33 found
Sort by:
  1.  64 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1968). Kant on Outer and Inner Intuition. Noûs 2 (3):271-292.
  2.  38 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1965). Time for Change. Analysis 26 (2):41 - 43.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  36 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1963). Perceptual Relativity and Ideas in the Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (December):202-214.
  4.  29 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1990). Berkeley's Manifest Qualities Thesis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (3):385-401.
  5.  26 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1990). Pappas on the Role of Sensations in Reid's Theory of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):755-762.
  6.  19 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1974). Reid's Realism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):317-340.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7.  15 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1990). Bayle, Leibniz, Hume and Reid on Extension, Composites and Simples. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (3):299--314.
  8.  13 DLs
    Larry Arnhart, Carla Bagnoli, Christopher Berry, Deborah Boyle, Janet Broughton, Stephen Buckle, Dario Castiglione, Kenneth Clatterbaugh, Phillip D. Cummins & Daniel Flage (2004). Hume Studies Referees, 2003-2004. Hume Studies 30 (2):443-445.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9.  11 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1985). Problems of Cartesianism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):103-109.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10.  11 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1966). Philosophy, Science and Sense Perception. Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (4):354-356.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11.  8 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1991). Hume on the Idea of Existence. Hume Studies 17 (1):61-82.
    In the Treatise Hume claims one's idea of existence is not distinct from the idea of what one conceives to be existent. From clues in his extremely terse defence of his claim I construct an argument that is logically valid and founded on premises he is likely to have considered both cogent and consistent with his main philosophical principles. I also examine briefly and incompletely what his position on existence and the idea of existence does and does not include.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12.  8 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1973). Hume's Disavowal of the Treatise. Philosophical Review 82 (3):371-379.
  13.  8 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1989). Essays on Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 19 (2):175-176.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14.  8 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1975). Berkeley's Ideas of Sense. Noûs 9 (1):55-72.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15.  7 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1992). George Berkeley's Manuscript Introduction. Idealistic Studies 22 (3):235-236.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16.  7 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1989). Berkeley's Unstable Ontology. Modern Schoolman 67 (1):15-32.
  17.  7 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (2000). A Puzzling Passage in “Why Utility Pleases”. Hume Studies 26 (1):179-181.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18.  7 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1995). Hume as Dualist and Anti-Dualist. Hume Studies 21 (1):47-55.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19.  6 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (2005). Berkeley on Minds and Agency. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press 190.
  20.  6 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1999). Hume's Diffident Skepticism. Hume Studies 25 (1/2):43-65.
  21.  5 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1996). Hume on Qualities. Hume Studies 22 (1):49-88.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22.  5 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1973). Locke's Anticipation of Hume's Use of "Impression". Modern Schoolman 50 (3):297-301.
  23.  4 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1975). The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):153-154.
  24.  3 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1973). Locke's Anticipation of Hume's Use of "Impression". Modern Schoolman 50 (3):297-301.
  25.  2 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1967). Vernon on Descartes' Three Substances. Southern Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):126-128.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26.  1 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (ed.) (1992). Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27.  1 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1982). Hylas' Parity Argument. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28.  1 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1988). Sophistical Sam's Sad Condition. Teaching Philosophy 11 (1):63-64.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29.  1 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1987). On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley's 'New Theory of Vision'. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel
  30.  0 DLs
    Phillip Cummins (1985). How Hume Read Berkeley. Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 10:85-107.
  31.  0 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (1976). Reid on Abstract General Ideas. In Stephen Francis Barker & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations. University City Science Center 3-62.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32.  0 DLs
    Phillip D. Cummins (2007). Perceiving and Berkeley's Theory of Substance. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.
  33.  0 DLs
    M. R. Ayers, Phillip D. Cummins, Robert Fogelin, Don Garrett, Edwin McCann, Charles J. McCracken, George Pappas, G. A. J. Rogers, Barry Stroud, Ian Tipton, Margaret D. Wilson & Kenneth Winkler (1998). The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection of essays on themes in the work of John Locke , George Berkeley , and David Hume , provides a deepened understanding of major issues raised in the Empiricist tradition. In exploring their shared belief in the experiential nature of mental constructs, The Empiricists illuminates the different methodologies of these great Enlightenment philosophers and introduces students to important metaphysical and epistemological issues including the theory of ideas, personal identity, and skepticism. It will be especially useful in courses devoted (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation