23 found
Sort by:
  1. Philippe De Rouilhan, For a Truth-Conditional Semantic Solution to Frege-Like Paradoxes.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Philippe de Rouilhan (2012). Carnap and the Semantical Explication of Analyticity. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. Palgrave Macmillan
  3. Philippe De Rouilhan (2012). In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.
    Van Heijenoort’s main contribution to history and philosophy of modern logic was his distinction between two basic views of logic, first, the absolutist, or universalist, view of the founding fathers, Frege, Peano, and Russell, which dominated the first, classical period of history of modern logic, and, second, the relativist, or model-theoretic, view, inherited from Boole, Schröder, and Löwenheim, which has dominated the second, contemporary period of that history. In my paper, I present the man Jean van Heijenoort (Sect. 1); then (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Philippe De Rouilhan, Remarks on Recursive Definitions of Truth.
    For the sake of simplicity, we adopt the same logical frame as Tarski's in his Wahrheitsbegriff (Wb). There, Tarski is mainly interested in the possibility of explicitely defining truth for an object-language, he does not pay much attention to recursive definitions of truth. We say why. However, recursive definitions have advantages of their own. In particular, we prove the positive theorem: if L is of finite order ≥ 4, then a recursive definition is possible for L in a metalanguage of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Philippe De Rouilhan, Truth at Work: Generalizing and Solving Frege's Paradox.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Philippe De Rouilhan, Russell and the Meaning of Contradiction.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Philippe De Rouilhan, Which Model Theory ?
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Philippe de Rouilhan (2009). Carnap on Logical Consequence for Languages I and II. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan
  9. Philippe de Rouilhan (2007). Note sur Popper lecteur de Tarski. Philosophia Scientiae 11 (1):131-148.
    1. Introduction. 2. Is Tarski’s theory of truth, as Popper claims after Tarski himself, a rehabilitation of the traditional view of truth as correspondence to facts? — Yes, but not for the reasons he gives. 3. Is Tarski’s explicit definition of truth , as Popper claims after Tarski himself, purely morphological ? — No. 4. Is Tarski’s theory, as Tarski claims it to be, « epistomologically neutral » ? — This thesis is ambiguous, and Tarski can support it just as (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Philippe De Rouilhan, Ontological Commitment to Multiplicities.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Philippe De Rouilhan, Three Grades of Internalization of Truth.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Philippe De Rouilhan (2005). Note sur l'ordre de IF: Hintikka at-il véritablement découvert la véritable logique élémentaire? Philosophia Scientiae 9 (1):141-150.
    Is IF logic the true elementary logic, as Hintikka claims? Moreover is it truly elementary, viz. first-order, in the first place? One is tempted to answer no, because of the extraordinary power of this logic in comparison with ordinary first-order logic. However impressive this objection may be, it misses its aim. A direct refutation is needed, grounded on an analysis of the notion of order.RésuméLa logique IF est-elle la véritable logique élémentaire, comme le prétend Hintikka ? Mais, d’abord, est-elle véritablement (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Philippe De Rouilhan (2004). Présentation. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 3:247-256.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Philippe De Rouilhan (2004). The Basic Problem of the Logic of Meaning (I). Revue Internationale de Philosophie 3:329-372.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Philippe de Rouilhan (2002). On What There Are. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (2):183–200.
    Is second-order quantification legitimate? For Quine, it was pure non-sense, unless construed as first-order quantification in disguise, ranging over sets. Boolos rightly maintained that it could be interpreted in terms of plural quantification, but claimed that it then ranged over the same individuals as singular, first-order quantification. I protest that plural quantification ranges over what I call multiplicities. But what is a 'multiplicity'? And does this idea itself not fall prey to something like Frege's paradox?
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Gottlob Frege, Philippe de Rouilhan, Claudine Tiercelin & Corine Besson (2002). Écrits Posthumes. Mind 111 (442):410-411.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Philippe De Rouilhan (1998). Les tableaux de Beth: Syntaxe ou sémantique? Philosophia Scientiae 3 (4):303-322.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Philippe de Rouilhan (1996). Russell Et le Cercle des Paradoxes. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Philippe de Rouilhan (1996). Towards Finishing Off the Axiom of Reducibility. Philosophia Scientiae 1 (3):17-35.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. François Rivenc, Philippe de Rouilhan, George Boole & Souleymane Bachir Diagne (1993). Logique et fondements des mathématiques. Anthologie. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 183 (4):736-739.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Philippe De Rouilhan (1992). Russell and the Vicious Circle Principle. Philosophical Studies 65 (1/2):169.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Philippe de Rouilhan (1988). Frege les Paradoxes de la Répresentation. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Philippe de Rouilhan (1984). Le Menteur. The Temps de la Réflexion 5:271.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation