Search results for 'Onora Oneill' (try it on Scholar)

169 found
Sort by:
  1. Onora Oneill (2004). Consequences for Non-Consequentialists. Utilitas 16 (1):1-11.score: 240.0
    Both consequentialist and non-consequentialist ethical reasoning have difficulties in accounting for the value of consequences. Taken neat, consequentialism is too fierce in its emphasis on success and disregard of luck, while non-consequentialism seemingly over-values inner states and undervalues actual results. In UneasyVirtue Julia Driver proposes a form of objective consequentialism which claims that characters are good if they typically (but not invariably) produce good results. This position addresses the problems moral luck raises for consequentialism, but requires some form of realism (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John ONeill (1992). Altruism, Egoism, and the Market. Philosophical Forum 23 (4):278-288.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Oneill (1994). Humanism and Nature. Radical Philosophy 66:21-29.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Oneill (1995). In Partial Praise of a Positivist-the Work of Neurath, Otto. Radical Philosophy 74:29-38.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. ONeill (1997). Thinking Naturally. Radical Philosophy 83:36-39.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. P. Oneill (1994). The Same Thing Therefore Ought to Be and Ought Not to Be, Anselm on Conflicting Oughts. Heythrop Journal-a Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology 35 (3):312-314.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Onora O'Neill (1998). Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature: Onora O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):211–228.score: 21.0
    [Allen W. Wood] Kant's moral philosophy is grounded on the dignity of humanity as its sole fundamental value, and involves the claim that human beings are to be regarded as the ultimate end of nature. It might be thought that a theory of this kind would be incapable of grounding any conception of our relation to other living things or to the natural world which would value nonhuman creatures or respect humanity's natural environment. This paper criticizes Kant's argumentative strategy for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson & Daniel Weinstock (eds.) (2013). Reading Onora O'neill. Routledge.score: 18.0
    Onora O’Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O’Neill is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this important thinker. It includes specially (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Lisa Parker (2008). Review of Neil C. Manson and Onora O'Neill, Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):68-69.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Sean Sayers (2001). Review of Onora O'Neill, Bounds of Justice. [REVIEW] First Review.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Yvette E. Pearson (2008). Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), Pp. XI + 213. Utilitas 20 (2):248-250.score: 15.0
  12. Hill Jr (1979). Book Review:Acting on Principle. Onora Nell. [REVIEW] Ethics 89 (3):306-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Wendy Donner (1999). The Sources of Normativity Christine M. Korsgaard, with G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams Onora O'Neill, Editor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, Xv + 273 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (03):653-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Reviewed by Andrews Reath (2000). Onora O'Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Ethics 110 (4).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Carolyn McLeod (2003). A Review of Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics, by Onora O'Neill. American Journal of Medical Genetics 121 (1):85-87.score: 15.0
  16. Alan Thomas (2003). Review of Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (10).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Andrews Reath (2000). Onora O'Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning:Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Ethics 110 (4):855-859.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Alasdair Maclntyre (1983). Iv. Moral Rationality, Tradition, and Aristotle: A Reply to Onora O'Neill, Raimond Gaita, and Stephen R. L. Clark. Inquiry 26 (4):447 – 466.score: 15.0
    O'Neill's critique of my account of Kant does point to serious inadequacies in that treatment, but I argue in reply that on some central points she is mistaken and that Kant's moral rigorism and his conception of what it is to be a rational agent are more open to the conventional objections than she allows. What needs to be put in question is the whole nature of rational justification in morality, for justification always in fact requires the context of a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Brenda M. Baker (2004). Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 24 (1):45-47.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Bon-Stewbock (2003). Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Philosophical Inquiry 25 (1-2):265-268.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jason D. Morrow (2003). O'Neill, Onora. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):261-269.score: 15.0
  22. Theda Rehbock (2011). Neil C. Manson, Onora O'Neill (2007) Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Ethik in der Medizin 23 (1):83-84.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Christian Barry (2001). The Bounds of Justice, Onora O'Neill (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 226 Pp., $54.95 Cloth, $19.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Ethics and International Affairs 15 (1):197-200.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Kenneth Einar Himma (2002). Onora O'Neill, Bounds of Justice. Philosophical Inquiry 24 (1-2):111-113.score: 15.0
  25. Kok-Chor Tan (2001). Onora O'Neill, Bounds of Justice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (5):366-368.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. O. Höffe (1993). Onora O'Neill: Constructions of Reason. Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1989, 249 S. [REVIEW] Philosophische Rundschau 40 (1-2):83-86.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Richard Norman (1998). Onora O'Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, 1996, Pp. X+ 230,£ 35.00 Hardback,£ 12.95 Paperback. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 21 (4).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David Waller (1998). Onora O'Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (1):53-55.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Graham Bird (2003). Onora O'Neill's Bounds of Justice Consists of a Series of Essays, Some of Which Appear Here for the First Time, While Others Are Revisions of Previously Published Work. Though These Essays Range From Meta. Kantian Review 7:149.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. G. Graham (1998). Onora O'Neill Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Journal of Applied Philosophy 15:109-109.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jw Hamilton (1987). Oneill, Eugene and Addisons-Disease. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 30 (2):231-234.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. John Harris (2010). Part IV: Bioethics and Beyond. Humanity and Hyper-Regulation : From Nuremberg to Helsinki / Onora O'Neill ; Transhumanity : A Moral Vision of the Twenty-First Century. In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. S. James (1998). The Virtue of Justice: Onora O'Neill's Towards Justice and Virtue. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (2):253-263.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Berel Dov Lerner (2010). Neil C. Manson and Onora O'Neill, Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 29 (1):45-47.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Berel Dov Lerner (2009). Neil C. Manson and Onora O'Neill, Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Philosophy in Review 29 (1):45.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. McCarney (forthcoming). Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics; Onora O'Neill, A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Radical Philosophy.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jason D. Morrow (2003). Book Review: O'Neill, Onora. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):261-270.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jerome Neu (1988). Life-Lies and Pipe Dreams, Self-Deception in Ibsen The'wild Duck'and Oneill The'iceman Cometh'. Philosophical Forum 19 (4):241-269.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. O. O'Neill (1997). Herlinde Pauer-Studer on Tugend Und Gerechtigkeit: Eine Konstruktive Darstellung des Praktischen Denkens by Onora O'Neill (Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning). European Journal of Philosophy 5:331-333.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Co Schrag (1983). Oneill and Mays+ Response to Critique Concerning Radical-Reflection. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 14 (1):40-49.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Paweł Łuków (1990). Oblicza Głodu (Onora O'Neill, Faces of Hunger). Etyka 25.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Adam Etinson (2013). Human Rights, Claimability and the Uses of Abstraction. Utilitas 25 (4):463-486.score: 9.0
    This article addresses the so-called to human rights. Focusing specifically on the work of Onora O'Neill, the article challenges two important aspects of her version of this objection. First: its narrowness. O'Neill understands the claimability of a right to depend on the identification of its duty-bearers. But there is good reason to think that the claimability of a right depends on more than just that, which makes abstract (and not welfare) rights the most natural target of her objection (section (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Onora O'Neill (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 6.0
    Two centuries after they were published, Kant's ethical writings are as much admired and imitated as they have ever been, yet serious and long-standing accusations of internal incoherence remain unresolved. Onora O'Neill traces the alleged incoherences to attempts to assimilate Kant's ethical writings to modern conceptions of rationality, action and rights. When the temptation to assimilate is resisted, a strikingly different and more cohesive account of reason and morality emerges. Kant offers a "constructivist" vindication of reason and a moral (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Onora O'Neill (1996). Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press.score: 6.0
    Towards Justice and Virtue challenges the rivalry between those who advocate only abstract, universal principles of justice and those who commend only the particularities of virtuous lives. Onora O'Neill traces this impasse to defects in underlying conceptions of reasoning about action. She proposes and vindicates a modest account of ethical reasoning and a reasoned way of answering the question 'who counts?', then uses these to construct linked accounts of principles by which we can move towards just institutions and virtuous (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Onora O'Neill (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.score: 6.0
    Why has autonomy been a leading idea in philosophical writing on bioethics, and why has trust been marginal? In this important book, Onora O'Neill suggests that the conceptions of individual autonomy so widely relied on in bioethics are philosophically and ethically inadequate, and that they undermine rather than support relations of trust. She shows how Kant's non-individualistic view of autonomy provides a stronger basis for an approach to medicine, science and biotechnology, and does not marginalize untrustworthiness, while also explaining (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Thomas M. Besch (2014). On Discursive Respect. Social Theory and Practice 40 (2):207-231.score: 6.0
    Moral and political forms of constructivism accord to people strong, “constitutive” forms of discursive standing and so build on, or express, a commitment to discursive respect. The paper explores dimensions of discursive respect, i.e., depth, scope, and purchase; it addresses tenuous interdependencies between them; on this basis, it identifies limitations of the idea of discursive respect and of constructivism. The task of locating discursive respect in the normative space defined by its three dimensions is partly, and importantly, an ethical task (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Miriam Ronzoni (2010). Constructivism and Practical Reason: On Intersubjectivity, Abstraction, and Judgment. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):74-104.score: 6.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Lisa H. Schwartzman (2006). Abstraction, Idealization, and Oppression. Metaphilosophy 37 (5):565-588.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 169