Search results for 'Noah Leah Henderson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  63
    Leah Henderson, Noah D. Goodman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & James F. Woodward (2010). The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective. Philosophy of Science 77 (2):172-200.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2. Denis M. Walsh, Leah Henderson, Noah D. Goodman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, James F. Woodward, Hannes Leitgeb, Richard Pettigrew, Brad Weslake & John Kulvicki (2010). 1. Not a Sure Thing: Fitness, Probability, and Causation Not a Sure Thing: Fitness, Probability, and Causation (Pp. 147-171). [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 77 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Leah Henderson (2014). Bayesianism and Inference to the Best Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (4):687-715.
    Two of the most influential theories about scientific inference are inference to the best explanation and Bayesianism. How are they related? Bas van Fraassen has claimed that IBE and Bayesianism are incompatible rival theories, as any probabilistic version of IBE would violate Bayesian conditionalization. In response, several authors have defended the view that IBE is compatible with Bayesian updating. They claim that the explanatory considerations in IBE are taken into account by the Bayesian because the Bayesian (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  14
    Leah Henderson (forthcoming). The No Miracles Argument and the Base Rate Fallacy. Synthese:1-8.
    The no miracles argument is one of the main arguments for scientific realism. Recently it has been alleged that the no miracles argument is fundamentally flawed because it commits the base rate fallacy. The allegation is based on the idea that the appeal of the no miracles argument arises from inappropriate neglect of the base rate of approximate truth among the relevant population of theories. However, the base rate fallacy allegation relies on an assumption of random sampling of individuals from (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  24
    Leah Henderson (2003). The Von Neumann Entropy: A Reply to Shenker. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):291-296.
    Shenker has claimed that Von Neumann's argument for identifying the quantum mechanical entropy with the Von Neumann entropy, S() = – ktr( log ), is invalid. Her claim rests on a misunderstanding of the idea of a quantum mechanical pure state. I demonstrate this, and provide a further explanation of Von Neumann's argument.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  8
    Richard Cleve, Artur Ekert, Leah Henderson, Chiara Macchiavello & Michele Mosca (1998). On Quantum Algorithms. Complexity 4 (1):33-42.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  15
    Leah Henderson (2014). Can the Second Law Be Compatible with Time Reversal Invariant Dynamics? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:90-98.
    It is commonly thought that there is some tension between the second law of thermodynam- ics and the time reversal invariance of the microdynamics. Recently, however, Jos Uffink has argued that the origin of time reversal non-invariance in thermodynamics is not in the second law. Uffink argues that the relationship between the second law and time reversal invariance depends on the formulation of the second law. He claims that a recent version of the second law due to Lieb and Yngvason (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Eileen Willis, Luisa Toffoli, Julie Henderson, Leah Couzner, Patricia Hamilton, Claire Verrall & Ian Blackman (forthcoming). Rounding, Work Intensification and New Public Management. Nursing Inquiry:n/a-n/a.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    Leah Henderson (2002). Measuring Quantum Entanglement. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer 137--152.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Étienne Émile M. Boutroux & Archibald Henderson (1912). William James, Tr. By A. And B. Henderson.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  55
    Noah Leah Henderson, Joshua D. Goodman, James B. Tenenbaum & F. Woodward (2010). The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective. Philosophy of Science 77 (2).
    Hierarchical Bayesian models (HBMs) provide an account of Bayesian inference in a hierarchically structured hypothesis space. Scientific theories are plausibly regarded as organized into hierarchies in many cases, with higher levels sometimes called ‘paradigms’ and lower levels encoding more specific or concrete hypotheses. Therefore, HBMs provide a useful model for scientific theory change, showing how higher‐level theory change may be driven by the impact of evidence on lower levels. HBMs capture features described in the Kuhnian tradition, particularly the idea that (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  28
    David K. Henderson & Terence Horgan (2011). The Epistemological Spectrum: At the Interface of Cognitive Science and Conceptual Analysis. OUP Oxford.
    Henderson and Horgan set out a broad new approach to epistemology. They defend the roles of the a priori and conceptual analysis, but with an essential empirical dimension. 'Transglobal reliability' is the key to epistemic justification. The question of which cognitive processes are reliable depends on contingent facts about human capacities.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13.  69
    David Henderson, Terry Horgan & Matjaž Potrč (2007). Transglobal Evidentialism-Reliabilism. Acta Analytica 22 (4):281-300.
    We propose an approach to epistemic justification that incorporates elements of both reliabilism and evidentialism, while also transforming these elements in significant ways. After briefly describing and motivating the non-standard version of reliabilism that Henderson and Horgan call “transglobal” reliabilism, we harness some of Henderson and Horgan’s conceptual machinery to provide a non-reliabilist account of propositional justification (i.e., evidential support). We then invoke this account, together with the notion of a transglobally reliable belief-forming process, to give an account (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  16
    Mike J. Henderson (1997). Ethical Outsourcing in UK Financial Services: Employee Rights. Business Ethics 6 (2):110–124.
    Outsourcing is becoming a major option in British business, including the financial services industry, and it raises a number of ethical considerations. The author of this major ethical study contends that “Outsourcing seems to present a particular threat to employees ... because of the factors which have led to outsourcing and the way in which it tends to work.” Mike Henderson is an Associate of the Chartered Institute of Bankers and Senior Lecturer in Financial Services in the School of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  10
    Martha Henderson (2012). Franck L. B. Meijboom: Problems of Trust: A Question of Trustworthiness. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (1):107-109.
    Franck L. B. Meijboom: Problems of Trust: A Question of Trustworthiness Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10806-010-9300-4 Authors Martha L. Henderson, Master of Environmental Studies Program, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA 98505, USA Journal Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Online ISSN 1573-322X Print ISSN 1187-7863.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. David Henderson, Comments Are Welcome.
    Contemporary accounts of what it is for an agent to be justified in holding a given belief commonly carry substantive commitments concerning what cognitive processes can and should be like. In this paper, we argue that concern for the plausiblity of such psychological commitments leads to significant epistemological results. In particular, it leads to a multi-faceted epistemology in which elements of traditionally conflicting epistemologies are vindicated within a single epistemological account. We suggest thinking of the epistemologically relevant cognitive processes in (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. William Henderson (1999). John Ruskin's Political Economy. Routledge.
    This volume offers an exciting new reading of John Ruskin's economic and social criticism, based on recent research into rhetoric in economics. Willie Henderson uses notions derived from literary criticism, the rhetorical turn in economics and more conventional approaches to historical economic texts to reevaluate Ruskins economic and social criticism. By identifying Ruskin's rhetoric, and by reading his work through that of Plato, Xenophon, and John Stuart Mill, Willie Henderson reveals how Ruskin manipulated a knowledge base. Moreover in (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Christine Dunn Henderson (ed.) (2001). Seers and Judges: American Literature as Political Philosophy. Lexington Books.
    Alexis de Tocqueville asserted that America had no truly great literature, and that American writers merely mimicked the British and European traditions of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This new edited collection masterfully refutes Tocqueville's monocultural myopia and reveals the distinctive role American poetry and prose have played in reflecting and passing judgment upon the core values of American democracy. The essays, profiling the work of Mark Twain, F. Scott Fitzgerald, John Updike, Edith Wharton, Walt Whitman, Henry James, Willa Cather, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. David K. Henderson & Terence Horgan (2013). The Epistemological Spectrum: At the Interface of Cognitive Science and Conceptual Analysis. Oxford University Press Uk.
    David Henderson and Terence Horgan set out a broad new approach to epistemology, which they see as a mixed discipline, having both a priori and empirical elements. They defend the roles of a priori reflection and conceptual analysis in philosophy, but their revisionary account of these philosophical methods allows them a subtle but essential empirical dimension. They espouse a dual-perspective position which they call iceberg epistemology, and introduce the notion of transglobal reliability as the mark of the cognitive processes (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. George Henderson (2013). Value in Marx: The Persistence of Value in a More-Than-Capitalist World. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    Long prone to dogmatic disagreement, the question of value in Marx’s thought—what value is, the purpose it serves, its application to real-world capitalism—requires renewal if Marx’s work is to remain vibrant. In _Value in Marx_, George Henderson offers a lucid rereading of Marx that strips value of its turgid theoretical reduction and reframes it as an investigation into the tensions between social relations and forms as they are rather than as what they could otherwise become. Drawing on Marx’s _Capital_ (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Bruce Henderson (2010). Why Does God Let It Happen? Chrysalis Books.
    In the wake of life-changing events—whether as global in reach as the terrorist attacks on September 11 or as personal as the death of a child—the first question that springs to mind is “Why?” Why do good people suffer pain and loss? Why does God allow these things to happen? In this simple, straightforward book, Bruce Henderson tackles some of the most difficult questions that people of faith face in their lives. Drawing from the wisdom of visionary Emanuel Swedenborg, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Bruce Henderson (2010). Window to Eternity. Swedenborg Foundation Publishers.
    What happens to us when we die? Is there really a heaven and hell? Are there angels watching over us? These questions follow us from early childhood to old age, particularly in moments when we’re confronted with the loss of a loved one. In _Window to Eternity,_ Bruce Henderson draws from the teachings of visionary Emanuel Swedenborg to paint a vivid picture of heaven and hell, where the souls of the departed become angels and demons and indescribable wonders await. (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Fernanda Ferreira, Jens Apel & John M. Henderson (2008). Taking a New Look at Looking at Nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (11):405-410.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  24. Claude Bernard, Henry Copley Greene & Lawrence Joseph Henderson (1980). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Classics of Medicine Library.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   64 citations  
  25.  6
    Max Weber, A. M. Henderson & Talcott Parsons (1948). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Philosophical Review 57 (5):524-528.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   169 citations  
  26.  97
    Kirsten Henderson (2006). Book Review: A Change in the Weather: Climate and Culture in Australia; Australian Landforms: Understanding a Low, Flat, Arid and Old Landscape. [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 87 (1):143-145.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. G. P. Henderson (1962). Moral Finality. Philosophical Quarterly 12 (47):109-119.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Ernest N. Henderson (1927). Ethical Bases for Economic Reward. International Journal of Ethics 37 (4):349-361.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  44
    David Henderson (2009). Motivated Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):119 - 131.
    The concept of knowledge is used to certify epistemic agents as good sources (on a certain point or subject matter) for an understood audience. Attributions of knowledge and denials of knowledge are used in a kind of epistemic gate keeping for (epistemic or practical) communities with which the attributor and interlocutors are associated. When combined with reflection on kinds of practical and epistemic communities, and their situated epistemic needs for gate keeping, this simple observation regarding the point and purpose of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  30.  17
    J. Henderson (2003). Human Gaze Control During Real-World Scene Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (11):498-504.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  31.  13
    Robert Feagan & Amanda Henderson (2009). Devon Acres CSA: Local Struggles in a Global Food System. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 26 (3):203-217.
    This paper focuses on examining the dynamic nature of community supported agriculture (CSA) and the real-world experiences which mark its contours, often making it distinct from the early idealized CSA “model.” Specifically, our study examines the narratives of the farmers of Devon Acres CSA over its duration, in tandem with a survey of recent shareholders in order to understand and explain its evolution. The framework we develop here shows that this CSA is largely characterized by instrumental and functional beliefs and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  32.  8
    David Henderson (2011). Gate-Keeping Contextualism. Episteme 8 (1):83-98.
    This paper explores a position that combines contextualism regarding knowledge with the idea that the central point or purpose of the concept of knowledge is to feature in attributions that keep epistemic gate for contextually salient communities. After highlighting the main outlines and virtues of the suggested gate-keeping contextualism, two issues are pursued. First, the motivation for the view is clarified in a discussion of the relation between evaluative concepts and the purposes they serve. This clarifies why one's sense for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  33.  72
    Gail E. Henderson & Nancy M. P. King (forthcoming). Studying Benefit in Gene Transfer Research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  58
    Sanford Goldberg & David Henderson (2006). Monitoring and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):600 - 617.
    One of the central points of contention in the epistemology of testimony concerns the uniqueness (or not) of the justification of beliefs formed through testimony--whether such justification can be accounted for in terms of, or 'reduced to,' other familiar sort of justification, e.g. without relying on any epistemic principles unique to testimony. One influential argument for the reductionist position, found in the work of Elizabeth Fricker, argues by appeal to the need for the hearer to monitor the testimony for credibility. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  35. Lawrence J. Henderson (1918). Mechanism, From the Standpoint of Physical Science. Philosophical Review 27 (6):571-576.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  71
    Suzanne Watts Henderson (forthcoming). Book Review: Colossians Remixed: Subverting the Empire. [REVIEW] Interpretation 60 (1):108-110.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  14
    Jessica Schluter, Sarah Winch, Kerri Holzhauser & Amanda Henderson (2008). Nurses' Moral Sensitivity and Hospital Ethical Climate: A Literature Review. Nursing Ethics 15 (3):304-321.
    Increased technological and pharmacological interventions in patient care when patient outcomes are uncertain have been linked to the escalation in moral and ethical dilemmas experienced by health care providers in acute care settings. Health care research has shown that facilities that are able to attract and retain nursing staff in a competitive environment and provide high quality care have the capacity for nurses to process and resolve moral and ethical dilemmas. This article reports on the findings of a systematic review (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  38.  46
    Kirsten Henderson (2006). Book Review: Divided Natures. French Contributions to Political Ecology. [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 84 (1):145-147.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  38
    David Henderson (2008). Testimonial Beliefs and Epistemic Competence. Noûs 42 (2):190–221.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  40. David Henderson & Terry Horgan (2001). The A Priori Isn’T All That It Is Cracked Up to Be, But It Is Something. Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2):219-250.
    Alvin Goldman’s contributions to contemporary epistemology are impressive—few epistemologists have provided others so many occasions for reflecting on the fundamental character of their discipline and its concepts. His work has informed the way epistemological questions have changed (and remained consistent) over the last two decades. We (the authors of this paper) can perhaps best suggest our indebtedness by noting that there is probably no paper on epistemology that either of us individually or jointly have produced that does not in its (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  41.  13
    David Henderson (2013). Entitlement in Gutting's Epistemology of Philosophy: Comments on What Philosophers Know. Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):121-132.
    In What Philosophers Know, Gary Gutting provides an epistemology of philosophical reflection. This paper focuses on the roles that various intuitive inputs are said to play in philosophical thought. Gutting argues that philosophers are defeasibly entitled to believe some of these, prior to the outcome of the philosophical reflection, and that they then rightly serve as significant (again defeasible) anchors on reflection. This paper develops a view of epistemic entitlement and applies it to argue that many prephilosophical convictions of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42. David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.) (2015). Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Epistemic Evaluation aims to explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology. The methodology is to consider the point or purpose of our epistemic evaluations, and to pursue epistemological theory in light of such matters. Call this purposeful epistemology. The idea is that considerations about the point and purpose of epistemic evaluation might fruitfully constrain epistemological theory and yield insights for epistemological reflection. Several contributions to this volume explicitly address this general methodology, or some version of it. Others focus on (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  23
    Luke Henderson (2014). Character-Development and Heaven. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (3):319-330.
    Numerous philosophers in recent decades have argued that a partial explanation for how the blessed in heaven are impeccable while remaining free and responsible is that they have cultivated or developed such a virtuous character prior to heaven that once in heaven they are incapable of acting contrary to their virtuously cultivated characters. Further, because the agents are at least partially responsible for the construction of their characters, they can be considered free and responsible with regard to the choices or (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  5
    David K. Henderson (1993). Interpretation and Explanation in the Human Sciences. State University of New York Press.
    Refutes the methodological separatists who hold that the logic of explanation and testing in the human sciences is fundamentally different than in the natural sciences, and develops complementary accounts for interpretation and explanation, ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  45. Kirsten Henderson (2005). Book Review: Liberal Democracy 3.0. [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 81 (1):132-137.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  93
    Suzanne Watts Henderson (forthcoming). 1 Corinthians 1:3–9. Interpretation 62 (4):426-428.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  40
    David Henderson & Terence Horgan (2000). Iceberg Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):497-535.
    Accounts of what it is for an agent to be justified in holding a belief commonly carry commitments concerning what cognitive processes can and should be like. A concern for the plausibility of such commitments leads to a multi-faceted epistemology in which elements of traditionally conflicting epistemologies are vindicated within a single epistemological account. The accessible and articulable states that have been the exclusive focus of much epistemology must constitute only a proper subset of epistemologically relevant processing. The interaction of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  48. David Henderson & Terry Horgan (2007). Some Ins and Outs of Transglobal Reliabilism. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press 100.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  49. David K. Henderson (1994). Epistemic Competence and Contextualist Epistemology: Why Contextualism is Not Just the Poor Person's Coherentism. Journal of Philosophy 91 (12):627-649.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  50.  6
    N. King, G. Henderson, L. Churchill, A. Davis, S. C. Hull, D. K. Nelson, P. Parham-Vetter, B. Rothschild, M. Easter & B. Wilfond (2005). Consent Forms and the Therapeutic Misconception. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27:1-7.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000