Search results for 'Peter B. Jubb' (try it on Scholar)

4 found
  1. Peter B. Jubb (1999). Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1):77 - 94.
    Whistleblowing has been defined often and in differing ways in the literature. This paper has as its main purposes to clarify the meaning of whistleblowing and to speak for a narrow interpretation of it. A restrictive, general purpose definition is provided which contains six necessary elements: act of disclosure, actor, disclosure subject, target, disclosure recipient, and outcome.Whistleblowing is characterised as a dissenting act of public accusation against an organisation which necessitates being disloyal to that organisation. The definition differs from others (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  2. Peter B. Jubb (1999). A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1).
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  3
    Stephen Haswell, Peter Jubb & Bob Wearing (1999). Accounting Students and Cheating: A Comparative Study for Australia, South Africa and the UK. Teaching Business Ethics 3 (3):211-239.
  4.  6
    Andrew T. Forcehimes & Robert B. Talisse (2013). Clarifying Cohen: A Response to Jubb and Hall. Res Publica 19 (4):371-379.
    In this brief essay, we clarify Cohen’s ‘Facts and Principles’ argument, and then argue that the objections posed by two recent critiques of Cohen—Robert Jubb (Res Publica 15:337–353, 2009) and Edward Hall (Res Publica 19:173–181, 2013)—look especially vulnerable to the charge of being self-defeating. It may still be that Cohen’s view concerning facts and principles is false. Our aim here is merely to show that two recent attempts to demonstrate its falsity are unlikely to succeed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography