24 found
Order:
  1.  47
    Paolo Crivelli (2004). Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle's theory of truth, which has been the most influential account of the concept of truth from Antiquity onwards, spans several areas of philosophy: philosophy of language, logic, ontology, and epistemology. In this book, the first dedicated to this topic, Paolo Crivelli discusses all the main aspects of Aristotle's views on truth and falsehood. He analyses in detail the main relevant passages, addresses some well-known problems of Aristotelian semantics, and assesses Aristotle's theory from the point of view of modern analytic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2.  12
    Paolo Crivelli (2015). Aristotle. Phronesis 60 (1):127-144.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  37
    Paolo Crivelli & Timothy Williamson (1998). A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Philosophical Review 107 (3):471-474.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  39
    Paolo Crivelli & David Charles (2011). In Aristotles Prior Analytics. Phronesis 56 (3):193-203.
    It has often been claimed that (i) Aristotle's expression `protasis' means `premiss' in syllogistic contexts and (ii) cannot refer to the conclusion of a syllogism in the Prior Analytics . In this essay we produce and defend a counter-example to these two claims. We argue that (i) the basic meaning of the expression is `proposition' and (ii) while it is often used to refer to the premisses of a syllogism, in Prior Analytics 1.29, 45b4-8 it is used to refer to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  41
    Paolo Crivelli (2004). Aristotle on the Liar. Topoi 23 (1):61-70.
    The only passage from Aristotle's works that seemsto discuss the paradox of the liar is within chapter 25 of Sophistici Elenchi (180a34–b7). This passage raises several questions: Is it really about the paradox of the liar? If it is, is it addressing a strong version of the paradox or some weak strain of it? If it is addressing a strong version of the paradox, what solution does it propose? The conciseness of the passage does not enable one to answer these (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  9
    Paolo Crivelli & David Charles (2011). ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ' in Aristotle's "Prior Analytics". Phronesis 56 (3):193 - 203.
    It has often been claimed that (i) Aristotle's expression 'protasis' means 'premiss' in syllogistic contexts and (ii) cannot refer to the conclusion of a syllogism in the Prior Analytics. In this essay we produce and defend a counter-example to these two claims. We argue that (i) the basic meaning of the expression is 'proposition' and (ii) while it is often used to refer to the premisses of a syllogism, in Prior Analytics 1.29, 45b4-8 it is used to refer to the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  9
    Paolo Crivelli (2012). Aristotle's Logic. In Christopher Shields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. OUP Usa 113.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  21
    Paolo Crivelli (1994). Indefinite Propositions and Anaphora in Stoic Logic. Phronesis 39 (2):187-206.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  15
    Paolo Crivelli (1998). Αλλοδοξια. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80 (1):1-29.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    Paolo Crivelli (1996). The Argument From Knowing and Not Knowing in Plato's "Theaetetus" (187E5-188C8). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:177 - 196.
  11. Paolo Crivelli (1998). Allodoxia. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80:1-29.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  7
    Paolo Crivelli (1994). The Stoic Analysis of Tense and of Plural Propositions in Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathemticos. Classical Quarterly 44 (2):490-499.
    Adversus Mathematicos x is the second book dedicated by Sextus to the discussion of the physical doctrines put forward by dogmatic philosophers. An extensive section deals with Diodorus Cronus' arguments concerning movement.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Paolo Crivelli (2006). Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle's theory of truth, which has been the most influential account of the concept of truth from Antiquity onwards, spans several areas of philosophy: philosophy of language, logic, ontology and epistemology. In this 2004 book, Paolo Crivelli discusses all the main aspects of Aristotle's views on truth and falsehood. He analyses in detail the main relevant passages, addresses some well-known problems of Aristotelian semantics, and assesses Aristotle's theory from the point of view of modern analytic philosophy. In the process he (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Paolo Crivelli (2009). Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle's theory of truth, which has been the most influential account of the concept of truth from Antiquity onwards, spans several areas of philosophy: philosophy of language, logic, ontology and epistemology. In this 2004 book, Paolo Crivelli discusses all the main aspects of Aristotle's views on truth and falsehood. He analyses in detail the main relevant passages, addresses some well-known problems of Aristotelian semantics, and assesses Aristotle's theory from the point of view of modern analytic philosophy. In the process he (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Paolo Crivelli (2007). Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle's theory of truth, which has been the most influential account of the concept of truth from Antiquity onwards, spans several areas of philosophy: philosophy of language, logic, ontology and epistemology. In this 2004 book, Paolo Crivelli discusses all the main aspects of Aristotle's views on truth and falsehood. He analyses in detail the main relevant passages, addresses some well-known problems of Aristotelian semantics, and assesses Aristotle's theory from the point of view of modern analytic philosophy. In the process he (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Paolo Crivelli & David Charles (2011). Brill Online Books and Journals. Phronesis 56 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Paolo Crivelli (2007). Epictetus and Logic. In T. Scaltsas & Andrew S. Mason (eds.), The Philosophy of Epictetus. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Paolo Crivelli (1995). Modem Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers. The Stanley Victor Keeling Memorial Lectures 1981–1991. Philosophical Books 36 (1):35-37.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  13
    Paolo Crivelli (2011). Plato's Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. The sophist defined; 2. Puzzles about not-being; 3. Puzzles about being; 4. The communion of kinds; 5. Negation and not-being; 6. Sentences, false sentences, and false beliefs; Appendix: the Sophist on true and false sentences: formal presentation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Paolo Crivelli (2013). Plato's Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge University Press.
    Some philosophers argue that false speech and false belief are impossible. In the Sophist, Plato addresses this 'falsehood paradox', which purports to prove that one can neither say nor believe falsehoods. In this book Paolo Crivelli closely examines the whole dialogue and shows how Plato's brilliant solution to the paradox is radically different from those put forward by modern philosophers. He surveys and critically discusses the vast range of literature which has developed around the Sophist over the past fifty years, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Paolo Crivelli (2012). Plato's Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge University Press.
    Some philosophers argue that false speech and false belief are impossible. In the Sophist, Plato addresses this 'falsehood paradox', which purports to prove that one can neither say nor believe falsehoods. In this book Paolo Crivelli closely examines the whole dialogue and shows how Plato's brilliant solution to the paradox is radically different from those put forward by modern philosophers. He surveys and critically discusses the vast range of literature which has developed around the Sophist over the past fifty years, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Paolo Crivelli (2008). Plato's Philosophy of Language. In Gail Fine (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford University Press 217--242.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Paolo Crivelli (2010). The Stoics on Definition. In David Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy. OUP Oxford
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Paolo Crivelli (2007). The Stoics on Definitions and Universals. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18:89-122.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography