5 found
Order:
  1.  8
    Peter Ayton & Nigel Harvey (1994). Inappropriate Judgements: Slips, Mistakes or Violations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2.  14
    Silvio Aldrovandi, Marie Poirier, Daniel Heussen & Peter Ayton (2009). Memory Strategies Mediate the Relationships Between Memory and Judgment. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
    In the literature, the nature of the relationships between memory processes and summary evaluations is still a debate. According to some theoretical approaches (e.g., “two-memory hypothesis”; Anderson, 1989) retrospective evaluations are based on the impression formed while attending to the to-be-assessed stimuli(on-line judgment) – no functional dependence between information retrieval and judgment is implied. Conversely, several theories entail that judgment must depend, at least in part, on memory processes (e.g., Dougherty, Gettys, & Ogden, 1999; Schwarz, 1998; Tversky & Kahneman, 1973). (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  54
    Peter Ayton, Alice Pott & Najat Elwakili (2007). Affective Forecasting: Why Can't People Predict Their Emotions? Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):62 – 80.
    Two studies explore the frequently reported finding that affective forecasts are too extreme. In the first study, driving test candidates forecast the emotional consequences of failing. Test failers overestimated the duration of their disappointment. Greater previous experience of this emotional event did not lead to any greater accuracy of the forecasts, suggesting that learning about one's own emotions is difficult. Failers' self-assessed chances of passing were lower a week after the test than immediately prior to the test; this difference correlated (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  6
    Peter Ayton (2000). Do the Birds and Bees Need Cognitive Reform? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):666-667.
    Stanovich & West argue that their observed positive correlations between performance of reasoning tasks and intelligence strengthen the standing of normative rules for determining rationality. I question this argument. Violations of normative rules by cognitively humble creatures in their natural environments are more of a problem for normative rules than for the creatures.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Emma Walsh & Peter Ayton (2009). My Imagination Versus Your Feelings: Can Personal Affective Forecasts Be Improved by Knowing Other Peoples’ Emotions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (4):351-360.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography