15 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Peggy DesAutels (2012). Moral Perception and Responsiveness. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):334-346.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peggy DesAutels (2010). Sex Differences and Neuroethics. Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):95-111.
    Discussions in neuroethics to date have ignored an ever-increasing neuroscientific lilterature on sex differences in brains. If, indeed, there are significant differences in the brains of men versus women and in the brains of boys versus girls, the ethical and social implications loom very large. I argue that recent neuroscientific findings on sex-based brain differences have significant implications for theories of morality and for our understandings of the neuroscience of moral cognition and behavior.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rebecca Wisnant, Peggy Desautels, Lynn Arnault & Bat-Ami Bar On (eds.) (2010). Global Feminist Ethics. Rowman and Littlefield.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peggy DesAutels (2009). Resisting Organizational Power. In Lisa Tessman (ed.), Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. Springer. 223--236.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peggy Desautels (2008). Folk Feminist Theory: An Experimental Approach. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 240-244.
  6. Rebecca Whisnant & Peggy DesAutels (eds.) (2008). Global Feminist Ethics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peggy DesAutels (2004). Moral Mindfulness. In Peggy DesAutels & Margaret Urban Walker (eds.), Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield. 69--81.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Peggy DesAutels & Margaret Urban Walker (eds.) (2004). Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
    These essays by a distinguished international cast of philosophers explore moral psychology as it connects to social life, scientific studies, and literature.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Peggy DesAutels, Margaret P. Battin, Larry May & Johannes J. M. Van Delden (2001). Book Reviews-Praying for a Cure. When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict. Bioethics-Oxford 15 (2):160-160.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Peggy DesAutels & JoAnne Waugh (eds.) (2001). FEMINISTS DOING ETHICS. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.
    As the initial book in the Feminist Constructions series, Feminists Doing Ethics broaches the ideas of critiquing social practice and developing an ethics of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Sandra Lee Bartky, Daniel Callahan, Joan C. Callahan, Peggy DesAutels, Robin Fiore, Frida Kerner Furman, Martha Holstein, Diana Tietjens Meyers, Hilde Lindemann Nelson, James Lindemann Nelson, Sara Ruddick, Anita Silvers, Joan Tronto, Margaret Urban Walker & Susan Wendell (2000). Mother Time: Women, Aging, and Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Peggy DesAutels, Margaret P. Battin & Larry May (1999). Praying for a Cure: When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peggy Desautels (1998). Psychologies of Moral Perceivers. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 22 (1):266-280.
  14. Peggy Desautels (1997). Book Review: Virginia Held. Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 1995. [REVIEW] Hypatia 12 (4):200-202.
  15. Peggy DesAutels (1995). Christian Science, Rational Choice, and Alternative World Views. Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (3):89-104.