Search results for 'Nino B. Cocciharella' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  27
    Nino B. Cocciharella (1992). Cantor's Power-Set Theorem Versus Frege's Double-Correlation Thesis. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):179-201.
  2.  6
    N. H. B. & E. S. Bouchier (1921). A Short History of Antioch, 300 B. C. -- A. D. 1268. Journal of Hellenic Studies 41:295.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  4
    R. B. & J. Irmscher (1966). Miscellanea critica. Teil 1: aus Anlass des 150 jahrigen Bestehens der Verlagsgesellschaft und des graphischen Betriebes B. G. Teubner, Leipzig. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 86:312.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Carlos Santiago Nino, Carlos F. Rosenkrantz & Rodolfo Luis Vigo (eds.) (2008). Razonamiento Jurídico, Ciencia Del Derecho y Democracia En Carlos S. Nino. Distribuciones Fontamara.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  5
    Harold Levin (1991). Review: Nino B. Cocchiarella, Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1105-1107.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    John Corcoran & Woosuk Park (1988). Review: Nino B. Cocchiarella, Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (3):991-993.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. John Corcoran & Woosuk Park (1988). Cocchiarella Nino B.. Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals. Indices, No. 2. Bibliopolis, Naples 1986, Also Distributed by Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J., 265 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (3):991-993.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Jesús Padilla-gÁlvez (1990). Nino B. COCCHIARELLA: Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 5 (12/13):303-307.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Franz von Kutschera & Aus Platons Papierkorb (2001). Nino B. Cocchiarella: A Logical Reconstruction of Medieval Terminist Logic in Conceptual Realism Der Rahmen des begrifflichen Realismus' bietet eine logisch ideale Sprache, innerhalb der man die mittelalterliche Termlogik des 14. Jahrhunderts rekon-struieren kann. Die termlogische Konzeption eines Begriffs, die sich von Ock. [REVIEW] Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 4:11.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  7
    Woosuk Park (forthcoming). Where Have All the Californian Tense-Logicians Gone? Synthese:1-12.
    Arthur N. Prior, in the Preface of Past, Present and Future, made clear his indebtedness to “the very lively tense-logicians of California for many discussions”. Strangely,with a notable exception of Copeland, there is no extensive discussion of these scholars in the literature on the history of tense logic. In this paper, I propose to study how Nino B. Cocchiarella, as one of the Californian tense-logicians, interacted with Prior in the late 1960s. By gathering clues from their correspondence available at (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  9
    Gregory Landini (1990). How to Russell Another Meinongian. Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:93-122.
    This article compares the theory of Meinongian objects proposed by Edward Zalta with a theory of fiction formulated within an early Russellian framework. The Russellian framework is the second-order intensional logic proposed by Nino B. Cocchiarelly as a reconstruction of the form of Logicism Russell was examining shortly after writing The Principles of Mathematics. A Russellian theory of denoting concepts is developed in this intensional logic and applied as a theory of the "objects' of fiction. The framework retains the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  50
    Gregory Landini (2009). Cocchiarella's Formal Ontology and the Paradoxes of Hyperintensionality. Axiomathes 19 (2):115-142.
    This is a critical discussion of Nino B. Cocchiarella’s book “Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism.” It focuses on paradoxes of hyperintensionality that may arise in formal systems of intensional logic.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  1
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1985). Bealer George. Quality and Concept. Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York 1982, Xii + 311 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):554-556.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1986). Barwise Jon and Perry John. Situations and Attitudes. Bradford Books. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1983, Xxii + 352 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2):470-472.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1984). Goddard Leonard and Routley Richard. The Logic of Significance and Context. Volume 1. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh and London 1973, and Halsted Press, New York 1974, Xi + 641 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1413-1415.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  1
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1972). Gale Richard M.. The Language of Time. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, and Humanities Press, New York, 1968, Viii + 248 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1):170-172.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1971). Prior Arthur N.. Changes in Events and Changes in Things. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1968, Pp. 1–14. Prior Arthur N.. On Spurious Egocentricity. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1968, Pp. 15–25. , Pp. 326–335.)Prior Arthur N.. The Formalities of Omniscience. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1968, Pp. 26–44. , Pp. 114–129.)Prior Arthur N.. Contemplation and Action. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1968, Pp. 45–50.Prior Arthur N.. The Consequences of Actions. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1968, Pp. 51–58. Prior Arthur N.. Limited Indeterminism. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 1968, Pp. 59–65. , Pp. 55–61.)Prior Arthur N.. Identifiable Individuals. Papers on Time and Tense, by Prior Arthur N., Oxford at the Clarendon Press 19. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):515-518.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  1
    Harold Levin & Nino B. Cocchiarella (1991). Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1105.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  9
    Peter Kügler (1994). Die Zurückführung Des Möglichen Auf Das Wirkliche. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 25 (2):223 - 240.
    The Reduction of the Possible to the Real. Modern philosophy cannot avoid dealing with possible worlds - neither in the field of intensional logic nor in other fields not directly connected with logical investigations. This paper attempts to develop a method to substitute possible worlds by the real world, referring to the works of Stig Kanger and Nino B. Cocchiarella. This is done by investigating the metaphorical and dynamical functions of natural languages. It is proved that this new technique (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Nino B. Cocchiarella (1971). Bull R. A.. An Algebraic Study of Tense Logics with Linear Time. Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):173.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Nino B. Cocchiarella (1969). Luce David Randall. A Calculus of ‘Before.’ Theoria , Vol. 32 , Pp. 25-44. Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (4):646-647.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Nino B. Cocchiarella, Jon Barwise & John Perry (1986). Situations and Attitudes. Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2):470.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  33
    Mark B. Adams (2000). Last Judgment: The Visionary Biology of J. B. S. Haldane. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):457 - 491.
    This paper seeks to reinterpret the life and work of J. B. S. Haldane by focusing on an illuminating but largely ignored essay he published in 1927, "The Last Judgment" -- the sequel to his better known work, "Daedalus" (1924). This astonishing essay expresses a vision of the human future over the next 40,000,000 years, one that revises and updates Wellsian futurism with the long range implications of the "new biology" for human destiny. That vision served as a kind of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  24.  71
    Natalja Deng (2015). On Whether B-Theoretic Atheists Should Fear Death. Philosophia 43 (4):1011-1021.
    In this paper I revisit a dispute between Mikel Burley and Robin Le Poidevin about whether or not the B-theory of time can give its adherents any reason to be less afraid of death. In ‘Should a B-theoretic atheist fear death?’, Burley argues that even on Le Poidevin’s understanding of the B-theory, atheists shouldn’t be comforted. His reason is that the prevalent B-theoretic account of our attitudes towards the past and future precludes treating our fear of death as unwarranted. I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  11
    Roberto Horácio de Sá Pereira (forthcoming). A Nonconceptualist Reading of the B-Deduction. Philosophical Studies:1-18.
    In this paper, I propose a new nonconceptual reading of the B-Deduction. As Hanna correctly remarks :399–415, 2011: 405), the word “cognition” has in both editions of the first Critique a wide sense, meaning nonconceptual cognition, and a narrow meaning, in Kant’s own words “an objective perception”. To be sure, Kant assumes the first meaning to account for why the Deduction is unavoidable. And if we take this meaning as a premise of the B-Deduction, then there is a gap in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Matt Farr (2012). On A- and B-Theoretic Elements of Branching Spacetimes. Synthese 188 (1):85-116.
    This paper assesses branching spacetime theories in light of metaphysical considerations concerning time. I present the A, B, and C series in terms of the temporal structure they impose on sets of events, and raise problems for two elements of extant branching spacetime theories—McCall’s ‘branch attrition’, and the ‘no backward branching’ feature of Belnap’s ‘branching space-time’—in terms of their respective A- and B-theoretic nature. I argue that McCall’s presentation of branch attrition can only be coherently formulated on a model with (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27. Tommy J. Curry (2012). The Fortune of Wells: Ida B. Wells-Barnett's Use of T. Thomas Fortune's Philosophy of Social Agitation as a Prolegomenon to Militant Civil Rights Activism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (4):456-482.
    Jesus Christ may be regarded as the chief spirit of agitation and innovation. He himself declared, “I come not to bring peace, but a sword.” One cannot delve seriously into the centuries of activism and scholarship against racism, Jim Crowism, and the terrorism of lynching without encountering the legacies of Timothy Thomas Fortune and Ida B. Wells-Barnett. Black scholars from the 19th century to the present have been inspired by the sociological and economic works of Fortune and Wells. Scholars of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Mehmet Karabela (2013). Between Jadal and Burhān: Reading Post-Classical Islamic Intellectual History Through Ibn Ṭufeyl’s Novel Ḥayy B. Yaḳẓān. JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF DIVINITY OF ANKARA UNIVERSITY 54 (2):77-93.
    This article opens a new discussion in the field of post-classical Islamic intellectual history by showing how literature and intellectual history are two inseparable and interdependent fields through an analysis of Ibn Ṭufayl’s novel, Ḥayy b. Yaqẓān. To this end, the article first examines the tension between the two concepts of jadal and burhān, which have affected much of the currents in classical Islamic intellectual history, and does so by assessing the three main figures in Ibn Ṭufayl’s novel: Ḥayy, Absāl (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Veronica Ruvina (2010). Komitmen Organisasi: Karyawan Dengan Kepribadian Tipe a Dan Tipe B. Phronesis 9 (2).
    The aim of this study is to describe organizational commitment between type A personality’s and type B is personality’s workers on three companies. Organizational commitment is define as the degree of psychological identification with or attachment to the organization for which we work. Participant of this study was 108 workers from three different companies. Data was obtained by questionnaire and processed with SPSS for Windows ver. 12. Using Mann-Whitney independent t-test for non parametric, the result of organizational commitment U = (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  13
    Desh Raj Sirswal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Modern Indian Philosopher.
    Dr. B.R. Ambedkar is one of the names that changed social order of the age-old tradition of suppression and humiliation. He was an intellectual, scholar & statesman and contributed greatly in the nation building. He led a number of movements to emancipate the downtrodden masses and to secure human rights to millions of depressed classes. He has left an indelible imprint through his immense contribution in framing the modern Constitution of free India. He stands as a symbol of struggle for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Natalja Deng (2010). 'Beyond A- and B-Time' Reconsidered. Philosophia 38 (4):741-753.
    This article is a response to Clifford Williams’s claim that the debate between A- and B theories of time is misconceived because these theories do not differ. I provide some missing support for Williams’s claim that the B-theory includes transition, by arguing that representative B-theoretic explanations for why we experience time as passing (even though it does not) are inherently unstable. I then argue that, contra Williams, it does not follow that there is nothing at stake in the A- versus (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  9
    Desh Raj Sirswal, The Role of Religious and Spiritual Values in Shaping Humanity (A Study of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s Religious Philosophy).
    Values are an important part of human existence, his society and human relations. All social, economic, political, and religious problems are in one sense is reflection of this special abstraction of human knowledge. We are living in a globalized village and thinking much about values rather than practice of it. If we define religion and spirituality we can say that religion is a set of beliefs and rituals that claim to get a person in a right relationship with God, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  54
    Tomislav Ivezić (2003). The Proof That the Standard Transformations of E and B Are Not the Lorentz Transformations. Foundations of Physics 33 (9):1339-1347.
    In this paper it is exactly proved that the standard transformations of the three-dimensional (3D) vectors of the electric and magnetic fields E and B are not relativistically correct transformations. Thence the 3D vectors E and B are not well-defined quantities in the 4D space-time and, contrary to the general belief, the usual Maxwell equations with the 3D E and B are not in agreement with the special relativity. The 4-vectors E a and B a , as well-defined 4D quantities, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  92
    Stephan Torre (2009). Truth-Conditions, Truth-Bearers and the New B-Theory of Time. Philosophical Studies 142 (3):325-344.
    In this paper I consider two strategies for providing tenseless truth-conditions for tensed sentences: the token-reflexive theory and the date theory. Both theories have faced a number of objections by prominent A-theorists such as Quentin Smith and William Lane Craig. Traditionally, these two theories have been viewed as rival methods for providing truth-conditions for tensed sentences. I argue that the debate over whether the token-reflexive theory or the date theory is true has arisen from a failure to distinguish between conditions (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35.  60
    Jonathan Tallant (2008). What is It to “B” a Relation? Synthese 162 (1):117 - 132.
    The purpose of this paper is two fold: first, I look to show Oaklander’s (The ontology of time. New York: Prometheus Books, 2004) theory of time to be false. Second, I show that the only way to salvage the B-theory is via the adopting of the causal theory of time, and allying this to Oaklander’s claim that tense is to be eliminated. I then raise some concerns with the causal theory of time. My conclusion is that, if one adopts eternalism, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  43
    Francesco Orilia & L. Nathan Oaklander (2013). Do We Really Need a New B-Theory of Time? Topoi 34 (1):1-14.
    It is customary in current philosophy of time to distinguish between an A- (or tensed) and a B- (or tenseless) theory of time. It is also customary to distinguish between an old B-theory of time, and a new B-theory of time. We may say that the former holds both semantic atensionalism and ontological atensionalism, whereas the latter gives up semantic atensionalism and retains ontological atensionalism. It is typically assumed that the B-theorists have been induced by advances in the philosophy of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Objects in Time: Studies of Persistence in B-Time. Dissertation, Lund University
    This thesis is about the conceptualization of persistence of physical, middle-sized objects within the theoretical framework of the revisionary ‘B-theory’ of time. According to the B-theory, time does not flow, but is an extended and inherently directed fourth dimension along which the history of the universe is ‘laid out’ once and for all. It is a widespread view among philosophers that if we accept the B-theory, the commonsensical ‘endurance theory’ of persistence will have to be rejected. The endurance theory says (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  65
    Mikel Burley (2006). Beyond “Beyond a- and B-Time”. Philosophia 34 (4):411-416.
    This Article critically discusses Clifford Williams’ claim that the A-theory and B-theory of time are indistinguishable. I examine three considerations adduced by Williams to support his claim that the concept of time essentially includes transition as well as extension, and argue that, despite its prima facie plausibility, the claim has not been adequately justified. Williams therefore begs the question against the B-theorist, who denies that transition is essential. By Williams’ own lights, he ought to deny that the B-theory is a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  12
    Clifford Williams (1998). B-Time Transition. Philosophical Inquiry 20 (3-4):59-63.
    I argue that the proper way to think of the difference between A- and B-time is not as the difference between transition and the lack of transition, as is common, but as A-transition and B-transition. However, it is not evident what the difference is between these two kinds of transition. Thus, it is not evident what the difference is between A- and B-time.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  27
    Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Endurance Per Se in B-Time. Metaphysica 10 (2):175-183.
    Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevolds enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269-283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe's paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106-114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69-74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  28
    Daniel M. Johnson (2013). B-Theory Old and New: On Ontological Commitment. Synthese 190 (17):3953-3970.
    The most important argument against the B-theory of time is the paraphrase argument. The major defense against that argument is the “new” tenseless theory of time, which is built on what I will call the “indexical reply” to the paraphrase argument. The move from the “old” tenseless theory of time to the new is most centrally a change of viewpoint about the nature and determiners of ontological commitment. Ironically, though, the new tenseless theorists have generally not paid enough sustained, direct (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  42
    Clifford Williams (2003). Beyond a-and B-Time. Philosophia 31 (1-2):75-91.
    The common assumption in the debate between the A- and B-theories is that there is a difference between A- and B-time. A-time has been said to be characterized by a flow, whereas B-time has been said not to consist of a flow. This way of construing the debate, however, is mistaken. Both A- and B-time possess "flow" or transition. But if this is so, we need to ask how B-time flow differs from A-time flow. I argue that none of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  13
    Floris Roelofsen (2010). Condition B Effects in Two Simple Steps. Natural Language Semantics 18 (2):115-140.
    This paper is concerned with constraints on the interpretation of pronominal anaphora, in particular Condition B effects. It aims to contribute to a particular approach, initiated by Reinhart (Anaphora and semantic interpretation, 1983) and further developed elsewhere. It proposes a modification of Reinhart’s Interface Rule, and argues that the resulting theory compares favorably with others, while being compatible with independently motivated general hypotheses about the interaction between different interpretive mechanisms.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  9
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1989). Essay Review. History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):77-83.
    L. E. HAHN and P. A. SCHILPP (eds.), The philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1986. xvi + 705 pp. $35.95 cloth/$16.50 (paper).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  9
    Nino B. Cocchiarella (1989). Essay Review. History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):77-83.
    L. E. HAHN and P. A. SCHILPP (eds.), The philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1986. xvi + 705 pp. $35.95 cloth/$16.50 (paper).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  4
    Elena Conis (2011). “Do We Really Need Hepatitis B on the Second Day of Life?” Vaccination Mandates and Shifting Representations of Hepatitis B. Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (2):155-166.
    In the decade following hepatitis B vaccine’s 1981 approval, U.S. health officials issued evolving guidelines on who should receive the vaccine: first, gay men, injection drug users, and healthcare workers; later, hepatitis B-positive women’s children; and later still, all newborns. States laws that mandated the vaccine for all children were quietly accepted in the 1990s; in the 2000s, however, popular anti-vaccine sentiment targeted the shot as an emblem of immunization policy excesses. Shifting attitudes toward the vaccine in this period were (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. John Henry, Sarah Hutton, Charles B. Schmitt & Istituto Italiano Per Gli Studi Filosofici (1990). New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought Essays in the History of Science, Education and Philosophy ; in Memory of Charles B. Schmitt.
  48. Nino B. Cocchiarella & Max A. Freund (2008). Modal Logic: An Introduction to its Syntax and Semantics. Oxford University Press Usa.
    In this text, a variety of modal logics at the sentential, first-order, and second-order levels are developed with clarity, precision and philosophical insight. All of the S1-S5 modal logics of Lewis and Langford, among others, are constructed. A matrix, or many-valued semantics, for sentential modal logic is formalized, and an important result that no finite matrix can characterize any of the standard modal logics is proven. Exercises, some of which show independence results, help to develop logical skills. A separate sentential (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Bernard W. Bell, Emily Grosholz & James B. Stewart (1996). W.E.B. Du Bois on Race and Culture Philosophy, Politics, and Poetics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. David Branscome, Adriaan Lanni, Nino Luraghi, David Rohrbacher & Matthew B. Roller (2010). 1. Cover Cover (Pp. C1-C4). Classical Antiquity 29 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000