argue that several of the main issues that became a focus for classical Greek philosophy were initially framed by Homer. In particular, Homer identifies a tension between justice and individual excellence, and problematizes the connection between the heroic conception of excellence and ``eudaimonia'''' (happiness). The later philosophers address the problems raised in Homer by profoundly transforming the way each of these terms was to be conceived.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  16
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2005). Socrates' "Daimonion" and Rationality. Apeiron 38 (2):43 - 62.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  7
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1982). Socrates' Proposed Penalty in Plato's Apology. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 64 (1):1-18.
  45.  13
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (2012). Response to Critics. Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):234-248.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    Alexis Mourenza & Nicholas D. Smith (2012). Knowledge Is Sexy. Philo 14 (1):43-58.
    Philosophers’ appeals to the processes of natural selection that are adaptive in terms of survival provide an incomplete picture of what naturalists have available to them to make the sort of defense skeptics claim cannot be made. To supplement this picture, we provide evidence from what Darwin called “sexual selection” and also what others now call “social selection” to provide a more complete picture of why it is reasonable to suppose that evolution has supplied human beings and many other animals (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  23
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1990). What Makes Socrates a Good Man? Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2):169-179.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  14
    Nicholas D. Smith (1991). Socrates in the Apology: An Essay on Plato's Apology of Socrates. Ancient Philosophy 11 (2):399-407.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  13
    Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith (1997). The Problem of Punishment in Socratic Philosophy. Apeiron 30 (4):95 - 107.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  12
    Nicholas D. Smith & Thomas Brickhouse (1983). Justice and Dishonesty in Plato's Republic. Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):79-95.
    In this paper we explore plato's paradoxical remarks about the philosophical rulers' use of dishonesty in the "republic"--Rulers who, On the one hand, Are said to love truth above all else, But on the other hand are encouraged to make frequent use of "medicinal lies." we establish first that plato's remarks are in fact consistent, According to the relevant platonic theories too often forgotten by both critics and defenders of plato. Finally, We reformulate the underlying moral issue of the purported (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 108