Search results for 'Peter Nigel Jones' (try it on Scholar)

994 found
Sort by:
  1. Peter Nigel Jones (2010). Toleration and Recognition: What Should We Teach? Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):38-56.score: 870.0
    Generally we think it good to tolerate and to accord recognition. Yet both are complex phenomena and our teaching must acknowledge and cope with that complexity. We tolerate only what we object to, so our message to students cannot be simply, 'promote the good and prevent the bad'. Much advocacy of toleration is not what it pretends to be. Nor is it entirely clear what sort of conduct should count as intolerant. Sometimes people are at fault for tolerating what they (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Jones (1991). Parry's Papers Adam M. Parry: The Language of Achilles and Other Papers, with a Foreword by P. H. J. Lloyd-Jones. Pp. Xiv + 334. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. £35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):213-214.score: 540.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Peter Dear, Ian Hacking, Matthew L. Jones, Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison (2012). Objectivity in Historical Perspective. Metascience 21 (1):11-39.score: 480.0
    Objectivity in historical perspective Content Type Journal Article Category Book Symposium Pages 11-39 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9597-2 Authors Peter Dear, Department of History, Cornell University, 435 McGraw Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Ian Hacking, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, 170 St. George St., Toronto, ON M5R 2M8, Canada Matthew L. Jones, Department of History, Columbia University, 514 Fayerweather Hall, 1180 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA Lorraine Daston, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Jones (2012). Legalising Toleration: A Reply to Balint. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (3):265-270.score: 480.0
    Abstract I re-present my account of how a liberal democratic society can be tolerant and do so in a way designed to meet Peter Balint’s objections. In particular, I explain how toleration can be approached from a third-party perspective, which is that of neither tolerator nor tolerated but of rule-makers providing for the toleration that the citizens of a society are to extend to one another. Constructing a regime of toleration should not be confused with engaging in toleration. Negative (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Will Bynoe & Nicholas K. Jones (2013). Solitude Without Souls: Why Peter Unger Hasn't Established Substance Dualism. [REVIEW] Philosophia 41 (1):109-125.score: 360.0
    Unger has recently argued that if you are the only thinking and experiencing subject in your chair, then you are not a material object. This leads Unger to endorse a version of Substance Dualism according to which we are immaterial souls. This paper argues that this is an overreaction. We argue that the specifically Dualist elements of Unger’s view play no role in his response to the problem; only the view’s structure is required, and that is available to Unger’s opponents. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lowanne E. Jones (1985). Rolande J. Graves, Flamenca: Variations Sur les Thèmes de l'Amour Courtois. (American University Studies, Ser. 2: Romance Languages and Literature, 5.) New York, Frankfurt Am Main, and Bern: Peter Lang, 1983. Paper. Pp. Vi, 206. SFr 39. [REVIEW] Speculum 60 (4):984-985.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Albert Jones (2013). Book Review: Charles C. Camosy, Peter Singer and Christian Ethics: Beyond Polarization. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):227-230.score: 360.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Anna Trumbore Jones (2005). Thomas Gergen, Pratique Juridique de la Paix Et Trêve de Dieu à Partir du Concile de Charroux (989–1250)/Juristische Praxis der Pax Und Treuga Dei Ausgehend Vom Konzil von Charroux (989–1250). (Rechtshistorische Reihe, 285.) Frankfurt Am Main: Peter Lang, 2003. Paper. Pp. 264; Black-and-White Figures, 1 Table, and 1 Map. $42.95. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (4):1285-1286.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gary M. Lovett, Lynn M. Christenson, Peter M. Groffman, Clive G. Jones, Julie E. Hart & Myron J. Mitchell (2002). Insect Defoliation and Nitrogen Cycling in Forests. BioScience 52 (4):335.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Joshua A. Ramey, Peter T. Dunlap, Raya A. Jones & Antonina Lukenchuk (2010). Notes on Contributorsepat_665 123.. 124. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (1).score: 280.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gary M. Lovett, Lynn M. Christenson, Peter M. Groffman, Clive G. Jones, Julie E. Hart & Myron J. Mitchell (2002). Insect Defoliation and Nitrogen Cycling in Forests Laboratory, Plot, and Watershed Studies Indicate That Most of the Nitrogen Released From Forest Foliage as a Result of Defoliation by Insects is Redistributed Within the Ecosystem, Whereas Only a Small Fraction of Nitrogen is Lost by Leaching. BioScience 52 (4):335-341.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Vincent-Jones Peter (2000). Contractual Governance: Institutional and Organizational Analysis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (3).score: 280.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter G. Jones (2009). From Metaphysics to Mysticism. Dissertation, Pathways School of Philosophyscore: 240.0
    Mysticism claims of its logical scheme that it is Euclidean, that from its first axiom or principle the remainder of its doctrine follows, but it makes this claim in so many languages and in such a variety of obscure and self-contradictory ways that it is difficult to discern how this could be possible, and it is rarely considered a plausible claim in metaphysics. I believe it is plausible, and in this essay I try to explain why. -/- .
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter Jones (1979). Atheism and the Rejection of God: Contemporary Philosophy and The Brothers Karamazov (Review). Philosophy and Literature 3 (1):121-122.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Peter G. Jones (2012). Is Metaphysics a Waste of Time? Philosophy Pathways (171).score: 240.0
    The view that metaphysics is a waste of time appears to be gaining in popularity with every passing day. It is held openly by many scientists and even by many philosophers. I argue here that this is a consequence of the way metaphysics is often done, the futility of a certain approach to it, and not a reason to suppose that there is no useful knowledge to be acquired in metaphysics.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter G. Jones, The Metaphysics of Consciousness.score: 240.0
    Some time ago, in an article for the Journal of Consciousness Studies, David Chalmers challenged his peers to identify the ingredient missing from our current theories of consciousness, the absence of which prevents us from solving the 'hard' problem and forces us to make do with nonreductive theories. Here I respond to this challenge. I suggest that consciousness is a metaphysical problem and as such can be solved only within a global metaphysical theory. Such a theory would look very like (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Peter Jones (1994). Bearing the Consequences of Belief. Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (1):24–43.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter Smith & O. R. Jones (1986). The Philosophy of Mind: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    This is a straightforward, elementary textbook for beginning students of philosophy. The general aim is to provide a clear introduction to the main issues arising in the philosophy of mind. Part I discusses the Cartesian dualist view which many find initially appealing, and contains a careful examination of arguments for and against. Part II introduces the broadly functionalist type of physicalism which has Aristotelian roots. This approach is developed to yield accounts of perception, action, belief and desire, and the emerging (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Peter Jones (2006). Equality, Recognition and Difference. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (1):23-46.score: 240.0
    In recent years there has been much debate over whether recognition has displaced, or should displace, redistribution as the pre?eminent concern of contemporary politics. That debate is not about whether we should continue to pursue an egalitarian ideal, since equality is as much a goal for the politics of recognition as it is for the politics of redistribution. In this essay, I address only issues of recognition and ask what kind of equal recognition we can reasonably demand or pursue. I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Peter E. Jones (1994). Evald Ilyenkov and the History of Marxism in the USSR. History of the Human Sciences 7 (4):105-118.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Peter Jones (2012). Toleration, Religion and Accommodation. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3).score: 240.0
    Issues of religious toleration might be thought dead and advocacy of religious toleration a pointless exercise in preaching to the converted, at least in most contemporary European societies. This paper challenges that view. It does so principally by focusing on issues of religious accommodation as these arise in contemporary multi-faith societies. Drawing on the cases of exemption, Article 9 of the ECHR, and law governing indirect religious discrimination, it argues that issues and instances of accommodation are issues and instances of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peter Jones (2004). Introduction: Law and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):319-336.score: 240.0
    This essay considers some major questions raised by civil and other forms of conscientious disobedience. What distinguishes that form of dissent? Can we recognise the legitimacy of a political system yet defy its laws? Is disobeying a democratic decision especially or entirely unacceptable, or can disobedience be an instrument of democracy? If a regime recognises rights, how should we regard disobedience that appeals to those rights in challenging the regimes laws? How should reasons for obedience figure in our thinking about (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Peter Jones (2011). Introduction: Religion and Freedom of Expression. Res Publica 17 (1):1-6.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter Jones (2011). Religious Belief and Freedom of Expression: Is Offensiveness Really the Issue? Res Publica 17 (1):75-90.score: 240.0
    An objection frequently brought against critical or satirical expressions, especially when these target religions, is that they are ‘offensive’. In this article, I indicate why the existence of diverse and conflicting beliefs gives people an incentive to formulate their complaints in the language of offence. But I also cast doubt on whether people, in saying they are offended really mean to present that as the foundation of their complaint and, if they do, whether their complaint should weigh with us. These (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter Jones (2006). Toleration, Recognition and Identity. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (2):123–143.score: 240.0
  26. Jan-Erik Jones (2012). Review of John Locke and Natural Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2012.score: 240.0
    This is a review of Peter Anstey's John Locke and Natural Philosophy, which is a masterful and well-argued study of Locke's philosophy of science that shall become both the standard and starting place, for scholars and students alike, for decades to come. Anstey's meticulous and thorough research, combined with his comprehensive knowledge of the history of natural philosophy, make this work a must-read for all who are interested in Locke, early modern philosophy, the history of the philosophy of science, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Peter Jones (2004). Discourse and the Materialist Conception of History: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis. Historical Materialism 12 (1):97-125.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter G. Jones (2014). The Continuum East and West. Philosophy Pathways (185).score: 240.0
    We often speak of 'Eastern' and 'Western' philosophy, yet it is not always easy to distinguish the key factors that justify this distinction. This essay explores the very different conceptions of the continuum that underlie these two traditions of thought and knowledge. The views of Hermann Weyl are given and it is proposed that they are correct. Attention is drawn to the mutually-exclusive visions of the continuum that separate the philosophies of East and West, and that give us a way (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mark Peter Jones (1996). Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions. Sociological Theory 14 (3):290-309.score: 240.0
    With his recent introduction of `posthumanism, " a decentered variant of constructivist sociology of science, Andrew Pickering advertises novel conceptual resources for social theorists. In fact, he tenders nothing less than a fundamental reordering of social thought. By invoking the concept of "material agency, " Pickering seeks to redefine the relationship between "Nature" and "Society," while dismissing the "humanist bias" inherent in sociological inquiry. However, for all its ambition and good intentions, posthumanism delivers only analytical inconsistencies, the consequences of an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Werner Menski, Carl Olson, William Cenkner, Anne E. Monius, Sarah Hodges, Jeffrey J. Kripal, Carol Salomon, Deepak Sarma, William Cenkner, John E. Cort, Peter A. Huff, Joseph A. Bracken, Larry D. Shinn, Jonathan S. Walters, Ellison Banks Findly, John Grimes, Loriliai Biernacki, David L. Gosling, Thomas Forsthoefel, Michael H. Fisher, Ian Barrow, Srimati Basu, Natalie Gummer, Pradip Bhattacharya, John Grimes, Heather T. Frazer, Elaine Craddock, Andrea Pinkney, Joseph Schaller, Michael W. Myers, Lise F. Vail, Wayne Howard, Bradley B. Burroughs, Shalva Weil, Joseph A. Bracken, Christopher W. Gowans, Dan Cozort, Katherine Janiec Jones, Carl Olson, M. D. McLean, A. Whitney Sanford, Sarah Lamb, Eliza F. Kent, Ashley Dawson, Amir Hussain, John Powers, Jennifer B. Saunders & Ramdas Lamb (2005). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 9 (1-3):153-228.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Peter Jones (2006). Toleration, Value‐Pluralism, and the Fact of Pluralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):189-210.score: 240.0
    (2006). Toleration, Value‐pluralism, and the Fact of Pluralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: Vol. 9, The Political Theory of John Gray, pp. 189-210.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Roger Scruton & Peter Jones (1982). Laughter. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 56:197 - 228.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Peter Jones (1976). Hume's Aesthetics Reassessed. Philosophical Quarterly 26 (102):48-62.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peter Jones (1970). Doubts About "Prima Facie" Duties. Philosophy 45 (171):39 - 54.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter Jones (2003). An Historical Survey of the Subject of Beauty and the Literature on the Subject. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):203-205.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Peter Jones (2000). Human Rights and Diverse Cultures: Continuity or Discontinuity? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1):27-50.score: 240.0
  37. Peter Jones (1992). Neil MacCormick and Zenon Bankowski, Ed., Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution: Essays in Legal and Social Philosophy, Aberdeen, Aberdeen University Press, 1989, Pp. 396. Utilitas 4 (01):173-.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Peter Jones (1974). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 14 (1):468-475.score: 240.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Peter Jones (2008). Hume's Great Treatise. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):421 – 429.score: 240.0
  40. Peter Jones (1969). Understanding a Work of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (2):128-144.score: 240.0
    Two distinct senses of 'understanding', Neither implying that works of art have meaning, Or communicate: (1) 'cognitive', Referring to knowledge of character of work; (2) 'phenomenal', Parasitic on (1), Referring to what a viewer takes work to be, Or sees it as. Individuation and characterization of works is settled by contingent agreement. Understanding a work shares features with understanding persons, And arguments. It is an achievement concept, Partly passive, Partly active, Whose nature is unknown in advance. Critics create conventions for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter Jones & Simon Caney (2003). Introduction: Disagreement and Difference. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (3):1-11.score: 240.0
  42. Peter Jones (2008). A Marxist Philosophy of Language. By Jean-Jacques Lecercle. Translated by Gregory Elliott. Leiden: Brill. Historical Materialism Series Volume 12, 2006. [REVIEW] Journal of Critical Realism 7 (1):148-153.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter Jones (1971). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 11 (2):197-199.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Peter Jones (1998). Political Theory and Cultural Diversity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):28-62.score: 240.0
    How should we deal with social diversity if we conceive it as cultural diversity? Appeals to cultural relativism and to the collective good of diversity provide inadequate answers. Taking cultural diversity seriously requires that we respond to it fairly or justly and that, in turn, requires an approach that is impartial (or neutral) amongst cultures. Claims of impartiality are often thought peculiarly implausible when applied to cultural diversity, but an impartialist approach is in fact peculiarly appropriate to that form of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. P. F. Strawson, W. B. Gallie, Geoffrey Hunter, C. D. Rollins, Peter Winch, J. M. Hinton, W. H. Walsh, J. H. S. Armstrong & O. R. Jones (1960). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 69 (275):416-432.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Jones (1986). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (3):468-475.score: 240.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Peter Jones (2004). Early Responses to Hume. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):151 – 158.score: 240.0
  48. Peter Jones (1978). Hume on Art, Criticism and Language: Debts and Premises. Philosophical Studies 33 (2):109 - 134.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Peter Jones (ed.) (2005). The Reception of David Hume in Europe. Thoemmes Continuum.score: 240.0
    Printbegrænsninger: Der kan printes 10 sider ad gangen og max. 40 sider pr. session.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Peter Jones (2012). Women's Rights as Multicultural Claims: Reconfiguring Gender and Diversity in Political Philosophy. Contemporary Political Theory 11 (1):e5 - e7.score: 240.0
1 — 50 / 994