39 found
Sort by:
  1. Philip M. Merikle, N Early 300 Years Ago Leibniz, in His.
    moment there is in us an infinity of perceptions, unaccompanied by awareness or reflection; that is, of alterations in the soul itself, of which we are unaware because the impressions are either too minute or too numerous, or else too unvarying, so that they are not sufficiently distinctive on their own.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Philip M. Merikle, P€1`C€pt1OI1 W1tho\1t &W3.I`€1'1€SS.
    Many studies directed at demonstrating perception without awareness have relied on the dissociation paradigm. Although the logic underlying this paradigm is relatively straightforward, definitive results have been elusive in the absence of any general consensus as to what constitutes an adequate measure of awareness. We propose an alternative approach that involves comparisons of the relative sensitivity of comparable direct and indirect indexes of perception. The only assumption required by the proposed approach is that the sensitivity of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Philip M. Merikle, UHCOHSCIOUS Processes.
    The idea that cognitive processes can be meaningfully classified as conscious or unconscious has a long history in philosophy and psychology (see Ellenberger 1970: Erdelyi 1985; Perry and Laurence 1984, for reviews). However, even though many experimental reports during the past 100 years claim to demonstrate perception, Ieaming, or memory without conscious awareness, the distinction between conscious and unconscious ’ processes remains highly controversial. For example, the same empirical findings that Holender 1986 concludes provide little or no evidence for unconscious (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold, Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.
    There are hundreds of indications leading us to conclude that at every moment there is in us an infinity of perceptions, unaccompanied by awareness or reflection; that is, of alterations in the soul itself, of which we are unaware because the impressions are either too minute or too numerous, or else too unvarying, so that they are not sufficiently distinctive on their own. But when they are combined with others they do nevertheless have their effect and make themselves felt, at (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel Smilek, Alicia Callejas, Mike J. Dixon & Philip M. Merikle (2010). Corrigendum to “Ovals of Time: Time–Space Associations in Synaesthesia” [Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2008) 507–519]. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):504-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Troy A. W. Visser, Philip M. Merikle & Vincent Di Lollo (2005). Priming in the Attentional Blink: Perception Without Awareness? Visual Cognition 12 (7):1362-1372.
  7. Philip M. Merikle & Daniel Smilek (2001). Perception Without Awareness: Perspectives From Cognitive Psychology. Cognition 79 (1):115-34.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. M. Dixon, Daniel Smilek, C. Cudahy & Philip M. Merikle (2000). Five Plus Two Equals Yellow: Mental Arithmetic in People with Synaesthesia is Not Coloured by Visual Experience. Nature 406.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman (2000). Conscious Vs. Unconscious Perception. In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New Cognitive Neurosciences: 2nd Edition. Mit Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Daniel Smilek, Jonathan Eastwood & Philip M. Merikle (2000). Does Unattended Information Facilitate Change Detection? Journal of Experimental Psychology 26:480-487.
  11. J. A. Stolz & Philip M. Merikle (2000). Conscious and Unconscious Influences of Memory: Temporal Dynamics. Memory 8 (5):333-343.
  12. Troy A. W. Visser & Philip M. Merikle (1999). Conscious and Unconscious Processes: The Effects of Motivation. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):94-113.
    The process-dissociation procedure has been used in a variety of experimental contexts to assess the contributions of conscious and unconscious processes to task performance. To evaluate whether motivation affects estimates of conscious and unconscious processes, participants were given incentives to follow inclusion and exclusion instructions in a perception task and a memory task. Relative to a control condition in which no performance incentives were given, the results for the perception task indicated that incentives increased the participants' ability to exclude previously (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman (1997). Psychological Investigations of Unconscious Perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (1):5-18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Philip M. Merikle & S. Joordens (1997). Parallels Between Perception Without Attention and Perception Without Awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 6 (2-3):219-36.
  15. Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman (1996). Memory for Events During Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis. In B. Bonke, J. G. Bovill & N. Moerman (eds.), Memory and Awareness in Anesthesia III. Van Gorcum.
  16. Philip M. Merikle & M. Daneman (1996). Memory for Unconsciously Perceived Events: Evidence From Anesthetized Patients. Consciousness and Cognition 5 (4):525-541.
  17. Philip M. Merikle, S. Joordens & J. A. Stolz (1995). Measuring the Relative Magnitude of Unconscious Influences. Consciousness and Cognition 4 (4):422-39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. G. Caseley-Rondi, Philip M. Merikle & K. S. Bowers (1994). Unconscious Cognition in the Context of General Anesthesia. Consciousness and Cognition 3 (2):166-95.
  19. Philip M. Merikle (1994). On the Futility of Attempting to Demonstrate Null Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):412-412.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. S. Joordens & Philip M. Merikle (1993). Independence or Redundancy? Two Models of Conscious and Unconscious Influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 122 (4):462-67.
  21. Mark van Selst & Philip M. Merikle (1993). Perception Below the Objective Threshold? Consciousness and Cognition 2 (3):194-203.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Philip M. Merikle (1992). Perception Without Awareness: Critical Issues. American Psychologist 47:792-5.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold (1992). Measuring Unconscious Processes. In Robert F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (eds.), Perception Without Awareness. Guilford.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold (1992). Measuring Unconscious Perceptual Processes. In R.F. Bornstein & T.S. Pittman (eds.), Perception Without Awareness. New York: Guilford Press. 55-80.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold (1991). Comparing Direct (Explicit) to Indirect (Implicit) Measures to Study Unconscious Memory. Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory And Cognition 17 (2):224-233.
  26. Eyal M. Reingold & Philip M. Merikle (1991). Theory and Measurement in the Study of Unconscious Processes. Mind and Language 5:9-28.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Philip M. Merikle & Eyal M. Reingold (1990). Recognition and Lexical Decision Without Detection: Unconscious Perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:574-83.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Eyal M. Reingold & Philip M. Merikle (1990). On the Inter-Relatedness of Theory and Measurement in the Study of Unconscious Processes. Mind and Language 5 (1):9-28.
  29. Eyal M. Reingold & Philip M. Merikle (1988). Using Direct and Indirect Measures to Study Perception Without Awareness. Perception and Psychophysics 44:563-575.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. Cheesman & Philip M. Merikle (1986). Distinguishing Conscious From Unconscious Perceptual Processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology 40:343-67.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Philip M. Merikle & Jim Cheesman (1986). Consciousness is a “Subjective” State. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):42.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Philip M. Merikle & Jim Cheesman (1985). Conscious and Unconscious Processes: Same or Different? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):547-548.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. Cheesman & Philip M. Merikle (1984). Priming with and Without Awareness. Perception and Psychophysics 36:387-95.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Philip M. Merikle (1984). Toward a Definition of Awareness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (5):449-50.
  35. Philip M. Merikle (1982). Unconscious Perception Revisited. Perception and Psychophysics 31:298-301.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Philip M. Merikle & Nancy J. Gorewich (1979). Spatial Selectivity in Vision: Field Size Depends Upon Noise Size. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (5):343-346.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Mark Dallas & Philip M. Merikle (1976). Response Processes and Semantic-Context Effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (6):441-444.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Philip M. Merikle (1974). Selective Backward Masking with an Unpredictable Mask. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):589.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Philip M. Merikle (1968). Unit Size and Interpolated-Task Difficulty as Determinants of Short-Term Retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):370.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation