Search results for 'Nikolaj Nottelman' (try it on Scholar)

90 found
Sort by:
  1. Nikolaj Nottelman (2007). Is Believing at Will 'Conceptually Impossible'? Acta Analytica 22 (2):105-124.score: 240.0
    In this paper I discuss the claim that believing at will is ‘conceptually impossible’ or, to use a formulation encountered in the debate, “that nothing could be a belief and be willed directly”. I argue that such a claim is only plausible if directed against the claim that believing itself is an action-type. However, in the debate, the claim has been univocally directed against the position that forming a belief is an action-type. I argue that the many arguments offered in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Regula M. Zwahlen (2012). Different Concepts of Personality: Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (3-4):183-204.score: 21.0
    The main concern of both Berdjaev's and Bulgakov's philosophical strivings consists in developing a concept of the person as the foundation of human dignity and creativity within a Christian world view. Once attracted by Marxism with its emphasis on human dignity and social justice, they started to struggle against Marxism's atheist materialism because of its lack of a concept of person. However, the same concern will lead both thinkers down very different paths with different consequences. This paper argues that, even (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alicja A. Gęścińska & Steven Lepez (2010). Freedom as Praxis: A Comparative Analysis of August Cieszkowski and Nikolaj Berdjaev. Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):109 - 123.score: 18.0
    This essay attempts to elaborate a first thorough comparative analysis of August Cieszkowski and Nikolaj Berdjaev. Although the latter is well known as one of the most important Russian philosophers, the former is hardly known beyond the Polish borders. This general lack of recognition contrasts with the fact that Cieszkowski played a significant role in nineteenth century philosophy in Germany, France, Poland and Russia. A comparative analysis of Cieszkowski and Berdjaev will undergird the idea that Cieszkowski was not merely (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. F. J. McDonald (2013). New Waves in Metaethics By Michael Brady * New Waves in Truth By Cory D. Wright and Nikolaj J.L.L. Pedersen. Analysis 73 (2):400-402.score: 15.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James P. Scanlan (1985). Nikolaj Chernyshevsky and the Philosophy of Realism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Aesthetics. Studies in East European Thought 30 (1):1-14.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lisa Bortolotti & Ema Sullivan‐Bissett (2014). Nikolaj Nottelmann (Ed.), New Essays on Belief: Constitution, Content and Structure, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, Xii + 258 Pp., GBP 55 (Hardback), ISBN 9781137026514. [REVIEW] Dialectica 68 (1):141-146.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ekaterina Velmezova (2008). The Social Semantics of Mikhail Pokrovskij and Nikolaj Marr. Studies in East European Thought 60 (4):349 - 362.score: 15.0
    Criticizing the works of "Western" specialists in semantics, Soviet academician M. M. Pokrovskij (1868-1942) comes to the conclusion that social factors are essential for semantic evolution, while psychological factors constitute an intermediate link between the "external" life of a society and the semantics of the corresponding language. This conception resembles the general explanations of semantic evolution proposed by N. Ja. Marr (1864-1934). Nevertheless, despite a number of common points in the semantic theories of these two researchers, Pokrovskij's attitude towards Marr (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. L. N. Stolovich (1992). Michael Hagemeister. Nikolaj Fedorov. Studien zu Leben, Werk und Wirkung. Russian Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):77-82.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Wilhelm Kahle (1971). Zar Nikolaj I. Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 23 (3):220-244.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lisa Botolotti & Ema Sullivan-Bissett (2014). Review of New Essays on Belief: Constitution, Content and Structure by Nikolaj Nottelmann. [REVIEW] Dialectica 68 (1):141-146.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Olivier Depré (forthcoming). Nikolaj PLOTNIKOV, Gelebte Vernunft. Konzepte praktischer Rationalität beim frühen Hegel, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Fromman-Holzboog, 2004. Archives de Philosophie: Recherches Et Documentation.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Alexander Litschev (2012). Nikolaj O. Losskij: Der Charakter des russischen Volkes. Übersetzt und herausgegeben von Dietrich Kegler. Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 65 (2):109-113.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jeff Love (2013). Hegelian Madness? Nikolaj Fëdorov's Repudiation of History. Studies in East European Thought 65 (3-4):201-212.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Donato Mansueto (1999). Il mondo dei nomi propri. Michail e Nikolaj Bachtin tra etica ed estetica. Idee 40:189-222.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Julian D. Richards (2013). Mark A. Brisbane, Nikolaj A. Makarov, and Evgenij N. Nosov, Eds., The Archaeology of Medieval Novgorod in Context: Studies in Centre/Periphery Relations. Translations by Katharine Judelson. (The Archaeology of Medieval Novgorod 4.) Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2012. Pp. Xxviii, 500; Black-and-White Figures Plus CD-ROM. $120. ISBN: 9781842172780. [REVIEW] Speculum 88 (4):1069-1071.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. James P. Scanlan (1967). Nikolaj Ěernyševskij and Soviet Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 7 (1):1-27.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. M. Vaross (1996). Nikolaj O. Losskij, Russian Philosopher-An Obituary Originally Published in 1965. Filozofia 51 (10):722-723.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Katharina Breckner (2006). Russian Philosophers on Continuous Creation as the Basis for Social Change. Studies in East European Thought 58 (4):271 - 297.score: 9.0
    Vladimir Solov’ëv, Sergej Bulgakov, Nikolaj Berdjaev, and Semën Frank shared the conviction that Creation is incomplete: humanity must arrive at organizing social life on an “eighth day.” Thus they prophesied the Universal Church, “social Christianity,” “personalist socialism,” and “spiritual democracy.” Their attempt to avoid any illegitimate confusion between independent rational thought and Christian faith prompted Bulgakov to become an ordained theologian, Berdjaev a “philosophical poet,” and Frank a “Christian realist.” Solov’ëv’s theosophical attempt to philosophically substantiate faith and consequently eschatological (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Sergej S. Demidov (2009). Les relations mathématiques franco-russes entre les deux guerres mondiales. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 1:119-142.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2010). Truth, Pluralism, Monism, Correspondence. In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
    When talking about truth, we ordinarily take ourselves to be talking about one-and-the-same thing. Alethic monists suggest that theorizing about truth ought to begin with this default or pre-reflective stance, and, subsequently, parlay it into a set of theoretical principles that are aptly summarized by the thesis that truth is one. Foremost among them is the invariance principle.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2006). The Analogy Argument for Doxastic Voluntarism. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):559 - 582.score: 3.0
    An influential version of doxastic voluntarism claims that doxastic events such as belief-formations at least sometimes qualify as actions. William Alston has made a simple response to this claim by arguing on empirical grounds that in normal human agents intentions to form specific beliefs are simply powerless. However, despite Alston’s observation, various authors have insisted that belief-formations may qualify as voluntary in perfect analogy to certain types of actions or even to actions in general. I examine three analogy arguments of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2009). Entitlement, Value and Rationality. Synthese 171 (3):443-457.score: 3.0
    In this paper I discuss two fundamental challenges concerning Crispin Wright's notion of entitlement of cognitive project: firstly, whether entitlement is an epistemic kind of warrant since, seemingly, it is not underwritten by epistemic reasons, and, secondly, whether, in the absence of such reasons, the kind of rationality associated with entitlement is epistemic in nature. The paper investigates three possible lines of response to these challenges. According to the first line of response, entitlement of cognitive project is underwritten by epistemic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jens Christian Bjerring, Jens Ulrik Hansen & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2014). On the Rationality of Pluralistic Ignorance. Synthese 191 (11):2445-2470.score: 3.0
    Pluralistic ignorance is a socio-psychological phenomenon that involves a systematic discrepancy between people’s private beliefs and public behavior in certain social contexts. Recently, pluralistic ignorance has gained increased attention in formal and social epistemology. But to get clear on what precisely a formal and social epistemological account of pluralistic ignorance should look like, we need answers to at least the following two questions: What exactly is the phenomenon of pluralistic ignorance? And can the phenomenon arise among perfectly rational agents? In (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen (eds.) (2010). New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
    New Waves in Truth offers eighteen new and original research papers on truth and other alethic phenomena by twenty of the most promising young scholars working on truth today. Contributions to the volume span truth ascriptions, deflationism, realism and the correspondence theory, the value of truth, and kinds of truth and truth-apt discourse. The research programs of the contributors are beginning to reset that agenda, and each is positioned to make new waves throughout the subject.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Douglas Edwards (2011). Truth as One(s) and Many: On Lynch's Alethic Functionalism1. Analytic Philosophy 52 (3):213-230.score: 3.0
    Advocates of traditional views on truth such as the correspondence and coherence theories converge on two theses about truth: substantivism and monism. According to the former thesis, truth consists in some substantive property or relation F. According to the latter thesis, there is exactly one property or relation (whether substantive or not) in terms of which truth is to be accounted for across all truth-apt domains of discourse. The correspondence theorist thus has it that a proposition is true just in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (forthcoming). Varieties of Alethic Pluralism (and Why Alethic Disjunctivism is Relatively Compelling)∗. In Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (eds.), Truth Pluralism: Current Debates. Oxford University Press.score: 3.0
    The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of various forms of alethic pluralism. Along the way we will draw a number of distinctions that, hopefully, will be useful in mapping the pluralist landscape. Finally, we will argue that a commitment to alethic disjunctivism, a certain brand of pluralism, might be difficult to avoid for adherents of the other pluralist views to be discussed. We will proceed as follows: Section 1 introduces alethic monism and alethic pluralism. Section 2 (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2008). Introduction. Synthese 161 (3):325-337.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Marcus Rossberg (2010). Open-Endedness, Schemas and Ontological Commitment. Noûs 44 (2):329-339.score: 3.0
    Second-order axiomatizations of certain important mathematical theories—such as arithmetic and real analysis—can be shown to be categorical. Categoricity implies semantic completeness, and semantic completeness in turn implies determinacy of truth-value. Second-order axiomatizations are thus appealing to realists as they sometimes seem to offer support for the realist thesis that mathematical statements have determinate truth-values. The status of second-order logic is a controversial issue, however. Worries about ontological commitment have been influential in the debate. Recently, Vann McGee has argued that one (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2010). Stabilizing Alethic Pluralism. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):92-108.score: 3.0
    Alethic pluralism is the view that the nature of truth is not uniform across domains. There are several ways of bang true $(T_1 ...\,T_n )$ A simple argument, the 'instability challenge', purports to show that this view is inherently unstable. One can simply say that something is uniformly true if and only if it is T₁ or ... or $\,T_n $ . Being uniformly true is a single truth property that applies across the board, and so the nature of truth (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2012). Recent Work on Alethic Pluralism. Analysis 72 (3):588-607.score: 3.0
    While historically prominent theories of truth such as the correspondence theory, coherentism, pragmatism, verificationism, and instrumentalism diverge in many ways, they converge in at least one fundamental respect. They are all monist theories of truth. They incorporate the thesis that there is one property—and one property only—in virtue of which propositions can be true. The truth pluralist, on the other hand, rejects this idea. There are several properties in virtue of which propositions can be true. This article offers a survey (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2009). Solving the Caesar Problem Without Categorical Sortals. Erkenntnis 71 (2):141 - 155.score: 3.0
    The neo-Fregean account of arithmetical knowledge is centered around the abstraction principle known as Hume’s Principle: for any concepts X and Y , the number of X ’s is the same as the number of Y ’s just in case there is a 1–1 correspondence between X and Y . The Caesar Problem, originally raised by Frege in §56 of Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik , emerges in the context of the neo-Fregean programme, because, though Hume’s Principle provides a criterion of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Nikolaj Lübecker (2008). Sartre's Silence
    Limits of Recognition in Why Write?
    Sartre Studies International 14 (1):42-57.
    score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Nikolaj Nottelmann & Rik Peels (2013). Some Metaphysical Implications of a Credible Ethics of Belief. In , New Essays on Belief: Structure, Constitution, and Content. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
    Any plausible ethics of belief must respect that normal agents are doxastically blameworthy for their beliefs in a range of non-exotic cases. In this paper, we argue, first, that together with independently motivated principles this constraint leads us to reject occurrentism as a general theory of belief. Second, we must acknowledge not only dormant beliefs, but tacit beliefs as well. Third, a plausible ethics of belief leads us to acknowledge that a difference in propositional content cannot in all contexts count (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (2008). From Metaphysical Pluralism to Alethic Pluralism? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:201-208.score: 3.0
    Traditional theories of truth – such as the correspondence theory – are monist in character. All propositions, regardless of subject-matter, are true in the same way (if true). Recently, this view has been called into question by alethic pluralists (most notably Crispin Wright and Michael Lynch). According to the pluralist, the nature of truth varies across domains. Pluralists try to motivate their position by appealing to the following principle: for any domains D1 and D2, if the metaphysical constitutions of respectively (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2011). Belief-Desire Explanation. Philosophy Compass 6 (12):912-921.score: 3.0
    Theses claiming a constitutive or necessary role for belief-desire pairs in the rationalizing, motivation or explanation of action, are generally known as Humean. The main purpose of this short paper is clearly to present the basic versions of Humeanism and lay bare their commitments and interrelations in preparation for a short general introduction to the debate over belief-desire explanation of action. After this, some influential arguments for and against a Humean account of action explanation are briefly discussed.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Marcus Rossberg (2007). McGee on Open-Ended Schemas. In Helen Bohse & Sven Walter (eds.), Selected Contributions to GAP.6: Sixth International Conference of the German Society for Analytical Philosophy, Berlin, 11–14 September 2006. mentis.score: 3.0
    Vann McGee claims that open-ended schemas are more innocuous than ordinary second-order quantification, particularly in terms of ontological commitment. We argue that this is not the case.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2012). True Alethic Functionalism? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (1):125-133.score: 3.0
    International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Volume 20, Issue 1, Page 125-133, February 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Jesper Kallestrup (2013). The Epistemology of Absence-Based Inference. Synthese 190 (13):2573-2593.score: 3.0
    Our main aim in this paper is to contribute towards a better understanding of the epistemology of absence-based inferences. Many absence-based inferences are classified as fallacies. There are exceptions, however. We investigate what features make absence-based inferences epistemically good or reliable. In Section 2 we present Sanford Goldberg’s account of the reliability of absence-based inference, introducing the central notion of epistemic coverage. In Section 3 we approach the idea of epistemic coverage through a comparison of alethic and evidential principles. The (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Christoph Kelp & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2010). Second-Order Knowledge. In D. Pritchard & S. Bernecker (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (2012). Pluralist Theories of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2006). What Can the Problem of Mixed Inferences Teach Us About Alethic Pluralism? The Monist 89 (1):103-117.score: 3.0
    Here is a well-known thought about truth: Truth consists in correspondence with reality. A sentence is true just in case what it says corresponds with how the world is. Theories of truth that incorporate this thought are naturally regarded as robust or “heavyweight”. Truth is to be understood in a realist fashion. The world decides what is true and what is not. A recent incarnation of the correspondence view is found in truth-maker theories, whose adherents maintain that truths are true (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Ksana Blank (2007). The Rabbit and the Duck : Antinomic Unity in Dostoevskij, the Russian Religious Tradition, and Mikhail Bakhtin. Studies in East European Thought 59 (1-2):21 - 37.score: 3.0
    At the core of Dostoevskij's philosophy and theology lies a concept according to which the Truth (Istina) is antinomical: it contains both a thesis and its antithesis without expectation of synthesis. This concept can be traced to Eastern Patristics. After Dostoevskij, the theory of antinomies was elaborated by 20th century Russian religious thinkers such as Pavel Florenskij, Sergej Bulgakov, Nikolaj Berdjaev, Semën Frank, and Vladimir Losskij. Their ideas help us to understand that Dostoevskij's dialogism, made famous in its secular (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2014). Pluralism × 3: Truth, Logic, Metaphysics. Erkenntnis 79 (2):259-277.score: 3.0
    This paper offers a discussion of metaphysical pluralism, alethic pluralism, and logical pluralism. According to the metaphysical pluralist, there are several ways of being. According to the alethic pluralist, there are several ways of being true, and according to the logical pluralist, there are several ways of being valid. Each of these three forms of pluralism will be considered on its own, but the ambition of the paper is to explore possible connections between them. My primary objective is to present (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2013). The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification: A Reassessment. Synthese 190 (12):2219-2241.score: 3.0
    This paper undertakes two projects: Firstly, it offers a new account of the so-called deontological conception of epistemic justification (DCEJ). Secondly, it brings out the basic weaknesses of DCEJ, thus accounted for. It concludes that strong reasons speak against its acceptance. The new account takes it departure from William Alston’s influential work. Section 1 argues that a fair account of DCEJ is only achieved by modifying Alston’s account and brings out the crucial difference between DCEJ and the less radical position (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (forthcoming). Hume's Principle and Entitlement: On the Epistemology of the Neo-Fregean Programme. In Philip Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism. Oxford University Press.score: 3.0
  46. Nikolaj Jang Linding Pedersen (2006). What Can the Problem of Mixed Inferences Teach Us About Alethic Pluralism? The Monist 89 (1):102-117.score: 3.0
    Here is a well-known thought about truth: Truth consists in correspondence with reality. A sentence is true just in case what it says corresponds with how the world is. Theories of truth that incorporate this thought are naturally regarded as robust or “heavyweight”. Truth is to be understood in a realist fashion. The world decides what is true and what is not. A recent incarnation of the correspondence view is found in truth-maker theories, whose adherents maintain that truths are true (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Nikolaj Nottelmann (2012). Teaching & Learning Guide For: Belief-Desire Explanation. Philosophy Compass 7 (1):71-73.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen, Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij & Klemens Kappel (2014). Rational Trust. Synthese 191 (9):1953-1955.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Nikolaj Plotnikov (2009). Sergej N. Trubetskoj and the Concept of "Subject" in the History of Russian Thought. Studies in East European Thought 61 (2/3):197 - 208.score: 3.0
    The basic tendencies in the conceptual history of the 'subject' within Russian intellectual history are presented. This backgrounds a closer analysis of S. Trubetskoj's concept of 'conciliar consciousness', including the problems and aporiae connected with it. It will be shown that and how this conception depends on assumptions from prekantian metaphysics and therefore ignores the Kantian account of subjectivity.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij, Klemens Kappel & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2013). The Epistemology of Inclusiveness. Synthese 190 (7):1185-1188.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 90