Works by P. Diesing ( view other items matching `P. Diesing`, view all matches )
Disambiguations:
Paul Diesing [10]P. Diesing [4]

14 found
Sort by:
  1. Paul Diesing (2000). Comments on Rosenthal's "The Escape From Hegel". Science and Society 64 (3):374 - 378.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. P. Diesing (1993). Book Reviews : Mattei Dogan and Robert Pahre, Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Westview, Boulder, CO, 1990. Pp. X, 278, $34.85 (Paper. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):262-263.
  3. P. Diesing (1985). Book Reviews : Creating a Dialectical Social Science. BY IAN I. MITROFF and RICHARD O. MASON. Theory and Decision Library, Volume 25. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981. Pp. Ix + 189. $33.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (2):232-235.
  4. P. Diesing (1981). Albritton on Kosik: A Protest. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (4):459-460.
  5. P. Diesing (1981). Instrumental Reasoning and Systems Methodology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (4):516-517.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul Diesing (1972). Subjectivity and Objectivity in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 (1):147-165.
  7. Paul Diesing (1967). National Self-Determination and U.S. Foreign Policy. Ethics 77 (2):85-94.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Paul Diesing & Paul Piccone (1967). Kaufman on Alienation. Inquiry 10 (1-4):208-210.
    It is claimed that Arnold S. Kaufman's article ?On Alienation? (Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1965, pp. 141?65) shows no understanding of the concept of alienation, and the authors undertake to contrast the concept as Hegel and Marx develop it and Fromm and Mills re?state it, with Kaufman's interpretations of Marx, Fromm and Mills. They contrast the Marxist self?realization framework with Kaufman's want?satisfaction framework, and argue that in Marx alienation is necessarily concerned solely with labor, is unavoidable because a necessary (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paul Diesing (1966). Objectivism Vs. Subjectivism in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):124-.
    Recent developments in social science methods have made most of the objectivism-subjectivism arguments in the philosophy of social science obsolete. Developments in experimental methods have made possible a behavioristic treatment of everything cherished as important in human action by the subjectivists; developments in computer and mathematical models have made possible a type of theory which carries out the program of the subjectivists but is not vulnerable to the arguments of the objectivists. What remains of the philosophical argument are two types (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul Diesing (1958). Socioeconomic Decisions. Ethics 69 (1):1-18.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul Diesing (1957). Book Review:The Structure of a Moral Code John Ladd. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 24 (4):361-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Diesing (1955). Noneconomic Decision-Making. Ethics 66 (1):18-35.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Paul Diesing (1955). Book Review:Hopi Ethics. Richard B. Brandt. [REVIEW] Ethics 65 (4):314-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Paul Diesing (1950). The Nature and Limitations of Economic Rationality. Ethics 61 (1):12-26.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation