7 found
Sort by:
  1. Peter Tramel (2011). Reviews The Nature and Value of Knowledge. By Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar, and Adrian Haddock. Oxford University Press, 2010 288 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-958626-4. Hb £37. [REVIEW] Philosophy 86 (04):618-623.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Tramel (2010). Review of Dan Goldstick, Reason, Truth, and Reality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (1).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Peter Tramel (2008). Haack's Foundherentism is a Foundationalism. Synthese 160 (2):215 - 228.
    Susan Haack has always maintained that her unquestionably important foundherentist theory of epistemic justification is not a foundationalism. In a 1997 Synthese exchange, Laurence BonJour questioned her right to this claim, and she dug in and defended it. What was at stake is of timeless importance to epistemology: it goes directly to the question, “What is foundationalism?” I inquire with greater care than either Haack or BonJour took in 1997, and I find decisively in favor of the view that foundherentism (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Tramel (2008). Review of Hans Bernhard Schmid, Katinka Schulte-Ostermann, Nikos Psarros (Eds.), Concepts of Sharedness: Essays on Collective Intentionality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter Tramel (2007). Review of Larry May, War Crimes and Just War. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (10).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter Tramel, Moral Epistemology. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter Tramel (2001). Towards Reflectionist Intuitionism in Moral Epistemology. Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    Essential to moral epistemic intuitionism of the sort proposed by W. D. Ross in the 1930s is the claim that there are self-evident moral propositions that we can be justified in believing solely on the basis of understanding them. Recently, intuitionism in this sense is enjoying something of a renaissance. It is receiving considerable sympathetic attention from such prominent ethicists as Robert Audi, Jonathan Dancy, Brad Hooker, and David McNaughton. ;Of particular interest, I think, is Audi's claim that the most (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation