Search results for 'Opus postumum' (try it on Scholar)

571 found
Order:
  1.  43
    Ernst-Otto Onnasch (2009). Kants Transzendentalphilosophie des Opus Postumum Gegen den Transzendentalen Idealismus Schellings Und Spinozas. In Kants Philosophie der Natur, ihre Entwicklung im Opus postumum und spätere Wirkung.
    This paper analyzes, first, the reception of Schelling’s philosophy in the environment of Kant in Königsberg, and second in Kantian writings published by his students Jäsche and Rink. – The only two passages Kant mentions Schelling are to be found in the latest leaves of the Opus postumum. Here Schelling’s philosophy is characterized as transcendental idealism. In current research it became rather common to interpret these passages as a positive account of Schelling’s philosophy, moreover, that Kant recognized Schelling’s (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  30
    Michael Bennett McNulty (2016). Chemistry in Kant's Opus Postumum. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):64-95.
    In his Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (MAN), Kant claims that chemistry is an improper, though rational science. The chemistry to which Kant confers this status is the phlogistic chemistry of, for instance, Georg Stahl. In his Opus Postumum (OP), however, Kant espouses a broadly Lavoiserian conception of chemistry. In particular, Kant endorses Antoine Lavoisier's elements, oxygen theory of combustion, and role for the caloric. As Lavoisier's lasting contribution to chemistry, according to some histories of the science, was his (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  15
    Farzad Mahootian (2013). Paneth's Epistemology of Chemical Elements in Light of Kant's Opus Postumum. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2):171-184.
    Friedrich Paneth’s conception of “chemical element” has functioned as the official definition adopted by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry since 1923. Paneth maintains a distinction between empirical and “transcendental” concepts of element; furthermore, chemical science requires fluctuation between the two. The origin of the empirical-transcendental split is found in Immanuel Kant’s classic Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787). The present paper examines Paneth’s foundational concept of element in light of Kant’s attempt, late in life, to revoke key distinctions (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Henny Blomme (2013). Dieu en vue du système. Le statut de l'ens summum dans l'Opus postumum de Kant. In Robert Theis (ed.), Kant : Théologie et religion. Vrin
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism? In E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. deGruyter
    The three presumptions that Hegel’s idealism further develops or radicalises Kant’s transcendental idealism, that their respective versions of idealism are linked by Kant’s account of self-positing (Selbstsetzungslehre) in the late opus postumum and that the basic model of Hegel’s early idealism holds also for his mature system are wide-spread and largely unexamined. This paper examines several problems confronting these presumptions, including Hegel’s refutation of the basic premises of Kant’s transcendental idealism and Transzendentalphilosophie in the late opus (...) (§2), Hegel’s critical rejection of intellectual intuition because it cannot escape Pyrrhonian scepticism (§3), and his critical rejection of the deductivist ideal of scientia, which undergirds Kant’s transcendental idealism and his late Transzendentalphilosophie (§4), the highly un-Kantian principles of Hegel’s mature idealism (§5) and finally Hegel’s thorough and incisive critique in the 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit of common philosophical views, concepts and presuppositions, including those which undergird the three presumptions noted above (§6). To understand properly Hegel’s philosophy of nature and hence also his philosophical system requires abandoning those three presumptions. (shrink)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Eckart Förster & Michael Rosen (eds.) (2012). Opus Postumum. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is the first ever English translation of Kant's last major work, the so-called Opus Postumum, a work Kant himself described as his 'chef d'oeuvre' and as the keystone of his entire philosophical system. It occupied him for more than the last decade of his life. Begun with the intention of providing a 'transition from the metaphysical foundations of natural science to physics,' Kant's reflections take him far beyond the problem he initially set out to solve. In (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  7.  71
    Eckart Förster (2000). Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Harvard University Press.
    This is the first book in English devoted entirely to Kant's Opus postumum and its place in the Kantian oeuvre.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  8.  39
    Immanuel Kant (1993). Opus Postumum. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is the first ever English translation of Kant's last major work, the so-called Opus Postumum, a work Kant himself described as his 'chef d'oeuvre' and as the keystone of his entire philosophical system. It occupied him for more than the last decade of his life. Begun with the intention of providing a 'transition from the metaphysical foundations of natural science to physics,' Kant's reflections take him far beyond the problem he initially set out to solve. In (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  9.  4
    Sanford Budick (2016). The Function of Kant's Miltonic Citations on a Page of the Opus Postumum. Philosophy and Literature 40 (1):76-97.
    On one manuscript page of the Opus postumum Kant twice recurs to a passage from Paradise Lost that, seven years earlier, he had cited to exemplify aesthetic ideas and the concept of succession.1 Now he calls on these same verses to perform an additional function, namely, to represent the a priori idea of a community of reciprocity. For Kant, the “insertion” of this idea serves as an “actus of cognition” that can enable experience of the “subjectively actual”.2In the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  26
    Veit-Justus Rollmann & Andree Hahmann (2011). Weltstoff und absolute Beharrlichkeit: Die Erste Analogie der Erfahrung und der Entwurf Übergang 1–14 des Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 102 (2):168-190.
    In Kant's theoretical philosophy substance is not only constitutive for objects as one of the categories of pure reason, but also functions as a substrate for the unity of time. Result of these different functions is an ambiguity in the meaning of Kant's notion of substance. Is there only one or are there many individual substances?This paper traces the ways in which Kant uses substance not only in the Critique of Pure Reason, but also in the draft „Transition 1–14“ of (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  9
    Martin Shuster (2014). Kant's Opus Postumum and McDowell's Critique of Kant. Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):427-444.
    In this article, I have a modest goal: to sketch how Kant can avoid the charge of “subjective idealism” advanced against him by John McDowell and to do so with reference to Kant's last work, the so-called Opus Postumum. I am interested in defending Kant on this point because doing so not only shows how we need not—at least not because of this point about idealism—jump ship from Kant to Hegel , but also suggests that the Opus (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  8
    George Schrader (1951). Kant's Presumed Repudiation of the "Moral Argument" in the "Opus Postumum": An Examination of Adickes' Interpretation. Philosophy 26 (98):228-241.
    Until comparatively recently the complete text of the Opus Postutmum has not been available to students of the Kantian philosophy.Prior to the publication of Adickes’ commentary on this material in 1920, students of Kant were almost wholly dependent upon Reicke's incomplete and markedly inadequate edition of 1882–84. 2 Adickes’ commentary, with its abundance of quoted passages, provided an access to a great deal of material hitherto unavailable. But it was not until the publication of the Academy Edition in 1936 (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Giovanni Pietro Basile (2008). Idealismo e realismo nella ricezione neokantiana Dell ’Opus Postumum: Série 2 / Idealism and Realism in the Neokantian Reception of the Opus postumum‘. Kant E-Prints 3:103-114.
    The first interpretations of Kant’s unfinished work, the so-called Opus postumum, occur almost exclusively within German Neo-Kantianism . The central point of discussion focuses on the relationship between transcendental idealism and empirical realism in Kant’s late thought. Some Neokantians regard the final development of Kant’s philosophy as a radical form of idealism, either a fictionalism or a scientific idealism . Several interpreters attribute the theory of the so-called “double affection” to the Kant of the Opus postumum. (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Eckart Förster & Michael Rosen (eds.) (1995). Opus Postumum. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is the first ever English translation of Kant's last major work, the so-called Opus Postumum, a work Kant himself described as his 'chef d'oeuvre' and as the keystone of his entire philosophical system. It occupied him for more than the last decade of his life. Begun with the intention of providing a 'transition from the metaphysical foundations of natural science to physics,' Kant's reflections take him far beyond the problem he initially set out to solve. In (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Bryan Hall (2014). The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy Through the Opus Postumum. Routledge.
    In this book, Bryan Wesley Hall breaks new ground in Kant scholarship, exploring the gap in Kant’s Critical philosophy in relation to his post-Critical work by turning to Kant’s final, unpublished work, the so-called _Opus Postumum._ Although Kant considered this project to be the "keystone" of his philosophical efforts, it has been largely neglected by scholars. Hall argues that only by understanding the _Opus Postumum _can we fully comprehend both Kant’s mature view as well as his Critical project. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Bryan Hall (2014). The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy Through the Opus Postumum. Routledge.
    In this book, Bryan Wesley Hall breaks new ground in Kant scholarship, exploring the gap in Kant’s Critical philosophy in relation to his post-Critical work by turning to Kant’s final, unpublished work, the so-called _Opus Postumum._ Although Kant considered this project to be the "keystone" of his philosophical efforts, it has been largely neglected by scholars. Hall argues that only by understanding the _Opus Postumum _can we fully comprehend both Kant’s mature view as well as his Critical project. (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  39
    Ernst-Otto Onnasch (ed.) (2009). Kants Philosophie der Natur, Ihre Entwicklung Im "Opus Postumum" Und Ihre Wirkung. Walter de Gruyter.
    Insbesondere die Naturphilosophie hat Kant zeitlebens beschäftigt. Ihre Begründung kulminiert in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft in den berühmten Fragen, wie Erfahrung überhaupt und wie synthetische Urteile a priori möglich sind. Seine Metaphysischen Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft liefern eine metaphysische Begründung der newtonschen Physik. Dieses Begründungsprogramm hat die damalige Debatte nachhaltig beeinflusst. Das vielleicht größte systematische Problem in diesem Werk ist der von Kant sehr eng gefasste Begriff von Naturwissenschaft, der etwa die Chemie oder Biologie ausschließt. Insbesondere was die Biologie betrifft, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  11
    Hein van den Berg (2014). Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus Postumum. Springer Science + Business Media.
    Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum Hein van den Berg. Parts of Chap. 2 have been previously published in Hein van den Berg (2011), “ Kant's Conception of Proper Science.” Synthese 183 (1): 7–26. Parts of Chap.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  83
    Michael Friedman (2003). Eckart Förster and Kant's Opus Postumum. Inquiry 46 (2):215 – 227.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  58
    Howard Caygill (2005). The Force of Kant's Opus Postumum. Angelaki 10 (1):33-42.
  21.  6
    Eckart Förster (ed.) (1989). Kant's Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques' and the ‘Opus Postumum'. Stanford University Press.
  22. Vittorio Mathieu & Gerd Held (1989). Kants Opus Postumum. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  22
    Manfred Kuehn (1994). Review: Kant, Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770, Lectures on Logic, and Opus Postumum. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (4):676-679.
  24. Burkhard Tuschling (1971). Metaphysische Und Transzendentale Dynamik in Kants Opus Postumum. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  15
    William J. Sullivan (1971). Kant on the Existence of God in the "Opus Postumum". Modern Schoolman 48 (2):117-133.
  26.  16
    Eckart Förster (1993). Kant's Third Critique and the Opus Postumum. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 16 (2):345-358.
  27. Jacinto Rivera de Rosales (2005). El a priori de la corporalidad en el Opus postumum. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 32:221-248.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    Eckart Förster (1990). Fichte, Beck and Schelling in Kant's Opus Postumum. In G. MacDonald Ross & Tony McWalter (eds.), Kant and His Influence. Thoemmes Continuum 146.
  29.  27
    Eric Watkins (2008). Review: Emundts, Dina, Kants Übergangskonzeption Im 'Opus Postumum'. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):332-336.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Hein van den Berg (2016). Bryan Wesley Hall, The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy Through the Opus Postumum New York and London: Routledge, 2015 Pp. X + 220 9781138802148 $145. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 21 (2):329-333.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    Kenneth R. Westphal (1994). Opus Postumum. Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):410-413.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  15
    Klaus Hartmann (1972). Metaphysical and Transcendental Dynamics in Kant's Opus Postumum. Philosophy and History 5 (2):171-173.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  18
    Manfred Gawlina (2004). Kant, ein Atheist? Ein Strawson-Schüler liest das Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 95 (2):235-237.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Silvestro Marcucci (1986). ""Kant ei primi princípi" metafisic" della scienza della natura: dai Metaphysische Anfangsgründe del 1786 all¿ Opus postumum. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 15 (3):203-230.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  16
    Hugh Lloyd-Jones (1960). Menandri quae supersunt: Pars altera: Reliquiae apud veteres scriptores servatae. Edidit A. Körte: opus postumum retractavit, addenda ad utramque partem adiecit A. Thierfelder. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (03):256-.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  7
    Adela Cortina (1984). Die Auflösung des religiösen Gottesbegriffs im Opus postumum Kants. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):280-293.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  17
    Eckart Förster (2004). Zwei neu aufgefundene Lose Blätter zum Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 95 (1):21-28.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  13
    James Collins (1943). Kant's 'Opus Postumum'. New Scholasticism 17 (3):251-285.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    S. J. Poncelet (2013). God in het opus postumum Van Immanuel Kant. Bijdragen 22 (1):55-69.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  12
    A. W. Gomme (1955). The Fragments of Menander Menandri Quae Supersunt: Pars Altera: Reliquiae Apud Veteres Scriptores Servatae. Edidit A. Körte: Opus Postumum Retractavit, Addenda Ad Utramque Partem Adiecit A. Thierfelder. (Bibl. Scr. Gr. Et Rom. Teubneriana.) Pp. Xii+394. Leipzig: Teubner, 1953. Cloth, DM. 16.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (02):148-149.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  5
    Jean Grondin (1987). KANT, Emmanuel, Opus Postumum : Passage des Principes Métaphysiques de la Science de la Nature À la Physique. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 43 (3):425-426.
  42.  11
    François Marty (1992). L'Argument ontologique dans l'Opus postumum et l'influence de la Critique de la Faculté de Juger dans l'Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 83 (1):50-59.
  43.  5
    Félix Duque Pajuelo (2001). Islas En la Laguna Del Sistema: La Relación de Kant Con Fichtey Schelling En El Opus Postumum. Signos Filosóficos 5:11-46.
    If Fichte influenced in Kant like a reagent so that this took conscience of thelast consequences of his unfinished system, Would it be necessary to say thesame of Schelling? In principle, everything leads us to a negative answers.During the nineties Schelling was considered as a mere pupil and until..
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Guillermo Coronado (2005). Materia y fuerzas en el Opus Postumum. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 43 (108):123-127.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  5
    Hermann Schneider (1921). Kants Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 26 (1-2):165-173.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Antonio García Ninet (2002). La libertad en el Opus postumum de Zubiri. Estudios Filosóficos 51 (147):257-286.
    El presente artículo estudia la visión zubiriana de la voluntad en el pensamiento publicado póstumamente de Zubiri, donde aparece un concepto original de libertad como capacidad de autodeterminación de la voluntad.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Ernst-Otto Onnasch (2014). The Role of the Organism in the Transcendental Philosophy of Kant’s Opus Postumum. In Eric Watkins & Ina Goy (eds.), Kant's Theory of Biology. De Gruyter 239-256.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    Ibon Uribarri (1999). Problematical and critical idealism. The new discussion about the "cogito" in Kant's Opus postumum. Enrahonar:79-82.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Lucía Procuranti (2004). Il problema dellétere nell¿ Opus Postumum di Kant. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 33 (1):55-78.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Erich Adickes & Immanuel Kant (1920). Kants Opus Postumum. Reuther & Reichard.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 571