Search results for 'Peter Nicholls' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Peter Nicholls & Dan Passell (1985). Kripke's Contingent A Priori and Necessary A Posteriori. Philosophy Research Archives 11:481-489.score: 120.0
    We think that Kripke’s arguments that there are contingent a priori truths and that there are necessary a posteriori truths about named and essentially described entities fail. They fail for the reasons that there are ambiguities in each of the three eases. In the first ease, what is known apriori is not what is contingent. In the latter two cases, what is necessary or essential is not what is known a posteriori.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Nicholls (2010). A Necessary Blindness. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (13):28-40.score: 120.0
    Modernism is often characterised by its appeal to painting rather than to music as a model of literary form. This essay explores what is taken to be a continuing dependence on metre and rhythm as types of signification. From Swinburne and Mallarmé through to Pound and Eliot, it is argued, poets looked to “musical” effects of verse as rich sources of memory and association.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Miguel A. Altieri, Peter M. Rosset & Clara I. Nicholls (1997). Biological Control and Agricultural Modernization: Towards Resolution of Some Contradictions. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 14 (3):303-310.score: 120.0
    An emergent contradiction in the contemporary development of biological control is that of the prevalence of the substitution of periodic releases of natural enemies for chemical insecticides and the dominance of biotechnologically developed transgenic crops. Input substitution leaves in place the monoculture nature of agroecosystems, which in itself is a key factor in encouraging pest problems. Biotechnology, now under corporate control, creates more dependency and can potentially lead to Bt resistance, thus excluding from the market a key biopesticide. Approaches for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Miguel A. Altieri, Nelso Companioni, Kristina Cañizares, Catherine Murphy, Peter Rosset, Martin Bourque & Clara I. Nicholls (1999). The Greening of the “Barrios”: Urban Agriculture for Food Security in Cuba. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 16 (2):131-140.score: 120.0
    Urban agriculture in Cuba has rapidly become a significant source of fresh produce for the urban and suburban populations. A large number of urban gardens in Havana and other major cities have emerged as a grassroots movement in response to the crisis brought about by the loss of trade, with the collapse of the socialist bloc in 1989. These gardens are helping to stabilize the supply of fresh produce to Cuba's urban centers. During 1996, Havana's urban farms provided the city's (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert Halliday, Rod Nicholls, Mark Wynn, Nick Trakakis, Yujin Nagasawa, Maarten Wisse, Peter Kügler & Igor Douven (2004). Returning the Gift of Life. Ars Disputandi 4.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Roderick Nicholls (1996). Peter Loptson, Theories of Human Nature Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 16 (1):33-35.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Fabienne Peter (2009). Democratic Legitimacy Without Collective Rationality Fabienne Peter. In Boudewijn Paul de Bruin & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan. 143.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Madsen Peter (2004). Peter Singer on Global Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1).score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George H. Scithers & Darrell Schweitzer (1981). SF Encyclopedia The Science Fiction Encyclopedia Peter Nicholls. Bioscience 31 (1):76-76.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Riccardo Strobino (2012). Truth and Paradox in Late XIVth Century Logic : Peter of Mantua’s Treatise on Insoluble Propositions. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 23:475-519.score: 18.0
    This paper offers an analysis of a hitherto neglected text on insoluble propositions dating from the late XiVth century and puts it into perspective within the context of the contemporary debate concerning semantic paradoxes. The author of the text is the italian logician Peter of Mantua (d. 1399/1400). The treatise is relevant both from a theoretical and from a historical standpoint. By appealing to a distinction between two senses in which propositions are said to be true, it offers an (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul Richard Blum (2013). Péter Pázmánys Seelenlehre. In Alinka Ajkay Rita Bajáki (ed.), Pázmány Nyomában. Tanulmányok Hargittay Emil tiszteletére. Mondat.score: 18.0
    Péter Pázmány taught philosophy at the Jesuit university of Graz, end of 16th century. This analyzes his interpretation of Aristotelian psychology.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Kevin Schilbrack (2009). Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch. [REVIEW] Sophia 48 (4):399-412.score: 18.0
    Many point to Peter Winch’s discussion of rationality, relativism, and religion as a paradigmatic example of cultural relativism. In this paper, I argue that Winch’s relationship to relativism is widely misinterpreted in that, despite his pluralistic understanding of rationality, Winch does allow for universal features of culture in virtue of which cross-cultural understanding and even critique is possible. Nevertheless, I also argue that given the kind of cultural universals that Winch produces, he fails to avoid relativism. This is because (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. N. N. Trakakis (2010). Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest. Sophia 49 (1):129-140.score: 18.0
    In responding to Peter Forrest’s defence of ‘tough-minded theodicy’, I point to some problematic features of theodicies of this sort, in particular their commitment to an anthropomorphic conception of God which tends to assimilate the Creator to the creaturely and so diminishes the otherness and mystery of God. This remains the case, I argue, even granted Forrest’s view that God may have a very different kind of morality from the one we mortals are subject to.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anthony Skelton (forthcoming). Singer, Peter (1946-). In Michael Gibbons (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 18.0
    A short encyclopedia article on Peter Singer.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Luca Malatesti, Forum on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Forum 2 SWIF Philosophy of Mind Review.score: 18.0
    A book symposium on Peter, Carruthers. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Contents: Author's précis Colin Allen, Evolving Phenomenal Consciousness - Carruthers's reply. José Luis Bermúdez, Commentary - Carruthers's reply - Reply to Carruthers: Properties, first-order representationalism and reinforcement. Joseph Levine, Commentary - Carruthers's reply. William Seager, Dispositions and Consciousness - Carruthers's reply.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Koepsell (2010). Peter Hare and the Problem of Evil. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):53-59.score: 18.0
    Peter Hare and Edward Madden's collaborative book Evil and the Concept of God (968) has become a staple in literature about the problem of evil and remains frequently cited by supporters and critics alike. The major concepts of the work arose out of earlier papers in which they first began to formulate their arguments about the problem of evil. Their article "Evil and Unlimited Power" embodies many of their arguments against quasi-theist attempts to resolve the problem of evil.1 Assembled (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Erinn Cunniff Gilson (2009). Peter Hallward: Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):429-434.score: 18.0
    Review essay of Peter Hallward's Out of This World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jose Filipe Silva & Juhana Toivanen (2011). The Active Nature of the Soul in Sense Perception: Robert Kilwardby and Peter Olivi. Vivarium 48 (3-4):245-278.score: 18.0
    This article discusses the theories of perception of Robert Kilwardby and Peter of John Olivi. Our aim is to show how in challenging certain assumptions of medieval Aristotelian theories of perception they drew on Augustine and argued for the active nature of the soul in sense perception. For both Kilwardby and Olivi, the soul is not passive with respect to perceived objects; rather, it causes its own cognitive acts with respect to external objects and thus allows the subject to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Kieran Bonner (2010). Peter McHugh and Analysis: The One and the Many, the Universal and the Particular, the Whole and the Part. [REVIEW] Human Studies 33 (2):253-269.score: 18.0
    This paper takes the passing of Peter McHugh as an occasion to examine the intellectual development of his work. The paper is mainly focused on the product of his collaboration with his colleague and friend, Alan Blum. As such, it addresses the tradition of social inquiry, Analysis, which they cofounded. It traces the influence of Harold Garfinkel’s Ethnomethodology on McHugh and on the beginning of Analysis. The collaboration with Blum is examined through a variety of coauthored works but most (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Joseph Margolis (2010). A Word of Thanks for Peter Hare's Patience. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):3-8.score: 18.0
    Peter Hare took a belle-lettriste pleasure in hopping from one philosophical topic to another. Not carelessly but lightheartedly enough. I mean by that, not that there is no deeper interlocking linkage among his many papers—there is—but rather that the center of gravity of each piece rests with the special patience and affection Peter spends on the specific topic some chanced-upon author or authors bring into view. He pursues each such topic intensively in a deliberately narrow-gauged way, testing its (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Riccardo Strobino (2011). Contexts of Utterance and Evaluation in Peter of Mantua's Obligationes. Vivarium 49 (1-3):275-299.score: 18.0
    In this paper I will examine the relation between the theory of obligations and its use in sophismatic contexts through the lens of certain pragmatic concerns. In order to do this, I will take a sophism discussed by Peter of Mantua in his treatise on obligations as a case-study. I will first provide a brief outline of the structure of the treatise and then examine a concrete case that shows how the relationship between background assumptions (casus and context of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Kenneth Colburn & Mary Moore (2010). Honoring (Recollecting) Our Memory of Peter McHugh as Social Theorist. Human Studies 33 (2):271-279.score: 18.0
    The recent death of Peter McHugh becomes an occasion for the remembrance and recollection of the distinctive form of reflexive or analytic social inquiry, which framed his work and that of his longtime friend and collaborator, Alan Blum. Following dual appointments at York University, Toronto, Canada in 1972, Blum and McHugh’s partnership formed the basis for a community of scholars and students throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. A brief review of McHugh and Blum’s works shows theoretical roots in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. José L. Tasset (2013). Razones para una buena muerte (La justificación de la eutanasia en la tradición utilitarista: De David Hume a Peter Singer). Télos 18 (1-2):153-195.score: 18.0
    There are good moral reasons to support euthanasia, and these reasons are fundamentally of a utilitarian root. There are few moral reasons to oppose euthanasia in its strict sense, and they are clearly outweighed by the reasons argumented from a utilitarian perspective. Such teleological and consequentialist good reasons were originally advanced by David Hume in his brief and brilliant essay "Of Suicide" (1757), the true source for current Bioethics. Hume's arguments have been expanded in scope by some contemporary utilitarians, especially (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John J. McDermott (2010). Philosophical Remarks on Peter Hare. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.score: 18.0
    These remarks are offered as a celebration of Peter Hare as a philosopher. Stressed here is the astute character of Hare's philosophical commentary.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David Lynes (2010). Studying Sociology with Peter McHugh. Human Studies 33 (2):287-288.score: 18.0
    Peter McHugh’s influence on those of us who studied and worked with him as part of York University’s graduate sociology programme in Toronto from the mid-1970s until the late 1980s, while lasting and undeniable, is not necessarily immediately apparent nor easily articulated. What follows is a brief reflection on how this difficulty can be understood as integral to Peter McHugh’s unique contribution both to those of us fortunate enough to have studied with him, and more broadly, to the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen Stich (2004). Some Questions From the Not-so-Hostile Worldi'm Grateful to Kent Bach, Peter Godfrey-Smith, and Shaun Nichols for Their Helpful Advice. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):503 – 511.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Coos Engelsma (2014). On Peter Klein's Concept of Arbitrariness. Metaphilosophy 45 (2):192-200.score: 18.0
    According to Peter Klein, foundationalism fails because it allows a vicious form of arbitrariness. The present article critically discusses his concept of arbitrariness. It argues that the condition Klein takes to be necessary and sufficient for an epistemic item to be arbitrary is neither necessary nor sufficient. It also argues that Klein's concept of arbitrariness is not a concept of something that is obviously vicious. Even if Klein succeeds in establishing that foundationalism allows what he regards as arbitrariness, this (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter Coghlan & Nick Trakakis (2006). Confronting the Horror of Natural Evil: An Exchange Between Peter Coghlan and Nick Trakakis. Sophia 45 (2):5-26.score: 15.0
    In this exchange, Peter Coghlan and Nick Trakakis discuss the problem of natural evil in the light of the recent Asian tsunami disaster. The exchange begins with an extract from a newspaper article written by Coghlan on the tsunami, followed by three rounds of replies and counter-replies, and ending with some final comments from Trakakis. While critical of any attempt to show that human life is good overall despite its natural evils, Coghlan argues that instances of natural evil, even (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Peter Winch & Raimond Gaita (eds.) (1990). Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch. Routledge.score: 15.0
    Written by eminent philosophers from Britain, Europe, America, and Australia, the essays of this collection are a tribute to Peter Winch, whose work is marked by his deep appreciation of the most fundamental aspect of Wittgenstein's legacy: that we cannot detach our concepts from their roots in human life. The voices in this volume unite in different tones of sympathy and criticism by discussing the theme of human conditioning: the human conditioning of what we can find intelligible, possible and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Peter King, Peter Abelard. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 15.0
    Peter Abelard (1079 – 21 April 1142) [‘Abailard’ or ‘Abaelard’ or ‘Habalaarz’ and so on] was the pre-eminent philosopher and theologian of the twelfth century. The teacher of his generation, he was also famous as a poet and a musician. Prior to the recovery of Aristotle, he brought the native Latin tradition in philosophy to its highest pitch. His genius was evident in all he did. He is, arguably, the greatest logician of the Middle Ages and is equally famous (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Evan Selinger, Don Ihde, Ibo Poel, Martin Peterson & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2012). Erratum To: Book Symposium on Peter Paul Verbeek's Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):605-631.score: 15.0
    Erratum to: Book Symposium on Peter Paul Verbeek’s Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011 Content Type Journal Article Category Erratum Pages 1-27 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0058-z Authors Evan Selinger, Dept. Philosophy, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA Don Ihde, Dept. Philosophy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA Ibo van de Poel, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands Martin Peterson, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands Peter-Paul Verbeek, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter Singer (2008). Interview - Peter Singer. The Philosophers' Magazine 40 (40):59-60.score: 15.0
    Peter Singer is probably the best-known and most controversial ethicist in the world today. He rigorously applies utilitarian moral theory to issues such as world poverty, the environment, abortion, euthanasia and, most famously, animal welfare. He has also written a book about his grandfather, David Oppenheim, who died in Theresienstadt concentration camp. He is Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ana Maria Mora-Marquez (2011). Pragmatics in Peter John Olivis Account of Signification of Common Names. Vivarium 49 (1-3):150-164.score: 15.0
    The aim of this paper is to present a reconstruction of Olivi's account of signification of common names and to highlight certain intrusion of pragmatics into this account. The paper deals with the question of how certain facts, other than original imposition, may be relevant to determine the semantical content of an utterance, and not with the question of how we perform actions by means of utterances. The intrusion of pragmatics into Olivi's semantics we intend to point out may seem (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Harry Oldmeadow (2007). Review of Peter Kelly, Buddha in a Bookshop. [REVIEW] Sophia 46 (3):315-316.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Tyson Edward Lewis (2009). Capitalists and Conquerors
    Teaching Against Global Capitalism and the New Imperialism
    Rage and Hope: Interviews with Peter McLaren on War, Imperialism, and Critical Pedagogy.
    Historical Materialism 17 (1):201-208.
    score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Peter Abelard (2001). Peter Abelard: Collationes. Clarendon Press.score: 15.0
    Peter Abelard (1079-1142) is widely recognized as one of the most important writers of the twelfth century, famed for his skill in logic as well as his romance with Heloise. Even among Abelard's writings, the Collationes - or Dialogue between a Christian, a Philosopher, and a Jew - are remarkable for their daring and intellectual imaginativeness. Written probably c.1130, the work contains the fullest exposition of many aspects of abelard's ethics, the only statement of his unusual eschatological theory, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. T. C. Kline Iii (2001). Sheltering Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger and Xunzi. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2):261-282.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Thierry Coquand & Bas Spitters (2005). A Constructive Proof of the Peter‐Weyl Theorem. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (4):351-359.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Emilie Dardenne (2010). The Reception of Peter Singer's Theories in France. Society and Animals 18 (2):205-218.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peter Singer, Ethics and the New Animal Liberation Movement by in Peter Singer (Ed), in Defense of Animals New York: Basil Blackwell, 1985, Pp. 1-10. [REVIEW]score: 12.0
    Acrobat version This book In Defense of Animals ] provides a platform for the new animal liberation movement. A diverse group of people share this platform: university philosophers, a zoologist, a lawyer, militant activists who are ready to break the law to further their cause, and respected political lobbyists who are entirely at home in parliamentary offices. Their common ground is that they are all, in their very different ways, taking part in the struggle for animal liberation. This struggle is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Holly Lawford-Smith (2012). Peter Corning: The Fair Society: The Science of Human Nature and the Pursuit of Social Justice. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 27 (2):313-320.score: 12.0
    Peter Corning: The Fair Society: The science of human nature and the pursuit of social justice Content Type Journal Article Category Review Essay Pages 1-8 DOI 10.1007/s10539-011-9304-0 Authors Holly Lawford-Smith, Centre for Applied Ethics and Public Philosophy, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia Journal Biology and Philosophy Online ISSN 1572-8404 Print ISSN 0169-3867.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Bob Corbett, Bonnie Steinbock Comments and on and Criticisms of Peter Singer's "Speciesism" Argument.score: 12.0
    Bonnie Steinbock argues that Peter Singer has made an important contribution to remind us that animals deserve very special consideration, but that he fails to make a compelling case against "speciesism.".
