Search results for 'Peter K. Klein' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  59
    Peter K. Klein (1998). Insanity and the Sublime: Aesthetics and Theories of Mental Illness in Goya's Yard with Lunatics and Related Works. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 61:198-252.
  2. Peter K. Klein (1978). Contribución al estudio de la miniatura en León y Castilla en la alta Edad Media Mireille Mentré. Speculum 53 (3):600-601.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  11
    Hans Kamp, Boem-mo Kang, Paul Kay, Ali Kazmi, Edward L. Keenan, Jeff King, Ewan Klein, Angelika Kratzer, Manfred Krifka & William Ladusaw (1995). 688 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Iwanska, Lucia Johnson, Mark Kadmon, Nirit K~ Ilm~ N, L~ Zlo. Linguistics and Philosophy 18:687-688.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  3
    Carsten Klein (1997). Peter Schmitter, Hg., Zur Theorie und Methode der Geschichtsschreibung der Linguistik. Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 2 (1):303-311.
  5.  2
    Carsten Klein (1997). Peter Schmitter, Hg.,Zur Theorie und Methode der Geschichtsschreibung der Linguistik. [REVIEW] Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 2 (1):303-311.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Sally Allen, Joanna Hubbs, Outrunning Atalanta, Feminine Destiny, Rita Arditti, Renate Dueli Klein & Shelley Minden (1987). Abel, Elizabeth, and Emily K. Abel, Eds., The Signs Reader: Women, Gender and Scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1983. Allen, Jeffner, Lesbian Philosophy: Explorations. Palo Alto: Institute of Lesbi-an Studies 1986. [REVIEW] In Marsha Hanen & Kai Nielsen (eds.), Science, Morality and Feminist Theory. University of Calgary Press 423.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Martin Klein (1965). Briefe Zur Wellenmechanik by Schrodinger; Planck; Einstein; Lorentz; K. Przibram. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 56:83-84.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Rudolf Klein (1989). From Global Rationing to Target Setting in the U.K. Hastings Center Report 19 (4):3-4.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. E. P. Hayden, L. R. Dougherty, B. Maloney, T. M. Olino, H. Sheikh, C. E. Durbin, J. I. Nurnberger Jr, D. K. Lahiri & D. N. Klein (2008). Early-Emerging Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression and the Serotonin Transporter Promoter Region Polymorphism. J Affect Disord 107:227-30.
    BACKGROUND: Serotonin transporter promoter genotype appears to increase risk for depression in the context of stressful life events. However, the effects of this genotype on measures of stress sensitivity are poorly understood. Therefore, this study examined whether 5-HTTLPR genotype was associated with negative information processing biases in early childhood. METHOD: Thirty-nine unselected seven-year-old children completed a negative mood induction procedure and a Self-Referent Encoding Task designed to measure positive and negative schematic processing. Children were also genotyped for the 5-HTTLPR gene. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  2
    Braybrooke David, Brown Bryson & K. Schotch Peter (1998). [Book Review] Logic on the Track of Social Change. [REVIEW] In Stephen Everson (ed.), Ethics. Cambridge University Press 109--1.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  2
    K. Peter (1996). 20 Language and the Evolution of Mind-Reading. In Peter Carruthers & Peter K. Smith (eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press 344.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. E. P. Hayden, L. R. Dougherty, B. Maloney, C. Emily Durbin, T. M. Olino, J. I. Nurnberger Jr, D. K. Lahiri & D. N. Klein (2007). Temperamental Fearfulness in Childhood and the Serotonin Transporter Promoter Region Polymorphism: A Multimethod Association Study. Psychiatr Genet 17:135-42.
    OBJECTIVES: Early-emerging, temperamental differences in fear-related traits may be a heritable vulnerability factor for anxiety disorders. Previous research indicates that the serotonin transporter promoter region polymorphism is a candidate gene for such traits. METHODS: Associations between 5-HTTLPR genotype and indices of fearful child temperament, derived from maternal report and standardized laboratory observations, were examined in a community sample of 95 preschool-aged children. RESULTS: Children with one or more long alleles of the 5-HTTLPR gene were rated as significantly more nervous during (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. D. Schwender, A. Kaiser, S. Klasing, K. Peter & E. Pöppel (1993). Explicit and Implicit Memory and Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials During Cardiac Surgery. In P. S. Sebel, B. Bonke & E. Winograd (eds.), Memory and Awareness in Anesthesia. Prentice-Hall
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Peter D. Klein (2008). Useful False Beliefs. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press 25--63.
  15. Peter D. Klein (1999). Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):297-325.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   43 citations  
  16. Peter Klein (2007). Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of Reasoning. Philosophical Studies 134 (1):1 - 17.
    The purpose of this paper is to explain how infinitism—the view that reasons are endless and non-repeating—solves the epistemic regress problem and to defend that solution against some objections. The first step is to explain what the epistemic regress problem is and, equally important, what it is not. Second, I will discuss the foundationalist and coherentist responses to the regress problem and offer some reasons for thinking that neither response can solve the problem, no matter how they are tweaked. Then, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  17.  85
    Kourken Michaelian, Stanley B. Klein & Karl K. Szpunar (forthcoming). The Past, the Present, and the Future of Future-Oriented Mental Time Travel: Editors' Introduction. In Kourken Michaelian, Stanley B. Klein & Karl K. Szpunar (eds.), Seeing the Future: Theoretical Perspectives on Future-Oriented Mental Time Travel. Oxford University Press
  18. Peter Klein (1995). ``Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument Fails". Philosophical Topics 23 (1):213--236.
  19.  5
    Daniel J. Grodner, Natalie M. Klein, Kathleen M. Carbary & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2010). Some,” and Possibly All, Scalar Inferences Are Not Delayed: Evidence for Immediate Pragmatic Enrichment”. Cognition 116 (1):42-55.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  20. Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield (1994). What Price Coherence? Analysis 54 (3):129 - 132.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  21. Peter D. Klein (2005). Reply to Ginet. In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  22. Peter D. Klein (1981). Certainty, a Refutation of Scepticism. University of Minnesota Press.
    Rich with historical and cultural value, these works are published unaltered from the original University of Minnesota Press editions.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  23. Peter D. Klein (1971). A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 68 (16):471-482.
  24. Peter Klein (2003). When Infinite Regresses Are Not Vicious. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):718–729.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  25. Peter D. Klein (2004). What IS Wrong with Foundationalism is That It Cannot Solve the Epistemic Regress Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):166–171.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  26. Peter D. Klein (2011). Infinitism and the Epistemic Regress Problem. In Tolksdorf Stephan (ed.), Conceptions of Knowledge. De Gruyter 487-508.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  70
    Peter Klein (1998). Review: Foundationalism and the Infinite Regress of Reasons. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):919 - 925.
    In Metaepistemology and Skepticism (Rowman & Littlefield:\n1995), Richard Fumerton defends foundationalism. As part of\nthe defense he rejects infinitism--the view that holds that\nthe solution to the problem of the regress of justificatory\nreasons is that the reasons are infinitely many and\nnonrepeating. I examine some of those arguments and attempt\nto show that they are not really telling against (at least\nsome versions of) infinitism. Along the way I present some\nobjections to his account of inferential justification.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  28. Peter Klein (2007). How to Be an Infinitist About Doxastic Justification. Philosophical Studies 134 (1):25 - 29.
  29. Peter D. Klein (2000). Why Not Infinitism? Epistemology 5:199-208.
    As the Pyrrhonians made clear, reasons that adequately justify beliefs can have only three possible structures: foundationalism, coherentism, and infinitism. Infinitism—the view that adequate reasons for our beliefs are infinite and non-repeating—has never been developed carefully, much less advocated. In this paper, I will argue that only infinitism can satisfy two intuitively plausible constraints on good reasoning: the avoidance of circular reasoning and the avoidance of arbitrariness. Further, I will argue that infinitism requires serious, but salutary, revisions in our evaluation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  30.  7
    Peter Klein & John Turri, Infinitism. Oxford Bibliographies.
    Infinitism, along with foundationalism and coherentism, is a logically possible solution to the epistemic regress problem. But unlike the other two views, infinitism has only been developed and defended as a plausible solution since the late 1990’s. Infinitists grant that although there is an ending point of any actual chain of cited reasons for a belief, no belief (including the last one cited) is fully justified until a reason for it is provided. In addition to differing with foundationalism about the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield (1996). No Help for the Coherentist. Analysis 56 (2):118–121.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  32.  87
    Peter Klein (2004). Closure Matters: Academic Skepticism and Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):165–184.
  33. Peter D. Klein (1976). Knowledge, Causality, and Defeasibility. Journal of Philosophy 73 (20):792-812.
  34.  51
    Peter Klein (1985). The Virtues of Inconsistency. The Monist 68 (1):105-135.
    I "argue" that by knowingly accepting a set of propositions which is logically inconsistent, An epistemic agent need not violate any valid epistemic rule. Those types of logically inconsistent sets which it is permissible to accept are distinguished from those which may not be accepted. The results of the discussion are applied to the lottery paradox set of propositions and the preface paradox set. I also "suggest" that it may be an epistemic virtue to accept some inconsistent sets.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  35. Peter D. Klein (2003). How a Pyrrhonian Skeptic Might Respond to Academic Skepticism. In Luper Steven (ed.), The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Ashgate Press 75--94.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  36.  39
    Peter D. Klein (2005). Infinitism's Take on Justification, Knowledge, Certainty and Skepticism. Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS 50 (4):153-172.
    O propósito deste artigo é mostrar como podem ser desenvolvidas explicações robustas de justificação e de certeza no interior do infinitismo. Primeiro, eu explico como a concepção infinitista de justificação epistêmica difere das concepções fundacionista e coerentista. Em segundo lugar, explico como o infinitista pode oferecer uma solução ao problema do regresso epistêmico. Em terceiro lugar, explico como o infinitismo, per se, é compatível com as teorias daqueles que sustentam 1) que o conhecimento requer certeza e que uma tal forma (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37. Peter Klein (2008). Contemporary Responses to Agrippa's Trilemma. In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press
    This article discusses contemporary response to the epistemic regress problem or Agrippa's trilemma. The epistemic regress problem is considered the most crucial in the entire theory of knowledge and it is a major concern for many contemporary epistemologists. However, only two of the three alternative solutions have been developed in any detail, foundationalism and coherentism. Infinitism was not seriously considered as a solution because of the finite-mind objection. This article also provides a brief evaluation of foundationalism, emergent coherentism, and infinitism.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  53
    Peter D. Klein (2000). Contextualism and the Real Nature of Academic Skepticism. Noûs 34 (s1):108 - 116.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  39. Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Laurence Bonjour, Earl Conee, Richard Feldman, Richard Foley, Peter Klein, Jonathan Kvanvig, Keith Lehrer, William Lycan, Peter Markie, George Pappas, Alvin Plantinga, Ernest Sosa, Marshall Swain & Bas van Fraassen (1996). Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In his widely influential two-volume work, Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga argued that warrant is that which explains the difference between knowledge and true belief. Plantinga not only developed his own account of warrant but also mapped the terrain of epistemology. Motivated by Plantinga's work, fourteen prominent philosophers have written new essays investigating Plantingian warrant and its contribution to contemporary epistemology. The resulting collection, representing a broad array of views, not only gives readers a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  40. Peter D. Klein (1992, 2010). Certainty. In Dancy Jonathan & Sosa Ernest (eds.), A Companion to Epitemology. Blackwell
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  41.  57
    Peter D. Klein (1980). Misleading Evidence and the Restoration of Justification. Philosophical Studies 37 (1):81 - 89.
  42.  56
    Peter D. Klein & John Turri, Infinitism in Epistemology. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Infinitism in Epistemology This article provides an overview of infinitism in epistemology. Infinitism is a family of views in epistemology about the structure of knowledge and epistemic justification. It contrasts naturally with coherentism and foundationalism. All three views agree that knowledge or justification requires an appropriately structured chain of reasons. What form may such a […].
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Peter D. Klein (2000). The Failures of Dogmatism and a New Pyrrhonism. Acta Analytica 15 (24):7-24.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  44. Peter Klein (2008). ``Useful False Beliefs&Quot. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press 25-63.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45.  71
    Peter D. Klein (1979). Misleading "Misleading Defeaters". Journal of Philosophy 76 (7):382-386.
  46.  20
    Peter Klein (2010). Skepticism and Closure. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):213-236.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  25
    Peter Klein (1986). Immune Belief Systems. Philosophical Topics 14 (1):259-280.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  48. Peter D. Klein (2004). Ascent and Assent? In Greco John (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  28
    Peter D. Klein (2011). Epistemic Justification and the Limits of Pyrrhonism. In Diego Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Springer
  50.  1
    Calvin K. Lai, Allison L. Skinner, Erin Cooley, Sohad Murrar, Markus Brauer, Thierry Devos, Jimmy Calanchini, Y. Jenny Xiao, Christina Pedram, Christopher K. Marshburn, Stefanie Simon, John C. Blanchar, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, John Conway, Liz Redford, Rick A. Klein, Gina Roussos, Fabian M. H. Schellhaas, Mason Burns, Xiaoqing Hu, Meghan C. McLean, Jordan R. Axt, Shaki Asgari, Kathleen Schmidt, Rachel Rubinstein, Maddalena Marini, Sandro Rubichi, Jiyun-Elizabeth L. Shin & Brian A. Nosek (forthcoming). Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: II. Intervention Effectiveness Across Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000