60 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Paul A. Roth [59]Paul Andrew Roth [1]
See also:
Profile: Paul A. Roth (University of California, Santa Cruz)
  1. Paul A. Roth (forthcoming). Beyond Understanding: The Career of the Concept of Understanding in the Human Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul A. Roth (forthcoming). How Narratives Explain. Social Research.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Paul A. Roth (forthcoming). Narrative Explanations: The Case of History. History and Theory.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul A. Roth & Thomas A. Ryckman (forthcoming). Chaos, Clio, and Scientific Illusions of Understanding. History and Theory.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul A. Roth (2013). History and the Manifest Image: Hayden White as a Philosopher of History1. History and Theory 52 (1):130-143.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul A. Roth (2013). Hayden White in Philosophical Perspective: Review Essay of Herman Paul's Hayden White: The Historical Imagination. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (1):0048393113480609.
    For almost half a century, the person most responsible for fomenting brouhahas regarding degrees of plasticity in the writing of histories has been Hayden White. Yet, despite the voluminous responses provoked by White’s work, almost no effort has been made to treat White’s writings in a systematic yet sympathetic way as a philosophy of history. Herman Paul’s book begins to remedy that lack and does so in a carefully considered and extremely scholarly fashion. In his relatively brief six chapters (plus (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Paul A. Roth (2013). The Silence of the Norms: The Missing Historiography of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (4):545-52.
  8. Paul A. Roth (2012). Editors Introduction:What Does History Matter to . . .? Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):301-307.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paul A. Roth (2012). Searleworld1. History and Theory 51 (1):123-142.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul A. Roth (2012). The Pasts. History and Theory 51 (3):313-339.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul A. Roth (2009). Quo Vadis? Quine's Web, Kuhn's Revolutions, and Baert's “Way Forward”. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (3):357 - 363.
  12. Paul A. Roth (2009). Review of Robert Piercey, The Uses of the Past From Heidegger to Rorty: Doing Philosophy Historically. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Paul A. Roth (2009). Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Paul A. Roth (2008). Review of Jonathan Gorman, Historical Judgement: The Limits of Historiographical Choice. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (8).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Paul A. Roth (2008). 4. Three Dogmas (More or Less) of Explanation. History and Theory 47 (1):57–68.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul A. Roth (2008). The Epistemology of Science After Quine. In Stathis Psillos & Martin Curd (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. 3.
  17. Paul A. Roth (2008). Varieties and Vagaries of Historical Explanation. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):214-226.
    For the better part of the 20th century, expositions of issues regarding historical explanation followed a predictable format, one that took as given the nonequivalence of explanations in history and philosophical models of scientific explanation. Ironically, at the present time, the philosophical point of note concerns how the notion of science has itself changed. Debates about explanation in turn need to adapt to this. This prompts the question of whether anything now still makes plausible the thought that history must make (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Paul A. Roth (2007). The Disappearance of the Empirical: Some Reflections on Contemporary Culture Theory and Historiography. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):271-292.
    This paper surveys the parallel fates of the notion of the empirical in philosophy of science in the 20th century and the notion of experience as evidence in one important line of debate in historiography/philosophy of history. The focus concerns the presumably crucial role some notion of the empirical plays in the assessment of knowledge claims. The significance of 'the empirical' disappears on the assumption that theories either determine what counts as experience or explain away any apparently discordant evidence. One (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Paul A. Roth (2006). Review of C. Mantzavinos, Naturalistic Hermeneutics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Paul A. Roth (2005). Three Grades of Normative Involvement: Risjord, Stueber, and Henderson on Norms and Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):339-352.
    What makes for a good explanation of a person’s actions? Their reasons, or soa natural reply goes. But how do reasons function as part of explanations, that is, within an account of the causes of action? Here philosophers divide concerning the logical relation in which reasons stand to actions. For, tradition holds, reasons evaluatively characterized must be causally inert, inasmuch as the normative features cannot be found in any account of the empirical/descriptive. To countenance reasons as causes thus seems to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mark S. Peacock & Paul A. Roth (2004). Holocaust Studies: What is to Be Learned? History of the Human Sciences 17 (2-3):1-13.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Paul A. Roth (2003). Kitcher's Two Cultures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):386-405.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Paul A. Roth (2003). ``Mistakes''. Synthese 136 (3):389-408.
    A suggestion famously made by Peter Winch and carried through to present discussions holds that what constitutes the social as a kind consists of something shared – rules or practices commonly learned, internalized, or otherwise acquired by all members belonging to a society. This essays argues against the explanatory efficacy of appeals to this shared something as constitutive of a social kind by examining a violation of social norms or rules, viz., mistakes. I argue that an asymmetric relation exists between (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Paul A. Roth (2003). Mistakes. Synthese 136 (3):389 - 408.
    A suggestion famously made by Peter Winch and carried through to present discussions holds that what constitutes the social as a kind consists of something shared -- rules or practices commonly learned, internalized, or otherwise acquired by all members belonging to a society. This essays argues against the explanatory efficacy of appeals to this shared something as constitutive of a social kind by examining a violation of social norms or rules, viz., mistakes. I argue that an asymmetric relation exists between (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Paul A. Roth (2003). Review of Hilary Kornblith, Knowledge and its Place in Nature. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (12).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen P. Turner & Paul A. Roth (2003). Introduction. Ghosts and the Machine: Issues of Agency, Rationality, and Scientific Methodology in Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science. In Stephen P. Turner & Paul Andrew Roth (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell Pub.. 1--17.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephen P. Turner & Paul Andrew Roth (eds.) (2003). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell Pub..
