Search results for 'Niels Halberg' (try it on Scholar)

418 found
Sort by:
  1. Egon Noe, Niels Halberg & Jens Reddersen (2005). Indicators of Biodiversity and Conservational Wildlife Quality on Danish Organic Farms for Use in Farm Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Indicator Development and Testing. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):383-414.score: 240.0
    Organic farming is expected to contribute to conserving national biodiversity on farms, especially remnant, old, and undisturbed small biotopes, forests, and permanent grassland. This objective cannot rely on the legislation of organic farming solely, and to succeed, farmers need to understand the goals behind it. A set of indicators with the purpose of facilitating dialogues between expert and farmer on wildlife quality has been developed and tested on eight organic farms. “Weed cover in cereal fields,” was used as an indicator (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Franz Halberg, Germaine Cornélissen & Barbara Schack (2004). Self-Experimentation Chronomics for Health Surveillance and Science; Also Transdisciplinary Civic Duty? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):267-269.score: 30.0
    Self-surveillance and self-experimentation are of concern to everyone interested in finding out the factors that increase one's risk of stroke from.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. N. Halberg, E. Steen Kristensen & I. Sillebak Kristensen (1995). Nitrogen Turnover on Organic and Conventional Mixed Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (1):30-51.score: 30.0
    Separate focus on crop fertilization or feeding practices inadequately describes nitrogen (N) loss from mixed dairy farms because of (1) interaction between animal and crop production and between the production system and the manager, and (2) uncertainties of herd N production and crop N utilization. Therefore a systems approach was used to study N turnover and N efficiency on 16 conventional and 14 organic private Danish farms with mixed animal (dairy) and crop production. There were significant differences in N surplus (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. [deleted]Birbaumer Niels (2008). Measure of Neurofeedback Effects in an fMRI Brain-Computer Interface with Support Vector Machine and Granger Causality Model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2.score: 30.0
  5. Margareta Halberg (1989). Feminist Epistemology: An Impossible Project. Radical Philosophy 53:3-7.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. [deleted]Birbaumer Niels (2008). On-Line BCI Driven Orthosis for Stroke Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2.score: 30.0
  7. [deleted]Birbaumer Niels (2008). The Role of Theta Event-Related Synchronization During Prospective Memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2.score: 30.0
  8. Don Howard (1994). What Makes a Classical Concept Classical? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. In Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 201--230.score: 21.0
    Niels Bohr, 19231 “There must be quite definite and clear grounds, why you repeatedly declare that one must interpret observations classically, which lie absolute ly in thei r essenc e. . . . It must belong to your deepest conviction—and I cannot understand on what you base it.”.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Slobodan Perovic (2013). Emergence of Complementarity and the Baconian Roots of Niels Bohr's Method. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 44 (3):162-173.score: 21.0
    I argue that instead of a rather narrow focus on N. Bohr's account of complementarity as a particular and perhaps obscure metaphysical or epistemological concept (or as being motivated by such a concept), we should consider it to result from pursuing a particular method of studying physical phenomena. More precisely, I identify a strong undercurrent of Baconian method of induction in Bohr's work that likely emerged during his experimental training and practice. When its development is analyzed in light of Baconian (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Honner (1987). The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    Niels Bohr, founding father of modern atomic physics and quantum theory, was as original a philosopher as he was a physicist. This study explores several dimensions of Bohr's vision: the formulation of quantum theory and the problems associated with its interpretation, the notions of complementarity and correspondence, the debates with Einstein about objectivity and realism, and his sense of the infinite harmony of nature. Honner focuses on Bohr's epistemological lesson, the conviction that all our description of nature is dependent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ravi Gomatam (2007). Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible? Philosophy of Science 74 (5):736-748.score: 18.0
    The Copenhagen interpretation, which informs the textbook presentation of quantum mechanics, depends fundamentally on the notion of ontological wave-particle duality and a viewpoint called “complementarity.” In this paper, Bohr's own interpretation is traced in detail and is shown to be fundamentally different from and even opposed to the Copenhagen interpretation in virtually all its particulars. In particular, Bohr's interpretation avoids the ad hoc postulate of wave function ‘collapse' that is central to the Copenhagen interpretation. The strengths and weakness of both (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jagdish Mehra (1987). Niels Bohr's Discussions with Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger: The Origins of the Principles of Uncertainty and Complementarity. Foundations of Physics 17 (5):461-506.score: 18.0
    In this paper, the main outlines of the discussions between Niels Bohr with Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger during 1920–1927 are treated. From the formulation of quantum mechanics in 1925–1926 and wave mechanics in 1926, there emerged Born's statistical interpretation of the wave function in summer 1926, and on the basis of the quantum mechanical transformation theory—formulated in fall 1926 by Dirac, London, and Jordan—Heisenberg formulated the uncertainty principle in early 1927. At the Volta Conference in Como (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Dan Zahavi (2012). Manfred Frank and Niels Weidtmann (Eds.): Husserl Und Die Philosophie des Geistes. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 28 (1):81-84.score: 18.0
    Manfred Frank and Niels Weidtmann (Eds.): Husserl und die Philosophie des Geistes Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s10743-011-9101-2 Authors Dan Zahavi, Center for Subjectivity Research, Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Journal Husserl Studies Online ISSN 1572-8501 Print ISSN 0167-9848.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jan Faye, Niels Bohr and the Vienna Circle.score: 18.0
    The 2nd International Congress for the Unity of Science was held in Copenhagen from the 21st June to the 26th June 1936. Among the Danish participants was Jørgen Jørgensen, professor of philosophy at the University of Copenhagen and the leading figure of logical positivism in Denmark, and Niels Bohr, the famous physicist, the father of the atomic theory, and the originator of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics. In fact, the event took place in Bohr’s honorary mansion at Carlsberg. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Edward MacKinnon (1980). Niels Bohr on the Unity of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:224 - 244.score: 18.0
    Niels Bohr began his career with an attempt to give a correct descriptive account of the motion of electrons. When forced to abandon this interpretation, he adopted, but soon rejected, a hypothetical-deductive account. In his development of an interpretation for the new quantum theory Bohr began to concentrate on the way language functions to make descriptions possible. His later work on this problem and on the role of concepts in the foundations of science led him to anticipate some (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1994). Niels Bohr's Argument for the Irreducibility of Biology to Physics. In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 231--255.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Óscar Navarro Rojas (2010). El surgimiento de la complementariedad: Niels Bohr y la Conferencia de Como. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 48 (123):65-76.score: 18.0
    El artículo discute el texto publicado de la conferencia de Niels Bohr ofrecida en el año 1927 donde analiza los desarrollos de la mecánica cuántica y sus implicaciones. Asimismo se discute como en esta conferencia es donde el físico danés presenta por primera vez su argumento para el marco conceptual de la complementariedad, marco necesario, según Bohr, para ordenar el conocimiento producido por la nueva física.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Favrholdt (1994). Niels Bohr and Realism. In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 77--96.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David Kaiser (1994). Niels Bohr's Conceptual Legacy in Contemporary Particle Physics. In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 257--268.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Victor Weisskopf & Niels Bohr (forthcoming). Niels Bohr, the Quantum, and the World. Social Research.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Niels Bohr (1987). The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr. Ox Bow Press.score: 18.0
    v. 1. Atomic theory and the description of nature -- v. 2. Essays 1932-1957 on atomic physics and human knowledge -- v. 3. Essays 1958-1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge -- v. 4. Causality and complementarity.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Niels Bohr (1987). The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr Vol. I-Iv. Ox Bow Press.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Niels Bohr Centennial (1992). Symposium Niels Bohr Centennial. In Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise. Kluwer. 261.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.) (1994). Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter Bokulich (2005). Niels Bohr's Generalization of Classical Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 35 (3):347-371.score: 15.0
    We clarify Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics by demonstrating the central role played by his thesis that quantum theory is a rational generalization of classical mechanics. This thesis is essential for an adequate understanding of his insistence on the indispensability of classical concepts, his account of how the quantum formalism gets its meaning, and his belief that hidden variable interpretations are impossible.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ravi Gomatam, Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation.score: 15.0
    The Copenhagen interpretation, which informs the textbook presentation of quantum mechanics, depends fundamentally on the notion of ontological wave-particle duality and a viewpoint called “complementarity”. In this paper, Bohr’s own interpretation is traced in detail and is shown to be fundamentally different from and even opposed to the Copenhagen interpretation in virtually all its particulars. In particular, Bohr’s interpretation avoids the ad hoc postulate of wave function ‘collapse’ that is central to the Copenhagen interpretation. The strengths and weakness of both (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Thomas Söderqvist (1994). Darwinian Overtones: Niels K. Jerne and the Origin of the Selection Theory of Antibody Formation. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 27 (3):481 - 529.score: 15.0
  28. Dugald Murdoch (1987). Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.score: 15.0
    Murdoch describes the historical background of the physics from which Bohr's ideas grew; he traces the origins of his idea of complementarity and discusses its meaning and significance. Special emphasis is placed on the contrasting views of Einstein, and the great debate between Bohr and Einstein is thoroughly examined. Bohr's philosophy is revealed as being much more subtle, and more interesting than is generally acknowledged.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John Honner (1982). The Transcendental Philosophy of Niels Bohr. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (1):1-29.score: 15.0
  30. Edward MacKinnon (1986). Book Review:The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity Henry J. Folse. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 53 (3):458-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John Honner (1982). Niels Bohr and the Mysticism of Nature. Zygon 17 (3):243-253.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Pierdaniele Giaretta (2009). Medicine & Philosophy. A Twenty-First Century Introduction – by Ingvar Johansson and Niels Lynøe. Dialectica 63 (1):89-94.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Henry J. Folse (1995). Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 26 (1):107-116.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Henry J. Folse (1986). Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:96 - 104.score: 15.0
    Although it is, often considered a form of anti-realism, here it is argued that Bohr's complementarity viewpoint must accept entity realism based on its analysis of the causal interaction involved in observation. However, because Bohr accepts the quantum postulate he must reject the view that the goal of theory is to represent the independently existing object apart from observation. Thus he abandons the spectator account of knowledge and with it the correspondence theory of truth. In this respect his view is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. G. Burniston Brown (1936). Where is Science Going? By Max Planck. With a Preface by Albert Einstein. Translated and Edited by James Murphy. (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.1933. Pp. 224. Price 7s. 6d. Net.)Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. By Niels Bohr. (Cambridge University Press. 1934. Pp. 119. Price 6s. Net.)Science and the Human Temperament. By Erwin Schrödinger. Translated and with a Biographical Introduction by James Murphy. Foreword by Lord Rutherford of Nelson. (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.1935. Pp. 154. Price 7s. 6d. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 11 (43):366-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Alfred Lande (1959). Book Review:Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge Niels Bohr. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 26 (2):150-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Peter Achinstein (1993). How to Defend a Theory Without Testing It: Niels Bohr and the "Logic of Pursuit". Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18 (1):90-120.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Rudolf B. Brun (1999). Does God Play Dice? A Response to Niels H. Gregersen, "The Idea of Creation and the Theory of Autopoietic Processes". Zygon 34 (1):93-100.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. S. Müller‐Markus (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy∗. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73-93.score: 15.0
    Soviet attitude towards Bohr reflects changes in the ideological approach to science. During the last period before Stalin's death ?danov proclaimed the campaign against Western influence in Soviet philosophy and science. Nevertheless the physicist M. A. Markov tried to introduce complementarity as a materialistic interpretation of quantum?mechanics in 1948. He was officially condemned. This was followed by a period (1948?54) during which heavy attacks were made against the Copenhagen school. In 1958, after a personal exchange of thoughts with Bohr, academician (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Justin Hodge (1999). Cappelhørn, Niels Jørgen, and Jon Stewart, Eds. Kierkegaard Revisited: Proceedings From the Conference “Kierkegaard and the Meaning of Meaning It”. Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):151-153.score: 15.0
  41. Hans Jonas (1986). Parallelism and Complementarity: The Psycho-Physical Problem in Spinoza and in the Succession of Niels Bohr. In Marjorie G. Grene & Debra Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 237--247.score: 15.0
  42. Paul Weiss (1939). Book Review:International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Vol. I, Foundations of the Unity of Science: ; No. 1, Encyclopedia and Unified Science; Otto Neurath, Niels Bohr, John Dewey, Bertrand Russell, Rudolph Carnap, Charles W. Morris; No. 2, Foundations of the Theory of Signs; Charles W. Morris; No. 5, Procedures of Empirical Science; Victor F. Lenzen; No. 6, Principles of the Theory of Probability. Ernest Nagel. [REVIEW] Ethics 49 (4):498-.score: 15.0
  43. Arianna Borrelli (2013). Niels Bohr and the Quantum Atom: The Bohr Model of Atomic Structure 1913–1925. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (2):222-224.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Alfons Borgers (1958). Review: Niels Bohr, The Causality Problem in Atomic Physics; Werner Heisenberg, Language and Reality in Modern Physics; Evert Willem Beth, Die Stellung der Logik Im Gebaude der Heutigen Wissenschaft. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):66-66.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. H. (1995). Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 26 (1):107-116.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jeffrey Bub (1990). Book Review:Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics Dugald Murdoch. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 57 (2):344-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Brian Gregor (2011). Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, David Kangas, Bruce H. Kirmmse, George Pattison, Vanessa Rumble, and K. Brian Söderquist, Eds. , Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks Volume 3: Notebooks 1-15 . Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 31 (2):107-110.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. James T. Cushing (1994). Book Review:Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy Jan Faye. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 61 (1):149-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Martin M. Tweedale (1987). Book Review:The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages Niels J. Green-Pedersen. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (3):486-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Charles E. Caton (1963). Book Review:On the Nature of Meanings, a Philosophical Analysis Niels Egmont Christensen. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 30 (1):83-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 418