7 found
Order:
See also:
  1.  21
    Paul C. Martin (2013). The Exploratory and Reflective Domain of Metaphor in the Comparison of Religions. Zygon 48 (4):936-965.
    There has been a longstanding interest in discovering or uncovering resemblances among what are ostensibly diverse religious schemas by employing a range of methodological approaches and tools. However, it is generally considered a problematic undertaking. Jonathan Z. Smith has produced a large body of work aimed at explicating this and has tacitly based his model of comparison on metaphor, which is traditionally understood to connote similarity between two or more things, as based on a linguistic or pragmatic assessment. However, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  14
    Paul C. Martin (2014). The Colorful Depictions of God in Mystical Consciousness. Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality 14 (1):35-54.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  32
    Paul C. Martin, The Erotic Imaginary of Divine Realization in Kabbalistic and Tantric Metaphysics.
    In this paper I consider the way in which divinity is realized through an imaginary locus in the mystical thought of Jewish kabbalah and Hindu tantra. It demonstrates a reflective consciousness by the adept or master in understanding the place of God’s being, as a supernal and mundane reality. For the comparative assessment of these two distinctive approaches I shall use as a point of departure the interpretative strategies employed by Elliot Wolfson in his detailed work on Jewish mysticism. He (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  20
    Paul C. Martin, The Feminine in the Making of God: Highlighting the Sensible Topography of Divinity.
    What does it mean to talk of the power of God in relation to the human self? The discourses generated by the Jewish and Christian tradition about the capacity for divinity have been mainly promulgated by men, and have more often than not served to exclude women cognitively, practically, and spiritually. As a result they have been made powerless in the face of God’s presence. It is possible to look to ideas developed in Hindu Tantra for comparative notions of power (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  23
    Paul C. Martin, On Discerning the Realm of God in the Thought of Kabbalah and Tantra.
    This paper explores the way in which God as the infinite ground of existence is discerned by the imagination and understanding. The representation of the apophatic divine is facilitated by the working of the human mind, which means that the manifold nature of thinking establishes the presence of God. In the metaphysical speculations of kabbalah and tantra the singular light of Ein Sof and Paramashiva intersects with the human imagination, and is refracted into a multiple display of understanding. So the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  18
    Paul C. Martin, The Place of Speculation in Kabbalah and Tantra.
    In this paper I consider the apparently distinctive outlooks indicated by the mystical thought of Jewish kabbalah and Hindu tantra as they aim at realizing the scope of divine awareness. It is a profound horizon of light that beckons to them, which shows them to be on the verge of touching God. For both traditions there is a demonstrative reflective consciousness by the practitioner in realizing and recognizing the place of God’s being, as a supernal and mundane reality. It is (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Paul C. Martin & Pam Papadelos (forthcoming). Who Stands for the Norm? The Place of Metonymy in Androcentric Language. Social Semiotics.
    Since its emergence as an academic discipline in the early 1970s, feminist commentary and scholarship has prosecuted a critique of androcentric or sexist (gender exclusive) language, which has to some extent been successful. The struggle by women to occupy a positive linguistic space is continually being challenged by the endemic nature of masculine bias, which is realized through “indirect” or “subtle” sexism in the community. Seemingly innocuous words, like guy/guys, are frequently used to represent both men and women, reminiscent of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography