Search results for 'Peter Boschung' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Peter Boschung (2006). From a Topical Point of View: Dialectic in Anselm of Canterbury's De Grammatico. Brill.
    This study reads Anselm of Canterbury's enigmatic work De grammatico as his introduction to dialectic, covering a model for discourse, a theory of fallacies, and a theory of signification. It provides a new perspective on Anselm's dialectical thought, on dialectic in the 11th century, and on the continuity with 12th Century logical thought.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Fabienne Peter (2009). Democratic Legitimacy Without Collective Rationality Fabienne Peter. In Boudewijn Paul de Bruin & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan 143.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  0
    SíS. Peter (2009). My Life with Censorship: Sís, Peter, 1949- -- Childhood and Youth. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):42-45.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Madsen Peter (2004). Peter Singer on Global Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  64
    William Craig (2014). Peter van Inwagen, Substitutional Quantification, and Ontological Commitment. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):553-561.
    Peter van Inwagen has long claimed that he doesn’t understand substitutional quantification and that the notion is, in fact, meaningless. Van Inwagen identifies the source of his bewilderment as an inability to understand the proposition expressed by a simple sentence like “,” where “$\Sigma$” is the existential quantifier understood substitutionally. I should think that the proposition expressed by this sentence is the same as that expressed by “.” So what’s the problem? The problem, I suggest, is that van Inwagen (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  18
    Cailin O'Connor (forthcoming). Book Review Peter Godfrey-Smith, Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science.
    Review of Peter Godfrey-Smith's Philosophy of Biology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Paul Richard Blum (2013). Péter Pázmánys Seelenlehre. In Alinka Ajkay Rita Bajáki (ed.), Pázmány Nyomában. Tanulmányok Hargittay Emil tiszteletére. Mondat
    Péter Pázmány taught philosophy at the Jesuit university of Graz, end of 16th century. This analyzes his interpretation of Aristotelian psychology.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Riccardo Strobino (2012). Truth and Paradox in Late XIVth Century Logic : Peter of Mantua’s Treatise on Insoluble Propositions. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 23:475-519.
    This paper offers an analysis of a hitherto neglected text on insoluble propositions dating from the late XiVth century and puts it into perspective within the context of the contemporary debate concerning semantic paradoxes. The author of the text is the italian logician Peter of Mantua (d. 1399/1400). The treatise is relevant both from a theoretical and from a historical standpoint. By appealing to a distinction between two senses in which propositions are said to be true, it offers an (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  45
    John Martin Fischer & Neal A. Tognazzini (2007). Exploring Evil and Philosophical Failure: A Critical Notice of Peter van Inwagen's *The Problem of Evil*. Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):458-474.
    In his recent book on the problem of evil, Peter van Inwagen argues that both the global and local arguments from evil are failures. In this paper, we engagevan Inwagen’s book at two main points. First, we consider his understanding of what it takes for a philosophical argument to succeed. We argue that while his criterion for success is interesting and helpful, there is good reason to think it is too stringent. Second, we consider his responses to the global (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  72
    Anthony Skelton (2014). Singer, Peter (1946-). In Michael Gibbons (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Wiley-Blackwell 3454-3455.
    A short encyclopedia article on Peter Singer.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  13
    Coos Engelsma (2014). On Peter Klein's Concept of Arbitrariness. Metaphilosophy 45 (2):192-200.
    According to Peter Klein, foundationalism fails because it allows a vicious form of arbitrariness. The present article critically discusses his concept of arbitrariness. It argues that the condition Klein takes to be necessary and sufficient for an epistemic item to be arbitrary is neither necessary nor sufficient. It also argues that Klein's concept of arbitrariness is not a concept of something that is obviously vicious. Even if Klein succeeds in establishing that foundationalism allows what he regards as arbitrariness, this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  75
    Kevin Schilbrack (2009). Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch. [REVIEW] Sophia 48 (4):399-412.
    Many point to Peter Winch’s discussion of rationality, relativism, and religion as a paradigmatic example of cultural relativism. In this paper, I argue that Winch’s relationship to relativism is widely misinterpreted in that, despite his pluralistic understanding of rationality, Winch does allow for universal features of culture in virtue of which cross-cultural understanding and even critique is possible. Nevertheless, I also argue that given the kind of cultural universals that Winch produces, he fails to avoid relativism. This is because (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Berel Dov Lerner & Peter Winch (2002). Rules, Magic and Instrumental Reason a Critical Interpretation of Peter Winch's Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  61
    N. N. Trakakis (2010). Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest. Sophia 49 (1):129-140.
    In responding to Peter Forrest’s defence of ‘tough-minded theodicy’, I point to some problematic features of theodicies of this sort, in particular their commitment to an anthropomorphic conception of God which tends to assimilate the Creator to the creaturely and so diminishes the otherness and mystery of God. This remains the case, I argue, even granted Forrest’s view that God may have a very different kind of morality from the one we mortals are subject to.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  50
    Jose Filipe Silva & Juhana Toivanen (2011). The Active Nature of the Soul in Sense Perception: Robert Kilwardby and Peter Olivi. Vivarium 48 (3-4):245-278.
    This article discusses the theories of perception of Robert Kilwardby and Peter of John Olivi. Our aim is to show how in challenging certain assumptions of medieval Aristotelian theories of perception they drew on Augustine and argued for the active nature of the soul in sense perception. For both Kilwardby and Olivi, the soul is not passive with respect to perceived objects; rather, it causes its own cognitive acts with respect to external objects and thus allows the subject to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  52
    Luca Malatesti, Forum on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Forum 2 SWIF Philosophy of Mind Review.
    A book symposium on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Contents: Author's précis Colin Allen, Evolving Phenomenal Consciousness - Carruthers's reply. José Luis Bermúdez, Commentary - Carruthers's reply - Reply to Carruthers: Properties, first-order representationalism and reinforcement. Joseph Levine, Commentary - Carruthers's reply. William Seager, Dispositions and Consciousness - Carruthers's reply.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  6
    T. C. Kline Iii (2001). Sheltering Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger and Xunzi. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2):261-282.
    This article brings Xunzi's views on religious practice into conversation with Peter Berger's sociological understanding of religion in an effort both to deepen our understanding of their theories concerning the constructed nature of religious worldviews and to consider critically the plausibility of their arguments. The author suggests that comparison of Berger's theory in "The Sacred Canopy" with Xunzi's account of the "Dao" enables us to explain why certain weaknesses arise in Berger's theory--namely, the difficulty of imagining how the self (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  45
    David Koepsell (2010). Peter Hare and the Problem of Evil. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):53-59.
    Peter Hare and Edward Madden's collaborative book Evil and the Concept of God (968) has become a staple in literature about the problem of evil and remains frequently cited by supporters and critics alike. The major concepts of the work arose out of earlier papers in which they first began to formulate their arguments about the problem of evil. Their article "Evil and Unlimited Power" embodies many of their arguments against quasi-theist attempts to resolve the problem of evil.1 Assembled (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  12
    José L. Tasset (2013). Razones para una buena muerte (La justificación de la eutanasia en la tradición utilitarista: De David Hume a Peter Singer). Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 18 (1-2):153-195.
    There are good moral reasons to support euthanasia, and these reasons are fundamentally of a utilitarian root. There are few moral reasons to oppose euthanasia in its strict sense, and they are clearly outweighed by the reasons argumented from a utilitarian perspective. Such teleological and consequentialist good reasons were originally advanced by David Hume in his brief and brilliant essay "Of Suicide" (1757), the true source for current Bioethics. Hume's arguments have been expanded in scope by some contemporary utilitarians, especially (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  46
    Erinn Cunniff Gilson (2009). Peter Hallward: Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):429-434.
    Review essay of Peter Hallward's Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  35
    Kieran Bonner (2010). Peter McHugh and Analysis: The One and the Many, the Universal and the Particular, the Whole and the Part. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (2):253-269.
    This paper takes the passing of Peter McHugh as an occasion to examine the intellectual development of his work. The paper is mainly focused on the product of his collaboration with his colleague and friend, Alan Blum. As such, it addresses the tradition of social inquiry, Analysis, which they cofounded. It traces the influence of Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology on McHugh and on the beginning of Analysis. The collaboration with Blum is examined through a variety of coauthored works but most (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  0
    T. C. Kline Iii (2001). Sheltering Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger and Xunzi. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2):261-282.
    This article brings Xunzi's views on religious practice into conversation with Peter Berger's sociological understanding of religion in an effort both to deepen our understanding of their theories concerning the constructed nature of religious worldviews and to consider critically the plausibility of their arguments. The author suggests that comparison of Berger's theory in "The Sacred Canopy" with Xunzi's account of the "Dao" enables us to explain why certain weaknesses arise in Berger's theory--namely, the difficulty of imagining how the self (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  8
    Emilie Dardenne (2010). The Reception of Peter Singer's Theories in France. Society and Animals 18 (2):205-218.
    Peter Singer’s views on the status of nonhuman animals have attracted both attention and intense controversy in many Western countries, including the United States, Canada, and Germany. The reactions to his theories in France are less well known. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of critical responses to Singer by French academics and thinkers. How have they received Singer’s contention that we must bring nonhuman animals within the sphere of moral concern? Do French scholars agree (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  29
    John Corcoran (2010). Peter Hare on the Proposition. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):21-34.
    Peter H. Hare (1935-2008) developed informed, original views about the proposition: some published (Hare 1969 and Hare-Madden 1975); some expressed in conversations at scores of meetings of the Buffalo Logic Colloquium and at dinners following. The published views were expository and critical responses to publications by Curt J. Ducasse (1881-1969), a well-known presence in American logic, a founder of the Association for Symbolic Logic and its President for one term.1Hare was already prominent in the University of Buffalo's Philosophy Department (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  6
    Thierry Coquand & Bas Spitters (2005). A Constructive Proof of the Peter‐Weyl Theorem. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (4):351-359.
    We present a new and constructive proof of the Peter-Weyl theorem on the representations of compact groups. We use the Gelfand representation theorem for commutative C*-algebras to give a proof which may be seen as a direct generalization of Burnside's algorithm [3]. This algorithm computes the characters of a finite group. We use this proof as a basis for a constructive proof in the style of Bishop. In fact, the present theory of compact groups may be seen as a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  26
    Joseph Margolis (2010). A Word of Thanks for Peter Hare's Patience. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):3-8.
    Peter Hare took a belle-lettriste pleasure in hopping from one philosophical topic to another. Not carelessly but lightheartedly enough. I mean by that, not that there is no deeper interlocking linkage among his many papers—there is—but rather that the center of gravity of each piece rests with the special patience and affection Peter spends on the specific topic some chanced-upon author or authors bring into view. He pursues each such topic intensively in a deliberately narrow-gauged way, testing its (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  12
    Marie-Eve Morin (2008). The Politics of Peter Sloterdijk's Global Foam. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 30:47-56.
    This paper takes up Peter Sloterdijk’s proposition for a new thinking of the world as global foam. After quickly reminding the reader of the main characteristics of “bubbles” as “immune spheres of existence”, I retrace the three phases of the history globalization as they have been developed by Sloterdijk in the Spheres trilogy. I then focus on the third phase, also called Global Age, and try to bring together the two seemingly opposed concepts Sloterdijk has used to discuss the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  16
    Riccardo Strobino (2011). Contexts of Utterance and Evaluation in Peter of Mantua's Obligationes. Vivarium 49 (1-3):275-299.
    In this paper I will examine the relation between the theory of obligations and its use in sophismatic contexts through the lens of certain pragmatic concerns. In order to do this, I will take a sophism discussed by Peter of Mantua in his treatise on obligations as a case-study. I will first provide a brief outline of the structure of the treatise and then examine a concrete case that shows how the relationship between background assumptions (casus and context of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Amihud Gilead (2015). Cruelty, Singular Individuality, and Peter the Great. Philosophia 43 (2):337-354.
    In discussing cruelty toward human beings, I argue that disregarding the singularity of any human being is necessary for treating her or him cruelly. The cruelty of Peter the Great, relying upon the intolerance of any human singular individuality, serves me as a paradigm-case to illustrate that. The cruelty of Procrustes and that of Stalin rely upon similar grounds. Relating to a person’s singularity is sufficient to prevent cruelty toward that person. In contrast, a liberal state of mind or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  14
    Kenneth Colburn & Mary Moore (2010). Honoring (Recollecting) Our Memory of Peter McHugh as Social Theorist. Human Studies 33 (2):271-279.
    The recent death of Peter McHugh becomes an occasion for the remembrance and recollection of the distinctive form of reflexive or analytic social inquiry, which framed his work and that of his longtime friend and collaborator, Alan Blum. Following dual appointments at York University, Toronto, Canada in 1972, Blum and McHugh’s partnership formed the basis for a community of scholars and students throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. A brief review of McHugh and Blum’s works shows theoretical roots in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  13
    David Lynes (2010). Studying Sociology with Peter McHugh. Human Studies 33 (2):287-288.
    Peter McHugh’s influence on those of us who studied and worked with him as part of York University’s graduate sociology programme in Toronto from the mid-1970s until the late 1980s, while lasting and undeniable, is not necessarily immediately apparent nor easily articulated. What follows is a brief reflection on how this difficulty can be understood as integral to Peter McHugh’s unique contribution both to those of us fortunate enough to have studied with him, and more broadly, to the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  9
    Harry Oldmeadow (2007). Review of Peter Kelly, Buddha in a Bookshop. [REVIEW] Sophia 46 (3):315-316.
    Keywords Harold Stewart - Peter Kelly - Traditionalist circle in Melbourne PETER KELLY, Buddha in a Bookshop. North Fitzroy, Vic, Australia: Ulysses Press, 2007, 176t viii pp., ISBN: 9780646469775, pb.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  5
    John J. McDermott (2010). Philosophical Remarks on Peter Hare. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.
    These remarks are offered as a celebration of Peter Hare as a philosopher. Stressed here is the astute character of Hare's philosophical commentary.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Jacques Derrida, Peter Eisenman, Jeffrey Kipnis & Thomas Leeser (1997). Chora L Works Jacques Derrida and Peter Eisenman. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  0
    Prabhu Venkataraman & Tanuja Kalita (2015). Is Peter Singer Inconsistent in His Ethics? Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 5 (10):45-52.
    Peter Singer in his Practical Ethics and in other works as well gives importance to reason in making an ethical decision. Thinkers question Singer’s consistency and employment of reason in his ethical decisions. Jacqueline A Laing talks about Singer’s inconsistency in her article 'Inconsistency and Consequentialism'. With reference to animal rights and abortion, she claims that Singer uses different yardstick, thus Singer is inconsistent. She remarks that Singer uses the notion of ‘sentientism’ for the defense of animal rights, whereas (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Peter von der Mühll & Olof Gigon (1946). Phyllobolia Für Peter von der Mühll Zum 60. Geburtstag Am 1. August 1945. B. Schwabe.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  79
    Peter Beilharz (2007). Review: Max Koch, Roads to Post-Fordism: Labour Markets and Social Structures in Europe (Ashgate, 2006); Christian Joerges, Bo Strath and Peter Wagner (Eds), The Economy as a Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism (UCL, 2005). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 91 (1):143-145.
    Review: Max Koch, Roads to Post-Fordism: Labour Markets and Social Structures in Europe ; Christian Joerges, Bo Strath and Peter Wagner , The Economy as a Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  30
    Peter Singer (2008). Interview - Peter Singer. The Philosophers' Magazine 40 (40):59-60.
    Peter Singer is probably the best-known and most controversial ethicist in the world today. He rigorously applies utilitarian moral theory to issues such as world poverty, the environment, abortion, euthanasia and, most famously, animal welfare. He has also written a book about his grandfather, David Oppenheim, who died in Theresienstadt concentration camp. He is Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  72
    Peter Coghlan & Nick Trakakis (2006). Confronting the Horror of Natural Evil: An Exchange Between Peter Coghlan and Nick Trakakis. Sophia 45 (2):5-26.
    In this exchange, Peter Coghlan and Nick Trakakis discuss the problem of natural evil in the light of the recent Asian tsunami disaster. The exchange begins with an extract from a newspaper article written by Coghlan on the tsunami, followed by three rounds of replies and counter-replies, and ending with some final comments from Trakakis. While critical of any attempt to show that human life is good overall despite its natural evils, Coghlan argues that instances of natural evil, even (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  47
    Peter Winch & Raimond Gaita (eds.) (1990). Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch. Routledge.
    Written by eminent philosophers from Britain, Europe, America, and Australia, the essays of this collection are a tribute to Peter Winch, whose work is marked by his deep appreciation of the most fundamental aspect of Wittgenstein's legacy: that we cannot detach our concepts from their roots in human life. The voices in this volume unite in different tones of sympathy and criticism by discussing the theme of human conditioning: the human conditioning of what we can find intelligible, possible and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  21
    Evan Selinger, Don Ihde, Ibo Poel, Martin Peterson & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2012). Erratum To: Book Symposium on Peter Paul Verbeek's Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):605-631.
    Erratum to: Book Symposium on Peter Paul Verbeek’s Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011 Content Type Journal Article Category Erratum Pages 1-27 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0058-z Authors Evan Selinger, Dept. Philosophy, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA Don Ihde, Dept. Philosophy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA Ibo van de Poel, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands Martin Peterson, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands Peter-Paul Verbeek, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  28
    Peter King, Peter Abelard. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Peter Abelard (1079 – 21 April 1142) [‘Abailard’ or ‘Abaelard’ or ‘Habalaarz’ and so on] was the pre-eminent philosopher and theologian of the twelfth century. The teacher of his generation, he was also famous as a poet and a musician. Prior to the recovery of Aristotle, he brought the native Latin tradition in philosophy to its highest pitch. His genius was evident in all he did. He is, arguably, the greatest logician of the Middle Ages and is equally famous (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Mar Peter-Raoul (2012). Peter Maurin—Pedagogy From the Margins. Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 22 (1):102-131.
    Peter Maurin, a French, itinerant immigrant, known, if at all, as co-founder with Dorothy Day of the Catholic Worker movement plies his pedagogy from the margins of society, identifying with the poor of the Depression. He believes his vocation is to awaken the poor and professionals alike to reconstruct a personalist democracy and restore its spiritual foundation, Remarkably resonate with John Dewey’s experiential learning, Jane Addams’ Hull House initiative, and the Brazilian educator and theologian Paulo Freire’s theory of humankind’s (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  13
    Ana Maria Mora-Marquez (2011). Pragmatics in Peter John Olivis Account of Signification of Common Names. Vivarium 49 (1-3):150-164.
    The aim of this paper is to present a reconstruction of Olivi's account of signification of common names and to highlight certain intrusion of pragmatics into this account. The paper deals with the question of how certain facts, other than original imposition, may be relevant to determine the semantical content of an utterance, and not with the question of how we perform actions by means of utterances. The intrusion of pragmatics into Olivi's semantics we intend to point out may seem (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    Tyson Edward Lewis (2009). Capitalists and Conquerors
    Teaching Against Global Capitalism and the New Imperialism
    Rage and Hope: Interviews with Peter McLaren on War, Imperialism, and Critical Pedagogy.
    Historical Materialism 17 (1):201-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  12
    Peter Abelard (2001). Peter Abelard: Collationes. Clarendon Press.
    Peter Abelard was one of the most influential writers and thinkers of the twelfth century, famed for his skill in logic as well as his romance with Heloise. His Collationes - or Dialogue between a Christian, a Philosopher, and a Jew - is remarkable for the boldness of its conception and thought.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. D. E. Luscombe (1969). The School of Peter Abelard the Influence of Abelard's Thought in the Early Scholastic Period. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Joseph Mccabe (1901). Peter Abélard. Duckworth.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. C. J. Mews (1981). The Development of the Theologia of Peter Abelard.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  91
    Susan Rechter (1993). Reviews : Peter Beilharz (Ed.), Social Theory: A Guide to Central Thinkers (Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1992); Peter Beilharz, Heroes and Pedestrians: Social Theory in Sociology, Latrobe University Sociology Paper No. 17 (1991). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 35 (1):127-132.
    Reviews : Peter Beilharz , Social Theory: A Guide to Central Thinkers ; Peter Beilharz, Heroes and Pedestrians: Social Theory in Sociology, Latrobe University Sociology Paper No. 17.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000