Search results for 'Peter Nigel Jones' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  33
    Peter Nigel Jones (2010). Toleration and Recognition: What Should We Teach? Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):38-56.
    Generally we think it good to tolerate and to accord recognition. Yet both are complex phenomena and our teaching must acknowledge and cope with that complexity. We tolerate only what we object to, so our message to students cannot be simply, 'promote the good and prevent the bad'. Much advocacy of toleration is not what it pretends to be. Nor is it entirely clear what sort of conduct should count as intolerant. Sometimes people are at fault for tolerating what they (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  7
    Peter Jones (1991). Parry's Papers Adam M. Parry: The Language of Achilles and Other Papers, with a Foreword by P. H. J. Lloyd-Jones. Pp. Xiv + 334. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. £35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):213-214.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  18
    Peter Jones (2012). Legalising Toleration: A Reply to Balint. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (3):265-270.
    Abstract I re-present my account of how a liberal democratic society can be tolerant and do so in a way designed to meet Peter Balint’s objections. In particular, I explain how toleration can be approached from a third-party perspective, which is that of neither tolerator nor tolerated but of rule-makers providing for the toleration that the citizens of a society are to extend to one another. Constructing a regime of toleration should not be confused with engaging in toleration. Negative (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. Peter Dear, Ian Hacking, Matthew L. Jones, Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison (2012). Objectivity in Historical Perspective. Metascience 21 (1):11-39.
    Objectivity in historical perspective Content Type Journal Article Category Book Symposium Pages 11-39 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9597-2 Authors Peter Dear, Department of History, Cornell University, 435 McGraw Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Ian Hacking, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, 170 St. George St., Toronto, ON M5R 2M8, Canada Matthew L. Jones, Department of History, Columbia University, 514 Fayerweather Hall, 1180 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA Lorraine Daston, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Will Bynoe & Nicholas K. Jones (2013). Solitude Without Souls: Why Peter Unger Hasn't Established Substance Dualism. Philosophia 41 (1):109-125.
    Unger has recently argued that if you are the only thinking and experiencing subject in your chair, then you are not a material object. This leads Unger to endorse a version of Substance Dualism according to which we are immaterial souls. This paper argues that this is an overreaction. We argue that the specifically Dualist elements of Unger’s view play no role in his response to the problem; only the view’s structure is required, and that is available to Unger’s opponents. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. David Albert Jones (2013). Book Review: Charles C. Camosy, Peter Singer and Christian Ethics: Beyond Polarization. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):227-230.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  7
    Anna Trumbore Jones (2005). Thomas Gergen, Pratique Juridique de la Paix Et Trêve de Dieu À Partir du Concile de Charroux (989–1250)/Juristische Praxis der Pax Und Treuga Dei Ausgehend Vom Konzil von Charroux (989–1250). (Rechtshistorische Reihe, 285.) Frankfurt Am Main: Peter Lang, 2003. Paper. Pp. 264; Black-and-White Figures, 1 Table, and 1 Map. $42.95. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (4):1285-1286.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Lowanne E. Jones (1985). Rolande J. Graves, Flamenca: Variations Sur les Thèmes de l'Amour Courtois. (American University Studies, Ser. 2: Romance Languages and Literature, 5.) New York, Frankfurt Am Main, and Bern: Peter Lang, 1983. Paper. Pp. Vi, 206. SFr 39. [REVIEW] Speculum 60 (4):984-985.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  10
    Thomas T. Hills, Peter M. Todd & Michael N. Jones (2015). Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory. Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (3):513-534.
    When searching for concepts in memory—as in the verbal fluency task of naming all the animals one can think of—people appear to explore internal mental representations in much the same way that animals forage in physical space: searching locally within patches of information before transitioning globally between patches. However, the definition of the patches being searched in mental space is not well specified. Do we search by activating explicit predefined categories and recall items from within that category, or do we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  1
    Joshua A. Ramey, Peter T. Dunlap, Raya A. Jones & Antonina Lukenchuk (2010). Notes on Contributorsepat_665 123.. 124. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Vincent-Jones Peter (2000). Contractual Governance: Institutional and Organizational Analysis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  23
    Angela Woods, Nev Jones, Marco Bernini, Felicity Callard, Ben Alderson-Day, Johanna Badcock, Vaughn Bell, Chris Cook, Thomas Csordas, Clara Humpston, Joel Krueger, Frank Laroi, Simon McCarthy-Jones, Peter Moseley, Hilary Powell & Andrea Raballo (2014). Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Phenomenology of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40:S246-S254.
    Despite the recent proliferation of scientific, clinical, and narrative accounts of auditory verbal hallucinations, the phenomenology of voice hearing remains opaque and undertheorized. In this article, we outline an interdisciplinary approach to understanding hallucinatory experiences which seeks to demonstrate the value of the humanities and social sciences to advancing knowledge in clinical research and practice. We argue that an interdisciplinary approach to the phenomenology of AVH utilizes rigorous and context-appropriate methodologies to analyze a wider range of first-person accounts of AVH (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13. Peter Jones (1979). Atheism and the Rejection of God: Contemporary Philosophy and The Brothers Karamazov (Review). Philosophy and Literature 3 (1):121-122.
  14.  45
    Peter G. Jones, Solving Metaphysics Part I - Metaphysics in a Nutshell: A Lazy Philosopher's Guide.
    This essay proposes that metaphysics is best done as lazily as possible, and that a lazy approach, which some would call 'high level', is effective where it means that issues are simplified and unpleasant facts are faced with no wriggling on the hook. It sketches out the solution proposed by Buddhism or more generally mysticism. It suggest that the principle obstacle to a solution for metaphysics is Russell's Paradox, and that it can be overcome.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  33
    Peter Jones (2006). Toleration, Recognition and Identity. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (2):123–143.
  16.  82
    Peter G. Jones, Solving Metaphysics Part II - Do We Regularly Make a Mistake in Metaphysics?
    We should cherish metaphysics for its power to overcome false views and yet we admonish it for its ongoing failure. Is it possible that this is for the embarrassingly simple reason that we usually ignore Aristotle’s definition for a legitimate contradictory pair?
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Peter G. Jones (2012). Is Metaphysics a Waste of Time? Philosophy Pathways (171).
    The view that metaphysics is a waste of time appears to be gaining in popularity with every passing day. It is held openly by many scientists and even by many philosophers. I argue here that this is a consequence of the way metaphysics is often done, the futility of a certain approach to it, and not a reason to suppose that there is no useful knowledge to be acquired in metaphysics.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Peter E. Jones (1994). Evald Ilyenkov and the History of Marxism in the USSR. History of the Human Sciences 7 (4):105-118.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Peter G. Jones, The Metaphysics of Consciousness.
    Some time ago, in an article for the Journal of Consciousness Studies, David Chalmers challenged his peers to identify the ingredient missing from our current theories of consciousness, the absence of which prevents us from solving the 'hard' problem and forces us to make do with nonreductive theories. Here I respond to this challenge. I suggest that consciousness is a metaphysical problem and as such can be solved only within a global metaphysical theory. Such a theory would look very like (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  43
    Peter Jones (2015). Toleration, Religion and Accommodation. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):542-563.
    Issues of religious toleration might be thought dead and advocacy of religious toleration a pointless exercise in preaching to the converted, at least in most contemporary European societies. This paper challenges that view. It does so principally by focusing on issues of religious accommodation as these arise in contemporary multi-faith societies. Drawing on the cases of exemption, Article 9 of the ECHR, and law governing indirect religious discrimination, it argues that issues and instances of accommodation are issues and instances of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  55
    Peter G. Jones, The Case of the Missing Ingredient.
    As a fan of Sherlock Holmes from a young age it occurred to me recently to wonder what the great detective would have made of the 'hard' problem of consciousness. Here is one possible scenario.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  77
    Peter G. Jones (2014). The Continuum East and West. Philosophy Pathways (185).
    We often speak of 'Eastern' and 'Western' philosophy, yet it is not always easy to distinguish the key factors that justify this distinction. This essay explores the very different conceptions of the continuum that underlie these two traditions of thought and knowledge. The views of Hermann Weyl are given and it is proposed that they are correct. Attention is drawn to the mutually-exclusive visions of the continuum that separate the philosophies of East and West, and that give us a way (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  76
    Peter Jones (1994). Bearing the Consequences of Belief. Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (1):24–43.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  24.  36
    Peter Jones (2006). Equality, Recognition and Difference. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (1):23-46.
    In recent years there has been much debate over whether recognition has displaced, or should displace, redistribution as the pre?eminent concern of contemporary politics. That debate is not about whether we should continue to pursue an egalitarian ideal, since equality is as much a goal for the politics of recognition as it is for the politics of redistribution. In this essay, I address only issues of recognition and ask what kind of equal recognition we can reasonably demand or pursue. I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  16
    Peter Jones (2000). Human Rights and Diverse Cultures: Continuity or Discontinuity? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1):27-50.
  26.  7
    Peter Jones (2012). The Value and Limits of Rights: A Reply. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):495-516.
    I reply to each of the contributions in this issue. I agree with much that Hillel Steiner argues, especially his insistence that the associated ideas of impartiality and discontinuity are crucial to dealing satisfactorily with a diversity of competing claims. I am, however, less willing to conceive provision for that diversity as the role, rather than a role, that we should ascribe to rights. I question the success of David Miller?s endeavour to provide a unified justification of human rights grounded (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  17
    Peter Jones (2004). The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Hume Studies 30 (2):416-418.
  28. Peter Jones (1982). Hume's Sentiments Their Ciceronian and French Context. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  29.  7
    Peter Jones (2015). Dignity, Hate and Harm. [REVIEW] Political Theory 43 (5):678-686.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  2
    Ruyu Hung, Edward Comstock, Peter Rule, Jim Mackenzie, Constance Ellwood, Sharon Jessop & Adrian Jones (2011). Notes on Contributorsepat_820 1012. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (9).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  13
    Peter Jones (1998). Political Theory and Cultural Diversity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):28-62.
    How should we deal with social diversity if we conceive it as cultural diversity? Appeals to cultural relativism and to the collective good of diversity provide inadequate answers. Taking cultural diversity seriously requires that we respond to it fairly or justly and that, in turn, requires an approach that is impartial (or neutral) amongst cultures. Claims of impartiality are often thought peculiarly implausible when applied to cultural diversity, but an impartialist approach is in fact peculiarly appropriate to that form of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32.  5
    Peter Jones (2009). Breaking Away From Capital? Theorising Activity in the Shadow of Marx. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 11 (1):45-58.
    The paper reflects on the relationship between the understanding of human activity which Marx expresses in Capital and the theoretical model of activity offered by an influential contemporary variant of Activity Theory. The paper argues that this variant departs significantly from Marx’s conception of human activity and its role in what he calls the ‘labour process’. In particular, Activity Theory has failed to distinguish between the labour process and the valorization process, a distinction which is fundamental to Capital and to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  58
    Peter Smith & O. R. Jones (1986). The Philosophy of Mind: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    This is a straightforward, elementary textbook for beginning students of philosophy. The general aim is to provide a clear introduction to the main issues arising in the philosophy of mind. Part I discusses the Cartesian dualist view which many find initially appealing, and contains a careful examination of arguments for and against. Part II introduces the broadly functionalist type of physicalism which has Aristotelian roots. This approach is developed to yield accounts of perception, action, belief and desire, and the emerging (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34.  41
    Peter Jones (2004). Introduction: Law and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):319-336.
    This essay considers some major questions raised by civil and other forms of conscientious disobedience. What distinguishes that form of dissent? Can we recognise the legitimacy of a political system yet defy its laws? Is disobeying a democratic decision especially or entirely unacceptable, or can disobedience be an instrument of democracy? If a regime recognises rights, how should we regard disobedience that appeals to those rights in challenging the regimes laws? How should reasons for obedience figure in our thinking about (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  20
    Peter Jones (1971). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 11 (2):197-199.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Barrie Axford, Adrian Blau, Virginia Boon, Wallace Brown, Luis Cabrera, Tom Campbell, Karin Fierke, Simon Glaze, Peter Jones & Markus Kornprobst (2009). First Page Preview. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  18
    Peter Jones (2006). Toleration, Value‐Pluralism, and the Fact of Pluralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):189-210.
    (2006). Toleration, Value‐pluralism, and the Fact of Pluralism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: Vol. 9, The Political Theory of John Gray, pp. 189-210.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  19
    Peter Jones (1976). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (1):468-475.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  19
    Peter Jones (1986). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (3):468-475.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Peter Jones (2009). Hume on the Arts and "the Standard of Taste" : Texts and Contexts. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press 414--446.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  28
    Mark Peter Jones (1996). Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions. Sociological Theory 14 (3):290-309.
    With his recent introduction of `posthumanism, " a decentered variant of constructivist sociology of science, Andrew Pickering advertises novel conceptual resources for social theorists. In fact, he tenders nothing less than a fundamental reordering of social thought. By invoking the concept of "material agency, " Pickering seeks to redefine the relationship between "Nature" and "Society," while dismissing the "humanist bias" inherent in sociological inquiry. However, for all its ambition and good intentions, posthumanism delivers only analytical inconsistencies, the consequences of an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  15
    Peter Jones (forthcoming). Accommodating Religion and Shifting Burdens. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-22.
    With some qualifications, this article endorses Brian Leiter’s argument that religious accommodation should not shift burdens from believers to non-believers. It argues that religious believers should take responsibility for their beliefs and for meeting the demands of their beliefs. It then examines the implications of that argument for British law on indirect discrimination (disparate impact) as it relates to religion or belief: burden-shifting from believers to employers and providers of goods and services should be deemed acceptable only insofar as the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Peter Jones, Group Rights. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  45
    Peter Jones (2011). Religious Belief and Freedom of Expression: Is Offensiveness Really the Issue? Res Publica 17 (1):75-90.
    An objection frequently brought against critical or satirical expressions, especially when these target religions, is that they are ‘offensive’. In this article, I indicate why the existence of diverse and conflicting beliefs gives people an incentive to formulate their complaints in the language of offence. But I also cast doubt on whether people, in saying they are offended really mean to present that as the foundation of their complaint and, if they do, whether their complaint should weigh with us. These (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  6
    Peter V. Jones (1986). Iliadic Studies. The Classical Review 36 (01):4-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    Peter Jones (1965). Theological Explanation. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 62 (11):287-292.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  37
    Peter Jones (1971). Works of Art and Their Availability-for-Use. British Journal of Aesthetics 11 (2):115-122.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  14
    Peter Jones (2012). Women's Rights as Multicultural Claims: Reconfiguring Gender and Diversity in Political Philosophy. Contemporary Political Theory 11 (1):e5 - e7.
  49.  7
    Peter Jones & Simon Caney (2000). Introduction. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1):1-6.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  25
    Roger Scruton & Peter Jones (1982). Laughter. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 56:197 - 228.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000