    Presents a collection of essays that cover a variety of issues in the social sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Paul A. Roth (2002). Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Time. Common Knowledge 8 (2):418-419.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Paul A. Roth (2002). Ways of Pastmaking. History of the Human Sciences 15 (4):125-143.
    Riddles of induction – old or new, Hume’s or Goodman’s – pose unanswered challenges to assumptions that experiences logically legitimate expectations or classifications. The challenges apply both to folk beliefs and to scientific ones. In particular, Goodman’s ‘new riddle’ famously confounds efforts to specify how additional experiences confirm the rightness of currently preferred ways of organizing objects, i.e. our favored theories of what kinds there are.1 His riddle serves to emphasize that neither logic nor experience certifies accepted groupings of objects (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Paul A. Roth, Alyson Wylie & James Bohman (2002). St. Louis Roundtable on Philosophy of the Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):3-91.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Paul A. Roth (2001). Review Symposium. History of the Human Sciences 14 (2):87-97.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Paul A. Roth (2000). The Object of Understanding. In K. R. Stueber & H. H. Kogaler (eds.), Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences. Boulder: Westview Press. 243--269.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Paul A. Roth (1999). Naturalizing Goldman. Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):89-111.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Paul A. Roth (1999). The Full Hempel. History and Theory 38 (2):249–263.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Paul A. Roth (1998). What Does the Sociology of Scientific Knowlegde Explain. In Irving Velody & Robin Williams (eds.), The Politics of Constructionism. Sage Publications. 69--82.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Paul A. Roth (1996). Dubious Liaisons: A Review of Alvin Goldman's Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 9 (2):261 – 279.
    Alvin Goldman's recent collection (Goldman, 1992) includes many of the important and seminal contributions made by him over the last three decades to epistemology, philosophy of mind, and analytic metaphysics. Goldman is an acknowledged leader in efforts to put material from cognitive and social science to good philosophical use. This is the “liaison” which Goldman takes his own work to exemplify and advance. Yet the essays contained in Liaisons chart an important evolution in Goldman's own views about the relation between (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Paul A. Roth (1996). Microfoundations Without Foundations: Comments on Little. Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):57-64.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Paul A. Roth (1996). Will the Real Scientists Please Stand Up? Dead Ends and Live Issues in the Explanation of Scientific Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):43-68.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Paul A. Roth (1995). New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy. Metaphilosophy 26 (4):440-448.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Paul A. Roth (1995). Microfoundations Without Foundations. Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (Supplement):57-64.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ronald Munson & Paul A. Roth (1994). Testing Normative Naturalism: The Problem of Scientific Medicine. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):571-584.
    Laudan's normative naturalism' claims to account for the success of science by construing theories and other claims as methodological rules interpreted as defeasible hypothetical imperatives for securing cognitive ends. We ask two questions regarding the adequacy for medicine of Laudan's meta- methodology. First, although Laudan denies that general aims can be assigned to a science, we show that this is not the case for medicine. Second, we argue that Laudan's account yields mixed results as a tool for evaluating methodological rules (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Paul A. Roth (1994). What Does the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge Explain?: Or, When Epistemological Chickens Come Home to Roost. History of the Human Sciences 7 (1):95-108.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Paul A. Roth (1992). Hayden White and the Aesthetics of Historiography. History of the Human Sciences 5 (1):17-35.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Paul A. Roth (1991). Interpretation as Explanation. In David R. Hiley, James Bohman & Richard Shusterman (eds.), The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Cornell University Press. 179--196.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Paul A. Roth (1991). The Bureaucratic Turn: Weber Contra Hempel in Fuller's Social Epistemology. Inquiry 34 (3 & 4):365 – 376.
    Like the positivists, Fuller is concerned to demarcate and systematically evaluate scientific claims and practices. Fuller corrects and reforms the positivist enterprise in light of his sociological naturalism. What Fuller's analysis brings to the fore is how the naturalization of epistemology makes the power?knowledge relation into an epistemological issue. Yet, in his writings. Fuller is radically divided with respect to how to react to this fact. Specifically, Fuller vacillates between, on the one hand, a concern for democratizing norms and, on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Paul A. Roth (1991). Truth in Interpretation: The Case of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (2):175-195.
    This article explores and attempts to resolve some issues that arise when psychoanalytic explanations are construed as a type of historical or narrative explanation. The chief problem is this: If one rejects the claim of narratives to verisimilitude, this appears to divorce the notion of explanation from that of truth. The author examines, in particular, Donald Spence's attempt to deal with the relation of narrative explanations and truth. In his critique of Spence's distinction between narrative truth and historical truth, the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Paul A. Roth (1990). Michael Krausz, Ed., Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 10 (2):66-70.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Paul A. Roth (1989). Politics and Epistemology: Rorty, MacIntyre, and the Ends of Philosophy. History of the Human Sciences 2 (2):171-191.
    In this paper, I examine how a manifest disagreement between Richard Rorty and Alasdair MacIntyre concerning the history of philosophy is but one of a series of deep and interrelated disagreements concerning, in addition, the history of science, the good life for human beings, and, ultimately, the character of and prospects for humankind as well. I shall argue that at the heart of this series of disagreements rests a dispute with regard to the nature of rationality. And this disagreement concerning (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Paul A. Roth (1986). Pseudo-Problems in Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (1):59-82.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Paul A. Roth (1984). Who Needs Paradigms? Metaphilosophy 15 (3-4):225-238.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 60