115 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Paul Feyerabend [68]Paul K. Feyerabend [47]
See also:
  1.  80
    Paul Feyerabend (1993). Against Method. Verso.
    Feyerabrend argues that intellectual progress relies on the creativity of the scientist, against the authority of science.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   365 citations  
  2.  43
    Paul Feyerabend (1978). Science in a Free Society. Nlb.
  3.  16
    Paul Feyerabend (1974/1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. Humanities Press.
  4. Paul Feyerabend (1975). How to Defend Society Against Science. Radical Philosophy 11 (1):3-9.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  5. Paul Feyerabend (1987). Farewell to Reason. Verso.
    Essays discuss relativism, knowledge, creativity, progress, Aristotle, Galileo, cultural pluralism, and reason.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  6. Paul K. Feyerabend (1962). Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (ed.), Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía. 103-106.
  7. Paul Feyerabend (1981). Problems of Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
    Over the past thirty years Paul Feyerabend has developed an extremely distinctive and influentical approach to problems in the philosophy of science. The most important and seminal of his published essays are collected here in two volumes, with new introductions to provide an overview and historical perspective on the discussions of each part. Volume 1 presents papers on the interpretation of scientific theories, together with papers applying the views developed to particular problems in philosophy and physics. The essays in volume (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   32 citations  
  8. Paul Feyerabend (1981). Realism, Rationalism, and Scientific Method. Cambridge University Press.
    Over the past thirty years Paul Feyerabend has developed an extremely distinctive and influentical approach to problems in the philosophy of science. The most important and seminal of his published essays are collected here in two volumes, with new introductions to provide an overview and historical perspective on the discussions of each part. Volume 1 presents papers on the interpretation of scientific theories, together with papers applying the views developed to particular problems in philosophy and physics. The essays in volume (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  9. Paul Feyerabend (2009). Naturphilosophie. Suhrkamp.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  10.  17
    Paul Feyerabend (1970). Consolations for the Specialist1. In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press 197.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   55 citations  
  11. Paul Feyerabend (1955). Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. Philosophical Review 64 (3):449-483.
  12. Paul Feyerabend (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press.
  13.  97
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1963). Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Review of Metaphysics 17 (September):49-67.
  14.  4
    Paul Feyerabend (1995). Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. University of Chicago Press.
    The self-portrait of an intellectual reveals his childhood in Vienna, wounds at the Russian front in the German army, encounters with the famous, innumerable love affairs, four marriages, and refusal to accept a "petrified and tyrannical ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15.  43
    Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini (2000). For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. University of Chicago Press.
    The work that helped to determine Paul Feyerabend's fame and notoriety, Against Method,stemmed from Imre Lakatos's challenge: "In 1970 Imre cornered me at a party. 'Paul,' he said, 'you have such strange ideas.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  16. Paul K. Feyerabend (1968). On a Recent Critique of Complementarity: Part I. Philosophy of Science 35 (4):309-331.
    Discussions of the interpretation of quantum theory are at present obstructed by (1) the increasing axiomania in physics and philosophy which replaces fundamental problems by problems of formulation within a certain preconceived calculus, and (2) the decreasing (since 1927) philosophical interest and sophistication both of professional physicists and of professional philosophers which results in the replacement of subtle positions by crude ones and of dialectical arguments by dogmatic ones. More especially, such discussions are obstructed by the ignorance of both opponents, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  17. Paul K. Feyerabend (1991). Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Blackwell Pub.
    The Socratic, or dialog, form is central to the history of philosophy and has been the discipline's canonical genre ever since. Paul Feyerabend's Three Dialogues on Knowledge resurrects the form to provide an astonishingly flexible and invigorating analysis of epistemological, ethical and metaphysical problems. He uses literary strategies - of irony, voice and distance - to make profoundly philosophical points about the epistemic, existential and political aspects of common sense and scientific knowledge. He writes about ancient and modern relativism; the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  18. Paul Feyerabend (1987). Putnam on Incommensurability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):75-81.
  19. Paul K. Feyerabend (1974). Zahar on Einstein. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):25-28.
  20. Peder Anker, Per Ariansen, Alfred J. Ayer, Murray Bookchin, Baird Callicott, John Clark, Bill Devall, Fons Elders, Paul Feyerabend, Warwick Fox, William C. French, Harold Glasser, Ramachandra Guha, Patsy Hallen, Stephan Harding, Andrew Mclaughlin, Ivar Mysterud, Arne Naess, Bryan Norton, Val Plumwood, Peter Reed, Kirkpatrick Sale, Ariel Salleh, Karen Warren, Richard A. Watson, Jon Wetlesen & Michael E. Zimmerman (1999). Philosophical Dialogues: Arne Naess and the Progress of Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The volume documents, and makes an original contribution to, an astonishing period in twentieth-century philosophy—the progress of Arne Naess's ecophilosophy from its inception to the present. It includes Naess's most crucial polemics with leading thinkers, drawn from sources as diverse as scholarly articles, correspondence, TV interviews and unpublished exchanges. The book testifies to the skeptical and self-correcting aspects of Naess's vision, which has deepened and broadened to include third world and feminist perspectives. Philosophical Dialogues is an essential addition to the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  21. Paul K. Feyerabend (1969). Science Without Experience. Journal of Philosophy 66 (November):791-795.
  22. Paul Feyerabend (1989). Realism and the Historicity of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 86 (8):393-406.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  23.  34
    Paul Feyerabend (1977). Changing Patterns of Reconstruction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):351-369.
  24. Paul K. Feyerabend (1964). A Note on the Problem of Induction. Journal of Philosophy 61 (12):349-353.
  25. Paul K. Feyerabend (1963). Comment: Mental Events and the Brain. Journal of Philosophy 60 (11):295-296.
  26.  6
    Paul K. Feyerabend (forthcoming). The Concept of Intelligibility in Modern Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Paul Feyerabend & Bert Terpstra (2000). Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction Versus the Richness of Being. Philosophy 75 (294):618-622.
    From flea bites to galaxies, from love affairs to shadows, Paul Feyerabend reveled in the sensory and intellectual abundance that surrounds us. He found it equally striking that human senses and human intelligence are able to take in only a fraction of these riches. "This a blessing, not a drawback," he writes. "A superconscious organism would not be superwise, it would be paralyzed." This human reduction of experience to a manageable level is the heart of _Conquest of Abundance_, the book (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  28.  69
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1965). On the "Meaning" of Scientific Terms. Journal of Philosophy 62 (10):266-274.
  29.  14
    Paul Feyerabend (1996). Killing Time. University of Chicago Press.
    Killing Timeis the story of Paul Feyerabend's life.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  30.  48
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1984). Mach's Theory of Research and its Relation to Einstein. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (1):1-22.
  31.  90
    Paul Feyerabend (1999). Knowledge, Science, and Relativism: 1960-1980. Cambridge University Press.
    This third volume of Paul Feyerabend's philosophical papers, which gathers together work originally published between 1960 and 1980, offers a range of his characteristically exciting treatments of classic questions in the philosophy of science. It includes his previously untranslated paper 'The Problem of Theoretical Entities', and the important lecture 'Knowledge without Foundations', in which he develops the perspective on early philosophy and science put forward by Karl Popper. Other themes discussed include theoretical pluralism, the nature of scientific method, the relationship (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32. Paul K. Feyerabend (1963). Mental Events and the Brain. Journal of Philosophy 40 (May):295-6.
  33.  3
    Paul Feyerabend (1981). Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press.
  34.  61
    Paul Feyerabend (1980). Democracy, Elitism, and Scientific Method. Inquiry 23 (1):3 – 18.
    Scientific standards cannot be separated from the practice of science and their use presupposes immersion in this practice. The demand to base political action on scientific standards therefore leads to elitism. Democratic relativism, on the other hand, demands equal rights for all traditions or, conversely, a separation between the state and any one of the traditions it contains; for example, it demands the separation of state and science, state and humanitarianism, state and Christianity. Democratic relativism defends the rights of people (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  35.  74
    Paul Feyerabend (1994). Art as a Product of Nature as a Work of Art. World Futures 40 (1):87-100.
    Two claims are discussed. One is that works of art are a product of nature, no less than rocks and flowers. The other is that nature itself is an artifact, constructed by scientists and artisans, throughout centuries, from a partly yielding, partly resisting material of unknown properties. Since both claims are supported by convincing evidence, the world appears much more slippery than commonly assumed by rationalists. Intellectual generalizations around ?art,? ?nature? or ?science? are simplifying devices that can help us order (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36. Paul K. Feyerabend (1979). Erkenntnis Für Freie Menschen.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  37.  71
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1966). The Structure of Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):237-249.
  38.  61
    Paul Feyerabend (1975). 'Science.' The Myth and its Role in Society. Inquiry 18 (2):167 – 181.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39. Paul Feyerabend (1994). Potentially Every Culture is All Cultures. Common Knowledge 3 (2):16-22.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  3
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1988). Knowledge And The Role Of Theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (June):157-178.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  41.  29
    Paul Feyerabend (1974). Popper'sobjective Knowledge1. Inquiry 17 (1-4):475-507.
  42.  66
    Paul Feyerabend (1958). Reichenbach's Interpretation of Quantum-Mechanics. Philosophical Studies 9 (4):49 - 59.
  43.  93
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1968). A Note on Two 'Problems' of Induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):251-253.
  44.  6
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1976). On the Critique of Scientific Reason. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel 109--143.
  45.  34
    Paul Feyerabend (1977). Marxist Fairytales From Australia. Inquiry 20 (1-4):372 – 397.
  46.  36
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1969). On a Recent Critique of Complementarity: Part II. Philosophy of Science 36 (1):82-105.
  47.  5
    Paul Feyerabend (1977). Review: Changing Patterns of Reconstruction. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):351 - 369.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  48.  25
    Paul K. Feyerabend (1967). The Theatre as an Instrument of the Criticism of Ideologies. Inquiry 10 (1-4):298 – 312.
    It is the thesis of the paper that the arts of the twentieth century have gone much further in the criticism of customary modes of thought than have both the sciences and the various critical philosophies which exist today. Moreover, they have not only developed an abstract principle of criticism, they have also studied the psychological conditions under which criticism can be expected to become effective. Some plays and the theoretical essays of Ionesco are analysed as an example. It is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  49.  24
    Paul Feyerabend (1980). Zahar on Mach, Einstein and Modern Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (3):273-282.
  50.  77
    Paul Feyerabend (1975). Imre Lakatos. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):1-18.
1 — 50 / 115