Search results for 'Peter Hayward' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Ariela Gross, Clarissa Hayward, Courtney Jung, John Kane, Adolph Reed Jr, Rogers Smith, Peter Swenson & Nomi Stolzenberg (2002). Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do About It. Political Theory 30 (4):588-611.
  2. Wilson Carey McWilliams, Bob Pepperman Taylor, Bryan G. Norton, Robyn Eckersley, Joe Bowersox, J. Baird Callicott, Catriona Sandilands, John Barry, Andrew Light, Peter S. Wenz, Luis A. Vivanco, Tim Hayward, John O'Neill, Robert Paehlke, Timothy W. Luke, Robert Gottlieb & Charles T. Rubin (2002). Democracy and the Claims of Nature: Critical Perspectives for a New Century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In Democracy and the Claims of Nature, the leading thinkers in the fields of environmental, political, and social theory come together to discuss the tensions and sympathies of democratic ideals and environmental values. The prominent contributors reflect upon where we stand in our understanding of the relationship between democracy and the claims of nature. Democracy and the Claims of Nature bridges the gap between the often competing ideals of the two fields, leading to a greater understanding of each for the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  1
    Keith A. Bauer, Courtney S. Campbell, Lauren A. Clark, Paul J. Ford, Sven Ove Hansson, Matti Häyry, Sarah Hayward, Peter Herissone-Kelly & Micah Hester (2007). Bette Anton, MLS, is Head Librarian for the Pamela & Kenneth Fong Optometry & Health Sciences Library of the University of California, Berkeley. This Library Serves the UC Berkeley School of Optometry and the UC Berkeley–UC San Francisco Joint Medical Program. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16:251-253.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Peter Hayward (2008). Developing Wisdom: How Foresight Develops in Individuals and Groups. Vdm Verlag Dr. Müller.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Fama Mackenzie, Snider Sarah, Hayward William, Friedman Rhonda & Turkeltaub Peter (2014). “I Know It but I Can’T Say It”: Clarifying the Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Snider Sarah, Sullivan Kelli, Hayward William, Luta George, Turkeltaub Peter & Friedman Rhonda (2014). What Factors Predict Individual Subjects' Re-Learning of Words During Anomia Treatment? Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Hayward William, Fama Mackenzie, Sullivan Kelli, Snider Sarah, Lacey Elizabeth, Friedman Rhonda & Turkeltaub Peter (2014). Inner Speech in People with Aphasia. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Donatella Di Cesare, Trawny Peter, Andrew J. Mitchell & Reinhard Mehring (2016). Donatella Di Cesare: Heidegger, die Juden, die Shoah und Peter Trawny, Andrew J. Mitchell : Heidegger, die Juden, noch einmal. Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 69 (2):137-146.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Madsen Peter (2004). Peter Singer on Global Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  10
    F. H. Hayward (1901). Mr. Hayward's Evaluation of Professor Sidgwick's Ethics: A Reply. International Journal of Ethics 11 (3):360-365.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    SíS. Peter (2009). My Life with Censorship: Sís, Peter, 1949- -- Childhood and Youth. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):42-45.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. F. H. Hayward (1901). Mr. Hayward's Evaluation of Professor Sidgwick's Ethics: A Reply. Ethics 11 (3):360.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. F. H. Hayward (1901). Mr. Hayward's Evaluation of Professor Sidgwick's Ethics: A Reply. International Journal of Ethics 11 (3):360-365.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Fabienne Peter (2009). Democratic Legitimacy Without Collective Rationality Fabienne Peter. In Boudewijn Paul de Bruin & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan 143.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. R. Péter (1957). Péter Rózsa. Rekurzív Definiciók, Melyek Változó Számu Korábbi Függvényertéket Használnak Fel. Matematikai Lapok , Vol. 5 , Pp. 7–9. An Abstract of XX 176.Péter Rózsa. Ujabb Bizonyítás Arra, Hogy a Csillag-Kalmár-Féle Elemi Függvények Osztálya Szükebb, Mint a Primitiv-Rekurzív Függvényeké. Matematikai Lapok , Vol. 5 , Pp. 244–252. Hungarian Version of XX 282.Péter Rózsa. Kalmár László Matematikai Munkássága . Ebd., Bd. 6 , S. 138–150. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):295-296.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  93
    Tom Kitwood (1992). Reviews : Peter Barham and Robert Hayward, From the Mental Patient to the Person. London: Tavistock/Routledge, 1991. 152 Pp. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 5 (1):100-103.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Jo Ann Mcnamara (2001). James Howard-Johnston and Paul Antony Hayward, Eds., The Cult of Saints in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Contribution of Peter Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. X, 298. $74. [REVIEW] Speculum 76 (4):1050-1052.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Jo Ann McNamara (2001). The Cult of Saints in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Contribution of Peter BrownJames Howard-Johnston Paul Antony Hayward. Speculum 76 (4):1050-1052.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. K. Soper (forthcoming). Peter Coates, Nature: Western Attitudes Since Ancient Times. Tim Hayward, Political Theory and Ecological Values. Radical Philosophy.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Riccardo Strobino (2012). Truth and Paradox in Late XIVth Century Logic : Peter of Mantua’s Treatise on Insoluble Propositions. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 23:475-519.
    This paper offers an analysis of a hitherto neglected text on insoluble propositions dating from the late XiVth century and puts it into perspective within the context of the contemporary debate concerning semantic paradoxes. The author of the text is the italian logician Peter of Mantua (d. 1399/1400). The treatise is relevant both from a theoretical and from a historical standpoint. By appealing to a distinction between two senses in which propositions are said to be true, it offers an (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  74
    Cailin O’Connor (2015). Review: Peter Godfrey-Smith. Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 82 (4):731-733.
    Review of Peter Godfrey-Smith's Philosophy of Biology.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  32
    Lukáš Lička (2016). Perception and Objective Being: Peter Auriol on Perceptual Acts and Their Objects. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):49-76.
    This article discusses the theory of perception of Peter Auriol. Arguing for the active nature of the senses in perception, Auriol applies the Scotistic doctrine of objective being to the theory of perception. Nevertheless, he still accepts some parts of the theory of species. The paper introduces Auriol's view on the mechanism of perception and his account of illusions. I argue for a direct realist reading of Auriol's theory of perception and propose that his position becomes clearer if we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Paul Richard Blum (2013). Péter Pázmánys Seelenlehre. In Alinka Ajkay Rita Bajáki (ed.), Pázmány Nyomában. Tanulmányok Hargittay Emil tiszteletére. Mondat
    Péter Pázmány taught philosophy at the Jesuit university of Graz, end of 16th century. This analyzes his interpretation of Aristotelian psychology.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  68
    John Martin Fischer & Neal A. Tognazzini (2007). Exploring Evil and Philosophical Failure: A Critical Notice of Peter van Inwagen's *The Problem of Evil. Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):458-474.
    In his recent book on the problem of evil, Peter van Inwagen argues that both the global and local arguments from evil are failures. In this paper, we engagevan Inwagen’s book at two main points. First, we consider his understanding of what it takes for a philosophical argument to succeed. We argue that while his criterion for success is interesting and helpful, there is good reason to think it is too stringent. Second, we consider his responses to the global (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  25.  83
    William Craig (2014). Peter van Inwagen, Substitutional Quantification, and Ontological Commitment. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (4):553-561.
    Peter van Inwagen has long claimed that he doesn’t understand substitutional quantification and that the notion is, in fact, meaningless. Van Inwagen identifies the source of his bewilderment as an inability to understand the proposition expressed by a simple sentence like “,” where “$\Sigma$” is the existential quantifier understood substitutionally. I should think that the proposition expressed by this sentence is the same as that expressed by “.” So what’s the problem? The problem, I suggest, is that van Inwagen (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  50
    Coos Engelsma (2014). On Peter Klein's Concept of Arbitrariness. Metaphilosophy 45 (2):192-200.
    According to Peter Klein, foundationalism fails because it allows a vicious form of arbitrariness. The present article critically discusses his concept of arbitrariness. It argues that the condition Klein takes to be necessary and sufficient for an epistemic item to be arbitrary is neither necessary nor sufficient. It also argues that Klein's concept of arbitrariness is not a concept of something that is obviously vicious. Even if Klein succeeds in establishing that foundationalism allows what he regards as arbitrariness, this (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Anthony Skelton (2014). Singer, Peter (1946-). In Michael Gibbons (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Wiley-Blackwell 3454-3455.
    A short encyclopedia article on Peter Singer which discusses his views on the obligations that the global wealthy have to the global poor and on our obligations to non-human animals.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  66
    Jose Filipe Silva & Juhana Toivanen (2010). The Active Nature of the Soul in Sense Perception: Robert Kilwardby and Peter Olivi. Vivarium 48 (3-4):245-278.
    This article discusses the theories of perception of Robert Kilwardby and Peter of John Olivi. Our aim is to show how in challenging certain assumptions of medieval Aristotelian theories of perception they drew on Augustine and argued for the active nature of the soul in sense perception. For both Kilwardby and Olivi, the soul is not passive with respect to perceived objects; rather, it causes its own cognitive acts with respect to external objects and thus allows the subject to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  12
    Tobias Hoffmann (2015). Peter Auriol on Free Choice and Free Judgment. Vivarium 53 (1):65-89.
    Some medieval authors defend free choice by arguing that, even though human choices are indeed caused by the practical judgment about what is best to do here and now, one is nevertheless able to freely influence that practical judgment’s formation. This paper examines Peter Auriol’s account of free choice, which is a quite elaborate version of this approach and which brings its theoretical problems into focus. I will argue in favor of Auriol’s basic theory, but I will also propose (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    Marcus Agnafors (2015). Mixing Interest and Control? Assessing Peter Vallentyne’s Hybrid Theory of Rights. Philosophia 43 (4):933-949.
    The relationship between libertarianism and state is a contested one. Despite pressing full and strict ownership of one’s person and any justly acquired goods, many libertarians have suggested ways in which a state, albeit limited, can be regarded as just. Peter Vallentyne has proposed that all plausible versions of libertarianism are compatible with what he calls ‘private-law states’. His proposal is underpinned by a particular conception of rights, which brings Interest Theory of rights and Will Theory of rights together. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  6
    Juhana Toivanen (2016). Peter Olivi on Political Power, Will, and Human Agency. Vivarium 54 (1):22-45.
    _ Source: _Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 22 - 45 This essay discusses the views of Peter Olivi on the foundations of political power and agency. The central argument is that there is a strong connection between Olivi’s voluntarist psychology and his views concerning political power. According to Olivi, political power is ultimately based on the will of God, but in such a way that both the rulers and their subjects have, through their individual freedom, the liberty to use (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  78
    John Corcoran (2010). Peter Hare on the Proposition. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):21-34.
    Peter H. Hare (1935-2008) developed informed, original views about the proposition: some published (Hare 1969 and Hare-Madden 1975); some expressed in conversations at scores of meetings of the Buffalo Logic Colloquium and at dinners following. The published views were expository and critical responses to publications by Curt J. Ducasse (1881-1969), a well-known presence in American logic, a founder of the Association for Symbolic Logic and its President for one term.1Hare was already prominent in the University of Buffalo's Philosophy Department (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  81
    Kevin Schilbrack (2009). Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch. [REVIEW] Sophia 48 (4):399-412.
    Many point to Peter Winch’s discussion of rationality, relativism, and religion as a paradigmatic example of cultural relativism. In this paper, I argue that Winch’s relationship to relativism is widely misinterpreted in that, despite his pluralistic understanding of rationality, Winch does allow for universal features of culture in virtue of which cross-cultural understanding and even critique is possible. Nevertheless, I also argue that given the kind of cultural universals that Winch produces, he fails to avoid relativism. This is because (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  8
    Prabhu Venkataraman & Tanuja Kalita (2015). Is Peter Singer Inconsistent in His Ethics? Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 5 (10):45-52.
    Peter Singer in his Practical Ethics and in other works as well gives importance to reason in making an ethical decision. Thinkers question Singer’s consistency and employment of reason in his ethical decisions. Jacqueline A Laing talks about Singer’s inconsistency in her article 'Inconsistency and Consequentialism'. With reference to animal rights and abortion, she claims that Singer uses different yardstick, thus Singer is inconsistent. She remarks that Singer uses the notion of ‘sentientism’ for the defense of animal rights, whereas (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  66
    David Koepsell (2010). Peter Hare and the Problem of Evil. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):53-59.
    Peter Hare and Edward Madden's collaborative book Evil and the Concept of God (968) has become a staple in literature about the problem of evil and remains frequently cited by supporters and critics alike. The major concepts of the work arose out of earlier papers in which they first began to formulate their arguments about the problem of evil. Their article "Evil and Unlimited Power" embodies many of their arguments against quasi-theist attempts to resolve the problem of evil.1 Assembled (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  70
    N. N. Trakakis (2010). Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest. Sophia 49 (1):129-140.
    In responding to Peter Forrest’s defence of ‘tough-minded theodicy’, I point to some problematic features of theodicies of this sort, in particular their commitment to an anthropomorphic conception of God which tends to assimilate the Creator to the creaturely and so diminishes the otherness and mystery of God. This remains the case, I argue, even granted Forrest’s view that God may have a very different kind of morality from the one we mortals are subject to.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  6
    T. C. Kline Iii (2001). Sheltering Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger and Xunzi. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2):261-282.
    This article brings Xunzi's views on religious practice into conversation with Peter Berger's sociological understanding of religion in an effort both to deepen our understanding of their theories concerning the constructed nature of religious worldviews and to consider critically the plausibility of their arguments. The author suggests that comparison of Berger's theory in "The Sacred Canopy" with Xunzi's account of the "Dao" enables us to explain why certain weaknesses arise in Berger's theory--namely, the difficulty of imagining how the self (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Luca Malatesti, Forum on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Forum 2 SWIF Philosophy of Mind Review.
    A book symposium on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Contents: Author's précis Colin Allen, Evolving Phenomenal Consciousness - Carruthers's reply. José Luis Bermúdez, Commentary - Carruthers's reply - Reply to Carruthers: Properties, first-order representationalism and reinforcement. Joseph Levine, Commentary - Carruthers's reply. William Seager, Dispositions and Consciousness - Carruthers's reply.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  56
    Erinn Cunniff Gilson (2009). Peter Hallward: Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):429-434.
    Review essay of Peter Hallward's Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  45
    Joseph Margolis (2010). A Word of Thanks for Peter Hare's Patience. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):3-8.
    Peter Hare took a belle-lettriste pleasure in hopping from one philosophical topic to another. Not carelessly but lightheartedly enough. I mean by that, not that there is no deeper interlocking linkage among his many papers—there is—but rather that the center of gravity of each piece rests with the special patience and affection Peter spends on the specific topic some chanced-upon author or authors bring into view. He pursues each such topic intensively in a deliberately narrow-gauged way, testing its (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  15
    T. C. Kline Iii (2001). Sheltering Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger and Xunzi. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2):261-282.
    This article brings Xunzi's views on religious practice into conversation with Peter Berger's sociological understanding of religion in an effort both to deepen our understanding of their theories concerning the constructed nature of religious worldviews and to consider critically the plausibility of their arguments. The author suggests that comparison of Berger's theory in "The Sacred Canopy" with Xunzi's account of the "Dao" enables us to explain why certain weaknesses arise in Berger's theory--namely, the difficulty of imagining how the self (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  19
    José L. Tasset (2013). Razones para una buena muerte (La justificación de la eutanasia en la tradición utilitarista: De David Hume a Peter Singer). Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 18 (1-2):153-195.
    There are good moral reasons to support euthanasia, and these reasons are fundamentally of a utilitarian root. There are few moral reasons to oppose euthanasia in its strict sense, and they are clearly outweighed by the reasons argumented from a utilitarian perspective. Such teleological and consequentialist good reasons were originally advanced by David Hume in his brief and brilliant essay "Of Suicide" (1757), the true source for current Bioethics. Hume's arguments have been expanded in scope by some contemporary utilitarians, especially (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  39
    Kieran Bonner (2010). Peter McHugh and Analysis: The One and the Many, the Universal and the Particular, the Whole and the Part. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (2):253-269.
    This paper takes the passing of Peter McHugh as an occasion to examine the intellectual development of his work. The paper is mainly focused on the product of his collaboration with his colleague and friend, Alan Blum. As such, it addresses the tradition of social inquiry, Analysis, which they cofounded. It traces the influence of Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology on McHugh and on the beginning of Analysis. The collaboration with Blum is examined through a variety of coauthored works but most (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Berel Dov Lerner & Peter Winch (2002). Rules, Magic and Instrumental Reason a Critical Interpretation of Peter Winch's Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  30
    Riccardo Strobino (2011). Contexts of Utterance and Evaluation in Peter of Mantua's Obligationes. Vivarium 49 (1-3):275-299.
    In this paper I will examine the relation between the theory of obligations and its use in sophismatic contexts through the lens of certain pragmatic concerns. In order to do this, I will take a sophism discussed by Peter of Mantua in his treatise on obligations as a case-study. I will first provide a brief outline of the structure of the treatise and then examine a concrete case that shows how the relationship between background assumptions (casus and context of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Jacques Derrida, Peter Eisenman, Jeffrey Kipnis & Thomas Leeser (1997). Chora L Works Jacques Derrida and Peter Eisenman. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  10
    Emilie Dardenne (2010). The Reception of Peter Singer's Theories in France. Society and Animals 18 (2):205-218.
    Peter Singer’s views on the status of nonhuman animals have attracted both attention and intense controversy in many Western countries, including the United States, Canada, and Germany. The reactions to his theories in France are less well known. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of critical responses to Singer by French academics and thinkers. How have they received Singer’s contention that we must bring nonhuman animals within the sphere of moral concern? Do French scholars agree (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    Amihud Gilead (2015). Cruelty, Singular Individuality, and Peter the Great. Philosophia 43 (2):337-354.
    In discussing cruelty toward human beings, I argue that disregarding the singularity of any human being is necessary for treating her or him cruelly. The cruelty of Peter the Great, relying upon the intolerance of any human singular individuality, serves me as a paradigm-case to illustrate that. The cruelty of Procrustes and that of Stalin rely upon similar grounds. Relating to a person’s singularity is sufficient to prevent cruelty toward that person. In contrast, a liberal state of mind or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  15
    Marie-Eve Morin (2008). The Politics of Peter Sloterdijk's Global Foam. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 30:47-56.
    This paper takes up Peter Sloterdijk’s proposition for a new thinking of the world as global foam. After quickly reminding the reader of the main characteristics of “bubbles” as “immune spheres of existence”, I retrace the three phases of the history globalization as they have been developed by Sloterdijk in the Spheres trilogy. I then focus on the third phase, also called Global Age, and try to bring together the two seemingly opposed concepts Sloterdijk has used to discuss the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  7
    Thierry Coquand & Bas Spitters (2005). A Constructive Proof of the Peter‐Weyl Theorem. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (4):351-359.
    We present a new and constructive proof of the Peter-Weyl theorem on the representations of compact groups. We use the Gelfand representation theorem for commutative C*-algebras to give a proof which may be seen as a direct generalization of Burnside's algorithm [3]. This algorithm computes the characters of a finite group. We use this proof as a basis for a constructive proof in the style of Bishop. In fact, the present theory of compact groups may be seen as a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000