Search results for 'Norman Friedman' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. M. P. Friedman (2001). Tomorrow the World: Hitler, Northwest Africa, and the Path Toward America. By Norman JW Goda. The European Legacy 6 (3):393-393.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Samantha Brennan, Claudia Card, Bernard Dauenhauer, Marilyn A. Friedman, Dale Jamieson, Richard Arneson, Clark Wolf, Robert Nagle, James Nickel, Christoph Fehige & Norman Daniels (2000). The Idea of a Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In this unique volume, some of today's most eminent political philosophers examine the thought of John Rawls, focusing in particular on his most recent work. These original essays explore diverse issues, including the problem of pluralism, the relationship between constitutive commitment and liberal institutions, just treatment of dissident minorities, the constitutional implications of liberalism, international relations, and the structure of international law. The first comprehensive study of Rawls's recent work, The Idea of Political Liberalism will be indispensable for political philosophers (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  3.  5
    Morton P. Friedman, Edward C. Carterette & Norman H. Anderson (1968). Long-Term Probability Learning with a Random Schedule of Reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p1):442.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  15
    Norman Friedman (1953). Imagery: From Sensation to Symbol. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 12 (1):25-37.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  5
    Herbert Read, Norman Friedman, Jiri Kolaja, Robert N. Wilson & Victor S. Yarros (1955). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (3):408-411.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Harvey Friedman & L. A. Harrington (1985). Harvey Friedman's Research on the Foundations of Mathematics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Alinda Friedman & Norman R. Brown (2000). Reasoning About Geography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2):193-219.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Richard Norman (2004). Can There Be a Just War?: Norman Can There Be a Just War? Think 3 (8):7-16.
    Richard Norman examines justifications for war that are rooted in the right of self-defence.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Harvey M. Friedman, Friedman@Math.Ohio-State.Edu.
    It has been accepted since the early part of the Century that there is no problem formalizing mathematics in standard formal systems of axiomatic set theory. Most people feel that they know as much as they ever want to know about how one can reduce natural numbers, integers, rationals, reals, and complex numbers to sets, and prove all of their basic properties. Furthermore, that this can continue through more and more complicated material, and that there is never a real problem.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Harvey Friedman, A Complete Theory of Everything: Satisfiability in the Universal Domain Harvey M. Friedman October 10, 1999 Friedman@Math.Ohio-State.Edu Www.Math.Ohio-State.Edu/~Friedman/. [REVIEW]
    Here we take the view that LPC(=) is applicable to structures whose domain is too large to be a set. This is not just a matter of class theory versus set theory, although it can be interpreted as such, and this interpretation is discussed briefly at the end.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Harvey Friedman, A Complete Theory of Everything: Satisfiability in the Universal Domain Harvey M. Friedman October 10, 1999 Friedman@Math.Ohio-State.Edu. [REVIEW]
    Here we take the view that LPC(=) is applicable to structures whose domain is too large to be a set. This is not just a matter of class theory versus set theory, although it can be interpreted as such, and this interpretation is discussed briefly at the end.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  9
    Lesley Friedman (1993). Reply to Flage's On Friedman's Look. Hume Studies 19 (1):199-202.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  5
    Lorenzo Imbesi, Bruce Sterling, Donald Norman & Derrick de Kerckhove (2010). Technology, Crisis, and Interaction Design: A Conversation with Bruce Sterling, Donald Norman, and Derrick de Kerckhove. Mediatropes 2 (2):128-135.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  2
    R. Z. Friedman (1982). Kierkegaard: First Existentialist or Last Kantian?: R. Z. FRIEDMAN. Religious Studies 18 (2):159-170.
    Kierkegaard's leap of faith is one of the most thoroughly explored topics in modern philosophy. What can yet another inquiry into this notion hope to achieve? A number of significant things, I think, of both historical and systematic value. The main contention of this paper is that the leap of faith, often associated with the emergence of existentialism, is Kierkegaard's response to a problem which is essentially Kantian in origin and structure. Kierkegaard wants to accomodate both the Kantian interpretation of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Richard Norman (1982). The Primacy of Practice: ‘Intelligent Idealism’ in Marxist Thought1: Richard Norman. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 13:155-179.
    The chief defect of all previous materialism is that things, reality, the sensible world, are conceived only in the form of objects of observation , but not as human sense activity , not as practical activity , not subjectively. Hence, in opposition to materialism, the active side was developed abstractly by idealism, which of course does not know real sense activity as such.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Milton Friedman (forthcoming). Milton Friedman's Case Against Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  3
    Milton Friedman (1954). Book Review:Essays in Positive Economics. Milton Friedman. [REVIEW] Ethics 65 (1):71-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Alinda Friedman & Lyle E. Bourne (1976). Erratum to Friedman and Bourne. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 105 (3):253-253.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Milton Friedman (2006). Fanatical, Not Reasonable: A Short Correspondence Between Walter Block and Milton Friedman. Journal of Libertarian Studies 20 (3):61-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Michael Friedman (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science /Michael Friedman. --. --. Princeton University Press, C1983.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Michael Friedman (1998). I–Michael Friedman. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):111-129.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. H. Friedman (1995). Sheard, M., See Friedman, H. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 71:307.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Julius Lipner, Dermot Killingley & David Friedman (eds.) (1986). A Net Cast Wide: Investigations Into Indian Thought in Memory of David Friedman. Grevatt & Grevatt.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Robert W. Ackerman (1965). Ywain and GawainAlbert B. Friedman Norman T. Harrington. Speculum 40 (1):135-137.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  3
    Norman A. Stillman (2009). S. D. Goitein and Mordechai Akiva Friedman, India Traders of the Middle Ages: Documents From the Cairo Geniza . Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2008. Pp. Xxix, 918; 15 Color Plates, Genealogical Tables, and 3 Maps. €249. [REVIEW] Speculum 84 (3):719-721.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Lainie Friedman Ross (1998). Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform By Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light, and Ronald L. Caplan. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41 (4):605-606.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Norman A. Stillman (2009). India Traders of the Middle Ages: Documents From the Cairo Geniza S. D. Goitein Mordechai Akiva Friedman. Speculum 84 (3):719-721.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Christopher Cosans (2009). Does Milton Friedman Support a Vigorous Business Ethics? Journal of Business Ethics 87 (3):391 - 399.
    This paper explores the level of obligation called for by Milton Friedman’s classic essay “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits.” Several scholars have argued that Friedman asserts that businesses have no or minimal social duties beyond compliance with the law. This paper argues that this reading of Friedman does not give adequate weight to some claims that he makes and to their logical extensions. Throughout his article, Friedman emphasizes the values of freedom, respect (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  29.  23
    Sigmund Wagner-Tsukamoto (2007). Moral Agency, Profits and the Firm: Economic Revisions to the Friedman Theorem. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 70 (2):209 - 220.
    The paper reconstructs in economic terms Friedman's theorem that the only social responsibility of firms is to increase their profits while staying within legal and ethical rules. A model of three levels of moral conduct is attributed to the firm: (1) self-interested engagement in the market process itself, which reflects according to classical and neoclassical economics an ethical ideal; (2) the obeying of the "rules of the game," largely legal ones; and (3) the creation of ethical capital, which allows (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  30. Andrew Chignell (2008). NeoKantian Philosophies of Science: Cassirer, Kuhn, and Friedman. Philosophical Forum 39 (2):253-262.
    A description and critique of aspects of Michael Friedman's latter day NeoKantian program in the philosophy of science. -/- .
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  37
    Jim Wishloff (2009). The Land of Realism and the Shipwreck of Idea-Ism: Thomas Aquinas and Milton Friedman on the Social Responsibilities of Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):137 - 155.
    The views of thirteenth century Catholic thinker Thomas Aquinas and twentieth century economist Milton Friedman on the social responsibility of business are contrasted by probing the foundations of their positions. The basis of Aquinas' normative stance in political economy is found in the metaphysical and moral realism of the classic tradition. The role Descartes and Hobbes played in overturning this philosophical starting point and ushering in an age of ideology is traced out. Friedman's commitment to Comte's vision of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32.  15
    Ryan Samaroo (2015). Friedman's Thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52:129-138.
    This essay examines Friedman's recent approach to the analysis of physical theories. Friedman argues against Quine that the identification of certain principles as ‘constitutive’ is essential to a satisfactory methodological analysis of physics. I explicate Friedman's characterization of a constitutive principle, and I evaluate his account of the constitutive principles that Newtonian and Einsteinian gravitation presuppose for their formulation. I argue that something close to Friedman's thesis is defensible.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  35
    Joseph Lacey (2012). Climate Change and Norman Daniels' Theory of Just Health: An Essay on Basic Needs. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):3-14.
    Norman Daniels, in applying Rawls’ theory of justice to the issue of human health, ideally presupposes that society exists in a state of moderate scarcity. However, faced with problems like climate change, many societies find that their state of moderate scarcity is increasingly under threat. The first part of this essay aims to determine the consequences for Daniels’ theory of just health when we incorporate into Rawls’ understanding of justice the idea that the condition of moderate scarcity can fail. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. Joshua Preiss (2013). Milton Friedman, Amartya Sen, and Left and Right in American Politics. In Left and Right: The Great Dichotomy Revisited. 364-376.
    Milton Friedman and Amartya Sen have a lot in common. Both are Nobel Prize-winning economists who venture beyond the more technical questions of positive economics to demonstrate the relevance of their expertise to philosophy and public policy. Their social and political philosophy, including normative theorizing from their work and the work of other economists, comprises arguably the most influential part of their corpus. Like most Americans, both Friedman and Sen are liberals, in the sense that they argue that (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  84
    David Teira (2009). Why Friedman's Methodology Did Not Generate Consensus Among Economists? Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (2):201-214.
    In this paper I study how the theoretical categories of consumption theory were used by Milton Friedman in order to classify empirical data and obtain predictions. Friedman advocated a case by case definition of these categories that traded theoretical coherence for empirical content. I contend that this methodological strategy puts a clear incentive to contest any prediction contrary to our interest: it can always be argued that these predictions rest on a wrong classification of data. My conjecture is (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  10
    Erik Palmgren (1995). The Friedman‐Translation for Martin‐Löf's Type Theory. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 41 (3):314-326.
    In this note we show that Friedman's syntactic translation for intuitionistic logical systems can be carried over to Martin-Löf's type theory, inlcuding universes provided some restrictions are made. Using this translation we show that the theory is closed under a higher type version of Markov's rule.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  4
    Darlene O'Leary (2004). Interpreting Friedman's View of Business. Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 4:40-52.
    I have decided to focus this discussion on the famous article by Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits.” This article was originally published in 1970 and has been reproduced in many sources since then. So the article is over 30 years old. However, the perspective that Friedman promotes in this article is one that is still very much a part of discussions about business, business ethics, and ethics and economics. It seems legitimate (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  9
    Nico Vorster (2010). An Ethical Critique Of Milton Friedman's Doctrine On Economics And Freedom. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 9 (26):163-188.
    Milton Friedman was one of the most influential economists of the twentieth century. Many of the neo-liberal views that he advocated were adopted in the 1980’s by Western countries such as Britain and the United States. This essay focuses on Friedman’s views on politics, economics and freedom. The first section discusses his perspectives on the relation between capitalism and freedom, the nature of markets, his understanding of equality and of the social responsibility of business. The second section attempts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Friedrich Hügel, Norman Kemp Smith & Lawrence F. Barmann (1981). The Letters of Baron Friedrich von Hügel and Professor Norman Kemp Smith. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  64
    Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. E. Moore, Norman Malcolm & Gabriel Citron (2015). A Discussion Between Wittgenstein and Moore on Certainty : From the Notes of Norman Malcolm. Mind 124 (493):73-84.
    In April 1939, G. E. Moore read a paper to the Cambridge University Moral Science Club entitled ‘Certainty’. In it, amongst other things, Moore made the claims that: the phrase ‘it is certain’ could be used with sense-experience-statements, such as ‘I have a pain’, to make statements such as ‘It is certain that I have a pain’; and that sense-experience-statements can be said to be certain in the same sense as some material-thing-statements can be — namely in the sense that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  51
    Marius Stan (2014). Review: Friedman, Michael, Kant's Construction of Nature. Metascience 23 (2):233-242.
  42.  55
    David Teira (2007). Milton Friedman, the Statistical Methodologist. History of Political Economy 39 (3):511-28.
  43.  13
    Maurice Lagueux (1994). Friedman'S?Instrumentalism? And Constructive Empiricism in Economics. Theory and Decision 37 (2):147-174.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  15
    Álvaro J. Peláez Cedrés (2006). Reconsiderando a Friedman, Richardson Y lo a priori constitutivo. Ideas Y Valores 55 (131):51-72.
    Las interpretaciones contemporáneas en torno a lo a priori en la filosofía de la ciencia han estado dominadas fundamentalmente por las concepciones semántica y pragmática. El aporte de estas concepciones ha sido significativo, pero han rechazado injustificadamente, a mi modo de ver, el sentido funda..
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  23
    Eric Schliesser (2012). Inventing Paradigms, Monopoly, Methodology, and Mythology at 'Chicago': Nutter, Stigler, and Milton Friedman. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):160-171.
  46. Andrew Crane & Dirk Matten (2008). Incorporating the Corporation in Citizenship: A Response to Néron and Norman. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):27-33.
    This article presents a response to Néron and Norman’s contention that the language of citizenship is helpful in thinking about the political dimensions of corporate responsibilities. We argue that Néron and Norman’s main conclusions are valid but offer an extension of their analysis to incorporate extant streams of literature dealing with the political role of the corporation. We also propose that the perspective on citizenship adopted by Néron and Norman is rather narrow, andtherefore provide some alternative ways (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  47. Jennifer Nagel, Valerie San Juan & Raymond Mar (2013). Authentic Gettier Cases: A Reply to Starmans and Friedman. Cognition 129 (3):666-669.
    Do laypeople and philosophers differ in their attributions of knowledge? Starmans and Friedman maintain that laypeople differ from philosophers in taking ‘authentic evidence’ Gettier cases to be cases of knowledge. Their reply helpfully clarifies the distinction between ‘authentic evidence’ and ‘apparent evidence’. Using their sharpened presentation of this distinction, we contend that the argument of our original paper still stands.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  48. Thomas Mulligan (1986). A Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay 'the Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits'. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):265 - 269.
    The main arguments of Milton Friedman's famous and influential essay are unsuccessful: He fails to prove that the exercise of social responsibility in business is by nature an unfair and socialist practice.Much of Friedman's case is based on a questionable paradigm; a key premise is false; and logical cogency is sometimes missing.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  49. Graham Solomon (1989). An Addendum to Demopoulos and Friedman (1985). Philosophy of Science 56 (3):497-501.
    M. H. A. Newman (1928) criticized Russell's structuralist philosophy of science. Demopoulos and Friedman have discussed Newman's critique, showing its relevance to the structuralist positions held by Schlick and Carnap, and to Putnam's argument against "metaphysical realism". I discuss Richard Braithwaite's (1940) appeal to Newman in a critique of Arthur Eddington. Braithwaite believed Newman had shown that "structure depends upon content". Eddington, in his reply, misunderstood the generality of Newman's argument.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  50. Bill Shaw (1988). A Reply to Thomas Mulligan's “Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay 'the Social Responsibility of Business to Increase its Profits'”. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (7):537 - 543.
    Professor Thomas Mulligan undertakes to discredit Milton Friedman's thesis that The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. He attempts to do this by moving from Friedman's paradigm characterizing a socially responsible executive as willful and disloyal to a different paradigm, i.e., one emphasizing the consultative and consensus-building role of a socially responsible executive. Mulligan's critique misses the point, first, because even consensus-building executives act contrary to the will of minority shareholders, but even more importantly, because (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000