14 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Paul Gregory [11]Paul A. Gregory [3]
  1.  133 DLs
    Paul Gregory, Kripke on Private Language.
  2.  75 DLs
    Paul Gregory (2003). Putting the Bite Back Into. Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
    Recent Carnap scholarship suggests that the received view of the Carnap-Quine analyticity debate is importantly mistaken. It has been suggested that Carnap’s analyticity distinction is immune from Quine’s criticisms. This is either because Quine did not understand Carnap’s use of analytic-ity, or because Quine did not appreciate that, rather than dispelling dog-mas, he was merely offering an alternate framework for philosophy. It has also been suggested that ultimately nothing of substance turns on this dis-pute. I am sympathetic to these reassessments (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  55 DLs
    Paul Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
    Recently O'Grady argued that Quine's "Two Dogmas" misses its mark when Carnap's use of the analyticity distinction is understood in the light of his deflationism. While in substantial agreement with the stress on Carnap's deflationism, I argue that O'Grady is not sufficiently sensitive to the difference between using the analyticity distinction to support deflationism, and taking a deflationary attitude towards the distinction itself; the latter being much more controversial. Being sensitive to this difference, and viewing Quine as having reason to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4.  47 DLs
    Paul A. Gregory (2003). Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
    Recently O’Grady argued that Quine’s “Two Dogmas” misses its mark when Carnap’s use of the analyticity distinction is understood in the light of his deflationism. While in substantial agreement with the stress on Carnap’s deflationism, I argue that O’Grady is not sufficiently sensitive to the difference between using the analyticity distinction to support deflationism, and taking a deflationary attitude towards the distinction itself; the latter being much more controversial. Being sensitive to this difference, and viewing Quine as having reason to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5.  47 DLs
    Paul Gregory, Quine's Naturalism:.
    W. V. Quine was the most important naturalistic philosopher of the twentieth century and a major impetus for the recent resurgence of the view that empirical science is our best avenue to knowledge. His views, however, have not been well understood. Critics charge that Quine’s naturalized epistemology is circular and that it cannot be normative. Yet, such criticisms stem from a cluster of fundamental traditional assumptions regarding language, theory, and the knowing subject – the very presuppositions that Quine is at (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6.  18 DLs
    Paul Gregory, Willard Van Orman Quine.
  7.  11 DLs
    Paul A. Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas' -- All Bark and No Bite? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633-648.
    Recently O’Grady argued that Quine’s “Two Dogmas” misses its mark when Carnap’s use of the analyticity distinction is understood in the light of his deflationism. While in substantial agreement with the stress on Carnap’s deflationism, I argue that O’Grady is not sufficiently sensitive to the difference between using the analyticity distinction to support deflationism, and taking a deflationary attitude towards the distinction itself; the latter being much more controversial. Being sensitive to this difference, and viewing Quine as having reason to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8.  8 DLs
    Paul Gregory (1984). Against Couples. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (2):263-268.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9.  7 DLs
    Paul Gregory, List of Courses Taught at Washington and Lee University: Note: Each Syllabus Consists of Two Main Pages, the Home or Syllabus Page, and the Reading Schedule Which is Linked From the Home Page...
    PHIL 102 - Problems of Philosophy (Fall) This course has two main goals: first, to cultivate students’ critical attitude towards reading, writing, and daily life; second, to engage students with primary philosophical texts. Plato, Descartes, Locke, Hume, Peirce, Russell, Paley, Perry, Sagan, Ayer, Chisholm, and Dennett are among the authors I have used. Each week students are responsible for readings and reading questions to be answered out of class or in small in-class groups. These assignments are designed to develop critical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10.  6 DLs
    Paul Gregory (1988). Eroticism and Love. American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (4):339 - 344.
  11.  5 DLs
    Paul Gregory (1993). Personhood and Erotic Experience. Philosophy Now 5:8-12.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12.  5 DLs
    Paul Gregory (1986). The Two Sides of Love. Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2):229-233.
    The kind of love under consideration here is that between equal persons as it typically occurs within the context of a friendship. It is assumed that love opens the way to a sense of meaning or purpose for the individual, the difficulty addressed being that of how to pursue or recognise love. Is it primarily a form of action or of feeling? Can love be said to consist of giving? How does love relate to freedom and dependence? The consideration of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13.  4 DLs
    Paul Gregory (2004). Democracy Now. Philosophy Now 46:10-13.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14.  0 DLs
    Paul A. Gregory (1999). Language, Theory, and the Human Subject: Understanding Quine's Natural Epistemology. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
    The natural epistemology of W. V. Quine has not been well understood. Critics argue that Quine's scientific approach to epistemology is circular and fails to be normative, yet these criticisms tend to be based on the very presuppositions concerning language, theory, and epistemology that Quine is at pains to reject or alter. ;Quine's views on the meaningfulness of language use imply a breakdown in the dichotomy between language as a theoretically neutral instrument and theory as the commitment to some subset (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation