12 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Peter Arhem [10]P. Århem [7]
  1. Peter Århem & Hans Liljenström (2008). Beyond Cognition - on Consciousness Transitions. In Hans Liljenström & Peter Århem (eds.), Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic, and Physiological Aspects. Elsevier.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Marc Bekoff, Colin Allen, Gordon M. Burghardt, Ann B. Butler, Paul R. Manger & Peter Arhem (2008). Baker, Steve (2001) Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation. Urbana: University of Illinois. Barresi, J. And Moore, C.(1996)" Intentional Relations and Social Understanding.&Quot; Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19: 107-154. Bekoff, Marc (2002) Minding Animals: Awareness, Emotions. And Heart, New York: Oxford University. In Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader. Routledge. 143.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Hans Liljenström & Peter Århem (eds.) (2008). Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic, and Physiological Aspects. Elsevier.
    It was not long ago when the consciousness was not considered a problem for science. However, this has now changed and the problem of consciousness is considered the greatest challenge to science. In the last decade, a great number of books and articles have been published in the field, but very few have focused on the how consciousness evolves and develops, and what characterizes the transitions between different conscious states, in animals and humans. This book addresses these questions. Renowned researchers (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ann B. Butler, Paul R. Manger, B. I. B. Lindahl & Peter Århem (2005). Evolution of the Neural Basis of Consciousness: A Bird-Mammal Comparison. Bioessays 27 (9):923-936.
    The main objective of this essay is to validate some of the principal, currently competing, mammalian consciousness-brain theories by comparing these theories with data on both cognitive abilities and brain organization in birds. Our argument is that, given that multiple complex cognitive functions are correlated with presumed consciousness in mammals, this correlation holds for birds as well. Thus, the neuroanatomical features of the forebrain common to both birds and mammals may be those that are crucial to the generation of both (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. P. Arhem & H. Liljenstrom (2003). Peter Arhem, Hans Liljenstrom and BIB Lindahl Consciousness and Comparative Neuroanatomy Report on the Agora Workshop in Sigtuna, Sweden, on 21 August, 2002. [REVIEW] Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (3):88-85.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter Århem, Hans Liljenström & B. I. B. Lindahl (2003). Consciousness and Comparative Neuroanatomy: Report on the Agora Workshop in Sigtuna, Sweden, on 21 August, 2002. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (3):85-88.
  7. Peter Århem, Hans Liljenström & B. I. B. Lindahl (2002). Evolution of Consciousness: Report on the Agora Workshop in Sigtuna, Sweden, on 11-13 August 2001. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (4):81-84.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. P. Arhem & H. Liljenstrom (1997). On the Coevolution of Consciousness and Cognition. Journal of Theoretical Biology 187:601-12.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. P. Arhem (1996). Vertical Information Flow in the Brain: On Neuronal Micro Events and Consciousness. Biosystems 38:191-98.
  10. B. I. B. Lindahl & P. Århem (1994). Mind as a Force Field: Comments on a New Interactionistic Hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 171:111-22.
    The survival and development of consciousness in biological evolution call for an explanation. An interactionistic mind-brain theory seems to have the greatest explanatory value in this context. An interpretation of an interactionistic hypothesis, recently proposed by Karl Popper, is discussed both theoretically and based on recent experimental data. In the interpretation, the distinction between the conscious mind and the brain is seen as a division into what is subjective and what is objective, and not as an ontological distinction between something (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. P. Århem & B. I. B. Lindahl (1993). Neuroscience and the Problem of Consciousness: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches. An Introduction. Theoretical Medicine 14 (2):77-88.
  12. K. R. Popper, B. I. B. Lindahl & P. Århem (1993). A Discussion of the Mind-Brain Problem. Theoretical Medicine 14 (2):167-180.
    In this paper Popper formulates and discusses a new aspect of the theory of mind. This theory is partly based on his earlier developed interactionistic theory. It takes as its point of departure the observation that mind and physical forces have several properties in common, at least the following six: both are (i) located, (ii) unextended, (iii) incorporeal, (iv) capable of acting on bodies, (v) dependent upon body, (vi) capable of being influenced by bodies. Other properties such as intensity and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation