Search results for 'Opus postumum' (try it on Scholar)

292 found
Sort by:
  1. Ernst-Otto Onnasch (2009). Kants Transzendentalphilosophie des Opus Postumum Gegen den Transzendentalen Idealismus Schellings Und Spinozas. In , Kants Philosophie der Natur, ihre Entwicklung im Opus postumum und spätere Wirkung.score: 270.0
    This paper analyzes, first, the reception of Schelling’s philosophy in the environment of Kant in Königsberg, and second in Kantian writings published by his students Jäsche and Rink. – The only two passages Kant mentions Schelling are to be found in the latest leaves of the Opus postumum. Here Schelling’s philosophy is characterized as transcendental idealism. In current research it became rather common to interpret these passages as a positive account of Schelling’s philosophy, moreover, that Kant recognized Schelling’s (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Farzad Mahootian (2013). Paneth's Epistemology of Chemical Elements in Light of Kant's Opus Postumum. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2):171-184.score: 240.0
    Friedrich Paneth’s conception of “chemical element” has functioned as the official definition adopted by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry since 1923. Paneth maintains a distinction between empirical and “transcendental” concepts of element; furthermore, chemical science requires fluctuation between the two. The origin of the empirical-transcendental split is found in Immanuel Kant’s classic Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787). The present paper examines Paneth’s foundational concept of element in light of Kant’s attempt, late in life, to revoke key distinctions (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henny Blomme (2013). Dieu en vue du système. Le statut de l'ens summum dans l'Opus postumum de Kant. In Robert Theis (ed.), Kant : Théologie et religion. Vrin.score: 210.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). ‘Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism?’. In E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. deGruyter.score: 210.0
    The three presumptions that Hegel’s idealism further develops or radicalises Kant’s transcendental idealism, that their respective versions of idealism are linked by Kant’s account of self-positing (Selbstsetzungslehre) in the late opus postumum and that the basic model of Hegel’s early idealism holds also for his mature system are wide-spread and largely unexamined. This paper examines several problems confronting these presumptions, including Hegel’s refutation of the basic premises of Kant’s transcendental idealism and Transzendentalphilosophie in the late opus (...) (§2), Hegel’s critical rejection of intellectual intuition because it cannot escape Pyrrhonian scepticism (§3), and his critical rejection of the deductivist ideal of scientia, which undergirds Kant’s transcendental idealism and his late Transzendentalphilosophie (§4), the highly un-Kantian principles of Hegel’s mature idealism (§5) and finally Hegel’s thorough and incisive critique in the 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit of common philosophical views, concepts and presuppositions, including those which undergird the three presumptions noted above (§6). To understand properly Hegel’s philosophy of nature and hence also his philosophical system requires abandoning those three presumptions. (shrink)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eckart Förster (2000). Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Harvard University Press.score: 180.0
  6. Immanuel Kant (1993). Opus Postumum. Cambridge University Press.score: 180.0
    This volume is the first ever English translation of Kant's last major work, the so-called Opus Postumum, a work Kant himself described as his 'chef d'oeuvre' and as the keystone of his entire philosophical system. It occupied him for more than the last decade of his life. Begun with the intention of providing a 'transition from the metaphysical foundations of natural science to physics,' Kant's reflections take him far beyond the problem he initially set out to solve. In (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ernst-Otto Onnasch (ed.) (2009). Kants Philosophie der Natur, Ihre Entwicklung Im "Opus Postumum" Und Ihre Wirkung. Walter de Gruyter.score: 180.0
    Insbesondere die Naturphilosophie hat Kant zeitlebens beschäftigt. Ihre Begründung kulminiert in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781) in den berühmten Fragen, wie Erfahrung überhaupt und wie synthetische Urteile a priori möglich sind. Seine Metaphysischen Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (1786) liefern eine metaphysische Begründung der newtonschen Physik. Dieses Begründungsprogramm hat die damalige Debatte nachhaltig beeinflusst. Das vielleicht größte systematische Problem in diesem Werk ist der von Kant sehr eng gefasste Begriff von Naturwissenschaft, der etwa die Chemie oder Biologie ausschließt. <br><br>Insbesondere was die (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Bryan Hall (2014). The Post-Critical Kant: Understanding the Critical Philosophy Through the Opus Postumum. Routledge.score: 180.0
    In this book, Bryan Wesley Hall breaks new ground in Kant scholarship, exploring the gap in Kant’s Critical philosophy in relation to his post-Critical work by turning to Kant’s final, unpublished work, the so-called Opus Postumum. Although Kant considered this project to be the "keystone" of his philosophical efforts, it has been largely neglected by scholars. Hall argues that only by understanding the Opus Postumum can we fully comprehend both Kant’s mature view as well as his (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Friedman (2003). Eckart Förster and Kant's Opus Postumum. Inquiry 46 (2):215 – 227.score: 150.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Howard Caygill (2005). The Force of Kant's Opus Postumum. Angelaki 10 (1):33-42.score: 150.0
  11. Eric Watkins (2008). Kants Übergangskonzeption Im 'Opus Postumum', by Dina Emundts. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):332-336.score: 150.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Manfred Gawlina (2004). Kant, ein Atheist? Ein Strawson-Schüler liest das Opus postumum. Kant Studien 95 (2):235-237.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James Collins (1943). Kant's 'Opus Postumum'. New Scholasticism 17 (3):251-285.score: 150.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Eckart Förster (2004). Zwei neu aufgefundene Lose Blätter zum Opus postumum. Kant Studien 95 (1):21-28.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Eckart Förster (1993). Kant's Third Critique and the Opus Postumum. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 16 (2):345-358.score: 150.0
  16. Klaus Hartmann (1972). Metaphysical and Transcendental Dynamics in Kant's Opus Postumum. Philosophy and History 5 (2):171-173.score: 150.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. François Marty (1992). L'Argument ontologique dans l'Opus postumum et l'influence de la Critique de la Faculté de Juger dans l'Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 83 (1):50-59.score: 150.0
  18. George Schrader (1951). Kant's Presumed Repudiation of the "Moral Argument" in the "Opus Postumum&Quot;: An Examination of Adickes' Interpretation. Philosophy 26 (98):228 - 241.score: 150.0
  19. Hugh Lloyd-Jones (1960). Menandri quae supersunt: Pars altera: Reliquiae apud veteres scriptores servatae. Edidit A. Körte: opus postumum retractavit, addenda ad utramque partem adiecit A. Thierfelder. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (03):256-.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Adela Cortina (1984). Die Auflösung des religiösen Gottesbegriffs im Opus postumum Kants. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):280-293.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Wolfgang G. Bayerer (1967). Ein verschollenes loses Blatt aus kants opus postumum? Kant-Studien 58 (1-4):277-284.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Eckart Forster (1990). Fichte, Beck and Schelling in Kant's Opus Postumum. In G. MacDonald Ross & Tony McWalter (eds.), Kant and His Influence. Thoemmes Continuum. 146.score: 150.0
  23. Manfred Kuehn (1994). Review: Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770, And: Lectures on Logic, And: Opus Postumum. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (4):676-679.score: 150.0
  24. Gerhard Lehmann (1954). Erscheinungsstufung und realitätsproblem in kants opus postumum. Kant-Studien 45 (1-4):140-154.score: 150.0
  25. Antonio García Ninet (2002). La libertad en el Opus postumum de Zubiri. Estudios Filosóficos 51 (147):257-286.score: 150.0
    El presente artículo estudia la visión zubiriana de la voluntad en el pensamiento publicado póstumamente de Zubiri, donde aparece un concepto original de libertad como capacidad de autodeterminación de la voluntad.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Veit-Justus Rollmann & Andree Hahmann (2011). Weltstoff und absolute Beharrlichkeit: Die Erste Analogie der Erfahrung und der Entwurf Übergang 1–14 des Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 102 (2):168-190.score: 150.0
  27. Hermann Schneider (1921). Kants Opus Postumum. Kant-Studien 26 (1-2):165-173.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ibon Uribarri (forthcoming). Problematical and Critical Idealism. The New Discussion About the" Cogito" in Kant's Opus Postumum. Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofía.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Wolfgang G. Bayerer (1981). Bemerkungen zu einem neuerdings näher bekannt gewordenen Losen Blatt aus Kants Opus Postumum. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):127-131.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jacinto Rivera de Rosales (2005). El a priori de la corporalidad en el Opus postumum. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 32:221-248.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. A. W. Gomme (1955). The Fragments of Menander Menandri Quae Supersunt: Pars Altera: Reliquiae Apud Veteres Scriptores Servatae. Edidit A. Körte: Opus Postumum Retractavit, Addenda Ad Utramque Partem Adiecit A. Thierfelder. (Bibl. Scr. Gr. Et Rom. Teubneriana.) Pp. Xii+394. Leipzig: Teubner, 1953. Cloth, DM. 16.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (02):148-149.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. S. J. Poncelet (2013). God in het opus postumum Van Immanuel Kant. Bijdragen 22 (1):55-69.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. William J. Sullivan (1971). Kant on the Existence of God in the "Opus Postumum&Quot;. Modern Schoolman 48 (2):117-133.score: 150.0
  34. Kenneth R. Westphal (1994). Opus Postumum. Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):410-413.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Silvestro Marcucci (1986). Kant ei primi princípi" metafisic" della scienza della natura: dai Metaphysische Anfangsgründe del 1786 all¿ Opus postumum. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 15 (3):203-230.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Félix Duque Pajuelo (2001). Islas En la Laguna Del Sistema: La Relación de Kant Con Fichtey Schelling En El Opus Postumum. Signos Filosóficos 5:11-46.score: 150.0
    If Fichte influenced in Kant like a reagent so that this took conscience of thelast consequences of his unfinished system, Would it be necessary to say thesame of Schelling? In principle, everything leads us to a negative answers.During the nineties Schelling was considered as a mere pupil and until..
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Lucía Procuranti (2004). Il problema dellétere nell¿ Opus Postumum di Kant. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 33 (1):55-78.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Wolfgang Albrecht (1954). Die Sogenannte Neue Deduktion in Kants Opus Postumum. Archiv für Philosophie 5:57.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Guillermo Coronado (2005). Materia y fuerzas en el Opus Postumum. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 43 (108):123-127.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. António Fragoso Fernandes (2006). Da Aporia à Cisão: Uma Interpretação Do Opus Postumum Kantiano. Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. E. Forster (1988). Kastner, Abraham, Gotthelf and Philosophy-Kant Critique of Kastner in His Opus-Postumum. Kant-Studien 79 (3):342-347.score: 150.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. E. Forster (1988). Kästner und die Philosophie. Zu Kants Kästnerkritik im Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 79 (3):342-347.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. E. Forster (2004). Two Recently Rediscovered Loose Pages From Kant's' Opus Postumum'. Kant-Studien 95 (1):21-28.score: 150.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. M. Gawlina (2004). Kant, an Atheist? A Reading of 'Opus Postumum' by Eckart Forster (PhD Candidate of Peter F Strawson). Kant-Studien 95 (2):235-237.score: 150.0
  45. Jean Grondin (1987). KANT, Emmanuel, Opus Postumum : Passage des Principes Métaphysiques de la Science de la Nature à la Physique. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 43 (3):425-426.score: 150.0
  46. S. Marcucci (1986). Kant and the Fundamental Metaphysical Principles of the Science of Nature-From The'metaphysische Anfangsgrunde'of 1786 to The'Opus Postumum'. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 15 (3):203-229.score: 150.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. F. Marty (1992). The Ontological Argument in Kant 'Opus Postumum' and the Influence Exerted on It by the 'Critique de la Faculte de Juger'. Kant-Studien 83 (1):50-59.score: 150.0
  48. Leopoldo Prieto (1999). El Opus postumum de Kant: la resolución de la física en filosofía transcendental. Alpha Omega 2 (3):453-482.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Leopoldo Prieto (2000). Invitación al estudio del Opus postumum de Kant. Alpha Omega 3 (3):501-519.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Leopoldo Prieto Lopez (2009). The New" Transcendental Aesthetics" in Kant's" Opus Postumum&Quot;. Pensamiento 65 (243):79-116.score: 150.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 292