8 found
Sort by:
  1. Paolo Fait (forthcoming). Aristotele Ei Paralogismi Dell'identità. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paolo Fait (2009). Aristotle Metaphysics and Ethics (S.) Broadie Aristotle and Beyond. Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics. Pp. X + 203. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Cased, £45, US$85. ISBN: 978-0-521-87024-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (01):71-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Paolo Fait (2008). Aristotle and the Paralogisms of Identity. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 63 (2):205-226.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paolo Fait (2008). Jonathan Barnes, Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science:345-353.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paolo Fait (2004). Aristotle on a Puzzle About Logical Consequence: Necessity of Being Vs. Necessity of Saying. Topoi 23 (1):101-112.
    In the Posterior Analytics (I 6, 75a18–27) Aristotle discusses a puzzle which endangers the possibility of inferring a non-necessary conclusion. His solution relies on the distinction between the necessity of the conclusion's being the case and the necessity of admitting the conclusion once one has admitted the premisses. The former is a factual necessity, whereas the latter is meant to be a normative or deontic necessity that is independent of the facts stated by the premisses and the conclusion. This paper (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paolo Fait (2004). La predicazione linguistica nelle categorie di Aristotele. Rivista di Estetica 44 (26):23-36.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Paolo Fait (2002). Aristóteles y Los Límites de la Dialéctica: Notas Sobre El Arte de la Crítica (Peirastikê). Anuario Filosófico 35 (73):435-462.
    The paper deals with the art of cross-examination or probe (peirastiké) wich is, according to Aristotle, a part of dialectic and aims at revealing falle pretensions to knowledge. A detailed discussion of the relevant passages from the Sophistical Refutations shows that "peirastic" argumenta were not easily distinguishablc forro the arguments used by the sophists against the scientists in order to undermine their reputation. It is also shows that the difficulty of telling dialectic from sophistry is a theme Aristotle inherits frorn (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Paolo Fait (1998). L'éristique Mise En Formules. Dialogue 37 (01):131-.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation