Search results for 'Peter Albert Railton' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Peter Albert Railton (2003). Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. Cambridge University Press.score: 1230.0
    In our everyday lives we struggle with the notions of why we do what we do and the need to assign values to our actions. Somehow, it seems possible through experience and life to gain knowledge and understanding of such matters. Yet once we start delving deeper into the concepts that underwrite these domains of thought and actions, we face a philosophical disappointment. In contrast to the world of facts, values and morality seem insecure, uncomfortably situated, easily influenced by illusion (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Railton (1986). Moral Realism. Philosophical Review 95 (2):163-207.score: 240.0
    The question of moral realismwhether our ethical beliefs rest on some objective foundationis one that mattered as much to Aristotle as it does to us today, and his writings on this topic continue to provide inspiration for the contemporary debate. This volume of essays expands the fruitful conversation among scholars of ancient philosophy and contemporary ethical theorists on this question and related issues such as the virtues, justice, and Aristotles theory of tragedy.The distinguished contributors to this volume enrich and clarify (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Peter Railton (1984). Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.score: 240.0
    The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Railton (2010). Staying in Touch with Normative Reality. Philosophical Studies 151 (3):459 - 467.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter Railton (2009). Internalism for Externalists. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):166-181.score: 240.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter Railton (2006). Normative Guidance. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. 3-34.score: 240.0
    I’ve been told that there are two principal approaches to drawing figures from life. One begins by tracing an outline of the figure to be drawn, locating its edges and key features on an imagined grid, and then using perspective to fill in depth. The other approach proceeds from the ‘center of mass’ of the subject, seeking to build up the image by supplying contour lines, the intersections of which convey depth—as if the representation were being created in relief. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen Darwall, Allan Gibbard & Peter Railton (1992). Toward Fin de Siècle Ethics: Some Trends. Philosophical Review 101 (1):115-189.score: 240.0
  8. Peter A. Railton, Schmoozy Introduction.score: 240.0
    If practical reason is concerned with thoughtful normative regulation of action, then theoretical reason might be seen as a matter of thoughtful normative regulation of belief. The conclusion of a piece of practical reasoning, we are told, is an act or intention to act; the conclusion of a piece of theoretical reasoning, by parallel, would be a belief or a belief-tendency. Because theoretical reason is understood to be responsive specifically to epistemic – not merely pragmatic – reasons for belief, the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Peter Railton (1978). A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):206-226.score: 240.0
    It has been the dominant view that probabilistic explanations of particular facts must be inductive in character. I argue here that this view is mistaken, and that the aim of probabilistic explanation is not to demonstrate that the explanandum fact was nomically expectable, but to give an account of the chance mechanism(s) responsible for it. To this end, a deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation is developed and defended. Such a model has application only when the probabilities occurring in covering laws (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Peter Railton (1989). Naturalism and Prescriptivity. Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (01):151-.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Peter Railton (2008). Coping with Moral Uncertainty. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):794-801.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Peter Railton, Locke, Stock, and Peril: Natural Property Rights, Pollution, and Risk.score: 240.0
    Lockean natural rights theories have long been associated with laissez-faire policies on the part of the government, in large measure because of the sanctity they accord to individual rights, especially private property rights. However, I will argue that if one attempts to apply such theories to moral questions about pollution, they present a different face, one set so firmly against laissez-faire -- or laissez-polluer -- as to countenance serious restriction of what Lockeans have traditionally taken to be the proper sphere (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter Railton (2005). Précis of Facts, Values, and Norms. Philosophical Studies 126 (3):429 - 432.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter Railton (1986). Facts and Values. Philosophical Topics 14 (2):5-31.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Peter Railton (1999). Normative Force and Normative Freedom: Hume and Kant, but Not Hume Versus Kant. Ratio 12 (4):320–353.score: 240.0
    Our notion of normativity appears to combine, in a way difficult to understand but seemingly familiar from experience, elements of force and freedom. On the one hand, a normative claim is thought to have a kind of compelling authority; on the other hand, if our respecting it is to be an appropriate species of respect, it must not be coerced, automatic, or trivially guaranteed by definition. Both Hume and Kant, I argue, looked to aesthetic experience as a convincing example exhibiting (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter Railton (1994). Truth, Reason, and the Regulation of Belief. Philosophical Issues 5:71-93.score: 240.0
  17. Peter Railton (1988). How Thinking About Character and Utilitarianism Might Lead to Rethinking the Character of Utilitarianism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):398-416.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter Railton (1981). Probability, Explanation, and Information. Synthese 48 (2):233 - 256.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Peter Railton (2008). Reply to John Skorupski. Utilitas 20 (2):230-242.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Peter Railton (2012). The Critical Project Today. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):201-209.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Peter Railton (1992). Some Questions About the Justification of Morality. Philosophical Perspectives 6:27-53.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peter Railton (1993). Noncognitivism About Rationality: Benefits, Costs, and an Alternative. Philosophical Issues 4:36-51.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Peter Railton (1995). Subject‐Ive and Objective. Ratio 8 (3):259-276.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter Railton (1992). Pluralism, Determinacy, and Dilemma. Ethics 102 (4):720-742.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter Railton (1991). Moral Theory as a Moral Practice. Noûs 25 (2):185-190.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Peter Railton (1998). Moral Explanation and Moral Objectivity. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):175-182.score: 240.0
    What is the real issue at stake in discussions of "moral explanation"? There isn't one; there are many. The standing of purported moral properties and problems about our epistemic or semantic access to them are of concern both from within and without moral practice. An account of their potential contribution to explaining our values, beliefs, conduct, practices, etc. can help in these respects. By examining some claims made about moral explanation in Judith Thompson's and Gilbert Harman's Moral Relativism and Moral (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Peter Railton (1984). Marx and the Objectivity of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:813 - 826.score: 240.0
    Marx claims that his social theory is objective in the same sense as contemporary natural science. Yet his social theory appears to imply that the prevailing notion of scientific objectivity is ideological in character. Must Marx, then, either give up his claim of scientific objectivity or admit that he is engaged in a bit of ideology on behalf of his own theory? By suggesting an alternative way of understanding objectivity, an attempt is made to show that one can accept the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter Railton (2005). Reply to Ralph Wedgwood. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):501 - 508.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Peter Railton (forthcoming). The Affective Dog and its Rational Tale. Ethics.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Peter Railton (2011). Two Cheers for Virtue: Or, Might Virtue Be Habit Forming? Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 1:295-330.score: 240.0
    Traditional virtue-oriented approaches to ethics suppose that acquiring relatively stable character traits, such as courage and compassion, is crucial in addressing the question of how to be. However, recent psychological studies cast doubt on the idea that people develop such traits. In light of this pessimism, the paper raises the question: what is left of virtue theory? It argues that much remains once one shifts from a traditional understanding of virtues to one of cognitive/affective “if…then” dispositions that form a person’s (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Peter Railton (1986). Explanatory Asymmetry in Historical Materialism. Ethics 97 (1):233-239.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter Railton (2013). Reliance, Trust, and Belief. Inquiry 57 (1):122-150.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Peter Railton (1998). Review: Moral Explanation and Moral Objectivity. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):175 - 182.score: 240.0
    What is the real issue at stake in discussions of "moral explanation"? There isn't one; there are many. The standing of purported moral properties and problems about our epistemic or semantic access to them are of concern both from within and without moral practice. An account of their potential contribution to explaining our values, beliefs, conduct, practices, etc. can help in these respects. By examining some claims made about moral explanation in Judith Thompson's and Gilbert Harman's Moral Relativism and Moral (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peter Railton (2005). Reply to Ben Eggleston. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):491 - 499.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter Railton (2005). Review: Reply to Ralph Wedgwood. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):501 - 508.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Peter Railton (2005). Reply to Justin D'Arms. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):481 - 490.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Peter Railton (1982). Costs and Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Response to Bantz and MacLean. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:261 - 271.score: 240.0
    Although the standard theory and actual practice of cost-benefit analysis are seriously defective, the general idea of making social policy in accord with an aggregative, maximizing, consequentialist criterion is a sensible one. Therefore it is argued, against Bantz, that interpersonal utility comparisons can be meaningful, and, against both Bantz and MacLean, that quantitative overall assessments of expected value (using corrected prices) provide a presumptively rational basis for social choice. However, it does not follow that introducing cost-benefit tests into the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Peter Railton (1993). Essentially General Predicates. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18 (1):166-176.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Review author[S.]: Peter Railton (1992). Nonfactualism About Normative Discourse. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):961-968.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peter Railton (1992). Nonfactualism About Normative Discourse. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):961 - 968.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Hans Albert (1985). On Using Leibniz in Economics. Comment on Peter Koslowski. In Peter Koslowski (ed.), Economics and Philosophy. J.C.B. Mohr. 7--68.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter Railton (2000). A Priori Rules: Wittgenstein on the Normativity of Logic. In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press. 170--96.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter Railton (1998). Aesthetic Value, Moral Value, and the Ambitions of Naturalism. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Aesthetics and Ethics. Cambridge. 59--105.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Peter Railton (2005). Review: Reply to Justin D'Arms. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):481 - 490.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Peter A. Railton, Toward a Unified Theory of Rationality in Belief, Desire, and Action, Rev. Nov. 2010.score: 240.0
    Preliminary draft of November 2010???please do not circulate without permission.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Railton (2009). Practical Competence and Fluent Agency. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press. 81--115.score: 240.0
  47. Peter Railton (1987). Psi: Anomalous Correlation or Anomalous Explanation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):605.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Peter Railton (2005). Review: Reply to Ben Eggleston. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):491 - 499.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stephen Darwall, Allan Gibbard, Peter Railton, Robbie Davis-Floyd, P. Sven, Patrice DiQuinzio, Iris Marion, M. David Ermann, Mary B. Williams & Michele S. Shauf (1998). Curtler, Hugh Mercer. Rediscover. Teaching Philosophy 21 (1):115.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Peter Railton (1994). Broadening the Base for Bringing Cognitive Psychology to Bear on Ethics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):27.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999