7 found
Sort by:
  1. Peter J. Hammond (1991). Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Why and How They Are and Should Be Made. In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press. 200--254.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter J. Hammond (1991). Morality Within the Limits of Reason, Russell Hardin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, Xx + 234 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 7 (02):300-.
  3. Peter J. Hammond (1989). Book Review:Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Jon Elster, Aanund Hylland. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (1):190-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter J. Hammond (1988). Consequentialist Foundations for Expected Utility. Theory and Decision 25 (1):25-78.
    Behaviour norms are considered for decision trees which allow both objective probabilities and uncertain states of the world with unknown probabilities. Terminal nodes have consequences in a given domain. Behaviour is required to be consistent in subtrees. Consequentialist behaviour, by definition, reveals a consequence choice function independent of the structure of the decision tree. It implies that behaviour reveals a revealed preference ordering satisfying both the independence axiom and a novel form of sure-thing principle. Continuous consequentialist behaviour must be expected (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter J. Hammond (1988). Orderly Decision Theory. Economics and Philosophy 4 (02):292-.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter J. Hammond (1982). Utilitarianism, Uncertainty and Information. In Amartya Kumar Sen & Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. 85--102.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter J. Hammond (1976). Why Ethical Measures of Inequality Need Interpersonal Comparisons. Theory and Decision 7 (4):263-274.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation