4 found
Sort by:
  1. Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon (2012). The Silent Majority: Who Speaks at IRB Meetings. Irb 34 (4):15-20.
    Institutional review boards are almost universally considered to be overworked and understaffed. They also require substantial commitments of time and resources from their members. Although some surveys report average IRB memberships of 15 people or more, federal regulations require only five. We present data on IRB meetings at eight of the top 25 academic medical centers in the United States funded by the National Institutes of Health. These data indicate substantial contributions from primary reviewers and chairs during protocol discussions but (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Philip J. Candilis (2000). Organizational Ethics and the High Cost of Medicines. HEC Forum 12 (4):303-310.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Philip J. Candilis & Paul S. Appelbaum (1997). Role Responsibilities in the Conflict of Clinic and Courtroom. Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):382 – 385.
  4. Philip J. Candilis, Robert W. Wesley & Alison Wichman (1993). A Survey of Researchers Using a Consent Policy for Cognitively Impaired Human Research Subjects. Irb 15 (6):1.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation