Search results for 'Nikolaj Nottelman' (try it on Scholar)

109 found
Order:
  1.  53
    Nikolaj Nottelman (2007). Is Believing at Will 'Conceptually Impossible'? Acta Analytica 22 (2):105-124.
    In this paper I discuss the claim that believing at will is ‘conceptually impossible’ or, to use a formulation encountered in the debate, “that nothing could be a belief and be willed directly”. I argue that such a claim is only plausible if directed against the claim that believing itself is an action-type. However, in the debate, the claim has been univocally directed against the position that forming a belief is an action-type. I argue that the many arguments offered in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  16
    Regula M. Zwahlen (2012). Different Concepts of Personality: Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (3-4):183-204.
    The main concern of both Berdjaev's and Bulgakov's philosophical strivings consists in developing a concept of the person as the foundation of human dignity and creativity within a Christian world view. Once attracted by Marxism with its emphasis on human dignity and social justice, they started to struggle against Marxism's atheist materialism because of its lack of a concept of person. However, the same concern will lead both thinkers down very different paths with different consequences. This paper argues that, even (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Fritz J. McDonald (2013). New Waves in Metaethics By Michael Brady * New Waves in Truth By Cory D. Wright and Nikolaj J.L.L. Pedersen. Analysis 73 (2):400-402.
    Review of New Waves in Metaethics, edited by Michael Brady; and New Waves in Truth, edited by Cory D. Wright and Nikolaj J.L.L. Pedersen.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  36
    Alicja A. Gęścińska & Steven Lepez (2010). Freedom as Praxis: A Comparative Analysis of August Cieszkowski and Nikolaj Berdjaev. Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):109 - 123.
    This essay attempts to elaborate a first thorough comparative analysis of August Cieszkowski and Nikolaj Berdjaev. Although the latter is well known as one of the most important Russian philosophers, the former is hardly known beyond the Polish borders. This general lack of recognition contrasts with the fact that Cieszkowski played a significant role in nineteenth century philosophy in Germany, France, Poland and Russia. A comparative analysis of Cieszkowski and Berdjaev will undergird the idea that Cieszkowski was not merely (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  17
    Antonio Calcagno (2015). Distinctions of Being: Philosophical Approaches to Reality Edited by Nikolaj Zunic. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 69 (1):127-130.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  25
    Andrea Kruse (2015). Nikolaj Nottelmann: Blameworthy Belief. A Study in Epistemic Deontologism. Erkenntnis 80 (3):675-680.
    The theory of epistemic deontologism is an area of normative epistemology. It is concerned with the application of deontic notions such as obligation, permission, blame and praise in epistemic contexts. Nottelmann’s book “Blameworthy Belief” deals with the applicability of one of the central notions of epistemic deontologism, namely the concept of epistemic blameworthiness.But the study goes beyond the analysis and introduction of this concept. By introducing this notion Nottelmann establishes a theory of epistemic deontologism that is build upon epistemic blame (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  25
    Lisa Bortolotti & Ema Sullivan‐Bissett (2014). Nikolaj Nottelmann (Ed.), New Essays on Belief: Constitution, Content and Structure, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, Xii + 258 Pp., GBP 55 (Hardback), ISBN 9781137026514. [REVIEW] Dialectica 68 (1):141-146.
  8.  14
    James P. Scanlan (1967). Nikolaj Ěernyševskij and Soviet Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 7 (1):1-27.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  8
    Paul L. Simard Smith (2015). Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen and Cory D. Wright, Eds., Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 35 (4):220-224.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  7
    James P. Scanlan (1985). Nikolaj Chernyshevsky and the Philosophy of Realism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Aesthetics. Studies in Soviet Thought 30 (1):1-14.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    James P. Scanlan (1967). Nikolaj?Erny?Evskij and Soviet Philosophy. Studies in Soviet Thought 7 (1):1-27.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  13
    Wilhelm Kahle (1971). Zar Nikolaj I. Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 23 (3):220-244.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Alicja A. Gęścińska & Steven Lepez (2010). Freedom as Praxis: A Comparative Analysis of August Cieszkowski and Nikolaj Berdjaev. Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):109-123.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  4
    Ekaterina Velmezova (2008). The Social Semantics of Mikhail Pokrovskij and Nikolaj Marr. Studies in East European Thought 60 (4):349-362.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  26
    James P. Scanlan (1985). Nikolaj Chernyshevsky and the Philosophy of Realism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Aesthetics. Studies in East European Thought 30 (1):1-14.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  10
    Lisa Botolotti & Ema Sullivan-Bissett (2014). Review of New Essays on Belief: Constitution, Content and Structure by Nikolaj Nottelmann. [REVIEW] Dialectica 68 (1):141-146.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  22
    Ekaterina Velmezova (2008). The Social Semantics of Mikhail Pokrovskij and Nikolaj Marr. Studies in East European Thought 60 (4):349 - 362.
    Criticizing the works of "Western" specialists in semantics, Soviet academician M. M. Pokrovskij (1868-1942) comes to the conclusion that social factors are essential for semantic evolution, while psychological factors constitute an intermediate link between the "external" life of a society and the semantics of the corresponding language. This conception resembles the general explanations of semantic evolution proposed by N. Ja. Marr (1864-1934). Nevertheless, despite a number of common points in the semantic theories of these two researchers, Pokrovskij's attitude towards Marr (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  4
    Jeff Love (2013). Hegelian Madness? Nikolaj Fëdorov’s Repudiation of History. Studies in East European Thought 65 (3-4):201-212.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    Alexander Litschev (2012). Nikolaj O. Losskij: Der Charakter des russischen Volkes. Übersetzt und herausgegeben von Dietrich Kegler. Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 65 (2):109-113.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  9
    L. N. Stolovich (1992). Michael Hagemeister. Nikolaj Fedorov. Studien zu Leben, Werk und Wirkung. Russian Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):77-82.
    The name Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov has entered the ranks of the most outstanding thinkers who are worthy representatives of Russian philosophy. However, we shall not forget that this has become obvious only in recent years in the homeland of this unique philosopher. The scandal created by the publication in 1982 of Fedorov's works in the series Filosofskoe nasledie [Philosophical Heritage] is still remembered. On instructions from above, publication of the works was followed by dismissals, investigations, and allegations about the resurrection, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  2
    Julian D. Richards (2013). Mark A. Brisbane, Nikolaj A. Makarov, and Evgenij N. Nosov, Eds., The Archaeology of Medieval Novgorod in Context: Studies in Centre/Periphery Relations. Translations by Katharine Judelson. (The Archaeology of Medieval Novgorod 4.) Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2012. Pp. Xxviii, 500; Black-and-White Figures Plus CD-ROM. $120. ISBN: 9781842172780. [REVIEW] Speculum 88 (4):1069-1071.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Olivier Depré (forthcoming). Nikolaj PLOTNIKOV, Gelebte Vernunft. Konzepte praktischer Rationalität beim frühen Hegel, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Fromman-Holzboog, 2004. Archives de Philosophie: Recherches Et Documentation.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Donato Mansueto (1999). Il mondo dei nomi propri. Michail e Nikolaj Bachtin tra etica ed estetica. Idee 40:189-222.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. M. Vaross (1996). Nikolaj O. Losskij, Russian Philosopher-An Obituary Originally Published in 1965. Filozofia 51 (10):722-723.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  24
    Katharina Breckner (2006). Russian Philosophers on Continuous Creation as the Basis for Social Change. Studies in East European Thought 58 (4):271 - 297.
    Vladimir Solov’ëv, Sergej Bulgakov, Nikolaj Berdjaev, and Semën Frank shared the conviction that Creation is incomplete: humanity must arrive at organizing social life on an “eighth day.” Thus they prophesied the Universal Church, “social Christianity,” “personalist socialism,” and “spiritual democracy.” Their attempt to avoid any illegitimate confusion between independent rational thought and Christian faith prompted Bulgakov to become an ordained theologian, Berdjaev a “philosophical poet,” and Frank a “Christian realist.” Solov’ëv’s theosophical attempt to philosophically substantiate faith and consequently eschatological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  18
    Nikolaj Nottelmann (2012). Teaching & Learning Guide For: Belief-Desire Explanation. Philosophy Compass 7 (1):71-73.
    This guide accompanies the following article: Nikolaj Nottelmann, ‘Belief‐Desire Explanation’. Philosophy Compass Vol/Iss : 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1747‐9991.2011.00446.xAuthor’s Introduction“Belief‐desire explanation” is short‐hand for a type of action explanation that appeals to a set of the agent’s mental states consisting of 1. Her desire to ψ and 2. Her belief that, were she to φ, she would promote her ψ‐ing. Here, to ψ could be to eat an ice cream, and to φ could be to walk to the ice cream vendor. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  6
    Sergej S. Demidov (2009). Les relations mathématiques franco-russes entre les deux guerres mondiales. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 1 (1):119-142.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  89
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2010). Stabilizing Alethic Pluralism. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):92-108.
    Alethic pluralism is the view that the nature of truth is not uniform across domains. There are several ways of bang true $(T_1 ...\,T_n )$ A simple argument, the 'instability challenge', purports to show that this view is inherently unstable. One can simply say that something is uniformly true if and only if it is T₁ or ... or $\,T_n $ . Being uniformly true is a single truth property that applies across the board, and so the nature of truth (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  29. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2006). What Can the Problem of Mixed Inferences Teach Us About Alethic Pluralism? The Monist 89 (1):103-117.
    Here is a well-known thought about truth: Truth consists in correspondence with reality. A sentence is true just in case what it says corresponds with how the world is. Theories of truth that incorporate this thought are naturally regarded as robust or “heavyweight”. Truth is to be understood in a realist fashion. The world decides what is true and what is not. A recent incarnation of the correspondence view is found in truth-maker theories, whose adherents maintain that truths are true (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  30.  12
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (eds.) (2013). Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates. Oxford University Press.
    The relative merits and demerits of historically prominent views such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism have been subject to much attention in the truth literature and have fueled the long-lived debate over which of these views is the most plausible one. While diverging in their specific philosophical commitments, adherents of these historically prominent views agree in at least one fundamental respect. They are all alethic monists. They all endorse the thesis that there is only one property (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31. Jens Christian Bjerring, Jens Ulrik Hansen & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2014). On the Rationality of Pluralistic Ignorance. Synthese 191 (11):2445-2470.
    Pluralistic ignorance is a socio-psychological phenomenon that involves a systematic discrepancy between people’s private beliefs and public behavior in certain social contexts. Recently, pluralistic ignorance has gained increased attention in formal and social epistemology. But to get clear on what precisely a formal and social epistemological account of pluralistic ignorance should look like, we need answers to at least the following two questions: What exactly is the phenomenon of pluralistic ignorance? And can the phenomenon arise among perfectly rational agents? In (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Nikolaj Nottelmann & Rik Peels (2013). Some Metaphysical Implications of a Credible Ethics of Belief. In New Essays on Belief: Structure, Constitution, and Content. Palgrave Macmillan 230-250.
    Any plausible ethics of belief must respect that normal agents are doxastically blameworthy for their beliefs in a range of non-exotic cases. In this paper, we argue, first, that together with independently motivated principles this constraint leads us to reject occurrentism as a general theory of belief. Second, we must acknowledge not only dormant beliefs, but tacit beliefs as well. Third, a plausible ethics of belief leads us to acknowledge that a difference in propositional content cannot in all contexts count (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2009). Entitlement, Value and Rationality. Synthese 171 (3):443-457.
    In this paper I discuss two fundamental challenges concerning Crispin Wright's notion of entitlement of cognitive project: firstly, whether entitlement is an epistemic kind of warrant since, seemingly, it is not underwritten by epistemic reasons, and, secondly, whether, in the absence of such reasons, the kind of rationality associated with entitlement is epistemic in nature. The paper investigates three possible lines of response to these challenges. According to the first line of response, entitlement of cognitive project is underwritten by epistemic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  34. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2006). The Analogy Argument for Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):559 - 582.
    An influential version of doxastic voluntarism claims that doxastic events such as belief-formations at least sometimes qualify as actions. William Alston has made a simple response to this claim by arguing on empirical grounds that in normal human agents intentions to form specific beliefs are simply powerless. However, despite Alston’s observation, various authors have insisted that belief-formations may qualify as voluntary in perfect analogy to certain types of actions or even to actions in general. I examine three analogy arguments of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  35.  34
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2012). True Alethic Functionalism? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (1):125-133.
    International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Volume 20, Issue 1, Page 125-133, February 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36. Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2010). Truth, Pluralism, Monism, Correspondence. In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan
    When talking about truth, we ordinarily take ourselves to be talking about one-and-the-same thing. Alethic monists suggest that theorizing about truth ought to begin with this default or pre-reflective stance, and, subsequently, parlay it into a set of theoretical principles that are aptly summarized by the thesis that truth is one. Foremost among them is the invariance principle.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  23
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (forthcoming). Non-Rational Action in the Face of Disagreement: An Argument Against Non-Conformism. Synthese:1-32.
    Recently there has been a surge of interest in the intersection between epistemology and action theory, especially in principles linking rationality in thought and rationality in action. Recently there has also been a surge of interest in the epistemic significance of perceived peer disagreement: what, epistemically speaking, is the rational response in light of disagreement with someone whom one regards as an epistemic peer? The objective of this paper is to explore these two issues—separately, but also in connection with one (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2012). Recent Work on Alethic Pluralism. Analysis 72 (3):588-607.
    While historically prominent theories of truth such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism diverge in many ways, they converge in at least one fundamental respect. They are all monist theories of truth. They incorporate the thesis that there is one property—and one property only—in virtue of which propositions can be true. The truth pluralist, on the other hand, rejects this idea. There are several properties in virtue of which propositions can be true. This article offers a survey (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  70
    Nikolaj Nottelmann (2013). The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification: A Reassessment. Synthese 190 (12):2219-2241.
    This paper undertakes two projects: Firstly, it offers a new account of the so-called deontological conception of epistemic justification (DCEJ). Secondly, it brings out the basic weaknesses of DCEJ, thus accounted for. It concludes that strong reasons speak against its acceptance. The new account takes it departure from William Alston’s influential work. Section 1 argues that a fair account of DCEJ is only achieved by modifying Alston’s account and brings out the crucial difference between DCEJ and the less radical position (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  27
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (2012). Pluralist Theories of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  54
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Jesper Kallestrup (2013). The Epistemology of Absence-Based Inference. Synthese 190 (13):2573-2593.
    Our main aim in this paper is to contribute towards a better understanding of the epistemology of absence-based inferences. Many absence-based inferences are classified as fallacies. There are exceptions, however. We investigate what features make absence-based inferences epistemically good or reliable. In Section 2 we present Sanford Goldberg’s account of the reliability of absence-based inference, introducing the central notion of epistemic coverage. In Section 3 we approach the idea of epistemic coverage through a comparison of alethic and evidential principles. The (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  10
    Robert Lockie, Response to Elqayam, Nottelmann, Peels and Vahid on My Paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Poverty’.
    I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Poverty’: Shira Elqayam, Nikolaj Nottelmann, Rik Peels and Hamid Vahid. I maintain that all accounts of epistemic justification must be constrained by two limit positions which have to be avoided. One is Conceptual Limit Panglossianism. The other is Conceptual Limit meliorism. Within these bounds one may offer an account of rationality or epistemic justification that is closer to Meliorism or Panglossianism. Remarked upon are my respondents’ (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  82
    Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Douglas Edwards (2011). Truth as One(s) and Many: On Lynch's Alethic Functionalism1. Analytic Philosophy 52 (3):213-230.
    Advocates of traditional views on truth such as the correspondence and coherence theories converge on two theses about truth: substantivism and monism. According to the former thesis, truth consists in some substantive property or relation F. According to the latter thesis, there is exactly one property or relation (whether substantive or not) in terms of which truth is to be accounted for across all truth-apt domains of discourse. The correspondence theorist thus has it that a proposition is true just in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  65
    Evert van der Zweerde (2010). Where is the Common Ground? Interaction and Transfer Between European and Russian Philosophical Culture. Studies in East European Thought 62 (3-4):259-277.
    In this paper, I discuss and analyze three instances of exchange and interaction between Russian (incl. Soviet) and (West) European philosophical culture: the correspondence between Merab Mamardašvili and Louis Althusser, Jacques Derrida’s visit to Moscow in 1990, and a joint Russian–German publication by Nikolaj Plotnikov and Alexander Haardt. The focus is on the implicit mutual perception of philosophical cultures and on the ‘micro-politics’ of discourse that is at stake in their interaction. Also, it is shown how different contexts—labelled ‘philosophical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  81
    Christoph Kelp & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2010). Second-Order Knowledge. In D. Pritchard & S. Bernecker (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  16
    Nel Grillaert (2012). What's in God's Name: Literary Forerunners and Philosophical Allies of the Imjaslavie Debate. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (3-4):163-181.
    The aim of this paper is to explore the interaction between a tradition that belongs originally to the realm of orthodox contemplative monasticism (i.e., hesychasm) and nineteenth-and early twentieth-century Russian intellectuals. In the first part, this paper will explore how hesychasm gradually penetrated nineteenthcentury secular culture; a special focus will be on the hermitage of Optina Pustyn' and its renowned elders, as well as their appeal to members of the Optina-intelligentsia, especially Fëdor Dostoevskij. Then, attention will shift to the imjaslavie (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  48
    Jens Christian Bjerring & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2014). All the Things We Know: Extended Knowledge. Philosophical Issues 24 (1):24-38.
    In this paper we explore the potential bearing of the extended mind thesis—the thesis that the mind extends into the world—on epistemology. We do three things. First, we argue that the combination of the extended mind thesis and reliabilism about knowledge entails that ordinary subjects can easily come to enjoy various forms of restricted omniscience. Second, we discuss the conceptual foundations of the extended mind and knowledge debate. We suggest that the theses of extended mind and extended knowledge lead to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  8
    Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (2009). Entitlement, Value and Rationality. Synthese 171 (3):443-457.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen, Entitlement in Mathematics.
    Crispin Wright has recently introduced a non-evidential notion of warrant – entitlement of cognitive project – as a promising response to certain sceptical arguments, which have been subject to extensive discussion within mainstream epistemology. The central idea is that, for a given class of cognitive projects, there are certain basic propositions – entitlements – which one is warranted in trusting provided there is no sufficient reason to think them false. (See Wrigh [2].) The aim of this paper is to provide (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2008). The Present and Future State of Epistemic Deontologism. In Vincent Hendricks (ed.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 109