56 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Peter J. Lewis [30]Peter Lewis [23]Peter B. Lewis [3]
  1. Peter J. Lewis (2013). Retrocausal Quantum Mechanics: Maudlin's Challenge Revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):442-449.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter J. Lewis (2013). The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument. Synthese 190 (18):4009-4022.
    The Simulation Argument and the Doomsday Argument share certain structural similarities, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Aranyosi 2004, Richmond 2008, Bostrom and Kulczycki 2011). Both are cases where reflecting on one’s location among a set of possibilities yields a counter-intuitive conclusion—in one case that the end of humankind is closer than you initially thought, and in the second case that it is more likely than you initially thought that you are living in a computer simulation. Indeed, the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Peter Lewis (2012). Simon Saunders , Jonathan Barrett , Adrian Kent , and David Wallace , Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality . Oxford: Oxford University Press (2010), 618 Pp., $99.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 79 (1):177-181.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter J. Lewis, Credence for Whom?
    There is an important sense in which an agent’s credences are universal: while they reflect an agent’s own judgments, those judgments apply equally to everyone’s bets. This point, while uncontentious, has been overlooked; people automatically assume that credences concern an agent’s own bets, perhaps just because of the name “subjective” that is typically applied to this account of belief. This oversight has had unfortunate consequences for recent epistemology, in particular concerning the Sleeping Beauty case and its myriad variants.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter Lewis (2011). Rights as the Framework for Responsible Relationships Between Australia 'Invader-Society' and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Ethos 19 (4):6.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter J. Lewis, A Note on the Simulation Argument.
    The point of this note is to compare the Doomsday Argument to the Simulation Argument. The latter, I maintain, is a better argument than the former.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter J. Lewis, Maudlin's Challenge Revisited.
    In 1994, Maudlin proposed proposed an objection to the transactional interpretation (TI), involving an absorber that changes location depending on the trajectory of the particle. Maudlin considered this objection fatal. However, the TI did not die; rather, a number of responses were developed, some attempting to accommodate Maudlin's example within the existing TI, and others modifying the TI. I argue that none of these responses is fully adequate. The reason, I submit, is that there are two aspects to Maudlin's objection; (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Peter J. Lewis (2010). A Note on the Doomsday Argument. Analysis 70 (1):27-30.
    I argue that the Doomsday argument fails because it fails to take into account the lesson of the Sleeping Beauty puzzle.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Peter J. Lewis (2010). Credence and Self-Location. Synthese 175 (3):369-382.
    All parties to the Sleeping Beauty debate agree that it shows that some cherished principle of rationality has to go. Thirders think that it is Conditionalization and Reflection that must be given up or modified; halfers think that it is the Principal Principle. I offer an analysis of the Sleeping Beauty puzzle that allows us to retain all three principles. In brief, I argue that Sleeping Beauty’s credence in the uncentered proposition that the coin came up heads should be 1/2, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Peter J. Lewis (2010). Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics. Manuscrito 33:285--306.
    The main difficulty facing no-collapse theories of quantum mechanics in the Everettian tradition concerns the role of probability within a theory in which every possible outcome of a measurement actually occurs. The problem is two-fold: First, what do probability claims mean within such a theory? Second, what ensures that the probabilities attached to measurement outcomes match those of standard quantum mechanics? Deutsch has recently proposed a decision-theoretic solution to the second problem, according to which agents are rationally required to weight (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Anna Middleton, Graham H. Turner, Maria Bitner‐Glindzicz, Peter Lewis, Martin Richards, Angus Clarke & Dafydd Stephens (2010). Preferences for Communication in Clinic From Deaf People: A Cross‐Sectional Study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (4):811-817.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Peter J. Lewis (2009). Metaphysics and Quantum Physics. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter J. Lewis (2009). Probability, Self‐Location, and Quantum Branching. Philosophy of Science 76 (5):1009-1019.
    The main problem with the many‐worlds theory is that it is not clear how the notion of probability should be understood in a theory in which every possible outcome of a measurement actually occurs. In this paper, I argue for the following theses concerning the many‐worlds theory: (1) If probability can be applied at all to measurement outcomes, it must function as a measure of an agent’s self‐location uncertainty. (2) Such probabilities typically violate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter J. Lewis (2009). Reply to Papineau and Durà-Vilà. Analysis 69 (1):86-89.
    I argued that anyone who adopts the Everettian approach to the foundations of quantum mechanics must also accept the (unpopular) ‘halfer’ solution to the Sleeping Beauty puzzle. Papineau and Durà-Vilà have responded with an argument that it is perfectly cogent both to be an Everettian and to accept the (popular) ‘thirder’ solution to Sleeping Beauty. Here I attempt to rebut their argument, and to clarify my original position.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Peter Lewis (2008). Reflections on Aesthetic Judgment and Other Essays – by Benjamin Tilghman. Philosophical Investigations 31 (4):370-374.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter Lewis (2007). Portrait of the Patient as a Young Man: An Exploration of the Use of Photographs in Hospital. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):51-55.
    The display of personal photographs in hospital is a common practice that has yet to be rigorously examined. The photographs displayed are subject to interpretation by the viewer and may lead to misunderstandings or miscommunication if clarification of meaning is not sought. This paper explores a range of possible meanings that the display of photographs in hospital may hold, based on a case study of a 15 year old boy hospitalised with a life threatening illness. Further research is needed into (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Peter J. Lewis (2007). Empty Waves in Bohmian Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):787 - 803.
    There is a recurring line of argument in the literature to the effect that Bohm's theory fails to solve the measurement problem. I show that this argument fails in all its variants. Hence Bohm's theory, whatever its drawbacks, at least succeeds in solving the measurement problem. I briefly discuss a similar argument that has been raised against the GRW theory.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter J. Lewis (2007). How Bohm's Theory Solves the Measurement Problem. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):749-760.
    I examine recent arguments based on functionalism that claim to show that Bohm's theory fails to solve the measurement problem, or if it does so, it is only because it reduces to a form of the many-worlds theory. While these arguments reveal some interesting features of Bohm's theory, I contend that they do not undermine the distinctive Bohmian solution to the measurement problem. ‡I would like to thank Harvey Brown, Martin Thomson-Jones, and David Wallace for helpful discussions. †To contact the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Peter J. Lewis (2007). Quantum Sleeping Beauty. Analysis 67 (293):59-65.
    The Sleeping Beauty paradox in epistemology and the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics both raise problems concerning subjective probability assignments. Furthermore, there are striking parallels between the two cases; in both cases personal experience has a branching structure, and in both cases the agent loses herself among the branches. However, the treatment of probability is very different in the two cases, for no good reason that I can see. Suppose, then, that we adopt the same treatment of probability in each (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Peter J. Lewis (2007). Towards a Local Hidden Variable Theory. Foundations of Physics 37 (10):1461-1469.
    A local hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics is formulated by adapting Gell-Mann and Hartle’s many-histories formulation. The resulting theory solves the measurement problem by exploiting the independence loophole in Bell’s theorem; it violates the independence of hidden variable values and measuring device settings. Although the theory is problematic in some respects, it provides a concrete example via which the tenability of this approach can be better evaluated.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Peter J. Lewis (2007). Uncertainty and Probability for Branching Selves. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (1):1-14.
    Everettian accounts of quantum mechanics entail that people branch; every possible result of a measurement actually occurs, and I have one successor for each result. Is there room for probability in such an account? The prima facie answer is no; there are no ontic chances here, and no ignorance about what will happen. But since any adequate quantum mechanical theory must make probabilistic predictions, much recent philosophical labor has gone into trying to construct an account of probability for branching selves. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peter J. Lewis (2006). Conspiracy Theories of Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):359-381.
    It has long been recognized that a local hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics can in principle be constructed, provided one is willing to countenance pre-measurement correlations between the properties of measured systems and measuring devices. However, this ‘conspiratorial’ approach is typically dismissed out of hand. In this article I examine the justification for dismissing conspiracy theories of quantum mechanics. I consider the existing arguments against such theories, and find them to be less than conclusive. I suggest a more powerful (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Peter J. Lewis (2006). GRW: A Case Study in Quantum Ontology. Philosophy Compass 1 (2):224–244.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter B. Lewis (2005). Schopenhauer's Laughter. The Monist 88 (1):36-51.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter B. Lewis (2005). Wittgenstein, Tolstoy, and Shakespeare. Philosophy and Literature 29 (2):241-255.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Peter J. Lewis (2005). Interpreting Spontaneous Collapse Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (1):165-180.
    Spontaneous collapse theories of quantum mechanics require an interpretation if their claim to solve the measurement problem is to be vindicated. The most straightforward interpretation rule, the fuzzy link, generates a violation of common sense known as the counting anomaly. Recently, a consensus has developed that the mass density link provides an appropriate interpretation of spontaneous collapse theories that avoids the counting anomaly. In this paper, I argue that the mass density link violates common sense in just as striking a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Peter B. Lewis (2004). Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):283-285.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter J. Lewis (2004). Life in Configuration Space. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):713-729.
    This paper investigates the tenability of wavefunction realism, according to which the quantum mechanical wavefunction is not just a convenient predictive tool, but is a real entity figuring in physical explanations of our measurement results. An apparent difficulty with this position is that the wavefunction exists in a many-dimensional configuration space, whereas the world appears to us to be three-dimensional. I consider the arguments that have been given for and against the tenability of wavefunction realism, and note that both the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Peter J. Lewis (2003). Counting Marbles: A Reply to Critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):165-170.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Peter J. Lewis, Deutsch on Quantum Decision Theory.
    A major problem facing no-collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics in the tradition of Everett is how to understand the probabilistic axiom of quantum mechanics (the Born rule) in the context of a deterministic theory in which every outcome of a measurement occurs. Deutsch claims to derive a decision-theoretic analogue of the Born rule from the non-probabilistic part of quantum mechanics and some non-probabilistic axioms of classical decision theory, and hence concludes that no probabilistic axiom is needed. I argue that Deutsch’s (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Peter J. Lewis (2003). Four Strategies for Dealing with the Counting Anomaly in Spontaneous Collapse Theories of Quantum Mechanics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):137 – 142.
    A few years ago, I argued that according to spontaneous collapse theories of quantum mechanics, arithmetic applies to macroscopic objects only as an approximation. Several authors have written articles defending spontaneous collapse theories against this charge, including Bassi and Ghirardi, Clifton and Monton, and now Frigg. The arguments of these authors are all different and all ingenious, but in the end I think that none of them succeeds, for reasons I elaborate here. I suggest a fourth line of response, based (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter J. Lewis (2003). Quantum Mechanics and Ordinary Language: The Fuzzy Link. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1437-1446.
    It is widely acknowledged that the link between quantum language and ordinary language must be "fuzzier" than the traditional eigenstate-eigenvalue link. In the context of spontaneous-collapse theories, Albert and Loewer (1996) argue that the form of this fuzzy link is a matter of convention, and can be freely chosen to minimize anomalies for those theories. I defend the position that the form of the link is empirical, and could be such as to render collapse theories idle. This means that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Peter Lewis (2002). Hume's Aesthetic Theory. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):406-408.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peter Lewis (2001). William H. Brenner, Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, 1999, State University of New York Press, Xv+ 184, Price $18.95 Pb. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 24 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter J. Lewis (2001). Why the Pessimistic Induction is a Fallacy. Synthese 129 (3):371--380.
    Putnam and Laudan separately argue that the falsity of past scientific theories gives us reason to doubt the truth of current theories. Their arguments have been highly influential, and have generated a significant literature over the past couple of decades. Most of this literature attempts to defend scientific realism by attacking the historical evidence on which the premises of the relevant argument are based. However, I argue that both Putnam's and Laudan's arguments are fallacious, and hence attacking their premises is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Peter J. Lewis (2000). What is It Like to Be Schrödinger's Cat? Analysis 60 (265):22–29.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Peter J. Lewis (1997). Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):313-328.
    In quantum mechanics it is usually assumed that mutually exclusives states of affairs must be represented by orthogonal vectors. Recent attempts to solve the measurement problem, most notably the GRW theory, require the relaxation of this assumption. It is shown that a consequence of relaxing this assumption is that arithmatic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. It is argued that such a radical move is unwarranted given the current state of understanding of the foundations of quantum mechanics.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Peter Lewis (1996). Schopenhauer. Philosophical Books 37 (4):260-261.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Peter Lewis (1995). Art, the Community's Medicine. British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (3):205-216.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peter Lewis (1995). GRW and the Tails Problem. Topoi 14 (1):23-33.
    The GRW theory is a recent attempt to solve the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, and the tails problem is a well-known and potentially fatal criticism of the GRW theory. The first half of the paper is an exposition of the measurement problem, the GRW theory, and the tails problem. In the remainder of the paper, two methods of dealing with the tails problem are considered: first, altering the GRW theory so as to avoid the tails problem; and second, denying (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter Lewis (1995). Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? Philosophical Books 36 (1):49-51.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter Lewis (1992). Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religious Belief. Philosophical Books 33 (4):215-216.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter Lewis (1990). 'Original Nonsense': Art and Genius in Kant's Aesthetic. In G. MacDonald Ross & Tony McWalter (eds.), Kant and His Influence. Thoemmes Continuum. 126.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Peter Lewis (1990). Self and World in Schopenhauer's Philosophy. Philosophical Books 31 (2):80-82.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Peter Lewis (1990). Wittgenstein's Genius. Philosophical Investigations 13 (3):246-257.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Lewis (1989). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 29 (2):375-376.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Peter Lewis (1988). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 28 (2):375-376.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 56