20 found
Order:
  1. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
    The thirty-five chapters in this book describe various judgmental heuristics and the biases they produce, not only in laboratory experiments but in important...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   870 citations  
  2.  34
    Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) (2006). The Construction of Preference. Cambridge University Press.
    One of the main themes that has emerged from behavioral decision research during the past three decades is the view that people's preferences are often constructed in the process of elicitation. This idea is derived from studies demonstrating that normatively equivalent methods of elicitation (e.g., choice and pricing) give rise to systematically different responses. These preference reversals violate the principle of procedure invariance that is fundamental to all theories of rational choice. If different elicitation procedures produce different orderings of options, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  3. Paul Slovic, B. Fischoff & Sarah Lichtenstein (1982). Facts Versus Fears. In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press 463--489.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   61 citations  
  4. Paul Slovic (1992). Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger 117--152.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Amos Tversky, Shmuel Sattath & Paul Slovic (1988). Contingent Weighting in Judgment and Choice. Psychological Review 95 (3):371-384.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  6.  9
    Stephan Dickert, Daniel Västfjäll, Janet Kleber & Paul Slovic (2012). Valuations of Human Lives: Normative Expectations and Psychological Mechanisms of (Ir)Rationality. Synthese 189 (S1):95-105.
    A central question for psychologists, economists, and philosophers is how human lives should be valued. Whereas egalitarian considerations give rise to models emphasizing that every life should be valued equally, empirical research has demonstrated that valuations of lives depend on a variety of factors that often do not conform to specific normative expectations. Such factors include emotional reactions to the victims and cognitive considerations leading to biased perceptions of lives at risk (e.g., attention, mental imagery, pseudo-inefficacy, and scope neglect). They (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  20
    Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein (1968). Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p2):1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8.  2
    Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (1971). Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):46-55.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  7
    Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein (1968). Importance of Variance Preferences in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):646.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10.  20
    Ellen Peters & Paul Slovic (2007). Affective Asynchrony and the Measurement of the Affective Attitude Component. Cognition and Emotion 21 (2):300-329.
  11. Ellen Peters, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Daniel Västfjäll, C. K. Mertz, Paul Slovic & Judith H. Hibbard (2009). Bringing Meaning to Numbers: The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (3):213-227.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  2
    Paul Slovic (1969). Differential Effects of Real Versus Hypothetical Payoffs on Choices Among Gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):434.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  2
    Daniel Västfjäll & Paul Slovic (2015). The More Who Die, the Less We Care Psychic Numbing and Genocide. In David Kim & Susanne Kaul (eds.), Imagining Human Rights. De Gruyter 55-68.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Sarah Lichtenstein, Paul Slovic & Donald Zink (1969). Effect of Instruction in Expected Value on Optimality of Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):236.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  3
    Paul Slovic (1969). Manipulating the Attractiveness of a Gamble Without Changing its Expected Value. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):139.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Pär Bjälkebring, Daniel Västfjäll, Stephan Dickert & Paul Slovic (2016). Greater Emotional Gain From Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Daniel Kahneman & Paul Slovic (1982). Amos Tversky, Eds. 1982. In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Tehila Kogut, Paul Slovic & Daniel Västfjäll (2015). Scope Insensitivity in Helping Decisions: Is It a Matter of Culture and Values? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6):1042-1052.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Paul Slovic (1992). Social, Cultural, and Psycholgocial Paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger 117--152.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic, William J. Burns, Arvid Erlandsson, Lina Koppel, Erkin Asutay & Gustav Tinghög (2016). The Arithmetic of Emotion: Integration of Incidental and Integral Affect in Judgments and Decisions. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography