21 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Pablo Lorenzano (Universidad Nacional de Quilmes)
  1. Pablo Lorenzano (forthcoming). Bas Van Fraassen Y la Ley de Hardy-Weinberg. Principia.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. José Díez & Pablo Lorenzano (2013). Who Got What Wrong? Fodor and Piattelli on Darwin: Guiding Principles and Explanatory Models in Natural Selection. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 78 (5):1143-1175.
    The purpose of this paper is to defend, contra Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini (F&PP), that the theory of natural selection (NS) is a perfectly bona fide empirical unified explanatory theory. F&PP claim there is nothing non-truistic, counterfactual-supporting, of an “adaptive” character and common to different explanations of trait evolution. In his debate with Fodor, and in other works, Sober defends NS but claims that, compared with classical mechanics (CM) and other standard theories, NS is peculiar in that its explanatory models are (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Pablo Lorenzano (2013). Los Aspectos Erotéticos de la Ciencia: El Caso de la Genética. Revista de Filosofia Aurora 25 (423):13.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Pablo Lorenzano (2013). The Semantic Conception and the Structuralist View of Theories: A Critique of Suppe's Criticisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):600-607.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Joaquín Barutta & Pablo Lorenzano (2012). Reconstrucción estructuralista de la teoría del movimiento circular de la sangre, de William Harvey. Scientiae Studia 10 (2):219-241.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Pablo Lorenzano (2011). La teorización filosófica sobre la ciencia en el siglo xx (y lo que va del xxi). Discusiones Filosóficas 12 (19):131 - 154.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Pablo Lorenzano (2011). Philosophical Theorizing About Science in the Twentieth Century (and What has Elapsed of the Xxi). Discusiones Filosóficas 12 (19):131 - 154.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Pablo Lorenzano (2011). What Would Have Happened If Darwin Had Known Mendel (or Mendel's Work)? History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Pablo Lorenzano (2009). Lo a priori constitutivo en la ciencia y las leyes (y teorías) científicas. Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 33 (2):21-48.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Pablo Lorenzano (2008). Bas Van Fraassen y la Ley de Hardy-Weinberg: una discusión y desarrolo de su diagnóstico. Principia 12 (2):121-154.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n2p121 O objetivo deste trabalho é discutir e desenvolver o diagnóstico que efetua van Fraassen (1987, p. 110) da lei de Hardy-Weinberg, de acordo coo qual esta: 1) não pode ser considerada uma lei a ser utilizada como un axioma da teoria genética de populações, pois é uma lei de equilíbrio que só vale sob certas condições especiais, 2) só determina uma subclasse de modelos, 3) sua generalização resulta vácua e 4) variantes complexas da lei podem ser deduzidas para pressupostos (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Pablo Lorenzano (2008). Inconmensurabilidad Teórica y Comparabilidad Empírica: El Caso de la Genética Clásica. Análisis Filosófico 28 (2):239-279.
    En esta trabajo se analiza la relación existente entre las propuestas de Mendel, de los "redescubridores" -de Vries, Correns y Tschermak-, de Bateson y colaboradores y de Morgan y discípulos, e.e. la historia de la genética "clásica" ("formal" o "mendeliana"), en términos de "inconmensurabilidad", de forma tal de capturar y precisar tanto la idea de que entre éstas se dan ciertas discontinuidades y rupturas (del tipo de las señaladas por los detractores de la "historia oficial" de la genética) como de (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Pablo Lorenzano (2007). Fundamental Laws and Biological Laws. Scientiae Studia 5 (2):185-214.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Pablo Lorenzano (2007). Leyes fundamentales y leyes de la biología. Scientiae Studia 5 (2):185-214.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Pablo Lorenzano (2005). Comentarios a «Explicación teórica y compromisos ontológicos: un modelo estructuralista», de C. Ulises Moulines. Enrahonar 37:55-59.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Pablo Lorenzano (2005). Exemplars, Models and Principles in Classical Genetics. Scientiae Studia 3 (2):185-203.
  16. Pablo Lorenzano (2005). Ejemplares, modelos y principios en la genética clásica. Scientiae Studia 3 (2):185-203.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Pablo Lorenzano (2001). I NTRODUCCIÓN L a unidad de la ciencia fue una de las tesis fundamentales de la filosofía de la ciencia que surgió del Círculo de Viena, es decir, el empirismo lógico. Tal tesis, entendida como programa, fue desarrollada a través de sucesivos. Signos Filosóficos 5:121-131.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Pablo Lorenzano (2001). Sobre la Unidad de Las Ciencias Biológicas. Signos Filosóficos 5:121-131.
    The objectiveof this papper is to examine, by the light of some recent works in generalphilosophy of the science and special philosophy of the biology, the differentforms that assumes the thesis of the unit of the science, in order to be able todetermine in what sense we can spoke of an unit of the ..
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Wolfgang Balzer & Pablo Lorenzano (2000). The Logical Structure of Classical Genetics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (2):243-266.
    We present a reconstruction of so-called classical, formal or Mendelian genetics using a notation which we believe is more legible than that of earlier accounts, and lends itself easily to computer implementation, for instance in PROLOG. By drawing from, and emending, earlier work of Balzer and Dawe (1986,1997), the present account presents the three most important lines of development of classical genetics: the so-called Mendel's laws, linkage genetics and gene mapping, in the form of a theory-net. This shows that the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Pablo Lorenzano (2000). Class1cal Genet1cs and the Theory-Net of Genet1cs'. In Joseph D. Sneed, Wolfgang Balzer & C.-U. Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Knowledge Representation: Paradigmatic Examples. Rodopi. 75--251.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Pablo Lorenzano (1998). Hacia Una reconstrucción estructural de la genética clásica Y de sus relaciones con el mendelismo1. Episteme 3 (5):89-117.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation