Search results for 'Philip Stratton–Lake' (try it on Scholar)

997 found
Sort by:
  1. Philip Stratton Lake (2008). Being Virtuous and the Virtues : Two Aspects of Kant's Doctrine of Virtue. In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant's Ethics of Virtues. Walter De Gruyter.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Thomas Carson (2004). Philip Stratton‐Lake, Ed., Ethical Intuitionism: Re‐Evaluations:Ethical Intuitionism: Re‐Evaluations. Ethics 115 (1):175-177.score: 450.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Samuel V. Bruton (2003). Philip Stratton-Lake, Kant, Duty and Moral Worth, London, Routledge, 2000, Pp. Xi + 153. Utilitas 15 (2):248-249.score: 450.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Govert den Hartogh, Andrew Altman, Christopher Heath Wellman, Andrew Jason Cohen, Sarah Conly & Thomas Christiano (2004). 10. Philip Stratton‐Lake, Ed., Ethical Intuitionism: Re‐Evaluations Philip Stratton‐Lake, Ed., Ethical Intuitionism: Re‐Evaluations (Pp. 175-177). [REVIEW] Ethics 115 (1).score: 450.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Roger Crisp (2009). Goodness and Reasons: A Response to Stratton-Lake. Mind 118 (472):1095-1099.score: 300.0
    This article is a response to some of Philip Stratton-Lake’s criticisms of an earlier paper of mine in this journal, on the so-called ‘buck-passing’ account of goodness. Some elucidation is offered of the ‘wrong kind of reasons’ problem and of T. M. Scanlon’s view, and the question is raised of the role of goodness in the view outlined by Stratton-Lake.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Samuel J. Kerstein (2003). Review: Stratton-Lake, Duty and Moral Worth. Ethics 113 (3):721-724.score: 140.0
  7. Samuel V. Bruton (2003). Review: Stratton-Lake, Kant, Duty and Moral Worth. Utilitas 15 (02):248-.score: 140.0
  8. Brad Hooker (1997). Reply to Stratton-Lake. Mind 106 (424):759-760.score: 140.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Philip Stratton-Lake (2000). Kant, Duty, and Moral Worth. Routledge.score: 129.0
    Kant, Duty and Moral Worth tackles the debate over whether or not Kant said moral actions have worth only if they are carried out from duty or whether actions carried out from mixed motives can be good. Stratton-Lake offers a unique account of acting from duty which utilizes the distinction between primary and secondary motives. He maintains that moral law should not be understood as normative moral reason but as playing a transcendental role. Thus, a Kantian account of moral worth (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. W. D. Ross (2002). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.score: 90.0
    The Right and the Good, a classic of twentieth-century philosophy by the eminent scholar Sir David Ross, is now presented in a new edition with a substantial introduction by Philip Stratton-Lake, a leading expert on Ross. Ross's book is the pinnacle of ethical intuitionism, which was the dominant moral theory in British philosophy for much of the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Intuitionism is now enjoying a considerable revival, and Stratton-Lake provides the context for a proper understanding of Ross's (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gerald Lang (2008). The Right Kind of Solution to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem. Utilitas 20 (4):472-489.score: 90.0
    Recent discussion of Scanlon's account of value, which analyses the value of X in terms of agents' reasons for having certain pro-attitudes or contra-attitudes towards X, has generated the problem (WKR problem): this is the problem, for the buck-passing view, of being able to acknowledge that there may be good reasons for attributing final value to X that have nothing to do with the final value that X actually possesses. I briefly review some of the existing solutions offered to the (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.) (2006). Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press.score: 90.0
    Metaethics, understood as a distinct branch of ethics, is often traced to G. E. Moore's 1903 classic, Principia Ethica. Whereas normative ethics is concerned to answer first-order moral questions about what is good and bad, right and wrong, metaethics is concerned to answer second-order non-moral questions about the semantics, metaphysics, and epistemology of moral thought and discourse. Moore has continued to exert a powerful influence, and the sixteen essays here (most of them specially written for the volume) represent the most (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2003). Can Scanlon Avoid Redundancy by Passing the Buck? Analysis 63 (4):328–331.score: 90.0
    Scanlon suggests a buck-passing account of goodness. To say that something is good is not to give a reason to, say, favour it; rather it is to say that there are such reasons. When it comes to wrongness, however, Scanlon rejects a buck-passing account: to say that j ing is wrong is, on his view, to give a sufficient moral reason not to j. Philip Stratton-Lake 2003 argues that Scanlon can evade a redundancy objection against his (Scanlon’s) view of (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jeffrey Brand-ballard (2007). Why One Basic Principle? Utilitas 19 (2):220-242.score: 90.0
    Principle monists believe that our moral duties, such as fidelity and non-maleficence, can be justified in terms of one basic moral principle. Principle pluralists disagree, some suggesting that only an excessive taste for simplicity or a desire to mimic natural science could lead one to endorse monism. In Ideal Code, Real World (Oxford, 2000), Brad Hooker defends a monist theory, employing the method of reflective equilibrium to unify the moral duties under a version of rule consequentialism. Hooker's arguments have drawn (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Elizabeth Tropman (2014). Varieties of Moral Intuitionism. Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (2):177-194.score: 90.0
    Moral intuitionism is the view that we can know or justifiably believe some moral facts directly, without inferring them from other evidence or proof. While intuitionism is frequently dismissed as implausible, the theory has received renewed interest in the literature.See Robert Audi, The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004); Jill Graper Hernandez (ed.), The New Intuitionism (London: Continuum, 2011); Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005); Sabine Roeser, Moral (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Alan Thomas, Maxims and Thick Ethical Concepts: Reply to Moore.score: 90.0
    Adrian Moore’s paper continues the development of a radical re-interpretation of Kant’s practical philosophy initiated by his Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty. [Moore, 2003] I have discussed elsewhere why it seems to me that Moore’s work, taken as a composite with that of his co-symposiasts today Philip Stratton-Lake and Burt Louden, adds up to a comprehensive and radical re-assessment of the contemporary significance of Kant’s practical philosophy which moral philosophers generally ought not to ignore. [Thomas, 2004] Moore states (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David Ross (2002). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.score: 90.0
    The Right and the Good, a classic of twentieth-century philosophy by the great scholar Sir David Ross, is now presented in a new edition with a substantial introduction by Philip Stratton-Lake, a leading expert on Ross. Ross's book is the pinnacle of ethical intuitionism, which was the dominant moral theory in British philosophy for much of the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Intuitionism is now enjoying a considerable revival, and Stratton-Lake provides the context for a proper understanding of Ross's (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Philip Stratton‐Lake (2005). How to Deal with Evil Demons: Comment on Rabinowicz and Rønnow‐Rasmussen. Ethics 115 (4):788-798.score: 87.0
  19. Philip Stratton–Lake (2003). Scanlon's Contractualism and the Redundancy Objection. Analysis 63 (277):70–76.score: 87.0
    Ebbhinghaus, H., J. Flum, and W. Thomas. 1984. Mathematical Logic. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Forster, T. Typescript. The significance of Yablo’s paradox without self-reference. Available from http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk. Gold, M. 1965. Limiting recursion. Journal of Symbolic Logic 30: 28–47. Karp, C. 1964. Languages with Expressions of Infinite Length. Amsterdam.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Philip Stratton-Lake (2009). Roger Crisp on Goodness and Reasons. Mind 118 (472):1081-1094.score: 87.0
    Roger Crisp distinguishes a positive and a negative aspect of the buck-passing account of goodness (BPA), and argues that the positive account should be dropped in order to avoid certain problems, in particular, that it implies eliminativism about value. This eliminativism involves what I call an ontological claim, the claim that there is no real property of goodness, and an error theory, the claim that all value talk is false. I argue first that the positive aspect of the BPA is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Philip Stratton-Lake (2011). Recalcitrant Pluralism. Ratio 24 (4):364-383.score: 87.0
    In this paper I argue that the best form of deontology is one understood in terms of prima facie duties. I outline how these duties are to be understood and show how they offer a plausible and elegant connection between the reason why we ought to do certain acts, the normative reasons we have to do these acts, the reason why moral agents will do them, and the reasons certain people have to resent someone who does not do them. I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Philip Stratton-Lake (2003). Scanlon’s Contractualism and the Redundancy Objection. Analysis 63 (1):70-76.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Philip Stratton-Lake, Being Virtuous and the Virtues: Two Aspects of Kant's Doctrine of Virtue.score: 87.0
    In Moniker Betzler (Ed.), <span class='Hi'>Kant</span>’s Virtue Ethics, (Walter deGruyter: New York – Berlin, 2007).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Philip Stratton-Lake (1997). Can Hooker's Rule-Consequentialist Principle Justify Ross's Prima Facie Duties? Mind 106 (424):751-758.score: 87.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Philip Stratton-Lake (ed.) (2004). On What We Owe to Each Other. Blackwell.score: 87.0
    In "On What We Owe to Each Other," five leading moral philosophers assess various aspects of Scanlon's moral theory as laid out in this seminal work.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Philip Stratton-Lake (1993). Reason, Appropriateness and Hope: Sketch of a Kantian Account of a Finite Rationality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (1):61 – 80.score: 87.0
  27. Philip Stratton-Lake (1999). Why Externalism is Not a Problem for Ethical Intuitionists. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):77–90.score: 87.0
    Ethical intuitionists are often criticised on the ground that their view makes it possible for an agent to believe that she ought to ? whilst lacking any motive to ?-that is, on the ground that it involves, or implies a form of externalism. I begin by distinguishing this form of externalism (what I call 'belief externalism') from two other forms of ethical externalism-moral externalism, and reasons externalism. I then consider various reasons why one might think that ethical intuitionism is defective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Philip Stratton-Lake (1998). Internalism and the Explanation of Belief/Motivation Changes. Analysis 58 (4):311–315.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Philip Stratton-Lake (2003). Scanlon, Permissions, and Redundancy: Response to McNaughton and Rawling. Analysis 63 (4):332–337.score: 87.0
    According to one formulation of Scanlon’s contractualist principle, certain acts are wrong if they are permitted by principles that are reasonably rejectable because they permit such acts. According to the redundancy objection, if a principle is reasonably rejectable because it permits actions which have feature F, such actions are wrong simply in virtue of having F and not because their having F makes principles permitting them reasonably rejectable. Consequently Scanlon’s contractualist principle adds nothing to the reasons we have not to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Philip Stratton-Lake (2000). Expression, Description and Normativity. Res Publica 6 (1):117-125.score: 87.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Philip Stratton-Lake (2002). Review of Brian Hutchinson, G. E. Moore's Ethical Theory: Resistance and Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (9).score: 87.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Philip Stratton-Lake (1993). Formulating Categorical Imperatives. Kant-Studien 84 (3):317-340.score: 87.0
  33. Philip Stratton-Lake (1999). Recent Work on Kant's Ethics. Philosophical Books 40 (4):209-218.score: 87.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Philip Stratton-Lake (2005). Review of Bernard Gert, Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker (2006). Scanlon Versus Moore on Goodness. In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. 149.score: 87.0
  36. Philip Stratton-Lake (2006). A Review of Bernard Gert's Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. [REVIEW] Teaching Ethics 7 (1):57-61.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Philip Stratton-Lake (1997). Review: Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 1:177-185.score: 87.0
  38. Philip Stratton-Lake (1998). Kant and Contemporary Ethics. Kantian Review 2:1-13.score: 87.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Philip Stratton-Lake (2013). Dancy on Buck-Passing. In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking About Reasons: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford University Press.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Philip Stratton-Lake (2009). Ethical Choice. In John Shand (ed.), Central Issues of Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 87.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Philip Stratton‐Lake (2013). Ross, WD. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. William J. FitzPatrick, Gerhard Øverland, Talbot Brewer, David Enoch & Philip Stratton‐Lake (2005). 2.“Doing and Allowing” and Doing and Allowing “Doing and Allowing” and Doing and Allowing (Pp. 799-808). Ethics 115 (4).score: 87.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Philip Stratton-Lake (2011). Eliminativism About Derivative Prima Facie Duties. In Thomas Hurka (ed.), Underivative Duty: British Moral Philosophers From Sidgwick to Ewing. Oup Oxford.score: 87.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Philip Stratton-Lake (2010). Intuitionism. In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge.score: 87.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Philip Stratton-Lake (2002). Pleasure and Reflection in Ross's Intuitionism. In Phillip Stratton-Lake (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations. Oxford University Press. 113--36.score: 87.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Philip Stratton-Lake (2013). Rational Intuitionism. In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.score: 87.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Simon Kirchin (2005). What is Intuitionism and Why Be an Intuitionist? Social Theory and Practice 31 (4):581-606.score: 28.0
    This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of ethical intuitionism and is an extended critical discussion of an edited collection Rethinking Intutionism (ed.) Stratton-Lake (OUP) that has been much discussed. (My piece is one of the first discussions of it.) Along other matters, I argue for the original and fairly controversial claim that in order for intuitionism to hold water, we must allow that what is involved in full moral understanding can differ from person to person, rather than thinking that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Phillip Stratton-Lake (ed.) (2002). Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations. Oxford University Press.score: 28.0
    Ethical Intuitionism was the dominant moral theory in Britain for much of the eighteenth and nineteenth and the first third of the twentieth century. However, during the middle decades of the twentieth century ethical intuitionism came to be regarded as utterly untenable. It was thought to be either empty, or metaphysically and epistemologically extravagant, or both. This hostility led to a neglect of the central intuitionist texts, and encouraged the growth of a caricature of intuitionism that could easily be rejected (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Eduardo Salles O. Barra (2010). Valores epistêmicos no naturalismo normativos de Philip Kitcher. Principia 4 (1):1-26.score: 24.0
    This paper aims at analyzing Philip Kitcher's naturalistic epistemology, particularly its normative features, which are viewed as a sort of response to negative assessments made by radical naturalists on the plurality of epistemic values. According to them such values are ineffective for normative ends, e.g. theory choice. Differently from that quite excessive evaluation, Kitcher argues rather for explanatory unity as the most important and universal epistemic value. Even though Kitcher's arguments are sound, there remains some serious gaps as regards (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 997