8 found
Sort by:
  1. Paul Abela (2013). Review: Smith & Sullivan (Eds), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):148-154.
    Book Reviews Paul Abela, Kantian Review , FirstView Article(s).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Abela (2013). Review: Smith & Sullivan (Eds), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):148-154.
    Book Reviews Paul Abela, Kantian Review , FirstView Article(s).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Paul Abela (2005). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):558-560.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul Abela & O. Meo (2005). Recensioni/Reviews-Kants Empirical Realism. Epistemologia 28 (1).
  5. Paul Abela (2002). Kant's Empirical Realism. Oxford University Press.
    Paul Abela presents a powerful, experience-sensitive form of realism about the relation between mind and world, based on an innovative interpretation of Kant. Abela breaks with tradition in taking seriously Kant's claim that his Transcendental Idealism yields a form of empirical realism, and giving a realist analysis of major themes of the Critique of Pure Reason. Abela's blending of Kantian scholarship with contemporary epistemology offers a new way of resolving philosophical debates about realism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul Abela (2002). Kantian Walls and Bridges: Challenging the Integrationist Model of the Relation of Theoretical and Practical Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (4):591-615.
  7. Paul Abela (1996). Is Less Always More? An Argument Against the Natural Ontological Attitude. Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):72-76.
  8. Paul Abela (1996). Putnam's Internal Realism and Kant's Empirical Realism. Idealistic Studies 26 (1):45-56.
    This paper challenges Putnam's claim that his internal realism is a revival of Kant's empirical realism. I agree with Putnam that there are good reasons to revive Kant's rather neglected empirical realist doctrine. However, internal realism is not the way this should be done. At the center of the following discussion lies the important difference between Putman's "real within a scheme" model and Kant's assertion of the independent existence of empirical objects. The strategy for the paper is as follows. I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation