19 found
Order:
  1.  53
    Tim Thornton & Peter Lucas (2011). On the Very Idea of a Recovery Model for Mental Health. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (1):24-28.
    The recovery model has been put forward as a rival to the biomedical model in mental healthcare. It has also been invoked in debate about public policy for individual and community mental health and the broader goal of social inclusion. But this broader use threatens its status as a genuine model, distinct from others such as the biomedical model. This paper sets out to articulate, although not to defend, a distinct recovery model based on the idea that mental health is (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  21
    Peter Lucas (2011). Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.
    Principle 2 of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act (MCA) requires that decision-making capacity should be assumed, unless there is conclusive evidence, on a balance of probabilities, to the contrary (Department of Constitutional Affairs 2005). In his article “The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005,” Ajit Shah (2011) raises the concern that the new Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), introduced through the Mental Health Act (Department of Health 2007), conflict with this principle (henceforth, the principle (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  6
    Peter Lucas (2002). Environmental Ethics: Between Inconsequential Philosophy and Unphilosophical Consequentialism. Environmental Ethics 24 (4):353-369.
    Andrew Light and Eric Katz commend environmental pragmatism as a framework of choice for a more pluralistic, and (consequently) more practically effective environmental ethics. There is however a prima facie conflict between the promotion of pluralism and the promotion of pragmatism. I consider two different routes by which Light has attempted to resolve this conflict. Light’s first strategy involves distinguishing philosophical from metaphilosophical forms of pragmatism, locating its “metatheoretically pluralist” potential in the latter. I argue that the distinction collapses, leaving (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Immanuel Kant & Peter Gray Lucas (1953). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  16
    Peter Lucas (2011). Communication, Stereotypes and Dignity: The Inadequacy of the Liberal Case Against Censorship. Empedocles 2 (2):255-265.
    J. S. Mill’s case against censorship rests on a conception of relevant communications as truth apt. If the communication is true, everyone benefits from the opportunity to exchange error for truth. If it is false, we benefit from the livelier impression truth makes when it collides with error. This classical liberal model is not however adequate for today’s world. In particular, it is inadequate for dealing with the problem of stereotyping. Much contemporary communication is not truth apt. Advertising and journalism, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  23
    Peter Lucas (2002). Mind-Forged Manacles and Habits of the Soul: Foucault's Debt to Heidegger. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):310-328.
  7.  16
    Peter Lucas, Model-Based and Qualitative Reasoning in Biomedicine.
    These are the working notes of the workshop on Model-based and Qualitative Reasoning in Biomedicine, which was held during the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, AIME’03, on 19th October, 2003, in Protaras, Cyprus. The workshop brought together various researchers involved in the development and use of model-based and qualitative reasoning methods in tackling biomedical problems. Much of the biomedical knowledge is essentially model-based, as it is the understanding of the structure and function of biomedical systems that researchers wish (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  20
    Peter G. Lucas & J. N. Wright (1951). Descartes and the Wax--Two Rejoinders to Mr. Smart. Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4):348-355.
  9.  3
    Peter Lucas (2000). Teleological Presuppositions, and the 'Expectation Gap': A Response to Laura Westra. Environmental Values 9 (3):383 - 388.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  9
    Peter J. Lucas (1979). On the Blank Daniel-Cycle in MS Junius II. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 42:207-213.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    Peter Lucas (1956). Leibniz. By Ruth Lydia Saw. (Penguin Books, 1954. Pp. 240. Price 2s. 6d.). Philosophy 31 (116):92-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  1
    Peter Lucas (2002). Valuing Birds in the Bush: For Pluralism in Environmental Risk Assessment. Environmental Values 11 (2):177 - 191.
    It is now widely acknowledged that social theorists can make an important contribution to our understanding of environmental risk. There is however a danger that the current ascendancy of social theory will encourage a tendency to assimilate issues around environmental risk to those at stake in entrenched debates between realist and constructivist social theorists. I begin by citing a recent example of this trend, before going on to argue that framing the issues in terms of a monism/pluralism dichotomy would make (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Immanuel Kant & Peter G. Lucas (1953). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science a Translation From the German Based on the Original Editions. Manchester University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  0
    Peter Lucas (2014). Authenticity and Historicity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (3):233-235.
  15.  0
    Peter Lucas, Paul Constantino, Bernard Wood & Brian Lawn (2008). Dental Enamel as a Dietary Indicator in Mammals. Bioessays 30 (4):374-385.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  0
    Peter Lucas, Ethics and Self-Knowledge: Respect for Self Interpreting Agents.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Peter Lucas (2010). Is "Therapeutic Research" a Misnomer? In Matti Häyry (ed.), Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics. Rodopi 229--239.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  0
    Peter G. Lucas & Leslie Grint (1954). Leibniz: Discourse on Metaphysics. Philosophical Review 63 (3):441-444.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  0
    Peter Lucas (1956). No Title Available. Philosophy 31 (116):92-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography