Search results for 'Philip of Opus' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Jonathan Barnes (1977). The Epinomis Leonardo Tarán: Academica: Plato, Philip of Opus, and the Pseudo-Platonic Epinomis. Pp. Viii + 417. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1975. Cloth, $20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (02):170-171.score: 450.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Leonardo Tarán (1975). Academica--Plato, Philip of Opus, and the Pseudo-Platonic Epinomis. American Philosophical Society.score: 450.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jacques Ninio & Franklin Philip (2001). The Science of Illusions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.score: 420.0
    Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. Science 139: 769- 71. Shepard, RN 1 99o. Mind sights. New York: Freeman & Co. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Hobsbaum Philip (1969). A Theory of Communication. British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (2):171-185.score: 420.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Carlos Santamaria Juan A. Garcia-Madruga Philip & N. Johnson-Laird (1998). Reasoning From Double Conditionals: The Effects of Logical Structure and Believability. Thinking and Reasoning 4 (2):97 – 122.score: 420.0
    We report three experimental studies of reasoning with double conditionals, i.e. problems based on premises of the form: If A then B. If B then C. where A, B, and C, describe everyday events. We manipulated both the logical structure of the problems, using all four possible arrangements (or ''figures" of their constituents, A, B, and C, and the believability of the two salient conditional conclusions that might follow from them, i.e. If A then C , or If C then (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. A. Coldwell David, Nathalie Meurs Jon Billsberrvany & J. G. Marsh Philip (2008). The Effects of Person–Organization Ethical Fit on Employee Attraction and Retention: Towards a Testable Explanatory Model. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (4).score: 420.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Willem B. Drees (1999). God and Contemporary Science: Philip Clayton's Defense of Panentheism. Zygon 34 (3):515-525.score: 168.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Farzad Mahootian (2013). Paneth's Epistemology of Chemical Elements in Light of Kant's Opus Postumum. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2):171-184.score: 162.0
    Friedrich Paneth’s conception of “chemical element” has functioned as the official definition adopted by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry since 1923. Paneth maintains a distinction between empirical and “transcendental” concepts of element; furthermore, chemical science requires fluctuation between the two. The origin of the empirical-transcendental split is found in Immanuel Kant’s classic Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787). The present paper examines Paneth’s foundational concept of element in light of Kant’s attempt, late in life, to revoke key distinctions (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Bence Nanay (2013). From Philosophy of Science to Philosophy of Literature (and Back) Via Philosophy of Mind. Philip Kitcher’s Philosophical Pendulum. Theoria (77):257-264.score: 156.0
    A recent focus of Philip Kitcher’s research has been, somewhat surprisingly in the light of his earlier work, the philosophical analyses of literary works and operas. Some may see a discontinuity in Kitcher’s oeuvre in this respect – it may be difficult to see how his earlier contributions to philosophy of science relate to this much less mainstream approach to philosophy. The aim of this paper is to show that there is no such discontinuity: Kitcher’s contributions to the philosophy (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Geoffrey Brennan, Robert E. Goodin & Michael A. Smith (eds.) (2007). Common Minds: Themes From the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. Oxford University Press.score: 156.0
    During a career spanning over thirty years Philip Pettit has made seminal contributions in moral philosophy, political philosophy, philosophy of the social sciences, philosophy of mind and action, and metaphysics. The corpus of work Pettit has contributed and stimulated is all the more remarkable because of the way in which Pettit and his circle adapt lessons learned when thinking about problems in one area of philosophy to problems in a completely different area. -/- Common Minds presents specially written papers (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael J. McNeal (2013). Nietzsche and the Horror of Existence by Philip J. Kain (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (1):123-125.score: 150.0
    In Nietzsche and the Horror of Existence, Philip J. Kain makes a compelling case for taking Nietzsche’s concern with the subject of horror seriously and then challenges his conclusions about it. A corollary of existence, horror is an ineliminable part of being human. Our experience of horror prompts reflection on life and the act of philosophizing. Arguing it is a formative yet often overlooked theme in Nietzsche’s oeuvre, Kain recognizes that the experience of horror is central to “Nietzsche’s vision” (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jeremy R. Simon (2006). The Proper Ends of Science: Philip Kitcher, Science, and the Good. Philosophy of Science 73 (2):194-214.score: 150.0
    In Science, Truth, and Democracy, Philip Kitcher challenges the view that science has a single, context‐independent, goal, and that the pursuit of this goal is essentially immune from moral critique. He substitutes a context‐dependent account of science’s goal, and shows that this account subjects science to moral evaluation. I argue that Kitcher’s approach must be modified, as his account of science ultimately must be explicated in terms of moral concepts. I attempt, therefore, to give an account of science’s goal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. M. Solomon (1995). Legend Naturalism and Scientific Progress: An Essay on Philip Kitcher's the Advancement of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (2):205-218.score: 150.0
    Philip Kitcher's The Advancement of Science sets out, programmatically, a new naturalistic view of science as a process of building consensus practices. Detailed historical case studies--centrally, the Darwinian revolution--are intended to support this view. I argue that Kitcher's expositions in fact support a more conservative view, that I dub 'Legend Naturalism'. Using four historical examples which increasingly challenge Kitcher's discussions, I show that neither Legend Naturalism, nor the less conservative programmatic view, gives an adequate account of scientific progress. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Dyzenhaus David (2013). Critical Notice of On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, by Philip Pettit, Cambridge University Press, 2012, Xii+333pp. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):494-513.score: 150.0
    (2013). Critical notice of On the people's terms: a Republican theory and model of democracy, by Philip Pettit, Cambridge University Press, 2012, xii+333pp. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 494-513.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Inmaculada Perdomo (2012). The Characterization of Epistemology in Philip Kitcher: A Critical Reflection From New Empiricism. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):113-138.score: 150.0
    While the earlier work of Philip Kitcher, in particular The Advancement of Science (1993), continues to inform his more recent studies, such as Science, Truth, and Democracy (2001), there are significant "changes of opinion" from those articulated in the 1990s. One may even speak of two different stages in the configuration of epistemological proposals. An analysis, from an empiricist standpoint, of the shifts between one and the other indicates further evolution towards realist positions but much more modest ones than (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul Vincent Spade, Thomas Aquinas on the Mixture of the Elements, to Master Philip of Castrocaeli.score: 146.0
    seem to be a kind of corruption of the elements and not a mixture. Again, if the substantial form of a mixed body is the act of matter without presupposing the forms of simple bodies, then the simple bodies of the elements will lose their definition (rationem). For an element is that of which something is primarily composed, and exists in it and is indivisible ac-.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. G. T. Griffith & G. Cawkwell (1980). Philip of Macedon. Journal of Hellenic Studies 100:254.score: 146.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Daniel Attala Pochon (1997). Dos escepticismos y desafío escéptico en The Advancement of Science, de Philip Kitcher (Two Skepticism and Skeptic Challenge in Philip Kitcher's The Advancement of Science). Theoria 12 (2):317-335.score: 144.0
    En este artículo me propongo analizar el punto de partida epistemológico de un reciente libro de Philip Kitcher (The Advancement of Science) a través de su discusión con las concepciónes ‘escépticas’. Podemos distinguir entre dos tipos de escepticismo en Ia trama deI libro de Kitcher: uno débil y otro radical. Intentamos difinir el tipo de realismo que Kitcher defiende, para finalmente mostrar que tal tipo de realismo es posible para Kitcher en Ia medida que no toma en cuenta el (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James Kraft (2006). Philip Quinn's Contribution to the Epistemic Challenge of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 42 (4):453-465.score: 144.0
    In this essay I describe seven central characteristics of Philip Quinn's approach to the epistemic challenge of religious diversity as they surface in his responses to other contemporary approaches. In the process an assessment is given of Quinn's contribution, and continued relevance, to the contemporary discussions about this topic. The first three sections describe Quinn's confrontations with Alvin Plantinga, William Alston, and John Hick. The next section presents critical comments on Quinn's unique notion of thinning.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Michael Eades (2007). Newman's Adaptation of Bacci's The Life of St. Philip Neri. Newman Studies Journal 4 (1):38-54.score: 144.0
    This essay explores a relatively unknown and previously unstudied Newman work, The Life of St. Philip: Arranged for the Days of the Year, that he prepared for the use of his nascent English Oratorian community.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Daniel Attala Pochon (1997). Dos Escepticismos Y Desafío Escéptico En the Advancement of Science, de Philip Kitcher (Two Skepticism and Skeptic Challenge in Philip Kitcher's the Advancement of Science). Theoria 12 (2):317-335.score: 144.0
    En este artículo me propongo analizar el punto de partida epistemológico de un reciente libro de Philip Kitcher (The Advancement of Science) a través de su discusión con las concepciónes ‘escépticas’. Podemos distinguir entre dos tipos de escepticismo en Ia trama deI libro de Kitcher: uno débil y otro radical. Intentamos difinir el tipo de realismo que Kitcher defiende, para finalmente mostrar que tal tipo de realismo es posible para Kitcher en Ia medida que no toma en cuenta el (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. G. T. Griffith (1970). Philip of Macedon's Early Interventions in Thessaly (358–352 B.C.). Classical Quarterly 20 (01):67-.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Christopher Tuplin (1979). Philip George Cawkwell: Philip of Macedon. Pp. 215; 8 Maps. London: Faber & Faber, 1978. £7·50. The Classical Review 29 (02):268-270.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Christopher Tuplin (1982). Philip of Macedon M. B. Hatzopoulos and L. D. Loukopoulos (Edd.): Philip of Macedon. Pp. 254; 129 Tables, Maps, and (Colour) Plates. London: Heinemann, 1981. £21. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 32 (02):239-241.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Luigi Alici (2006). Initium Omnis Operis Verbum. On the Semantics of Opus/Operari in Augustine. Quaestio 6 (1):15-35.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. M. Cary (1938). Philip of Macedon F. R. Wüst: Philipp II von Makedonien Und Griechenland in den Jahren 346 Bis 338. Pp. X + 189. (Münchener Historische Abhandlungen, I. Reihe, 14. Heft.) Munich: Beck, 1938. Paper, (Export Price) RM. 6. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (06):232-233.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Christopher Ehrhardt (1967). Two Notes on Philip of Macedon's First Interventions In Thessaly. Classical Quarterly 17 (02):296-.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. M. Holroyd (1936). Philip of Macedon Arnaldo Momigliano: Filippo il Macedone. Saggio sulla storia greca del IV secolo a. C. Pp. xvi + 210. Florence: le Monnier, 1934. Paper, L. 30. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):32-33.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Leonard Chan (2006). J. Stroup Religious Studies 402.01 2 May 2006 The Truth of Opus Dei. Religious Studies 402:2.score: 140.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. Gawlina (2004). Kant, an Atheist? A Reading of 'Opus Postumum' by Eckart Forster (PhD Candidate of Peter F Strawson). Kant-Studien 95 (2):235-237.score: 140.0
  31. Veit-Justus Rollmann & Andree Hahmann (2011). Material World and Absolute Insistence: The First Analogy of Experience and the Draft Transition 1-14 of Opus Postumum. Kant-Studien 102 (2).score: 140.0
  32. Michael Whitby (1995). Philip the Nice Nicholas Hammond: Philip of Macedon. Pp. Xviii+235, 10 Figs, 16 Plates. London: Duckworth, 1994. Cased, £35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (02):326-328.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Philip Tromovitch (2012). Statistical Reporting with Philip's Sextuple and Extended Sextuple: A Simple Method for Easy Communication of Findings. Journal of Research Practice 8 (1):Article - P2.score: 138.0
    The advance of science and human knowledge is impeded by misunderstandings of various statistics, insufficient reporting of findings, and the use of numerous standardized and non-standardized presentations of essentially identical information. Communication with journalists and the public is hindered by the failure to present statistics that are easy for non-scientists to interpret as well as by use of the word significant, which in scientific English does not carry the meaning of "important" or "large." This article promotes a new standard method (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Wenceslao J. González & Philip Kitcher (eds.) (2011). Scientific Realism and Democratic Society: The Philosophy of Philip Kitcher. Rodopi.score: 138.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Geoffrey Brennan (ed.) (2007). Common Minds: Themes From the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. Oxford University Press.score: 132.0
    Beyond program explanation -- Mental causation on the program model -- Can hunter-gatherers hear color? -- Structural irrationality -- Freedom, coercion, and discursive control -- Conversability and deliberation -- Petit's molecule -- Contestatory citizenship : deliberative denizenship -- Crime, responsibility, and institutional design -- Disenfranchised silence -- Joining the dots.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Hrvoj Vanˇik (1999). Opus Magnum: An Outline for the Philosophy of Chemistry. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 1 (3):239-254.score: 132.0
    This work explores the nature of chemistry as an autonomous science and philosophical consequences of generalizations of some chemical aspects. Chemistry is regarded in its distinction from physics, going back to the alchemical aim for the ultimate experiment rather than for all explaining theory. Topology, shape, valence etc. are identified as typically chemical concepts. The contribution of chemistry to the general theory of complexity is demonstrated by approach of diminishing interactions by which smaller and smaller energy increments are needed to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Hrvoj VanČik (1999). Opus Magnum: An Outline for the Philosophy of Chemistry. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 1 (3):239-254.score: 132.0
    This work explores the nature of chemistry as an autonomous science and philosophical consequences of generalizations of some chemical aspects. Chemistry is regarded in its distinction from physics, going back to the alchemical aim for the ultimate experiment rather than for all explaining theory. Topology, shape, valence etc. are identified as typically chemical concepts. The contribution of chemistry to the general theory of complexity is demonstrated by approach of diminishing interactions by which smaller and smaller energy increments are needed to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Charles Pigden (1997). Review of The Social and Political Thought of Bertrand Russell by Philip Ironside. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):257-259.score: 132.0
    I take a dim view of this absurdly overpraised book, marred as it is is by errors of fact, interpretation and method and surprisingly uniformed (as it appears to be) about Russian history. It shows what can go wrong with Skinnerite intellectual history in the hands of somebody less gifted than Skinner himself.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Philip Patterson (1995). Anthology of Quality: A Book Review by Philip Patterson. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (1):51 – 52.score: 132.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Luc Lismont, Philippe Mongin, Strong Completeness, Volker Halbach, Hannes Leitgeb, Philip Welch, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Alasdair Urquhart & Synonymous Logics (2003). Philip G. Calabrese/Operating on Functions with Variable Domains 1–18 Stewart Shapiro/Mechanism, Truth, and Penrose's New Argu-Ment 19–42 Steven E. Boër/Thought-Contents and the Formal Ontology Of. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 32:667-668.score: 132.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Philip Kitcher (1991). Critical Notice: Philip Kitcher and Wesley C. Salmon,(Eds.), Scientific Explanation; and Wesley C. Salmon, Four Decades of Scientific Explanation* James H. Fetzert. [REVIEW] In Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper & J. D. Trout (eds.), The Philosophy of Science. Mit Press. 58--288.score: 132.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. D. Z. Philips (1998). Philip L. Quinn and Charles Taliaferro (Eds.) A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, 1997. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44:53-63.score: 128.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Edward L. Schoen (2007). Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (Eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis From Science to Religion. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):119-121.score: 126.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Daniel Jacobson (1996). Sir Philip Sidney's Dilemma: On the Ethical Function of Narrative Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4):327-336.score: 126.0
  45. Brady Bowman (2008). Philip T. Grier (Ed), Identity and Difference. Studies in Hegel's Logic, Philosophy of Spirit, and Politics (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22 (3):pp. 229-231.score: 126.0
  46. Barbara Forrest (2010). Philip Kitcher, Living with Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (3):425-432.score: 126.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Anthony Blunt (1940). El Greco's "Dream of Philip II": An Allegory of the Holy League. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 3 (1/2):58-69.score: 126.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Kendy M. Hess (2012). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents – By Christian List & Philip Pettit. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):165-167.score: 126.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Don Ross (2009). Philip Mirowski the Effortless Economy of Science? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):659-665.score: 126.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. C. A. J. Coady (2001). Critical Notice of Republicanism by Philip Pettit. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):119 – 124.score: 126.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999