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Ned Markosian (2001). Reviewed of Peter Ludlow, Semantics, Tense, and Time. Journal of Philosophy 98:325-329.score: 12.0
    This is not your typical book about the A-theory/B-theory controversy in metaphysics. <span class='Hi'>Peter</span> Ludlow attempts something that few philosophers have tried in the last thirty years: he actually argues from linguistic premises for metaphysical conclusions. The relevant linguistic premises have to do with the nature of language, a general theory of semantics, the proper analysis of tense, and various technical theses involving the treatment of temporal indexicals and temporal anaphora (among other things). The metaphysical conclusions that Ludlow argues (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Peter Abelard (1971). Peter Abelard's Ethics. Oxford,Clarendon Press.score: 12.0
    A penetrating and historically important critique of medieval moral thought.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Matti Eklund (2002). Peter Van Inwagen on Material Beings. Ratio 15 (3):245–256.score: 12.0
    Peter van Inwagen's book Material Beings is centered on the special composition question: the question of when some simples constitute a complex object. Van Inwagen's answer to this question is that simples only constitute a complex object when they constitute an organism. I argue that van Inwagen's reasoning in favor of this conclusion is unconvincing, and also that the significance of the special composition question itself is doubtful.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. W. Michael Hoffman & Jennifer Mills Moore (1982). What is Business Ethics? A Reply to Peter Drucker. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):293 - 300.score: 12.0
    In his What is Business Ethics? Peter Drucker accuses business ethics of singling out business unfairly for special ethical treatment, of subordinating ethical to political concerns, and of being, not ethics at all, but ethical chic. We contend that Drucker's denunciation of business ethics rests upon a fundamental misunderstanding of the field. This article is a response to his charges and an effort to clarify the nature, scope and purpose of business ethics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. John Marenbon (2006). The Rediscovery of Peter Abelard's Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):331-351.score: 12.0
    : My article surveys philosophical discussions of Abelard over the last twenty years. Although Abelard has been a well-known figure for centuries, his most important logical works were published only in the twentieth century and, so I argue, the rediscovery of him as an important philosopher is recent and continuing. I concentrate especially on work that shows Abelard as the re-discoverer of propositional logic (Chris Martin); as a subtle explorer of problems about modality (Simo Knuuttila, Herbert Weidemann) and semantics (Klaus (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Anthony Skelton (2009). Review of Peter Singer The Life You Can Save. [REVIEW] The Globe and Mail: F11.score: 12.0
    This is a review of Peter Singer The Life You Can Save. The author argues that the book is excellent and sees Singer at his best.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Peter Singer, Questions for Peter Singer The New York Times Magazine , December 24, 2006.score: 12.0
    You don't say much about who you are teaching, or what subject you teach, but you do seem to see a need to justify what you are doing. Perhaps you're teaching underprivileged children, opening their minds to possibilities that might otherwise never have occurred to them. Or maybe you're teaching the children of affluent families and opening their eyes to the big moral issues they will face in life — like global poverty, and climate change. If you're doing something like (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Klaas J. Kraay (2013). Peter van Inwagen on Gratuitous Evil. Religious Studies:1-18.score: 12.0
    Defenders and critics of the evidential argument from evil typically agree that if theism is true, no gratuitous evil occurs. But Peter van Inwagen has challenged this orthodoxy by urging that for all we know, given God's goals, it is impossible for God to prevent all gratuitous evil, in which case God is not required do so. If van Inwagen is right, the evidential argument from evil fails. After setting out this striking and innovative move, I examine three responses (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000