26 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Paul Healy [21]Patrick Healy [3]Philip Healy [1]P. Healy [1]
See also:
Profile: Patricia Healy (Bryn Mawr College)
  1. Paul Healy (2014). Making Public Policy Matter: The Hermeneutic Dimension. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 10 (2):278-299.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Healy (2013). Overcoming Incommensurability Through Intercultural Dialogue. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 9 (1):265-281.
    Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Is universalism necessarily ethnocentric? Are there inevitably incommensurable differences between diverse cultures and traditions? While these questions may appear highly theoretical at first sight, they inevitably have significant practical consequences as witnessed by the prominent contemporary discourse about a “clash (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. P. Healy (2011). Rethinking Deliberative Democracy: From Deliberative Discourse to Transformative Dialogue. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):295-311.
    Given its contribution to enhancing the inclusiveness, responsiveness, transparency and accountability of socio-political decision-making, the deliberative model has achieved considerable prominence in recent times as a basis for revitalizing democracy. But notwithstanding its strengths, it has also become clear that the deliberative proposal exhibits certain weaknesses that stand in need of correction if it is to realize its potential for revitalizing democracy in our contemporary pluralistic and multicultural world. Not surprisingly, then, there have been calls for significant modifications to the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul Healy (2011). DSM Diagnosis and Beyond: On the Need for a Hermeneutically-Informed Biopsychosocial Framework. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):163-175.
    While often dubbed “the bible of contemporary psychiatry” and widely hailed as providing “a benchmark” for the profession, on closer inspection the DSM is seen to be shot through with philosophical assumptions that restrict its theoretical cogency and limit it clinical efficacy. Hence, in the interests of enhanced patient-care it is important to think critically about the DSM, with a view to maximising its diagnostic strengths while minimising its weaknesses. The critical analysis undertaken in the present paper underscores the importance (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul Healy (2011). Situated Cosmopolitanism, and the Conditions of its Possibility: Transformative Dialogue as a Response to the Challenge of Difference. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 7 (2):157-178.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Patrick Healy (2009). Ann Collins, Teacher in Faith and Virtue: Lanfranc of Bec's Commentary on Saint Paul. (Commentaria. Sacred Texts and Their Commentaries: Jewish, Christian and Islamic, 1.) Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007. Pp. X, 219; Black-and-White Frontispiece, Black-and-White Figures, and 1 Table. €90. [REVIEW] Speculum 84 (3):691-692.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Paul Healy (2008). Phronetic Social Science: Prospects and Possibilities? Sandford Schram and Brian Caterino, Eds, Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. New York: New York University Press, 2006. History of the Human Sciences 21 (1):135-145.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Paul Healy (2007). Rationality, Dialogue, and Critical Inquiry: Toward a Viable Postfoundationalist Stance. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 3 (1):134-158.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Patrick Healy (2006). The Polemical Use of Scripture in the Chronicle of Hugh of Flavigny. Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 73 (1):1-36.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul Healy (2006). Human Rights and Intercultural Relations: A Hermeneutico-Dialogical Approach. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):513-541.
    By drawing on hermeneutico-dialogical principles, the approach developed here seeks to advance the global implementation of a viable human rights regime in a manner commensurate with the preservation of culture-specific differences. To this end, the present article undertakes to elucidate the conditions under which the ongoing intercultural debate about rights might yield a more productive outcome through fostering the implementation of the international human rights regime in a manner that can do justice to core intra-cultural beliefs, values and practices. Chief (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Patrick Healy (2005). Images of Knowledge: An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Sun.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Healy (2005). Rationality, Hermeneutics, and Dialogue: Toward a Viable Postfoundationalist Account of Rationality. Ashgate.
    Rationality, Hermeneutics and Dialogue develops a systematic response to these questions, defending an approach to rationality that can meet the demands of a ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Paul Healy (2004). Making Policy Debate Matter: Practical Reason, Political Dialogue, and Transformative Learning. History of the Human Sciences 17 (1):77-106.
    In a provocative recent study, Bent Flyvbjerg makes a sustained case for the need for a revitalized conception of social inquiry with direct input into the policy-making and planning process, contending that it is only in this way that social science can be made to matter again. Flyvbjerg further contends that to do justice to the reality of contemporary policy forums, we need to embrace a thoroughgoing dialogical conception of the policy-making process itself. To vindicate this contention and theoretically ground (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Paul Healy (2001). A 'Limit Attitude': Foucault, Autonomy, Critique. History of the Human Sciences 14 (1):49-68.
    On Foucault’s own telling, his distinctive approach to critique is to be characterized as a ‘limit attitude’. Definitive of this limit attitude is a problematizing, transgressive style of thinking oriented toward challenging existing ways of being and doing, with a view to liberating new possibilities for advancing ‘the undefined work of freedom’. From the outset, however, the efficacy of this problematizing approach to critique has been beset by doubts about the adequacy of its normative resources. In the present article, it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Paul Healy (2000). Self-Other Relations and the Rationality of Cultures. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):61-83.
    As attested by Taylor, Calhoun and others, recognition is central to (cultural) identity and to a related sense of self-worth. In contrast, by denying the comparable worth of other cultures, non-recognition represents a potentially damaging mode of intercultural relations. Although not widely acknowledged, a related consideration has been at issue in the rationality debate, initiated by Peter Winch, throughout its several phases. Briefly stated, the problem is that the polarized alternatives of ethnocentric universalism and self-sealing relativism that have characterized this (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul Healy (1998). Dialogue Across Boundaries: On the Discursive Conditions Necessary for a “Politics of Equal Recognition”. Res Publica 4 (1):59-76.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Paul Healy (1997). Between Habermas and Foucault: On the Limits and Possibilities of Critical and Emancipatory Reason. South African Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):140-149.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Paul Healy (1996). Situated Rationality and Hermeneutic Understanding. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):155-171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Philip Healy (1996). Faith in the Future, by Jonathan Sacks. The Chesterton Review 22 (4):517-520.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Paul Healy (1994). Rationality, Judgment, and Argument Assessment. Informal Logic 16 (1).
    In contrast to approaches to critical thinking which emphasize the importance of rules, strategies and criteria for the analysis and evaluation of arguments, this paper seeks to vindicate the central role which judgment plays in the assessment process. To counteract charges of arbitrariness or subjectivism in the exercise of judgment, individual and intersubjective constraints are outlined which can ensure its reliable exercise. The contextuality of argumentation, as it affects judgment, is discussed, and some conclusions are drawn about how acknowledgment of (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Paul Healy (1994). Rationality, Judgment and Rule-Following: A Reply to Reiner. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Paul Healy (1992). Truth, Justification, and Nonfoundationalism. Philosophical Studies 33:55-74.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Paul Healy (1990). Rationality. Irish Philosophical Journal 7 (1/2):180-185.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Paul Healy (1988). Kant, Blanshard, and the Coherence Theory of Truth. Idealistic Studies 18 (3):266-274.
    Against blanshard's classic argument for coherence, i maintain that coherence is neither the sole criterion nor nature of truth. in the face of blanshard's insistence that, since truth cannot be a matter of correspondence it must necessarily be a matter of coherence, i propose and defend a third option which combines the two polar positions. i develop this option through analysis of kant's writings on truth.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Paul Healy (1987). Is Habermas's Consensus Theory A Theory of Truth? Irish Philosophical Journal 4 (1-2):145-152.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Paul Healy & R. Grootendorst (1987). Critical Reasoning and Dialectical Argument: An Extension of Toulmin's Approach. Informal Logic 9 (1).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation