14 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Phil Hutchinson (Manchester Metropolitan University)
  1. Gillian Howie, Michael Mcghee, Phil Hutchinson, Michael Loughlin, Richard Shusterman & William Edelglass (2009). Teaching Philosophy. Continuum.
    In the current academic climate, teaching is often seen as secondary to research. Teaching Philosophy seeks to bring teaching philosophy higher on the academic agenda.An international team of contributors, all of whom share the view that philosophy is a subject that can transform students, offers practical guidance and advice for teachers of philosophy. The book suggests ways in which the teaching of philosophy at undergraduate level might be facilitated. Some of the essays place the emphasis on individual self discovery, others (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2.  4
    Phil Hutchinson (2011). The Philosopher's Task: Value‐Based Practice and Bringing to Consciousness Underlying Philosophical Commitments. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):999-1001.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  18
    Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2011). De‐Mystifying Tacit Knowing and Clues: A Comment on Henry Et Al. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):944-947.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Phil Hutchinson (2008). Shame and Philosophy: An Investigation in the Philosophy of Emotions and Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Experimental methods and conceptual confusion : philosophy, science, and what emotions really are -- To 'make our voices resonate' or 'to be silent'? : shame as fundamental ontology -- Emotion, cognition, and world -- Shame and world.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  53
    Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2008). Toward a Perspicuous Presentation of "Perspicuous Presentation". Philosophical Investigations 31 (2):141–160.
    Gordon Baker in his last decade published a series of papers (now collected in Baker 2004), which are revolutionary in their proposals for understanding of later Wittgenstein. Taking our lead from the first of those papers, on "perspicuous presentations," we offer new criticisms of 'elucidatory' readers of later Wittgenstein, such as Peter Hacker: we argue that their readings fail to connect with the radically therapeutic intent of the 'perspicuous presentation' concept, as an achievement-term, rather than a kind of 'objective' mapping (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  64
    Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2006). An Elucidatory Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Critique of Daniel D. Hutto's and Marie McGinn's Reading of Tractatus 6.54. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):1 – 29.
    Much has been written on the relative merits of different readings of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The recent renewal of the debate has almost exclusively been concerned with variants of the ineffabilist (metaphysical) reading of TL-P - notable such readings have been advanced by Elizabeth Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and H. O. Mounce - and the recently advanced variants of therapeutic (resolute) readings - notable advocates of which are James Conant, Cora Diamond, Juliet Floyd and Michael Kremer. During this debate, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  7.  4
    Phil Hutchinson (2007). What's the Point of Elucidation? Metaphilosophy 38 (5):691-713.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8.  13
    Phil Hutchinson (2006). Unsinnig: A Reply to Hutto. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):569 – 577.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Phil Hutchinson (2009). Emotion-Philosophy-Science. In Ylva Gustafsson, Camilla Kronqvist & Michael McEachrane (eds.), Emotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan
  10.  22
    Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2005). Wittgenstein's Method: Neglected Aspects by Gordon Baker. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004 Pp. 328. £40.00 HB. (Hereafter: BWM). Wittgenstein's Copernican Revolution: The Question of Linguistic Idealism by Ilham Dilman. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. Pp. 240. £52.50 HB. (Hereafter: DWCR) Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies by P. M. S. Hacker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2001 [Pb 2004]). Pp. 400. £45.00 HB; £19.99 PB. (Hereafter: HWCC) Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction by David G. Stern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. 224. £40.00 HB; £10.99 PB. (Hereafter: SWPI). [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (3):432-455.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  5
    Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2014). What’s Wrong with GM Food? The Philosophers' Magazine 65:39-45.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  1
    Phil Hutchinson, Andrei Korbut & Ekaterina Pavlenko (2012). Two Worlds of Action: Social Science, Social Theory and Systems of Sociological Refraction. Russian Sociological Review 11 (2):75-99.
    Despite many points of divergence, social scientists and social theorists seem united by one primary concern: to identify what it is people are doing. The thought that this might count as not only a viable but centrally important concern is grounded in a scepticism about the ability of societies’ ordinary members to reliably correctly identify their own and others’ actions. In this scepticism, such social scientists and social theorists usually situate themselves in opposition to ethnomethodologists and Peter Winch. This scepticism (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2005). Review: Review Article: Whose Wittgenstein? [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (313):432 - 455.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    Phil Hutchinson (2004). Steiner's Possession As It Were. European Journal of Political Theory 3 (3):245-265.
    Since the resurgence of interest in political philosophy in the early 1970s debates about freedom have been central. Throughout this period Hillel Steiner has proposed and defended the pure negative conception of freedom. This work is complemented by Ian Carter’s recent writings on freedom. Carter and Steiner advance a non-normative (empirical) conception of freedom employing tools from contemporary philosophy of action and language. In this article I seek to offer a deflationary critique of the Carter/Steiner position. My purpose is not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography