109 found
Order:
  1. Terence Penelhum (forthcoming). Book Review: Inspiration. [REVIEW] Interpretation 57 (4):458-458.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Terence Penelhum (forthcoming). Book Review: The Doctrine of Revelation: A Narrative Interpretation. [REVIEW] Interpretation 53 (1):100-100.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Terence Penelhum (1955). Hume on Personal Identity. Philosophical Review 64 (4):571-589.
  4.  4
    Terence Penelhum (2013). Religion After Atheism. Religious Studies 49 (2):249-255.
    This article reflects critically on some of the claims of J. L. Schellenberg's trilogy and on the fundamental decisions lying behind them. Some of the latter are found to be tied to his earlier work on atheism in ways that can be questioned.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  37
    T. Penelhum (1957). Analysis 'Is It Possible That One and the Same Individual Object Should Cease to Exist and, Later on, Start to Exist Again?'. Analysis 17 (6):123-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Terence Penelhum (2009). Hume's Moral Psychology. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press
  7.  1
    Terence Penelhum (1985). God and Skepticism. Philosophical Review 94 (4):599-602.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  8. Terence Penelhum (1995). Reason and Religious Faith. Westview Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9.  97
    Terence W. Penelhum (1971). The Importance of Self-Identity. Journal of Philosophy 68 (October):667-78.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  6
    Terence Penelhum (1985/1999). Butler. Routledge.
    This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  50
    Terence Penelhum (2000). Themes in Hume: The Self, the Will, Religion. Oxford University Press.
    Since the 1950s, Terence Penelhum has been a leading contributor to studies on the thought of David Hume. In this collection, he presents a selection of the best of his essays on Hume. Most of the essays are quite recent and three are previously unpublished.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  3
    J. L. Mackie, Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Anthony Kenny & Terence Penelhum (1985). The Miracle of Theism. Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):46-53.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  13.  14
    Terence Penelhum (1970). Survival and Disembodied Existence. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  14.  83
    Terence W. Penelhum (1959). Personal Identity, Memory, and Survival. Journal of Philosophy 56 (June):319-328.
  15.  62
    Terence Penelhum (1960). Divine Necessity. Mind 69 (274):175-186.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  46
    Terence Penelhum (1978). The Cosmological Argument. International Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):221-223.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  9
    Terence Penelhum (1964). Pleasure and Falsity. American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (2):81 - 91.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  18.  75
    Terence Penelhum (2004). Review of Robert J. Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles, Princeton. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (1).
  19. Terence Penelhum (1992). David Hume an Introduction to His Philosophical System. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  20.  7
    Terence Penelhum (1966). Religion and Philosophical Sophistication. World Futures 5 (2):74-77.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  9
    Terence Penelhum (1992). The Logic of Mortality. International Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):96-97.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  29
    Terence Penelhum (1983). Natural Belief and Religious Belief in Hume's Philosophy. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (131):166-181.
    This is a re-Examination of hume's intentions in the final part of the "dialogues". It is here, If anywhere, That we find the resolution of the conflict between his naturalistic acceptance that belief has non-Rational causes, And his wish to expose religious belief as irrational. The paper amends its author's previous view that hume is shown to have accepted, At least verbally, That such a theism is a result of cleanthes' arguments, But to have maintained his secularism by showing it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23. Terence Penelhum (1971). Religion and Rationality. New York,Random House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  24. T. Penelhum (1979). Hume's Skepticism and the Dialogues. In Norton (ed.), McGill Hume Studies.
  25.  26
    Terence Penelhum (1980). Hume. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (4):477-479.
  26.  17
    Terence Penelhum (2003). The Paranormal, Miracles and David Hume. Think 3 (3):7 - 14.
    Is parapsychology a pseudo-science? Many believe that the Eighteenth century philosopher David Hume showed, in effect, that it must be. In this article, Terence Penelhum explains and endorses Hume's arguments concerning testimony of the miraculous, but also explains why he believes there is now evidence of sufficient quality concerning the paranormal to make further investigation scientifically worth-while.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  20
    Terence Penelhum (1979). Human Nature and External Desires. The Monist 62 (3):304-319.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  7
    Terence Penelhum (1995). Warrant. International Studies in Philosophy 27 (4):129-131.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  38
    Terence W. Penelhum (1957). The Logic of Pleasure. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 (June):488-503.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  17
    Terence Penelhum (1966). Divine Goodness and the Problem of Evil. Religious Studies 2 (1):95 - 107.
    The purpose of this paper is not to offer any solution to the problem of evil, or to declare it insoluble. It is rather the more modest one of deciding on its nature. Many writers assume that the problem of evil is one that poses a logical challenge to the theist, rather than a challenge of a moral or scientific sort. If this assumption is correct, and the challenge cannot be met, Christian theism can be shown to be untenable on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31. Terence Penelhum (1982). Life After Death. In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  26
    A. N. Prior & Terence Penelhum (1957). Report on Analysis 'Problem' No. 11. Analysis 17 (6):121 - 124.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  1
    Terence Penelhum (1972). Problems of Religious Knowledge. --. Herder and Herder.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  23
    Terence Penelhum (1993). Hume's "Inexplicable Mystery". [REVIEW] Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):444-447.
  35. John James Macintosh & Terence Penelhum (1969). The First Critique Reflections on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Wadsworth.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  13
    Terence Penelhum (1988). Butler and Hume. Hume Studies 14 (2):251-276.
  37.  5
    Terence Penelhum (1992). The Self of Book 1 and the Selves of Book 2. Hume Studies 18 (2):281-291.
  38.  4
    Terence Penelhum (1974). Reply to Michael Durrant. Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):519-525.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  2
    Terence Penelhum (1977). The Analysis of Faith in St Thomas Aquinas: Terence Penelhum. Religious Studies 13 (2):133-154.
    My intent in this paper is to give an account of Aquinas' analysis of the nature of Christian faith, to indicate some difficulties to which it seems to me, and has seemed to others, to give rise, to try to evaluate the degree to which his analysis can suggest answers to those difficulties, and then to conclude with some general comments about the sources of those perplexities that still remain.*.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  19
    Terence Penelhum (2003). God, Reason and Theistic Proofs. International Studies in Philosophy 35 (4):217-219.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  29
    Terence Penelhum (1986). On "Perceiving God". Journal of Philosophy 83 (11):665-666.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  3
    Terence Penelhum (1960). Book Review:Religion and the Scientific Outlook. T. R. Miles. [REVIEW] Ethics 71 (1):68-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  3
    Terence Penelhum (1962). Book Review:Our Experience of God. H. D. Lewis. [REVIEW] Ethics 72 (4):299-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  8
    Terence Penelhum (1998). Critical Notice of Paul Russell's Freedom and Moral Sentiment: Hume's Way of Naturalizing Responsibility. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):81-94.
    Russell's study of Hume's theories of freedom and responsibility is the first extended treatment of these themes in the literature and shows in detail how what is regarded by most readers as merely the first statement of "compatibilism" is part of a full naturalistic analysis of praise, blame, punishment and responsibility. The notice seeks to bring out how Russell's account of Hume's view of freedom illuminates his psychology and ethics and concludes with a few "libertarian" criticisms of Hume's position.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  24
    Terence Penelhum (1986). Sceptics, Believers, and Historical Mistakes. Synthese 67 (1):131 - 146.
    Inattention to the historical antecedents of current philosophical views may impoverish our arguments in defense of those views. A case in point, examined here, concerns the difference that can be made for current strategies designed to defend religious belief by carefully reconsidering the position of historical sceptics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  8
    Terence Penelhum (1977). The Analysis of Faith in St. Thomas Aquinas. Religious Studies 13 (2):133 - 154.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  23
    Terence Penelhum (1961). On the Second Ontological Argument. Philosophical Review 70 (1):85-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    Terence Penelhum (1969). Is a Religious Epistemology Possible? Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 3:263-280.
    Those who despair of the possibility of proving the existence of God tend, naturally, to hold that knowledge of God's existence and of those religious claims that depend upon it can only be had, if it can be had at all, through some direct religious awareness or insight. On this view appeals to authority or to revelation rest on appeals to such insight, if it is agreed that the credentials of the revealing authority cannot be established by the methods of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  13
    Terence Penelhum (1998). Reported Miracles. International Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):123-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  12
    Terence Penelhum (1999). The Mind of David Hume. International Studies in Philosophy 31 (4):112-112.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 109