Search results for 'Phenomenalism' (try it on Scholar)

263 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Denis Fisette (2012). Phenomenology and Phenomenalism: Ernst Mach and the Genesis of Husserl's Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):53-74.score: 18.0
    How do we reconcile Husserl’s repeated criticism of Mach’s phenomenalism almost everywhere in his work with the leading role that Husserl seems to attribute to Mach in the genesis of his own phenomenology? To answer this question, we shall examine, first, the narrow relation that Husserl establishes between his phenomenological method and Mach’s descriptivism. Second, we shall examine two aspects of Husserl’s criticism of Mach: the first concerns phenomenalism and Mach’s doctrine of elements, while the second concerns the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Lauer (2009). Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism. Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.score: 18.0
    In this paper, I offer a detailed critical reading of Robert Brandom’s project to give an expressive bootstrapping account of intentionality, cashed out as a normative-phenomenalist account of what I will call genuine normativity. I claim that there is a reading of Making It Explicit that evades the predominant charges of either reductionism or circularity. However, making sense of Brandom’s book in the way proposed here involves correcting Brandom’s own general account of what he is doing in it, and thus (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James Giles (1994). A Study in Phenomenalism. Aalborg University.score: 18.0
    Phenomenalism is a philosophical theory of perception involving the idea that statements about material objects can be explained in terms of statements about actual and possible sense experiences. In this study James Giles explores the development of phenomenalism through the works of Locke, Berkeley, Hume, and others. He shows how problems occur for phenomenalists precisely at the point where they abandon their empiricism. Holding to empiricism, Giles then presents his own version of phenomenalism as a metaphysical thesis (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Pietro Gori (2012). Nietzsche as Phenomenalist? In Marco Brusotti, Günter Abel & Helmut Heit (eds.), Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie. deGruyter.score: 16.0
    During the second decade of the 20th century Hans Kleinpeter, an Austrian scholar devoted to the development of the modern science, published some brief papers on Nietzsche’s thought. Kleinpeter has been one of the main upholders of Mach’s epistemology and probably the first who connected his ideas with the philosophy of Nietzsche. In his book on Der Phänomenalismus (1913) he described a new world view that arose in the 19th century, a perspective that ‒ according to him ‒ completely contrasted (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ronald Loeffler (2005). Normative Phenomenalism: On Robert Brandom's Practice-Based Explanation of Meaning. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):32-69.score: 15.0
  6. John Bolender (1998). Factual Phenomenalism: A Supervenience Theory. Sorites 9 (9):16-31.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Colin McGinn (1980). Functionalism and Phenomenalism: A Critical Note. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (March):35-46.score: 15.0
  8. Robert A. Oakes (1977). An Illusion About Phenomenalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):201-206.score: 15.0
  9. Ran Lahav (1990). An Alternative to the Adverbial Theory: Dis-Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (3):553-568.score: 15.0
  10. E. Barkin (2003). Relative Phenomenalism - Toward a More Plausible Theory of Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (8):3-13.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jacques Morizot (2012). Phenomenalism in Epistemology and Physicalism in Aesthetics. Principia 15 (3):439-452.score: 15.0
    O ponto de partida deste artigo é a observação intrigante de que Goodman defendeu um ponto de vista fenomenalista em suas obras epistemológicas, e fenomenalista em suas obras sobre estética. Na verdade, seria certamente mais preciso dizer que seu foco era antifisicalista em epistemologia e antifenomenalista na estética. De qualquer maneira, a maioria dos interpretadores teria, espontaneamente, esperado a escolha oposta, de fato mais consistente com as posições tomadas pelos representantes dessas áreas. Contudo, a estratégia de Goodman não é arbitrária, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Harmen Ghijsen (2014). Phenomenalist Dogmatist Experientialism and the Distinctiveness Problem. Synthese 191 (7):1549-1566.score: 12.0
    Phenomenalist dogmatist experientialism (PDE) holds the following thesis: if $S$ has a perceptual experience that $p$ , then $S$ has immediate prima facie evidential justification for the belief that $p$ in virtue of the experience’s phenomenology. The benefits of PDE are that it (a) provides an undemanding view of perceptual justification that allows most of our ordinary perceptual beliefs to be justified, and (b) accommodates two important internalist intuitions, viz. the New Evil Demon Intuition and the Blindsight Intuition. However, in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Byeong D. Lee (2008). A Pragmatic Phenomenalist Account of Knowledge. Dialogue 47 (3-4):565-.score: 12.0
    ABSTRACT: Robert Brandom argues for a "pragmatic phenomenalist account" of knowledge. On this account, we should understand our notion of justification in accordance will a Sellarsian social practice model, and there is nothing more to the phenomenon of knowledge than the proprieties of takings-as-knowing. I agree with these two claims. But Brandom's proposal is so sketchy that it is unclear how it can deal will a number of much-discussed problems in contemporary epistemology. The main purpose of this article is to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Andoni Ibarra & Ekai Txapartegi (2004). Color y Qualia. Ni Representacionismo Ni Fenomenismo (Color and Qualia: Neither Representationalism nor Phenomenalism). Crítica 36 (106):29 - 54.score: 12.0
    El debate entre representacionistas y fenomenistas acerca del realismo de los qualia parece no avanzar. Este artículo defiende una solución que no es ni representacionista ni fenomenista. En contra de los representacionistas mantenemos que no todo contenido perceptual es reducible a su contenido representacional. En contra de los fenomenistas sostenemos que todo contenido perceptual es contenido intencional. Negamos así la existencia de los qualia, de aquellos, al menos, caracterizados de manera más estándar. Finalmente, mostramos que nuestra propuesta --situada entre el (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. E. D. Klemke (1960). Universals and Particulars in a Phenomenalist Ontology. Philosophy of Science 27 (3):254-261.score: 12.0
    A phenomenalist philosophy which employs the Principle of Acquaintance (PA) plus the Principle that what exists are the referents of certain meaningful terms, defined by PA, cannot include either universals or particulars in its ontology, but is limited to instances of universals as constituting the range of ontological existents. Universals must be omitted since they are repeatable and, hence, never wholly presented or contained, whereas the objects of direct acquaintance are wholly and exhaustively presented. Furthermore, no entities beyond characters (qualities (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robert L. Greenwood (1985). C.I. Lewis and the Issue of Phenomenalism. Philosophy Research Archives 11:441-452.score: 12.0
    According to the received view, the philosophy of C.I. Lewis is a form of phenomenalism. The first part of this paper is an argument designed to show that Lewis does not support one of the necessary conditions for ontological phenomenalism; namely, the sense-datum theory. The secondpart is an argument designed to show that Lewis’ theory is incompatible with linguistic phenomenalism, a view according to which there is an equivalence of meaning between physical object statements and sense-data statements. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Pierre le Morvan (2004). Arguments Against Direct Realism and How to Counter Them. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):221-234.score: 9.0
    Since the demise of the Sense-Datum independent objects or events to be objects Theory and Phenomenalism in the last cenof perception; however, unlike Direct Retury, Direct Realism in the philosophy of alists, Indirect Realists take this percepperception has enjoyed a resurgence of tion to be indirect by involving a prior popularity.1 Curiously, however, although awareness of some tertium quid between there have been attempts in the literature the mind and external objects or events.3 to refute some of the arguments (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Panu Raatikainen (2014). Realism: Metaphysical, Scientific, and Semantic. In Kenneth R. Westphal (ed.), Realism, Science, and Pragmatism. Routledge. 139-158.score: 9.0
    Three influential forms of realism are distinguished and interrelated: realism about the external world, construed as a metaphysical doctrine; scientific realism about non-observable entities postulated in science; and semantic realism as defined by Dummett. Metaphysical realism about everyday physical objects is contrasted with idealism and phenomenalism, and several potent arguments against these latter views are reviewed. -/- Three forms of scientific realism are then distinguished: (i) scientific theories and their existence postulates should be taken literally; (ii) the existence of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Steven French & James Ladyman (2003). The Dissolution of Objects: Between Platonism and Phenomenalism. [REVIEW] Synthese 136 (1):73 - 77.score: 9.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. J. J. C. Smart (1963). Philosophy And Scientific Realism. Humanities Press.score: 9.0
    Originally published in 1963. In an introductory chapter the author argues that philosophy ought to be more than the art of clarifying thought and that it should concern itself with outlining a scientifically plausible world view. Early chapters deal with phenomenalism and the reality of theoretical entities, and with the relation between the physical and biological sciences. Free will, issues of time and space and man’s place in nature are covered in later chapters.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. C. I. Lewis (1955). Realism or Phenomenalism? Philosophical Review 64 (2):233-247.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. E. M. Adams (1959). The Inadequacy of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (1):93-102.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Robert Merrihew Adams (1983). Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):217-257.score: 9.0
  24. G. F. Stout, Phenomenalism.score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. H. B. Alexander (1905). Phenomenalism and the Problem of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (7):182-187.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. T. Z. Lavine (1981). C. I. Lewis and the Problem of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):386-395.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Robert Brandom (1988). Pragmatism, Phenomenalism, and Truth Talk. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):75-93.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. A. J. Ayer (1946). Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 47:163 - 196.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Monroe C. Beardsley (1942). Phenomenalism and Determinism. Journal of Philosophy 39 (26):711-717.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. James W. Cornman (1973). Theoretical Phenomenalism. Noûs 7 (2):120-138.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. W. Davis (1962). Berkeley and Phenomenalism. Dialogue 1 (01):67-80.score: 9.0
  32. James van Cleve (1981). C. I. Lewis' Defense of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):325-332.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Archibald A. Bowman (1916). Kant's Phenomenalism in its Relation to Subsequent Metaphysics. Mind 25 (100):461-489.score: 9.0
  34. Stephen Puryear (2012). Motion in Leibniz's Middle Years: A Compatibilist Approach. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:135-170.score: 9.0
    In the texts of the middle years (roughly, the 1680s and 90s), Leibniz appears to endorse two incompatible approaches to motion, one a realist approach, the other a phenomenalist approach. I argue that once we attend to certain nuances in his account we can see that in fact he has only one, coherent approach to motion during this period. I conclude by considering whether the view of motion I want to impute to Leibniz during his middle years ranks as a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. F. H. Bradley (1900). A Defence of Phenomenalism in Psychology. Mind 9 (33):26-45.score: 9.0
  36. John J. Drummond (1980). A Critique of Gurwitsch's “Phenomenological Phenomenalism”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):9-21.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Sandra B. Rosenthal (1980). C. I. Lewis and the Pragmatic Rejection of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):204-215.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Andrew Ward (1973). What's Not Really Wrong with Phenomenalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):245 – 252.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Robert McRae (1948). Phenomenalism and J. S. Mill's Theory of Causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):237-250.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Richard E. Aquila (1975). Kant's Phenomenalism. Idealistic Studies 5 (2):108-126.score: 9.0
  41. John Watting (1963). Phenomenalism Flawed. Inquiry 6 (1-4):196 – 199.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. J. P. McKinney (1959). Phenomenalism: A Survey and Reassessment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):221 – 233.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. C. D. Broad (1914). Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 15:227 - 251.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Nicholas Jolley (1986). Leibniz and Phenomenalism. Studia Leibnitiana 18 (1):38-51.score: 9.0
  45. John Christian Laursen, Richard H. Popkin & Peter Briscoe (1997). Hume in the Prussian Academy: Jean Bernard Mérian's "On the Phenomenalism of David Hume". Hume Studies 23 (1):153-162.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Robert Brown & John Watling (1949). Hypothetical Statements in Phenomenalism. Synthese 8 (1):355 - 366.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Hector Neri Castaneda (1961). Professor Bar-Hillel on Nonformal Implications and Phenomenalism. Philosophical Studies 12 (6):85 - 90.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. F. C. Doan (1905). Phenomenalism in Ethics. Mind 14 (54):221-234.score: 9.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Edward H. Madden & Chandana Chakrabarti (1976). James' 'Pure Experience' Versus Ayer's 'Weak Phenomenalism' Peirce on Man as a Language: A Textual Interpretation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (1):3 - 17.score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Michael J. Maloney (1982). Chisholm's Objection to Phenomenalism. Analysis 42 (1):25 - 26.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 263