5 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Nicholas K Jones (University of Birmingham)
  1. Nicholas K. Jones (2014). Realism Behind the Veil. Analysis 74 (4):721-730.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Will Bynoe & Nicholas K. Jones (2013). Solitude Without Souls: Why Peter Unger Hasn't Established Substance Dualism. [REVIEW] Philosophia 41 (1):109-125.
    Unger has recently argued that if you are the only thinking and experiencing subject in your chair, then you are not a material object. This leads Unger to endorse a version of Substance Dualism according to which we are immaterial souls. This paper argues that this is an overreaction. We argue that the specifically Dualist elements of Unger’s view play no role in his response to the problem; only the view’s structure is required, and that is available to Unger’s opponents. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Nicholas K. Jones (2013). The Universe As We Find It. By John Heil. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253):839-841.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Nicholas K. Jones (2013). The Universe As We Find It. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253):839-841.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nicholas K. Jones (2011). Williams on Supervaluationism and Logical Revisionism. Journal of Philosophy 108 (11):633-641.
    Central to discussion of supervaluationist accounts of vagueness is the extent to which they require revisions of classical logic and if so, whether those revisions are objectionable. In an important recent Journal of Philosophy article, J.R.G. Williams presents a powerful challenge to the orthodox view that supervaluationism is objectionably revisionary. Williams argues both that supervaluationism is non-revisionary and that even if it were, those revisions would be unobjectionable. This note shows that his arguments for both claims fail.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation