14 found
Sort by:
  1. Stephan Dickert, Daniel Västfjäll, Janet Kleber & Paul Slovic (2012). Valuations of Human Lives: Normative Expectations and Psychological Mechanisms of (Ir)Rationality. Synthese 189 (S1):95-105.
    A central question for psychologists, economists, and philosophers is how human lives should be valued. Whereas egalitarian considerations give rise to models emphasizing that every life should be valued equally, empirical research has demonstrated that valuations of lives depend on a variety of factors that often do not conform to specific normative expectations. Such factors include emotional reactions to the victims and cognitive considerations leading to biased perceptions of lives at risk (e.g., attention, mental imagery, pseudo-inefficacy, and scope neglect). They (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephan Dickert & Paul Slovic (2011). Unstable Values in Lifesaving Decisions. Frontiers in Psychology 2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ellen Peters & Paul Slovic (2007). Affective Asynchrony and the Measurement of the Affective Attitude Component. Cognition and Emotion 21 (2):300-329.
  4. Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) (2006). The Construction of Preference. Cambridge University Press.
    One of the main themes that has emerged from behavioral decision research during the past three decades is the view that people's preferences are often constructed in the process of elicitation. This idea is derived from studies demonstrating that normatively equivalent methods of elicitation (e.g., choice and pricing) give rise to systematically different responses. These preference reversals violate the principle of procedure invariance that is fundamental to all theories of rational choice. If different elicitation procedures produce different orderings of options, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul Slovic (1992). Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. 117--152.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul Slovic (1992). Social, Cultural, and Psycholgocial Paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. 117--152.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Daniel Kahneman & Paul Slovic (1982). Amos Tversky, Eds. 1982. In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
    The thirty-five chapters in this book describe various judgmental heuristics and the biases they produce, not only in laboratory experiments but in important...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paul Slovic, B. Fischoff & Sarah Lichtenstein (1982). Facts Versus Fears. In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. 463--489.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Sarah Lichtenstein, Paul Slovic & Donald Zink (1969). Effect of Instruction in Expected Value on Optimality of Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):236.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul Slovic (1969). Differential Effects of Real Versus Hypothetical Payoffs on Choices Among Gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):434.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Slovic (1969). Manipulating the Attractiveness of a Gamble Without Changing its Expected Value. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):139.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein (1968). Importance of Variance Preferences in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):646.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein (1968). Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p2):1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation