Search results for 'Operationism' (try it on Scholar)

52 found
Order:
  1. Uljana Feest (2005). Operationism in Psychology - What the Debate is About, What the Debate Should Be About. Journal for the Histoty of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (2):131-150.
    I offer an analysis of operationism in psychology, which is rooted in an historical study of the investigative practices of two of its early proponents (S. S. Stevens and E. C. Tolman). According to this analysis, early psychological operationists emphasized the importance of experimental operations and called for scientists to specify what kinds of operations were to count as empirical indicators for the referents of their concepts. While such specifications were referred to as “definitions,” I show that such definitions (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2.  97
    Maria Carla Galavotti (1995). Operationism, Probability and Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Science 1 (1):99-118.
    This paper investigates the kind of empiricism combined with an operationalist perspective that, in the first decades of our Century, gave rise to a turning point in theoretical physics and in probability theory. While quantum mechanics was taking shape, the classical (Laplacian) interpretation of probability gave way to two divergent perspectives: frequentism and subjectivism. Frequentism gained wide acceptance among theoretical physicists. Subjectivism, on the other hand, was never held to be a serious candidate for application to physical theories, despite the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  17
    S. Brian Hood & Benjamin J. Lovett (2011). Realism and Operationism in Psychiatric Diagnosis. Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):207-222.
    In the context of psychiatric diagnosis, operationists claim that mental disorders are nothing more than the satisfying of objective diagnostic criteria, whereas realists claim that mental disorders are latent entities that are detected by applying those criteria. The implications of this distinction are substantial in actual clinical situations, such as in the co-occurrence of disorders that may interfere with one another's detection, or when patients falsify their symptoms. Realist and operationist conceptions of diagnosis may lead to different clinical decisions in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  14
    Gary L. Hardcastle (1995). S. S. Stevens and the Origins of Operationism. Philosophy of Science 62 (3):404-424.
    Despite influencing the social sciences since the 1930s, S. S. Stevens' "operationist" philosophy of science has yet to be adequately understood. I reconstruct Stevens' operationism from his early work and assess the influence of various views (logical positivism, behaviorism and the "operational viewpoint" of P. W. Bridgman, among others) on Stevens. Stevens' operationism emerges, on my reconstruction, as a naturalistic methodological directive aimed at agreement, founded in turn on the belief that agreement is constitutive of science, the scientific (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  4
    Christopher D. Green, Of Immortal Mythological Beasts: Operationism in Psychology.
    It is practically an article of faith in psychology that in order to do empirical research one must first operationally define one's variables. However, the 'operational attitude', first advocated by the physicist Percy Bridgman in the 1920s, has since been rejected by virtually every serious philosopher of science as unworkable. Furthermore. 'operationism' -- as developed by psychologists in the 1930s and 1940s -- was based on a misunderstanding of Bridgman's intent from the outset. Nevertheless, contemporary textbooks continue to extol (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  8
    Joseph Epstein (1956). Operationism. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 53 (25):820-825.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Jay Moore (1975). On the Principle of Operationism in a Science of Behavior. Behaviorism 3 (2):120-138.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    R. H. (1955). Operationism. Review of Metaphysics 9 (2):359-359.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    Raymond J. Nogar (1956). Operationism. New Scholasticism 30 (3):380-382.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    Fred Wilson (1968). A Note on Operationism (Nota Sobre el Operacionalismo). Critica 2 (4):79 - 87.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  9
    Owen J. Flanagan (1980). Skinnerian Metaphysics and the Problem of Operationism. Behaviorism 8 (1):1-13.
  12. Carl G. Hempel (1958). A Logical Appraisal of Operationism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):354-356.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  9
    A. Cornelius Benjamin (1950). Operationism--A Critical Evaluation. Journal of Philosophy 47 (15):439-444.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  1
    Philip N. Hineline (1984). What, Then, is Skinner's Operationism? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):560.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  3
    Frank E. Hartung (1944). Operationism as a Cultural Survival. Philosophy of Science 11 (4):227-232.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  3
    Hornell Hart (1940). Operationism Analysed Operationally. Philosophy of Science 7 (3):288-313.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  3
    Atwell R. Turquette (1960). Review: Gustav Bergmann, Philipp G. Frank, Sense and Nonsense in Operationism; Carl G. Hempel, A Logical Appraisal of Operationism. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (3):255-256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  1
    George C. Rosenwald (1986). Why Operationism Doesn't Go Away: Extrascientific Incentives of Social-Psychological Research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (3):303-330.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  7
    Fred Wilson (1968). Is Operationism Unjust to Temperature? Synthese 18 (4):394 - 422.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  2
    J. Moore (1984). On skinner's radical operationism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):564.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  4
    Sylvain Bromberger (1957). Book Review:Operationism A. Cornelius Benjamin. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 24 (1):89-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Peter Harzem (1984). Operationism, Smuggled Connotations, and the Nothing-Else Clause. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):559.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Henry Mehlberg (1958). Review: Carl G. Hempel, A Logical Appraisal of Operationism. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):354-356.
  24.  1
    Carl G. Hempel (1941). Review: Gustav Bergmann, Kenneth W. Spence, Operationism and Theory in Psychology. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):64-65.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    Abram Cornelius Benjamin (1955). Operationism. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Gustav Bergmann & Kenneth W. Spence (1941). Operationism and Theory in Psychology. Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):64-65.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Gustav Bergmann, Philipp G. Frank & Carl G. Hempel (1960). Sense and Nonsense in Operationism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (3):255-256.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. M. Bunge (1988). The Ambivalent Legacy of Operationism. Philosophia Naturalis 25 (3/4):337-345.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Charles E. Bures (1940). Operationism, Construction, and Inference. Journal of Philosophy 37 (15):393-401.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. L. S. Hearnshaw (1941). Psychology and Operationism. Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 19 (1):44-57.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Arnold Isenberg (1956). L.S. Feuer's Psychoanalysis and Ethics and A.C. Benjamin's Operationism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17:276.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Howard Kendler (1983). Operationism: A Recipe for Reducing Confusion and Ambiguity. Journal of Mind and Behavior 4 (1).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Howard Kendler (1981). The Reality of Operationism: A Rejoinder. Journal of Mind and Behavior 2 (3).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Jon D. Ringen (1984). B. F. Skinner's Operationism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):567.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. H. R. (1955). Operationism. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 9 (2):359-359.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Joseph Rychlak (1983). Operationism and the Source of Meaning in Bridging the Theory/Method Bifurcation. Journal of Mind and Behavior 4 (1).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  39
    B. F. Skinner (1945). The Operational Analysis of Psychological Terms. Psychological Review 52 (4):270-78.
    The major contributions of operationism have been negative, largely because operationists failed to distinguish logical theories of reference from empirical accounts of language. Behaviorism never finished an adequate formulation of verbal reports and therefore could not convincingly embrace subjective terms. But verbal responses to private stimuli can arise as social products through the contingencies of reinforcement arranged by verbal communities.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  38.  70
    C. Chihara & Jerry A. Fodor (1965). Operationalism and Ordinary Language: A Critique of Wittgenstein. American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (October):281-95.
    This paper explores some lines of argument in wittgenstein's post-Tractatus writings in order to indicate the relations between wittgenstein's philosophical psychology, On the one hand, And his philosophy of language, His epistemology, And his doctrines about the nature of philosophical analysis on the other. The authors maintain that the later writings of wittgenstein express a coherent doctrine in which an operationalistic analysis of confirmation and language supports a philosophical psychology of a type the authors call "logical behaviorism." they also maintain (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  39.  66
    R. S. Peters (1951). Observationalism in Psychology. Mind 60 (January):43-61.
  40.  26
    Herbert Fingarette (1950). Unconscious Behavior and Allied Concepts: A New Approach to Their Empirical Interpretation. Journal of Philosophy 47 (August):509-519.
  41. C. A. Qadir (1961). Methodology of Psychology. Pakistan Philosophical Congress 8:133-144.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  22
    Uljana Feest (2010). Concepts as Tools in the Experimental Generation of Knowledge in Cognitive Neuropsychology. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):173-190.
    This paper asks (a) how new scientific objects of research are onceptualized at a point in time when little is known about them, and (b) how those conceptualizations, in turn, figure in the process of investigating the phenomena in question. Contrasting my approach with existing notions of concepts and situating it in relation to existing discussions about the epistemology of experimentation, I propose to think of concepts as research tools. I elaborate on the conception of a tool that informs my (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  20
    Lewis S. Feuer (1978). Teleological Principles in Science. Inquiry 21 (1-4):377 – 407.
    In the search for elementary particles, such principles are used as Gell?mann's that ?anything which is possible is compulsory?. This is an example of a teleological principle according to which the scientist tries to realize in science the kind of world that he desires on prior emotional grounds. Mendeleev's classical discovery of the Periodic Law and Table of Elements was thus guided by his mystical values. A mechanistic anti?teleologist such as Jacques Loeb was indeed a crypto?teleologist who wished science to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  22
    Henry C. Byerly & Vincent A. Lazara (1973). Realist Foundations of Measurement. Philosophy of Science 40 (1):10-28.
    This paper defends a realist interpretation of theories and a modest realism concerning the existence of quantities as providing the best account both of the logic of quantity concepts and of scientific measurement practices. Various operationist analyses of measurement are shown to be inadequate accounts of measurement practices used by scientists. We argue, furthermore, that appeals to implicit definitions to provide meaning for theoretical terms over and above operational definitions fail because implicit definitions cannot generate the requisite descriptive content. The (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45.  23
    Mario Bunge (1970). The Physicist and Philosophy. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 1 (2):196-208.
    The central thesis of this paper is that physicists have as much to learn from scientifically oriented philosophy as philosophers have to learn from physics. To begin with, any discussion of basic physical ideas and procedures is bound to be conducted in the light of some philosophy or other. Now, the standard philosophy of physics of our century is operationism. And philosophers, with the help of recent developments in semantics, epistemology and the theory of scientific inference, have shown that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  12
    Jay Moore (1989). Why Methodological Behaviorism is Mentalistic. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 9 (2):20-27.
    To be familiar with Skinner's radical behaviorism is to be familiar with its objections to both methodological behaviorism and mentalism. However, the relation between methodological behaviorism and mentalism is often not clear. Methodological behaviorism is generally held to be an attempt to explain behavior in terms of inter subjectively verifiable phenomena, whereas mentalism is generally held to be an attempt to explain behavior in terms of inner causes. The central issue is why does methodological behaviorism adopt the position that observable (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    Klaus Jürgen Düsberg (1995). Zur Kritik Eines Operationalistischen Arguments. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (2):313 - 322.
    An operationalist argument criticized. Operationism maintains that the relation between a quantity and its operational criteria is established by definition. The assertion that the relation holds cannot be an empirical hypothesis; it is neither falsifiable nor confirmable, since it is not even testable. With an example concerning the measurement of time it is shown that this argument rests upon an untenable presupposition.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  1
    Edward Manier (1965). The Theory of Evolution as Personal Knowledge. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):244-252.
    Dr. Marjorie Grene has argued that criteria taken from a personalist philosophy of science have regulative force in the dispute between orthogenetic and synthetic or neo-Darwinian theories of evolution, and that these criteria commend the acceptance of the orthogenetic position. Grene's position includes two basically correct theses concerning the limitations of operationism and reductionism. However, she fails to show that personalist tenets are necessary for the validation of these two theses. Moreover, the proposed modifications of evolutionary theory depend upon (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of judgment in criticism.--Bevilacqua, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. J. Moore (2005). Some Historical and Conceptual Background to the Development of BF Skinner's Radical Behaviorism-Part 3. Journal of Mind and Behavior 26 (3):137-160.
    The present article is the third in a series of three that outlines the historical and conceptual background of B.F. Skinner’s radical behaviorism as a philosophy of science. Of special interest in this article is the intellectual context of a paper on operationism Skinner published in 1945, in which he first used the term “radical behaviorism” in print. Overall, Skinner’s radical behaviorism was a thoroughgoing behaviorism that provided a naturalistic account of the full range of human functioning, including the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 52