13 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Paul Gregory [11]Paul A. Gregory [2]
  1. Paul Gregory, Kripke on Private Language.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Gregory, Willard Van Orman Quine.
  3. Paul Gregory, Quine's Naturalism:.
    W. V. Quine was the most important naturalistic philosopher of the twentieth century and a major impetus for the recent resurgence of the view that empirical science is our best avenue to knowledge. His views, however, have not been well understood. Critics charge that Quine’s naturalized epistemology is circular and that it cannot be normative. Yet, such criticisms stem from a cluster of fundamental traditional assumptions regarding language, theory, and the knowing subject – the very presuppositions that Quine is at (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul Gregory, List of Courses Taught at Washington and Lee University: Note: Each Syllabus Consists of Two Main Pages, the Home or Syllabus Page, and the Reading Schedule Which is Linked From the Home Page...
    PHIL 102 - Problems of Philosophy (Fall) This course has two main goals: first, to cultivate students’ critical attitude towards reading, writing, and daily life; second, to engage students with primary philosophical texts. Plato, Descartes, Locke, Hume, Peirce, Russell, Paley, Perry, Sagan, Ayer, Chisholm, and Dennett are among the authors I have used. Each week students are responsible for readings and reading questions to be answered out of class or in small in-class groups. These assignments are designed to develop critical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul Gregory (2004). Democracy Now. Philosophy Now 46:10-13.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
    Recently O'Grady argued that Quine's "Two Dogmas" misses its mark when Carnap's use of the analyticity distinction is understood in the light of his deflationism. While in substantial agreement with the stress on Carnap's deflationism, I argue that O'Grady is not sufficiently sensitive to the difference between using the analyticity distinction to support deflationism, and taking a deflationary attitude towards the distinction itself; the latter being much more controversial. Being sensitive to this difference, and viewing Quine as having reason to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Paul Gregory (2003). Putting the Bite Back Into. Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
    Recent Carnap scholarship suggests that the received view of the Carnap-Quine analyticity debate is importantly mistaken. It has been suggested that Carnap’s analyticity distinction is immune from Quine’s criticisms. This is either because Quine did not understand Carnap’s use of analytic-ity, or because Quine did not appreciate that, rather than dispelling dog-mas, he was merely offering an alternate framework for philosophy. It has also been suggested that ultimately nothing of substance turns on this dis-pute. I am sympathetic to these reassessments (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Paul A. Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas' -- All Bark and No Bite? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633-648.
    Recently O’Grady argued that Quine’s “Two Dogmas” misses its mark when Carnap’s use of the analyticity distinction is understood in the light of his deflationism. While in substantial agreement with the stress on Carnap’s deflationism, I argue that O’Grady is not sufficiently sensitive to the difference between using the analyticity distinction to support deflationism, and taking a deflationary attitude towards the distinction itself; the latter being much more controversial. Being sensitive to this difference, and viewing Quine as having reason to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paul A. Gregory (2003). Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
    Recently O’Grady argued that Quine’s “Two Dogmas” misses its mark when Carnap’s use of the analyticity distinction is understood in the light of his deflationism. While in substantial agreement with the stress on Carnap’s deflationism, I argue that O’Grady is not sufficiently sensitive to the difference between using the analyticity distinction to support deflationism, and taking a deflationary attitude towards the distinction itself; the latter being much more controversial. Being sensitive to this difference, and viewing Quine as having reason to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul Gregory (1993). Personhood and Erotic Experience. Philosophy Now 5:8-12.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul Gregory (1988). Eroticism and Love. American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (4):339 - 344.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Gregory (1986). The Two Sides of Love. Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2):229-233.
  13. Paul Gregory (1984). Against Couples. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (2):263-268.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation